Optimized Contact Scheduling for NOAA Search and Rescue Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

optimized contact scheduling for noaa search and rescue
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Optimized Contact Scheduling for NOAA Search and Rescue Overview - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Optimized Contact Scheduling for NOAA Search and Rescue Overview 2 Orbit Logic Proprietary Not Just Clouds NOAA satellites dont just collect weather data NOAA satellites also assist in Search and Rescue 3 Orbit Logic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Optimized Contact Scheduling for NOAA Search and Rescue

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Overview

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Not Just Clouds

  • NOAA satellites

don’t just collect weather data

  • NOAA satellites

also assist in Search and Rescue

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Orbit Logic Proprietary

What is SARSAT?

  • NOAA operates the Search And Rescue Satellite Aided

Tracking (SARSAT) system to detect and locate distress signals around the world

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Importance of Maintaining Contact

  • Satellite data is only

useful if it can be sent to a ground station via a space to ground contact

  • Maintaining consistent

contact means more data is available

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Orbit Logic Proprietary

The Problem

  • For the best chance at

finding distress signals, the space to ground contact schedule for the GPS satellites must be

  • ptimized to maintain a

low DOP

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Orbit Logic Proprietary

What is DOP?

  • DOP
  • Dilution of precision
  • Measurement of error

propagation when making position measurements via satellite

  • DOP values range from 1 to ∞
  • 1 is ideal
  • 2-5 is reliable for navigation
  • 5-10 is moderately reliable for

some calculations

  • 10-20+ is poor

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Orbit Logic Proprietary

System Design

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Orbit Logic Proprietary

The Team

  • Orbit Logic
  • Isabel Martinez, Zachary Roberts, Ella Herz
  • NOAA
  • Jesse Reich, Larry LeBeau, Kris Tai
  • AGI
  • Chris Mulcahy, Reggie Pforter, Jens Ramrath

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Orbit Logic Proprietary

The Solution

  • Orbit Logic, in collaboration with NOAA and AGI,

developed a software suite to solve this problem:

  • STK
  • Coverage tool for DOP calculations
  • Scheduler
  • Manages scheduling resources
  • Deconfliction for scheduling tasks
  • Plugin Code (python / C#)
  • Manages creation of STK scenario
  • Tracks DOP values
  • Adjusts scoring of tasking opportunities based on DOP

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Inputs and Outputs

  • Inputs
  • Satellite orbit data
  • Ground station location and obscuration masks
  • Ground targets / Areas of Regard (AOR)
  • Outputs (UI, .csv, keyword/value text files)
  • Contact schedules

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Workflow

User configures inputs Access and DOP Reports SARSAT service performs

  • ptimization

Schedule generated

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Orbit Logic Proprietary

The First Approach

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Proof of Concept

  • Did initial prototyping demo using a python script
  • Controlled STK and Scheduler via API commands
  • Created tasks in Scheduler based on satellite to ground station access times
  • Queried STK for DOP reports, adjusted task timeslot scoring in Scheduler
  • Used default algorithms (One-Pass)
  • DOP optimization done in script, not in Scheduler itself
  • Contact tasks were broken up into 9 minute chunks
  • Each satellite to ground contact was a minimum of 9 minutes
  • Original optimization of schedule took 11 minutes from start to finish
  • Original script was not parallelized
  • Used an average DOP value for several targets across continental US

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Original Demo Screenshots

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Orbit Logic Proprietary

How’d It Do?

  • Pros
  • Okay performance (took 11 minutes

for whole optimization run)

  • Some optimization based on good

satellites to use for good DOP

  • Cons
  • Timeslot scores were all set to 100

(highest) as long as they used any of the best satellites

  • Did not include actual DOP values for

timeslot scoring

  • Not easily configurable
  • Points in US had to be chosen prior to

scheduling

  • Doesn’t check if best satellites

actually have access to a ground station

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Orbit Logic Proprietary

The Second Attempt

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Goals For This Attempt

  • After Orbit Logic received the official statement of work, it was

time to make some updates to the proof of concept

  • Goals for the first round of updates included:
  • Checking that there was actually access between the ground stations

and the chosen best satellites

  • Tracking the actual computed DOP value for better use in optimization
  • Creating a mesh of points based on user-defined AOR instead of

selecting all points manually

  • Converting python to C# for performance purposes
  • Also, NOAA said that the scheduling system no longer had to

schedule LEO contacts

  • Instead, Scheduler will ingest the LEO contact schedule
  • The LEO contact schedule would become windows of unavailability on

the resources

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Script Updates

  • Of the previously listed goals, all

were accomplished

  • In the transition from python to C#,

Orbit Logic also updated the following:

  • DOP value now tracked for each

point, and the average DOP value across all points was used for scoring timeslots

  • Made input parameters configurable
  • utside of code
  • Refactored method used for setting

access restrictions in STK which boosted performance

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Orbit Logic Proprietary

But Was It Better?

  • Pros
  • Very fast performance (~2

minutes)

  • Optimization now based on

actual DOP values and best set of available satellites

  • Easily configurable
  • Cons
  • Poor coverage in some

locations

  • Antennas not fully

scheduled for contacts throughout the entire scheduling period

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Closing the Gaps

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Orbit Logic Proprietary

What Was Going Wrong?

  • NOAA’s analysis showed

there was poor DOP coverage near Alaska and the dateline

  • But in the schedule itself, it

appeared all satellites that had access to that region were already contacting the ground station for the full time of access

  • Needed to investigate the

problem setup in Scheduler

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Fixing Access

  • The first problem was related to how the access

time constraint was used in STK

  • The access check added in the previous major update

would send all access windows per satellite into STK separately

  • STK would in turn intersect all of the provided access

times

  • This overly constrained the tasks to only occur if all

ground stations had access to a given satellite

  • Changed the access constraint
  • Access windows were unioned prior to going to STK
  • Now it allows access as long as any one of the ground

stations can see the satellite

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Allowing multiple Satellite Contacts

  • NOAA pointed out that satellites were

allowed to contact multiple ground stations at a time

  • Original implementation assumed each

satellite could only contact 1 ground station at a time (ie. accommodation = 1)

  • Updated the scheduling method
  • First algorithm run assumes all satellites

have accommodation = 1

  • Locks all assignments in place from first

algorithm run

  • Second algorithm run assumes all

satellites have accommodation = unlimited

  • Second algorithm run fills in the gaps
  • This method prevents contact over-

assignment for satellites

  • Blue = Locked tasks from first run
  • Green = Assigned tasks from second run

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Orbit Logic Proprietary

How Are the Results Now?

  • Pros
  • Much longer contacts
  • DOP improvements
  • Cons
  • Gaps that are less

than the minimum contact duration length are still unscheduled

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Discussion

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Further Work

  • Improvements needed to resolve the small

gaps

  • Could be problem setup updates in Scheduler
  • Could be algorithm updates for Scheduler

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Conclusions

  • Final software suite does create optimized contact

schedules based on DOP

  • Needed to iterate on the problem setup many times based on

results from testing

  • Each iteration improved the DOP optimization
  • Final software suite is easy to use as well
  • Minimal user involvement needed to create optimized

schedules

  • Scheduling method could be applied for any system to
  • ptimize contact schedules for DOP
  • Configurability allows users to run analysis for any satellite

constellation, ground station and AOR combination

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Rescues This Year

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Contact Us

Orbit Logic 7852 Walker Dr., Suite 400 Greenbelt, MD 20770 www.OrbitLogic.com Email: Isabel.martinez@orbitlogic.com sarsat@orbitlogic.com Phone: (301) 982-6232 x7103

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Backup

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Acronyms

  • AGI
  • Analytical Graphics

Incorporated

  • AOR
  • Area of Regard
  • DOP
  • Dilution of Precision
  • GEO
  • Geostationary Orbit
  • GPS
  • Global Positioning System
  • LEO
  • Low Earth Orbit
  • NOAA
  • National Oceanographic and

Atmospheric Administration

  • PDOP
  • Position Dilution of Precision
  • SARSAT
  • Search And Rescue Satellite

Aided Tracking

  • USMCC
  • United States Mission Control

Center

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Orbit Logic Proprietary

Glossary

  • Accommodation
  • Number of tasks a resource can support simultaneously
  • Resource
  • Any object or entity required for schedule creation (ex. a

satellite)

  • Task
  • An action in the schedule that requires resources to complete

(ex. satellite contact)

  • Timeslot
  • Windows of time in which task assignments may occur. They

are constrained by access and resource availability times

33