opioids killing 65 000 in u s per year
play

Opioids killing 65,000 in U.S. per year Rep. Tom Marino backing law - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lakewood Library November 4 th , 2017 A collaboration between Jeffco Political Action Taskforce Common Cause Represent.Us With support from Jefferson Humanists Jefferson County League of Women Voters M AKING T HE S


  1. Lakewood Library November 4 th , 2017 A collaboration between Jeffco Political Action Taskforce • Common Cause • • Represent.Us With support from • Jefferson Humanists Jefferson County League of Women Voters • M AKING T HE S WAMP G O A WAY

  2. S PEAKERS & T OPICS MC: Ralph Hughes, Jefferson Political Action Taskforce It’s Clear that Our System Has A Problem Caroline Fry, Common Cause How Special Interests Commandeer Our Legislators Dan Silbaugh, Represent.Us What Is The American Anti-Corruption Act? Representative Joe Salazar How to Make a State Anti-Corruption Act Effective & Durable ➢ Q&A with the panel ➢ 15-minute Workshops: Answer questions and sign petitions Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  3. O BSERVABLE C ORRUPTION 60%  30%  Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page, Perspectives on Politics, American Political Science Association, September 2014 Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us Slide 3

  4. H OW A B AD L AW G ETS P ASSED ➢ Opioids killing 65,000 in U.S. per year ➢ Rep. Tom Marino backing law to remove DEA’s power to seize suspect pill shipments ➢ Law passed in 2016 after Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) negotiates a final version with the DEA ➢ Pharmaceuticals & Health Products campaign contributions: ▪ $1.5M to 23 sponsored & co-sponsored for four versions of the bill ▪ Marino $151,000 overall, $72,000 during 2016 election cycle ▪ Hatch $2.8M overall, $764,000 during the 2016 election cycle Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us Slide 4

  5. I T ’ S N OT J UST T HE R EPUBLICANS ➢ Statistical analysis of political money on the votes of Democrats who has voted for Dodd-Frank in 2010 ➢ For every $100,000 in contributions, they were 14% more likely to vote for amendments during 2013 to 2105 to weaken the law ➢ Those Democrats who switched sides typically received $200,000 to $400,000 from the financial sector Authors from the University of Massachusetts and the University of Texas Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us Slide 5

  6. S ENATORS M UST R AISE $1,650 F OR E VERY H OUR T HEY S ERVE Don’t you think I know that? $10.4M per winning candidate. Eight hours per day for 133 days over six years. Or $893 for every hour of a regular person’s working year. Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us Slide 6

  7. AN EXTREMELY BRIEF OVERVIEW OF HOW SPECIAL INTERESTS INFLUENCE POLICY C A R O L I N E F RY C O L O R A D O C O M M O N C A U S E

  8. LOBBYING

  9. OVERVIEW • Congress: $3.2 billion in 2016 • Colorado: $38.7 million in 2016 • 231 pages of registered lobbyists • Online lobbyist disclosure system • Ban on gifts from lobbyists > legislators ISSUES • Analysis – “If you want to know how much money is being spent on a specific issue [in Colorado], there’s not a simple way to do it” - Center for Public Integrity • Oversight – Who is paying attention?

  10. REVOLVING DOOR • Federal – Congress and Federal agencies • Colorado – Two-year revolving door restriction for state legislators – No recent data re: number of Colorado legislators who become lobbyists

  11. ALEC • From Wikipedia: – The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is a nonprofit organization of conservative state legislators and private sector representatives who draft and share model state-level legislation for distribution among state governments in the United States

  12. ELECTIONS

  13. OVERVIEW • $73.9M spent in Colorado elections in 2016 • Contribution limits • Reporting / disclosure – TRACER • Campaign finance reports not audited for compliance – Private citizens expected to prosecute ethics complaints at their own expense

  14. ISSUE COMMITTEES • Purpose: support or oppose a state or local ballot initiative/question • How they raise money – From anyone! – No contribution limits • How they spend money – Voter education / advertisements

  15. INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE COMMITTEES (SUPER PACS) • Purpose: to advocate for or against a political candidate(s) – Must be done independently of a candidate's campaign • How they make money – Can receive unlimited contributions from corporations, unions, associations, and individuals • How they spend money – May not give money directly to candidate committees, political parties, or otherwise coordinate with candidates – May engage in express advocacy • List of Super PACS

  16. HOW SUPER PAC COORDINATE WITH CANDIDATES • Walker Stapleton guest of honor at the fundraiser thrown by the super PAC who is supporting him (Better Now Colorado) • Carly Fiorina left the grassroots organizing to her Super PAC, who somehow knew every city she was traveling to ahead of time and drove people to her official campaign events • A Super PAC supporting Marco Rubio produced a video that shows him speaking directly into the camera… as if he recorded it • Jeb Bush held off declaring his official candidacy while touring with his “unaffiliated” Super PAC, Right to Rise, which raised over $100 million

  17. 501(C)4 SOCIAL WELFARE ORGS • Purpose: operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare – Allowed to participate in politics, as long as it does not become their primary focus – Are tax-exempt • How they raise money – Unlimited donations from individuals, corporations, businesses • How they spend money – Cannot directly donate to federal candidates – Can directly donate to political committees, super PACs • Reporting – Not required to report donors or spending to the FEC – Not required to report donors or spending to the CO SOS – Revenue and expenditures are reported on 990 tax form

  18. CAROLINE FRY ADVOCACY & MEDIA MANAGER CFRY@COMMONCAUSE.ORG COLORADOCOMMONCAUSE.ORG

  19. SOURCES • Colorado lobbying law offers murky picture of influence on politics – http://www.denverpost.com/2016/02/27/colorado-lobbying-law-offers-murky-picture-of-influence- on-politics/ • Colorado gets D+ grade in 2015 State Integrity Investigation – https://www.publicintegrity.org/2015/11/09/18347/colorado-gets-d-grade-2015-state-integrity- investigation • Colorado lobbying in 2016 – https://www.followthemoney.org/show-me?dt=3&lby-f-fc=2&lby-s=CO&lby-y=2016# – https://www.followthemoney.org/show-me?dt=3&lby-f-fc=2&lby-s=CO&lby-y=2016#[{1|gro=lby-f-cci • Colorado Secretary of State’s online lobbying system – https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/Home.do • Colorado Secretary of State’s campaign finance reporting system – http://tracer.sos.colorado.gov/PublicSite/homepage.aspx • Follow the Money top donors in Colorado elections 2016 – https://www.opensecrets.org/states/donors.php?state=CO

  20. W HAT IS THE A MERICAN A NTI -C ORRUPTION A CT ? Dan Silbaugh, Represent.Us Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  21. C ORRUPTION IS LEGAL IN A MERICA ➢ Lobbyist can donate money to candidate, representative can take and pass laws written by lobbyist ➢ Lobbyists can curry favor with representatives ➢ Not all political spending is required to be reported ➢ Gerrymandering, Primary system, First Past the Post, “independent” expenditures, etc … Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  22. T HE A MERICAN A NTI -C ORRUPTION A CT ➢ Model Legislation, adaptable to municipal, county, state and federal law. ▪ Living Document ▪ May be enacted in whole, part, or modified ➢ Drafted by election law scholars specifically to be constitutional ▪ Even under the current SCOTUS Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  23. T HE A MERICAN A NTI -C ORRUPTION A CT ➢ Makes corruption illegal ➢ As it is passed in municipalities, counties and states it will create a “clean” body of legislators in Washington D.C. ▪ Those clean legislators will then be able to pass a the AACA on a federal level ▪ “Farm Team” system of politician grooming Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  24. C ONFLICTS OF I NTEREST AND P OLITICAL B RIBERY ➢ Prohibit candidates from accepting campaign donations from lobbyists ➢ Prohibit lobbyist bundling ➢ Close the Revolving Door ➢ Prohibit fundraising during “Congress Hours” Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  25. F ULL T RANSPARENCY ➢ Automatic disclosure of all political fundraising and expenditures above $200 ➢ Enact DISCLOSE Act (S.229, H. 430) of 2015 ➢ Disclosure of bundlers Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  26. F IX O UR B ROKEN E LECTIONS ➢ End Gerrymandering ➢ Change how Elections are Funded ➢ Single, Open Primaries ➢ Ranked Choice Voting Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  27. E NFORCE THE R ULES ➢ “Independent” PAC coordination ➢ Increase Lobbying Disclosure Requirements ▪ Change Threshold for Reporting ▪ Transparent Lobbying Disclosure ▪ 2 year suspension for violations ➢ Fix the FEC ▪ Enact Federal Election Administration Act 2016 ▪ Enact Public Corruption Prosecution Improvements Act 2012 Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  28. A N E XAMPLE … ➢ Does Jefferson County have it’s own FEC? ➢ Does Jefferson County have it’s own independent election commission? ➢ Could one be created? ➢ How would it be composed? Maintained? Powers? Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

  29. A NOTHER E XAMPLE … . ➢ Credit/Voucher for small donors? ➢ What mechanism exists to do so? ➢ What mechanism COULD exist? ➢ Alternative method? Jeffco chapter of Represent.Us

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend