One-Way Dual Language Enrichment for ELLs Dr. Leo Gmez Presenter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

one way dual language enrichment for ells
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

One-Way Dual Language Enrichment for ELLs Dr. Leo Gmez Presenter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

One-Way Dual Language Enrichment for ELLs Dr. Leo Gmez Presenter Texas Commission for Public School Finance Texas Education Agency June 5, 2018 ELL Instructional Models Additive/Enrichment Subtractive/Remedial Dual Language TBE -


slide-1
SLIDE 1

One-Way Dual Language Enrichment for ELLs

  • Dr. Leo Gómez – Presenter

Texas Commission for Public School Finance Texas Education Agency

June 5, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ELL Instructional Models

Effective Additive/Enrichment Subtractive/Remedial

Dual Language

  • Two-Way
  • One-Way

TBE - Late Exit TBE – Early Exit Content-Based ESL ESL Pullout

Ineffective

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

3

Why is TBE & ESL Bad for ELLs?

 Limited use or no use of L1 = limited access to grade-level content & skills  Remedial Model = remedial instruction  Remedial instruction = watered-down curriculum; ability grouping focus on

interventions and language acquisition vs. content

 Remedial instruction results in poor performance on:  Language and Academic tasks  District Benchmarks and Standardized Tests  Graduation Rates  Poor ELL achievement at elementary level significantly impacts school

accountability and increases long-term ELLs

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA National Research - Long-Term ELL Achievement

N

N = 210,054

C E

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Two-Way DL One-Way DL Early Exit BE +

2

Content ESL Early-Exit + Trad. ESL Content-Based ESL ESL Pullout No Services

Average Reading Performance – native English Speakers

(Thomas & Collier, 2002)

Average English Reading Performance – ELLs

Note: Program Implementation through 5th Grade only

Remedial Models Enrichment Models

1 3 4

5

6

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA National Research Findings - ELL Achievement…

 ELLs with limited proficiency in English must NOT be placed in short-term

programs of only 1-3 years. In this study and all other research studies following ELLs long term, the minimum length of time it takes to reach grade-level performance in second language (English) is 4-5 years.

 ELLs with at least 4-5 years of primary language schooling reach grade-

level performance in English. As a group, students with limited or no primary language schooling (either in home or host country) are not able to reach grade-level performance in English

 When ELLs initially attend segregated, remedial programs, these students

do not close the achievement gap after reclassification and placement in the English mainstream. Instead, they maintain or widen the gap in later years

(Thomas & Collier, 2002)

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

6

National Research Findings…

The number one predictor for long-term academic achievement in English is the extent and quality

  • f L1 schooling

(Thomas & Collier, 2002)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA One-Way DLE for All ELLs!

 One-Way DLE is Strongest Bilingual Education Program  One-Way DLE does not require both language groups  All ELLs can be served District-Wide!  Reduce Long-Term ELLs!  Increase ELL Achievement (elementary & secondary)!  Increase Graduation Rates!

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA

8

2018 5th Grade ELL Reading – McAllen ISD # Students Approaches Meets Masters

Dual Language

42 92% 77% 44%

Gifted & Talented

27 89% 81% 63%

Early-Exit TBE

76 80% 45% 11%

Regular Program

48 75% 60% 21%

McAllen ISD – 5th All

1681 83% 62% 31%

ELL Reading – Dual Language vs. Early-Exit or ESL

2017 All Grades ELL Reading – State (AEIS) Approaches Meets Masters

Dual Language

67% 36% 19%

Early-Exit TBE

61% 32% 16%

ESL (content-based)

46% 20% 7%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Campus

Liberty Murphy Austin

LBJ

RYMS Alamo Kennedy Escalante Total

2016 Middle School Language and Culture Advanced Placement (AP) Data 33 32 16 32 14 3 13

8

1 22 9 1 18

8

3 25 14 44 26 11 25 14 5 212 125 40

  • A score of 3 is weighed as earning 6 college credit hours
  • A score of 4 is weighed as earning 9 college credit hours
  • A score of 5 is weighed as earing 12 college credit hours

Total

81 49 22 32 29 39 81 44 377

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Campus Total

PSJA ECHS

15 15

PSJA Memorial ECHS

10

1 1

12

PSJA North ECHS

66

19

3 88

PSJA Southwest ECHS

32

6 38

PSJA T. Jefferson ECHS

25

1

26

Total 148

27 4

179

  • A score of 3 is weighed as earning 6 college credit hours
  • A score of 4 is weighed as earning 9 college credit hours
  • A score of 5 is weighed as earing 12 college credit hours

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EOC for DL Ells

100%

96 95%

90%

85% 80% 78%

70%

66%

60%

50%

4096

30% 20% 10%

0%

Algebra I Biology US History English I English II

· '

  • 2015
  • 2016
  • 2016 All Students
  • 2016 State Ells

COLLEGE

3

UDY COHlllCHD COMPUIE

11