Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - application to spin polarized Heusler - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nuclear magnetic resonance application to spin polarized
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - application to spin polarized Heusler - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - application to spin polarized Heusler compounds Sabine Wurmehl, J. T. Kohlhepp, H. J. M. Swagten, B. Koopmans, M. Wjcik, B. Balke, C. G. F. Blum, G. H. Fecher, C. Felser, G. Jakob, H. Schneider, D. Ebke, G.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - application to spin polarized Heusler compounds

Sabine Wurmehl,

  • J. T. Kohlhepp, H. J. M. Swagten, B. Koopmans,
  • M. Wòjcik, B. Balke, C. G. F. Blum, G. H. Fecher,
  • C. Felser, G. Jakob, H. Schneider,
  • D. Ebke, G. Reiss

JST - DFG workshop, Kyoto, January 21st-23rd 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

  • Introduction
  • Materials
  • Method
  • Results of NMR analysis
  • Bulk samples of Co2Mn1-xFexSi
  • Thin films of Co2FeSi
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Materials: Heusler compounds

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ternary intermetallic compounds X2YZ

What is a Heusler compound?

Z (4a) Y(4b) X (8c)

Order: Atoms on proper position proper position X2YZ: X (8c) Y (4b) Z (4a) L21 ( )

m Fm3

X: Most electronegative transition metal Y: Transition metal Z: Main group element L21 Structure X2YZ (Prototype: Cu2MnAl) Spacegroup m Fm3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Z (4a) Y(4b) X (8c)

Why are Heusler compounds attractive?

High spin polarization Half-metallic ferromagnetism

Spintronic Spintronic applications applications

Different structure types Affects spin polarization Easy to tune properties The tailoring principle

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why are Heusler compounds attractive?

Z (4a) Y(4b) X (8c)

High spin polarization Half-metallic ferromagnetism

Spintronic Spintronic applications applications

Different structure types Affects spin polarization Easy to tune properties The tailoring principle

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nobel price in physics 2007

„…for the discovery of Giant Magnetoresistance" …for the discovery of Giant Magnetoresistance"

  • P. Grünberg und A. Fert
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Nobel price in physics 2007

„…for the discovery of Giant Magnetoresistance" …for the discovery of Giant Magnetoresistance"

  • P. Grünberg und A. Fert

Transport ph Transport phenomena enomena using using charge and spin of electrons charge and spin of electrons

  • P. Grünberg und A. Fert
slide-9
SLIDE 9

100% spin polarization at the Fermi-edge

Minority ↓ Majority ↑

Example: ↓ Bandgap at Fermi-edge ↑ DOS>0 at Fermi-edge Concept: Rob de Groot Material: NiMnSb Half Half-

  • metallic ferromagnetism

metallic ferromagnetism

de Groot et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50 (1983) 2024

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why are Heusler compounds attractive?

Z (4a) Y(4b) X (8c)

High spin polarization Half-metallic ferromagnetism

Spintronic Spintronic applications applications

Different structure types Affects spin polarization Easy to tune properties The tailoring principle

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Substitutional series: Tuning the properties of Heusler compounds by partial substitution of one constituent by another partial substitution of one constituent by another at one crystallographic position at one crystallographic position e.g. tuning the Fermi-edge in the middle of the gap

Tailoring of properties

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Example: Co2Mn(1-x)FexSi

Balke et al. Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) 104405

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Balke et al. Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) 104405

with high thermal stability with high thermal stability

Example: Co2Mn(1-x)FexSi

Robust half Robust half-

  • metallic ferromagnets

metallic ferromagnets

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Why are Heusler compounds attractive?

Z (4a) Y(4b) X (8c)

High spin polarization Half-metallic ferromagnetism

Spintronic Spintronic applications applications

Different structure types Affects spin polarization Easy to tune properties The tailoring principle

slide-15
SLIDE 15

(c) DO3 (Fe3Si) Fm3m (d) L21 (Cu2MnAl) Fm3m

Z (4a) Y(4b) X (8c) Y or Z (1a)

(a) A2 (Tungsten) Im3m (b) B2 (CsCl) Pm3m

X (1b) X or Y (8c + 4b) Z (4a) X, Y or Z (2a)

Various structure types were observed Various structure types were observed Disadvantage: Different structure types (and their mixtures)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Spin polarization depends on structure

Spin polarization Spin polarization ↔ structure! structure!

Gercsi et al. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19 (2007) 326216 Miura et al. Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 144413

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Structural Characterization

Structural characterization by conventional methods (e.g. XRD) not sufficient.

  • B. Balke, S. Wurmehl, et al.
  • Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 (2007) 172501
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Exchange of atoms

Two types:

  • Partial substitution

(Intentional exchange of atoms tuning of properties)

  • Structure type

(Unintentional exchange of atoms)

How to distinguish between types? How to distinguish between types?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Exchange of atoms

Two types:

  • Substitution (Intentional exchange of atoms

tuning of properties)

  • Structure type (Unintentional

exchange of atoms)

How to distinguish between types? How to distinguish between types?

Requirement: Requirement: (Local) Method! (Local) Method!

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Method: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Resonance frequency depends on Resonance frequency depends on local (magnetic and electronic) local (magnetic and electronic) environment of nucleus environment of nucleus

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

ωL= = γ γ B0

Topical review Wurmehl, Kohlhepp

  • J. Phys. D.: Appl. Phys. 41 (2008) 173002

Nuclear Zeeman splitting

slide-22
SLIDE 22

A typical 59Co NMR spectrum

Thanks to

  • H. Wieldraaijer

Different local environments Different local environments have different hyperfine fields have different hyperfine fields

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Results: Co2Mn1-xFexAl Problem: Problem: Intentional exchange of atoms Distribution of atoms in Distribution of atoms in substitutional series? substitutional series?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction

Co Co2Mn Mn(1

(1-

  • x)

x)Fe

FexSi Si:

  • Robust half

Robust half-

  • metallic ferromagnets

metallic ferromagnets with high thermal stability with high thermal stability

  • L2

L21 ordered

(XRD, EXAFS, Mößbauer-spectroscopy) Wurmehl et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 032503 Balke et al. Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) 104405 Si (4a) Mn/Fe(4b) Co (8c) L21 (Cu2MnAl) Fm3m

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Motivation

Crystallography: L2 L21 structure requires random distribution random distribution of Mn Mn and and Fe Fe on the 4b Wyckoff position! Question: Distribution of Distribution of Mn Mn and and Fe Fe on 4b position?

  • n 4b position?
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Synthesis of bulk materials

  • Arcmelting in

Argon atmosphere

  • Temperature

treatment in evacuated quartz tubes Polycrystalline bulk samples Polycrystalline bulk samples

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Fit of NMR spectrum

360 365 370 375 380 385 390

6% 14% 4% 10% 18% 22%

55Mn Spin-Echo Intensity (arb. units)

Frequency (MHz)

23%

Co2Mn0.5Fe0.5Si

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Local environments of Mn

Co Mn Si Mn

First coordination shell Second coordination shell

Third coordination shell: Third coordination shell:

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Random atom model

Example: Co2Mn0.5Fe0.5Si N: Number of nearest neighbour sites in third shell of 55Mn: 12 n: Number of Fe atoms in third shell of 55Mn (varied) x: Concentration of Fe (nominal: 0.5)

n n N

x x n n N N x n P ) 1 ( ! )! ( ! ) , ( − − =

Wurmehl et al.

  • Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 052506
  • J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 07D706

5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25

  • Rel. area of resonance line (%)

Random atom model (%) Number of Fe next neighbours

2 4 6 8 10 12

  • 2

2

  • 2

2

Difference (%)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

55Mn NMR of Co2Mn0.5Fe0.5Si

Each resonance line Each resonance line is attributed to certain numbers of Fe atoms is attributed to certain numbers of Fe atoms

55Mn Spin-Echo Intensity (arb. units)

Frequency (MHz)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Co2Mn1-xFexSi (0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.9)

Open symbols: random atom model Filled symbols: experimental data

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Measured Fe concentration

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Fe concentration x measured by

55Mn NMR

Nominal Fe concentration x

Measured Fe concentration Measured Fe concentration x follows nominal values follows nominal values

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Summary Co2Mn1-xFexSi

Structure of Co2Mn1-xFexSi confirmed by 55Mn NMR: L2 L21 type with random distribution of random distribution of Mn Mn and and Fe Fe

  • n 4b Wyckhoff position

Only intentional Only intentional exchange of atoms

Wurmehl et al.

  • Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 052506
  • J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008) 07D706
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusion Co2Mn1-xFexSi

High crystallographic order proved by 55Mn NMR high impact on 1) half-metallic character 2) high degree of spin polarization Co Co2Mn Mn1-

  • x

xFe

FexSi Heusler compounds with x Si Heusler compounds with x≈ 0.5 0.5 are are ideal candidates for spintronics ideal candidates for spintronics

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Results: Co Co2FeSi FeSi thin film samples Problem: Problem: Unintentional exchange of atoms Off Off-

  • stoichiometry

stoichiometry

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Motivation

Bulk:

  • L21 structure and 6 μB

Wurmehl et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 (2006) 032503 Balke et al. Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) 104405

Films:

  • Magnetic moments low (4.5 – 5.0 μB)

Inomata et al. J. Appl. Phys. 99 (2006) 08T314 Schneider et al. Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006) 174426

  • Tunneling Magnetoresistance is low (44% at RT, 68 % at 5K)

Gercsi et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 082512

  • Spin polarization

Spin polarization only 49%

  • nly 49% (PCAR, Jullière)

Gercsi et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 082512

Al (4a) Mn(4b) Cu (8c)

(d) L21 (Cu2MnAl) Fm3m

Co Co2FeSi is predicted to be a half FeSi is predicted to be a half-

  • metallic ferromagnet

metallic ferromagnet

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Expected NMR spectrum

4 Fe + 4 Si L21 structure: One first shell environment for the 59Co nuclei Co2FeSi One hyperfine field One single sharp resonance line

50 100 150 200 250 300 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28

Hyperfine field (T)

59Co Spin-Echo Intensity (arb. units)

Frequency (MHz)

Co2FeSi bulk sample

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Synthesis of films

Load lock Electronics “Carouso” Computer control Sputter guns with targets Turbo pump (UHV) User rf/dc sputtering Example: TU/e

slide-39
SLIDE 39

NMR of Co2FeSi films (Exemplarily: Mainz)

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

59Co Spin-Echo Intensity (arb.units)

(a)

Frequency (MHz) Hyperfine field (T)

  • RF magnetron sputtering
  • Deposited at 600°C
  • No capping and seed layer
  • Grown on MgO

Wurmehl et al. Submitted to J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. (2009) Films prepared by H. Schneider and G. Jakob, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Thin films in literature

Inomata et al. Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008) 214425

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Idea

  • Only high frequency lines

Only high frequency lines in Co2FeSi

  • Previous NMR results:

Fe-rich environments lead to high frequency satellites Fe-rich environments in Co2FeSi “Wrong” stoichiometry “Wrong” stoichiometry with Fe excess atoms??? with Fe excess atoms???

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24

59Co Spin-Echo Intensity (arb.units)

(a)

Frequency (MHz) Hyperfine field (T)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Fe - excess atoms

Two different types are possible:

  • Fe rich at the cost of Co
  • Fe rich at the cost of Si

Co2Fe(Si1-xFex) (Co2-xFex)FeSi Check local structure of Check local structure of corresponding bulk “model” samples corresponding bulk “model” samples

4 Co + 2 Fe 6 Co + 0 Fe 6 Fe + 2 Si 5 Fe + 3 Si 4 Fe + 4 Si 5 Co + 1 Fe

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Comparison with bulk spectra

Co2Fe(Si0.93Fe0.07) (Co1.88Fe0.12)FeSi

6 Fe + 2 Si 5 Fe + 3 Si 4 Fe + 4 Si 4 Co + 2 Fe 6 Co + 0 Fe 5 Co + 1 Fe

Bulk samples prepared by C.G.F. Blum Group of Prof. C. Felser

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Off

Off-

  • stoichiometric

stoichiometric films of Co2FeSi

  • ut of stoichiometric targets

stoichiometric targets

  • Similar results in films prepared by

films prepared by different groups different groups

  • Off

Off-

  • stoichiometry only apparent

stoichiometry only apparent using using local methods as NMR NMR Principal problem while sputtering Co Principal problem while sputtering Co2FeSi FeSi

Summary Co2FeSi

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Conclusion

Off-stoichiometry might explain

  • too low spin polarization
  • too low TMR ratio
  • too low element specific magnetic moments

BUT: Results associated with “good” x-ray diffraction data

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Troubleshooting

  • Find optimized target to get stoichiometric films
  • Optimize sputter conditions
  • Prepare films by
  • Molecular beam epitaxy
  • Pulsed laser deposition

BUT: Sputtering is more common in industry Film preparation monitored Film preparation monitored and optimized by NMR and optimized by NMR

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Take home message

Towards Towards technical technical application in application in spintronic spintronic devices devices

slide-48
SLIDE 48

you, you, for your attention!!! for your attention!!!

Benjamin Balke Christian G. F. Blum Gerhard H. Fecher Claudia Felser Gerhard Jakob Horst Schneider Hajo Elmers Jürgen T. Kohlhepp Henk J. M. Swagten Bert Koopmans Gregory Malinowski Tim Ellis Patrick Jacobs FNA

Money: Money: DFG Forschungsstipendium WU 595/1 DFG Forschungsstipendium WU 595/1-

  • 1

Marek Wòjcik

Thanks to Thanks to

Daniel Ebke Günter Reiss

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Conventional NMR vs NMR on ferromagnets

Methyl- Multiplett

  • High magnetic fields
  • Small frequency range

with small lines

  • High internal magnetic fields

High internal magnetic fields NO external field required

  • Large variations in field/frequency

with broad lines

  • Enhancement-effect

Methylene

Methylen- Multiplett

Chemical shift δ (parts per million [ppm])

Methyl

160 180 200 220 240

Frequency (MHz)

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Random atom model Fe excess atoms

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1 2 3 4 5 6

  • 5

5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

(a)

1 2 3 4 5 6

  • 5

5

(c) Difference (%) (d)

  • Rel. area of

resonance line (%) Probability according to binomial distribution (%) Number of Fe excess atoms Difference (%) (b) Co2Fe(Si1-xFex) (Co2-xFex)FeSi

n n N

x x n n N N x n P ) 1 ( ! )! ( ! ) , ( − − =

x = 0.08 x = 0.06

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Results: Co Co2FeAl FeAl bulk samples Problem: Problem: Unintentional exchange of atoms Structure types Structure types

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Mixing of Fe and Al atoms

Co2FeAl:

  • Half-metallic ferromagnetic Heusler compound
  • Tunneling Magnetoresistance about 50% at room temperature
  • B2

B2 type structure

(XRD, EXAFS, Mößbauer-spectroscopy)

Al (4a) Fe(4b) Co (8c) Fe or Al (1a)

Introduction

L21 Structure X2YZ (Protoyp: Cu2MnAl) B2 structure Co2(FeAl) (Protoyp: CsCl) Tezuka et al. J. Appl. Phys. 99 (2006) 08T314 Wurmehl et al. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 (2006) 803

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Motivation

Crystallography: B2 structure requires random distribution random distribution of Fe Fe and and Al Al on the 1a Wyckoff position! Questions: (A) (A) Distribution of Distribution of Fe Fe and and Al Al on the 1

  • n the 1a position

position (B) (B) Structural contributions Structural contributions (C) Effect of annealing on local structure (C) Effect of annealing on local structure

Fe or Al (1a)

B2 structure Co2(FeAl) (Protoyp: CsCl)

slide-54
SLIDE 54
  • Arcmelting
  • Optional:

Temperature treatment in evacuated quartz tubes. Polycrystalline bulk samples

Synthesis

slide-55
SLIDE 55

(A) Distribution of atoms

Co2FeAl in literature: B2 type structure Requires random distribution random distribution of Fe and Al Alters first shell environment of Co! Alters first shell environment of Co!

B2 structure of Co2(FeAl)

Fe or Al (1a)

Al (4a) Fe(4b) Co (8c)

slide-56
SLIDE 56

(A) First shell environment in the B2 structure

… … …

B2 structure: 9 different first shell environments B2 structure: 9 different first shell environments

4 Al + 4 Fe 1 Al + 7 Fe 6 Al + 2 Fe 8 Fe 2 Al + 6 Fe 8 Al

slide-57
SLIDE 57

m(Al))

  • (m(Fe)
  • h

= m(Al) h + m(Fe) h

  • )

H(Co

1 1 1 0 ≈

Δ B2 structure: mixing of Fe Fe and Al Al

  • m (Fe)= 2.91 μB
  • m (Al) ≈ 0μB

Mixing of magnetically extremely different elements Hyperfine field (transferred contributions):

(A) Spacing

Large spacing on the order of 20 Large spacing on the order of 20-

  • 60 MHz

60 MHz

slide-58
SLIDE 58

(A) Expected spectrum

Nine resonance lines Nine resonance lines Spacing roughly 20 Spacing roughly 20-

  • 60 MHz

60 MHz

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Literature

Inomata et al. J. Phys. D 39 (2006) 816

slide-60
SLIDE 60

125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300

59Co spin echo intensity (a. u.)

Frequency (MHz)

4Fe+4Al 3Fe+5Al 5Fe+3Al 6Fe+2Al 7Fe+1Al 8Fe 2Fe+ 6Al

59Co NMR spectrum Co2FeAl

As cast sample

slide-61
SLIDE 61

59Co NMR spectrum Co2FeAl

125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300

23%

59Co spin echo intensity (a. u.)

Frequency (MHz)

4Fe+4Al 3Fe+5Al 5Fe+3Al 6Fe+2Al 7Fe+1Al 8Fe 2Fe+ 6Al

6% 20% 34% 11% 4% 2%

  • 7 main lines with mean spacing of 27 MHz
  • Sub-lines with spacing of 5 MHz
slide-62
SLIDE 62

(A) Origin of main lines

Main lines: Distribution of Distribution of Fe Fe and and Al Al in first shell of in first shell of Co Co Spacing Spacing ≈ 30 MHz 30 MHz

slide-63
SLIDE 63

125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300

23%

Frequency (MHz)

4Fe+4Al 3Fe+5Al 5Fe+3Al 6Fe+2Al 7Fe+1Al 8Fe 2Fe+ 6Al

6% 20% 34% 11% 4% 2%

(A) Random atom model

59Co spin echo intensity (a. u.)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 5 10 15 20 25

0.4% 0.4% 3% 3% 11% 11% 22% 22%

Probability according to binomial distribution (%) Number Fe atoms

27%

n n N

x x n n N N x n P ) 1 ( ! )! ( ! ) , ( − − =

N=8 n=0-8 x≈0.5 Binomial distribution

B2 structure of Co2(FeAl)

Fe or Al (1a)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

n n N

x x n n N N x n P ) 1 ( ! )! ( ! ) , ( − − =

N=8 n=0-8 x≈0.5

(A) Model vs. experiment

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  • 10
  • 5

5 10

(b) Difference

  • Rel. area of

resonance line (%) Probability according to binomial distribution (%) Number of Fe atoms in the first shell of

59Co

Difference

slide-65
SLIDE 65

(A) Model vs. experiment

N=8 n=0-8 x≈0.5

Conflict between Conflict between model and experiment model and experiment

slide-66
SLIDE 66

X (8c) Fe(4b) Z(4a))

First shell in the L21 structure

n n N

x x n n N N x n P ) 1 ( ! )! ( ! ) , ( − − =

N=8 n=0-8 x≈0.5

(B) Model vs. experiment

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  • 10
  • 5

5 10

(b) Difference

  • Rel. area of

resonance line (%) Probability according to binomial distribution (%) Number of Fe atoms in the first shell of

59Co

Difference

slide-67
SLIDE 67

n n N

x x n n N N x n P ) 1 ( ! )! ( ! ) , ( − − =

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  • 10
  • 5

5 10 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

(a)

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  • 10
  • 5

5 10

(b) Difference (d)

  • Rel. area of

resonance line (%) Probability according to binomial distribution (%) Number of Fe atoms in the first shell of

59Co

Difference (c)

  • nly B2 contributions

B2 and L21 contributions

N=8 n=0-8 x≈0.5

{ }

K K K = ⋅ + − − ⋅ =

− 4 , 4 , 2 2

1

) 1 ( ! )! ( ! ) , (

n n L n n N B

with l x x n n N N b x n P δ δ

1, n=4 0, n≠4

(B) Structural contributions

slide-68
SLIDE 68

(B) Structural contributions

Distribution of Fe and Al not entirely random 90% 90% B2 B2 + + ≈ 10% 10% L2 L21 contributions contributions

Wurmehl et al. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 (2008) 115007

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Broad resonance line Broad resonance line corresponds to corresponds to A2 A2 structural contributions structural contributions

(C) Annealing

125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300

7% 7%

59Co spin-echo intensity (arb. units)

Frequency (MHz)

3% 7% 11% 9% 4%

A2 contributions

Wurmehl et al. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41 (2008) 115007

slide-70
SLIDE 70

125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 (b)

59Co spin echo intensity (a. u.)

Frequency (MHz) (a)

as cast annealed

Co (8c) Fe(4b) Al(4a))

Mixing of Y and Z atoms

Co (1b) Fe or Al (1a)

Example: fourth shell in the L21 structure in the B2 structure B2 structure: 25 different fourth shell environments L21 structure: One environment for the 59Co nuclei

Between 200-250 MHz: Separation of CoAl after annealing process

(A) Sub-lines

slide-71
SLIDE 71
  • Distribution of Fe and Al not entirely random

90% B2 + 90% B2 + ≈ 10% L2 10% L21

1 contributions

contributions

  • Sub-lines related to distribution

distribution

  • f Fe and Al in higher shells

in higher shells (cumulative higher shell effects) Sub Sub-

  • lines not apparent in thin films

lines not apparent in thin films Only unintentional exchange of atoms Only unintentional exchange of atoms

Summary

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Conclusions

High degree of order: Conservation of Conservation of half half-

  • metallic ferromagnetic properties (bulk)

metallic ferromagnetic properties (bulk) Higher long range order Higher long range order in bulk than in thin film samples in bulk than in thin film samples Improvement of structure: Improvement of structure: Better performance in spintronic devices…. Better performance in spintronic devices….