NTTS 2015 9 13 March 2015, Brussels Session 13C - Survey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NTTS 2015 9 13 March 2015, Brussels Session 13C - Survey - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
NTTS 2015 9 13 March 2015, Brussels Session 13C - Survey integration, coordination and alignment Avoiding duplicate collection of flow data: estimating intra-EU inbound tourism using partner data Christophe Demunter, Krista Dimitrakopoulou
Quick guide to tourism statistics
3 main types of tourism
- Domestic tourism = visits within a country by residents of that country
- Outbound tourism = visits by residents of a country outside that country
- Inbound tourism
= visits to a country by visitors who are not residents
2 sources for European statistics on tourism
- Household surveys cover domestic and outbound trips by EU residents
- Business surveys
cover domestic and inbound trips of tourists who stayed in rented accommodation
1 main gap in measuring tourism flows in Europe
- Total inbound
due to missing inbound flows of tourists not staying at rented accommodation
2
Inbound tourism
User needs
- Physical flows
number of visitors, number of nights, purpose, etc.
- Monetary flows
tourism expenditure by foreigners
How to adress the user needs
- Border surveys
difficult (free movement, Schengen) and very costly
- Using existing data e partner data from other countries
Outbound trip to Italy by a Finnish tourist Statistics Finland via the Finnish household survey Inbound trip in Italy by a Finnish tourist ISTAT via border survey? or… simply re-using the Finnish information on the same flow?
Conditions for exchanging partner data
Harmonisation
- Common EU regulatory framework Regulation 692/2011 concerning
European statistics on tourism
- Harmonised scope, concepts, definitions, variables and breakdowns,
reference period and file formats (micro-data transmitted to Eurostat)
Trust
- Using data not produced in country A to say something about country A
- Quality assurance e.g. data validation by Eurostat
Access
- Sufficiently detailed data Summary tables based on Eurostat micro-data
Coverage Sample size, completeness, availability and reliability
4
Coverage
Sample size
- Total sample of 490 000 tourism trips
Trips with at least 1 overnight stay by residents from the EU (-SE) and CH of which 154 000 outbound trips (31%) of which 114 000 outbound trips with a destination within the EU (74%) In other words: a sample of 114 000 intra-EU inbound trips! But big differences in 'inbound' sample size
5
Sample size for inbound trips from EU-28 (excl. SE) and CH
> 10000 ES, FR, DE, IT 5000 - 9999 UK 4000 - 4999 EL, PT, NL, BE 3000 - 3999 HR, AT, PL 2000 - 2999 SE, IE, RO 1000 - 1999 CZ, HU, LV, DK, BG, EE, SK, CY < 1000 MT, FI, LT, SI, LU,
Coverage
Completeness
- 28 reporting countries x 29 destinations (28 EU, EFTA) = 784 flows
(excluding domestic flows) 94% are included in the sample 6% were not observed (e.g EL to EE, EE to RO, CZ to LU)
6
Coverage
Availability and reliability of data
- 28 reporting countries x 29 destinations (28 EU, EFTA) = 784 flows
(excluding domestic flows)
7
36% 15% 43% 6%
Share of intra-EU flows
Available (> 50 obs) Lower reliability (20-49 obs) Not published (< 20 obs) Not observed
91%
5.5% 3.5%
Share of observed trips
Coverage
Availability and reliability of data
8
23 22 21 19 19 18 18 13 11 11 10 10 10 9 8 7 7 6 6 6 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 4 3 5 4 5 6 5 6 6 5 6 9 11 4 5 4 4 2 1 4 3 3 3 1 2 4 2 4 4 5 4 5 9 10 11 11 11 12 12 10 9 16 16 17 17 21 22 23 20 21 21 21 23 23 22 26 27
IT DE ES FR UK EL AT HR NL CH BE SE CZ PT PL HU NO BG DK IE SK CY EE FI MT RO SI LV LT LU IS LI
Number of partners countries broken down by sample size for this destination country
<20 obs (not used) 20-49 obs (unreliable) 50+ obs (reliable)
Note: not including trips by residents of Sweden
Coverage
Availability and reliability of data
9
99 99 99 99 95 92 98 95 90 93 73 69 88 79 81 46 46 31 86 72 84 58 93 33 46 52 50 62 42 10 19
20 40 60 80 100
IT DE ES FR UK EL AT HR NL CH BE SE CZ PT PL HU NO BG DK IE SK CY EE FI MT RO SI LV LT LU IS LI
Share of inbound trips accounted for by flows with more than 50 observations
Note: not including trips by residents of Sweden
Coverage
Availability and reliability of data
10
99 99 99 99 95 92 98 95 90 93 73 69 88 79 81 46 46 31 86 72 84 58 93 33 46 52 50 62 42 10 19 7 9 23 26 8 17 13 45 42 26 4 8 4 22 20 14 14 33 59
20 40 60 80 100
IT DE ES FR UK EL AT HR NL CH BE SE CZ PT PL HU NO BG DK IE SK CY EE FI MT RO SI LV LT LU IS LI
Share of inbound trips accounted for by flows with 20 or more observations
Flows with 20 to 49 observations Flows with more than 50 observations
Note: not including trips by residents of Sweden
Some preliminary results
Average expenditure per inbound trip by residents from the EU
Inbound visitors into the EU coming from other EU Member States spent on average 575 EUR per trip Ranging from 205 EUR in Slovakia (many short trips – average is 4.7 nights – from neighboring countries) to 793 EUR in Cyprus (longer trips – average is 12.1 nights) and 834 EUR in Finland
Note: not including trips by residents of Sweden 834 793 789 733 683 660 650 623 619 593 575 547 535 530 523 501 500 495 482 475 475 451 427 396 394 346 326 320 205 545 1272 156 966
500 1000 1500 FI CY EL ES IT PT UK BG MT IE EU DK FR AT HR SE HU LT EE SI RO DE PL NL CZ BE LV LU SK CH IS LI NO
Average expenditure per inbound trip by residents from the EU, in euro (2012)
Some preliminary results
Average expenditure per inbound night by residents from the EU
Inbound visitors from the EU spent on average 79 EUR per overnight stay Ranging from 37 EUR in Romania to 166 EUR in Estonia (the country with the shortest average length of stay – 2.9 nights – for inbound trips, mainly made by Finnish – 84% of all Estonian inbound tourism trips from
- ther EU countries)
Note: not including trips by residents of Sweden
166 124 94 93 93 92 92 87 85 83 83 82 80 80 80 79 78 77 76 74 74 68 65 60 60 54 53 43 37 105 140 113 101
50 100 150 200 EE FI UK AT IT LU SE BE NL CZ LT IE SI DE EL EU ES HU DK PT FR MT CY BG LV PL HR SK RO CH IS LI NO
Average expenditure per inbound night spent by residents from the EU, in euro (2012)
Coherence
Coherence check of the data source with accommodation data
- Nights spent at accommodation establishments < estimate for inbound nights ?
- OK for all countries where data is available, differences can among others be
explained by differences in the share of stays at non-rented accommodation (in particular stays at friends or relatives by visiting migrants) or by data collection thresholds in accommodation statistics (e.g. DK)
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE EL ES FI FR HR HU IE IT LT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK UK IS NO
Ratio of nights spent at tourist accommodation establishments by non- residents from EU-28 and estimated number of nights on inbound trips by residents from EU Member States
13
Coherence
Coherence check of the data source with accommodation data
- The gap between supply side and inbound demand side data can partially be
explained by considering the inbound trips spent at non-rented accommodation: about 25% of intra-EU trips was spent at non-rented accommodation in 2012
- RO: lowest ratio, but non-rented accommodation (68%) explains most of the gap
- DK: biggest unexplained gap due to under-coverage of accommodation data
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE EL ES FI FR HR HU IE IT LT LU LV MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK UK IS NO
Ratio of nights spent at tourist accommodation establishments by non- residents from EU-28 and estimated number of nights on inbound trips by residents from EU Member States
14
Coherence
Coherence check of the data source with existing inbound data
- Six Member States kindly provided data from their border surveys for 2012
(CZ, IE, ES, HU, MT, UK), this preliminary analysis has been anonymised
- Demand side data systematically lower than border survey (recall bias?)
- Deviations are bigger for trips than for nights (less recall for longer trips), as a
consequence also average duration is longer on the basis of demand side data
84% 71% 82% 59% 72% 99% 78% 94% 71% 119% 110% 115% 120% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
Ratio of inbound demand side data and inbound border survey data (2012)
Number of inbound trips Number of inbound nights Average duration 15
Conclusions
Burden & cost neutral High potential for bigger countries and/or popular destination countries, less for other countries
- Sample size in the generating countries?
biggest cost driver…
- Correlated with size and attractiveness
more observed trips
Some methodological issues inherent to the data source
- Non-response in household surveys possible systematic bias
- Recall bias regarding tourism trips
up to 20 to 25% underestimation
Coherence with other sources is satisfactory and promising Mixed enthousiasm regarding dissemination of this data
16