November 3 rd , 2008 Experiences in Japanese Licensing Basic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

november 3 rd 2008 experiences in japanese licensing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

November 3 rd , 2008 Experiences in Japanese Licensing Basic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

November 3 rd , 2008 Experiences in Japanese Licensing Basic Japanese licensing / collaboration strategies Importance of collaboration alignment Three-way partnerships in a highly competitive in- licensing environment


slide-1
SLIDE 1

November 3rd, 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2 2
  • Confidential -

Experiences in Japanese Licensing

  • Basic Japanese licensing / collaboration strategies
  • Importance of collaboration alignment
  • Three-way partnerships in a highly competitive in-

licensing environment – leveraging lessons learned The landscape of “Inter-Geographic” licensing has changed dramatically and will continue to change – adaptation will be THE critical skill

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Lessons from Eli Lilly and Company

A strong legacy of in-licensing from abroad

slide-4
SLIDE 4 4
  • Confidential -

Lessons from Lilly Business Development

  • In-Licensing has represented a key element of Lilly’s portfolio

strategy for many years

  • Key initial objectives for Lilly in all in-licensing transactions

– Establish Lilly’s leadership in the relevant disease area – Establishing guiding principles of a transaction – Develop a clear path to a transaction based on partner needs – Collaboration excellence with strong post deal “alliance management” Insulin Lorabid (Kyowa Hakko) Actos (Takeda) Prasugrel (Sankyo) Cialis sPLA2 (Shionogi)

slide-5
SLIDE 5 5
  • Confidential -

Lessons from Lilly Business Development

Two MOST critical lessons:

  • Establish your expertise

– Ability to manage a Japanese relationship (trust, respect) – Development (local regulatory, clinical) – Team (Sr. Mgmt, SAB, CAB, BOD) – Funding (venture, other sources) – Value-add for partner (data exchange, $$$, learning)

  • Establish guiding principles early in the process

– Value split based on risk/reward (financial and non-financial) – Responsibilities (development) – Set timing / process expectations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lessons From Peninsula Pharmaceuticals

Alignment of Strategy and Operational Execution

slide-7
SLIDE 7 7
  • Confidential -

Alignment of STRATEGY and OPERATIONS

  • Majority of key decisions in a NewCo are STRATEGIC

– Pharma may see decisions as low level PRODUCT issues

  • Good alliances move “Appropriate” decisions UP the organization so all strategic

impact on the NewCo can be assessed and considered

Finance / Legal

Clinical Development

Marketing Manufacturing Regulatory

Product Product Product Product

TRx TRx TRx

Function Function

CEO

Preside nt

slide-8
SLIDE 8 8
  • Confidential -

Alignment of STRATEGY and OPERATIONS

Finance / Legal

Clinical Development

Marketing Manufacturing Regulatory

Product Product Product Product

TRx TRx TRx

Function Function

CEO

Preside nt

  • A balanced JSC can elevate decision making
  • Needs to be a clear decision maker / process (involvement of senior people)
  • Regular meetings avoid sudden “killer issues” (in-person when possible)
  • Increases probability of obtaining a license and further control
  • Non-negotiable: IP and regulatory – must be decided locally
  • Opportunity: Equity participation by Shionogi
  • Keeps everyone “in-the-game” and elevates corporate interest

Joint Steering Committee

slide-9
SLIDE 9 9
  • Confidential -

The Payoff

  • The Peninsula / Shionogi Joint Steering Committee:

– Encouraged an investment from Shionogi in Series C financing ($25M) – Enabled data sharing for Shionogi’s MHLW licensing process – Minimized any wasteful overlap (Pre-clinical, manufacturing) – Was paramount to the JNJ acquisition allow clear line-of-sight communication between the relevant individuals – Allowed coordination of global publication and marketing efforts

  • A well established JSC in any license can provide benefits:

Expansion of doripenem Shareholder return Visibility on value Financial return “Leverageable” capabilities Clear alignment

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Executing with Lessons Learned

slide-11
SLIDE 11 11
  • Confidential -

Leveraging Lessons Learned

  • Lessons from Lilly and Peninsula helped deliver success in a

highly complicated three-way transaction

– sPLA2 collaboration discontinued – No clear out-licensing plan or leader – Partners needed to be convinced to “spend the time on a deal”

  • Both Lilly and Shionogi:

– Constructively participated in negotiation of the key contracts – Assisted in technology transfer (a lot of data) and enabled Anthera – Provided on-going support including regulatory/manufacturing – Became “Large” shareholders

sPLA2 Products and Technology

slide-12
SLIDE 12 12
  • Confidential -

$

Financing / Operating History

2007

A-002 Phase II PLASMA: Coronary Artery Disease A-001 Phase II IMPACTS: Acute Chest Syndrome in sickle cell patients A-002 Phase II Start: PLASMA2 QD

2006

IP License from Lilly $29M Series B ► VantagePoint ► Sofinnova ► Pappas ► Lilly ► Shionogi

2008

A-002 Phase II Results: PLASMA2 QD A-002 Completed SPA with FDA and EMEA advice process A-002 Phase IIb/III Start - FRANCIS A-623 Phase II IND $19M Follow-on Financing ►Caxton ►HBM

2009

A-623 Initiate Phase II (Q3) Strategic Financing for A002 (Q3 / Q4) A-001 IMPACTS RESULTS (Q1) A-002 FRANCIS 8 week and 6 month RESULTS (Q1 /Q2) Initiate Phase III LDL extension (Q2) Initiate Phase III ACS Study N=5000 (SPA) (Q4)

slide-13
SLIDE 13 13
  • Confidential -

Summary

  • Dealing with international licensing requires specialized skills

– In Japan, build confidence, trust and respect early – Focus on capabilities and matching with partner needs

  • True collaboration must be aligned

– A JSC can ensure key decisions are handled appropriately – Alignment has significant upside when “it counts most”

  • Brining together the fundamentals can help even in complex

transactions

– Guiding principles help steer the way – Even when managing complex three-way negotiations

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Sofinnova Ventures

Venture Capital for Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Spin Outs

Updated on August 2008

Presentation to New York Pharma Forum November 3, 2008 David S. Kabakoff

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Sofinnova At a Glance

– Leading US VC firm with over $1B under management ($375M Fund VII) – Firm founded in 1974; core team investing together for 10+ years – Offices in San Francisco, San Diego, Tokyo – Close relationship with Sofinnova Partners (Paris) – 3 investors, 3 EIR’s, 1 Strategic Advisor, 2 Asia-focused BD professionals – Back high quality, clinical stage therapeutic assets – Invest behind proven management teams – Deploy $15 – 25M over the life of a company (syndicate rounds of any size) for 20% ownership – Take an active role in the company at the board level – Back as long term partners; always support the company and the program

Investment Strategy Organizational Snapshot

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Sofinnova Life Sciences Team

Investment Professionals

Mike Powell, PhD Jim Healy, MD, PhD Anand Mehra, MD

Executives in Residence Business Development, Asia

Keiko Mitsunobu Goro Takeda

Cytel Corp Syntex Lab

Lars Ekman, MD, PhD David Kabakoff, PhD

NSDQ: DURA

Jay Shepard, PhD

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Life Science Portfolio

= IPO, Acquired or S-1 Filed

Partnering Platform Product Sales Company Stage Drug Discovery Clinical Development Commercial Business Model

Anza

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Sofinnova’s Core Spin-out Expertise

Pharmaceuticals Biotechnology Sofinnova’s Competitive Advantages

Extensive Spinout Experience of SVP’s Partners

Knowledge of Deal Structuring and Incentives for Parent Companies

Track Record of Building Companies around Top Talent

Spin-outs

Acquiring a Division or Mature Product from Established Company

Subhead Placeholder

Significant R&D Investment by Established Company

Mature Product/IP

Faster Path to Approval/Liquidity

Benefits

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Sofinnova’s Track Record of Spin-Out and Licensing

Corporate Spin-Out

Genentech and Connetics Roche Bristol Myers Squibb Medicis Janssen Ipsen

Product Licensing

Shionogi and Lilly Kureha Dong A Roche and Schering AG Baxter Amgen

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Licenses from Japanese Pharma to VC backed Biotechs

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Sofinnova Spin-outs from Asia

Shionogi / Eli Lilly Kureha Dong-A(Korea)

Focus and Speed in Development

Number 1 priority in product pipelines

Quick decision making and aggressive timeline to meet development milestones

High Quality of Management Team

Experienced teams built specifically around in-licensed technology

Strong network among clinical / regulatory experts and KOLs

Strong Alliance Partnerships with Licensor

Flexible deal structure to achieve mutual goals (win-win)

Strong personal relationships based on trust and cultural respect

Keys for Success

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Spin-out Deal Flow: Example - Trius.

“Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door.”

  • Jeff Stein is a Venture Partner at Sofinnova.
  • Together we founded Trius Therapeutics.
  • Trius licensed TR701 from Dong A Pharma
  • Raised $50M Sofinnova, Versant, Interwest, Prism, Kleiner

VC Deal Flow: Example: Trius Therapeutics Conventional Wisdom: If you build it, they will come

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Spin-out Example: Trius Therapeutics

Oral / IV Oxazolidinone licensed by SV venture partner IND filed in the US, potential for $150M in non-dilutive Funding Recruit experienced Team

  • f Big Pharma

Developers and Scientists Potential for liquidity, significant value created for licensor Data from Phase II front-loaded development plan, differentiate from Zyvox

22 Months from License and Series A Close Subhead Placeholder

Jeff Stein, PhD, CEO; David Kabakoff, PhD, Executive Chair

Ken Bartizal, PhD, CDO

– 30 years of ID development experience – 20 years at Merck, former Head ID Research, Multiple NDA’s (Invanz / Cancidas) 

Phillipe Prockimer, MD, CSO

– 20 years of ID clinical development experience – VP, Antiinfectives Research, J&J; VP, Antiinfectives Clinical Research, Aventis – 5 NDA’s, 4 MAA’s for NCE’s (doripenem, synercid, zagam, biaxin)

The Trius Team

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Spin-out Example: Anza Therapeutics

 Cerus is a public company in Concord, CA which develops and

markets systems for purification of blood and components using proprietary viral inactivation technology

 Cerus launched an immunotherapy R&D program as a new

application of it’s core technology in 2003

 In 2007, the IT program was spun out and Anza was born with:

– 20 Employees and management – Facilities/equipment from Cerus – 2 clinical stage products – cancer and HCV

 Anza was financed with a $ 20 Million Series A from Sofinnova,

Versant and Kleiner Perkins

 Cerus received equity in Anza and is eligible for milestones on first

two products and royalties on licensed products

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Spin-Out Venture Business Model

New Co. Experienced Team Pharmaceutical / Biotechnology Company Venture Capitals (Sofinnova, Co-investors) Partnering / M&A / IPO

Maximize Compound Value Compound(s) License, HR Investment

Upfront/ Milestone Royalty Equity Management team, Advisors, Board Equity

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Filing a Corporation Proposal on Development Plans Technical Discussions among Experts Project Kick-off Flexible Deal Structure

New Co. Start-up Process

Scientific Evaluation Development Strategy Due-Diligence Term Sheet LA Execution

Seed Financing Series A Financing

Opportunity Identification

Milestone Based Financing

Strategic Investment and Operational Support from VC Syndicate

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Advantages to VCs of Spin-outs based on Pharma Assets

 Quality and completeness of data packages  “Pre-formed teams” with project expertise, history and

passion

 “Arbitrage” – VC investment at fraction of prior investment  Collaboration opportunity with Pharma partner in territorial

deals

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Advantages to Parent of Asset Spin-outs to VC backed Newco

 Committed Capital for Licensed Assets  Management/Organizational Focus  Nimbleness, agility of small teams  Greater Flexibility on deal terms with Newcos than with

pharma

 Equity Upside

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Challenges to Building a new-co around licensed assets

 Assembling the “right” team and “technology transfer”  Gaining “ownership” for an asset licensed into an existing

  • rganization

 Mis-alignment between “parent” and VC or newco business

  • bjectives
slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Key Business Issues in VC Backed Spin-out Deals

 Financial Consideration

– Cash Payments – milestones, royalties, upfront – Equity (minority interest)

 Scope of Licenses

– Geography – Exclusivity – Non-competition – Supply

 Negotiation Rights in Favor of Parent

– Marketing – Manufacturing – “Pre-negotiated” versus “market” terms

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Success Factors in VC Backed Spin-outs

 Competitive Product Asset which attracts experienced

talent

 Deal Terms which enable Newco to grow and chart it’s

destiny

 Core leadership team willing to “spin-out” with product  Pharma management clarity of strategy and support for

deal completion

slide-32
SLIDE 32

San Francisco Office

140 Geary Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, CA, 94108 Ph: 415 228 3380

Menlo Park Office

850 Oak Grove Drive Menlo Park, CA, 94025 Ph: 415 228 3380

San Diego Office

BIOCOM VC Suites 4510 Executive Drive, Suite 206 San Diego, CA 92121 Ph: 858 550 0959

Tokyo Office

4-1-28 Toranomon Towers Office 19F Toranomon, Minatoku, Tokyo Office: +81 (0)3 5733 2036

www.sofinnova.com

Thank you !