November 20 2016 16
1
November 20 2016 16 1 Disclaimer We make forward-looking - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
November 20 2016 16 1 Disclaimer We make forward-looking statements in this presentation within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You
November 20 2016 16
1
2
We make forward-looking statements in this presentation within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You should not rely on them as predictions of future events. For these statements, we claim the protections of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in such Sections. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “contemplates,” “aims,” “continues,” “would” or “anticipates” or similar words or phrases in the positive or negative. For example, statements regarding potential growth in our portfolio, future results from operations, prospective acquisitions, projected leasing, and anticipated market conditions are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. They depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise, and we may not be able to realize them. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: changes in our industry, the real estate markets, either nationally or in Manhattan or the greater New York metropolitan area; resolution of the litigations and arbitration involving the company; reduced demand for office or retail space; general volatility of the capital and credit markets and the market price of our Class A common stock and our publicly-traded operating partnership units; changes in our business strategy; changes in technology and market competition, which affect utilization of our broadcast or other facilities; changes in domestic or international tourism, including geopolitical events and currency exchange rates; defaults on, early terminations of, or non-renewal of leases by tenants; bankruptcy or insolvency of a major tenant or a significant number of smaller tenants; fluctuations in interest rates; increased operating costs; declining real estate valuations and impairment charges; termination or expiration of our ground leases; availability, terms and deployment of capital; our failure to obtain necessary outside financing, including our unsecured revolving credit facility; our leverage; decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates; our failure to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness; our failure to redevelop and reposition properties successfully or on the anticipated timeline or at the anticipated costs; difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and completing acquisitions; risks of real estate development (including our Metro Tower development site), including the cost of construction delays and cost overruns; our failure to operate properties and operations successfully; our ability to manage our growth effectively; our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in the future; impact of changes in governmental regulations, tax law and rates and similar matters; our failure to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or REIT; a future terrorist event in the U.S.; environmental uncertainties and risks related to adverse weather conditions and natural disasters; lack, or insufficient amounts, of insurance; availability of, and our ability to attract and retain, qualified personnel; conflicts of interest affecting any of our senior management team; our understanding of our competition; changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates; our ability to comply with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to companies and, in particular, public companies. While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. You should not place undue reliance on any forward- looking statements, which are based only on information currently available to us (or to third parties making the forward-looking statements). We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions, new information, data or methods, future events or other changes after the date of this presentation, except as required by applicable law. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could impact our future results, performance or transactions, see the section entitled “Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, any subsequent reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K and other risks described in documents we subsequently file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Pure-play Manhattan and greater New York metropolitan area
Embedded, de-risked growth potential from four drivers of growth
Strong and flexible balance sheet, lowest leverage among Office REIT peers
Proven management team
3
4 EXPERIENCED AND COMMITTED
Anthony ny E. M Malk lkin in
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer 28 ye years rs with E ESRT 28 ye years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from Harvard College
Dav avid d A.
Karp rp
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer 5 ye years rs with E ESRT 34 ye 4 years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from University of California, Berkeley and M.B.A. from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania
Tho homas as P. D Dur urels
Executive Vice President & Director of Leasing and Operations 26 ye years rs with E ESRT 33 ye years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from Lehigh University
Tho homas as N. K Keltne ner, Jr Jr.
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary 38 ye years rs with E ESRT 38 ye years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from Harvard College and J.D. from Columbia Law School
John hn B
President & Chief Operating Officer 2 year ear with E ESRT 27 ye years rs in i indust stry ry Bachelor’s degree from Harvard College and M.B.A. from the Booth School at the University of Chicago
›
Senior management team with an average of approximately 32 years of experience in real estate
›
Since IPO, management team bench has been deepened with key additions
›
Extensive experience in Greater New York area real estate, through several economic and real estate cycles
›
Management is aligned with shareholders
›
Senior management team owns a significant amount of stock
›
The Malkin Family, led by Anthony E. Malkin, has not sold any shares, either at or after IPO
5 STEADY CASH NOI GROWTH; EXECUTING ON LEASING
thousand
1 Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016. Peer group includes Boston Properties, Paramount Group, and SL Green. 2 All figures are in dollars in thousands. Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016. Cash NOI is a non-GAAP measure that is reconciled to its GAAPequivalent measure in the appendix. 4Q 2013 through 2Q 2014 exclude the benefit of the acquisitions on July 15, 2014 of the option properties at 1400 Broadway and 111 West 33rd Street.
› 348,770 SF of leasing › 59.3% spreads achieved on new Manhattan office leases › Signed larger leases for longer term with better credit tenants › Reported 4.7% same- store cash NOI growth year-over-year compared to peer group average of
Q3 2016
200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 3Q 2014 4Q 2014 1Q 2015 2Q 2015 3Q 2015 4Q 2015 1Q 2016 2Q 2016 3Q 2016
Steady Cash NOI Growth2
Cash NOI on TTM basis
6 PURE-PLAY MANHATTAN AND GREATER NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA
10.1 Million Total Rentable Square Feet
Manhattan Office 74.6% GNYM Office 18.4% Retail 7.0%
9.4 Million Rentable Square Feet of Office Space
Manhattan Office 80% GNYM Office 20%
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
7 DIVERSIFIED BY INDUSTRY
Industry diversification by annualized fully escalated rent. Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
Consumer Goods 23.3% Finance, Insurance, Real Estate 17.0% Professional Services 11.8% Retail 16.8% Legal Services 3.5% Technology 7.8% Media & Advertising 3.9% Other 12.2% Non-Profit 3.7%
8
One Grand Central Place 111 West 33rd Street 1359 Broadway 1400 Broadway Office Properties Retail Properties
10.5% 2.8% 2.1% 6.5% 7.4% 5.9% 9.3% 55.5%
Available SLNC 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter
9 WELL LADDERED MANHATTAN OFFICE PORTFOLIO LEASE EXPIRATIONS
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
10 OVER 24% GROWTH POTENTIAL RELATIVE TO TTM CASH NOI OF $343M1
Lease up of vacant space $33 M $82 Million Signed leases not commenced $14 M Retail
$17 M Redevelopment Opportunity $18 M
1 Amounts reflect management’s estimates of additional revenues exclusive of free rent from the four drivers as of September 30, 2016 to be realized over time.Cash NOI is a non-GAAP measure that is reconciled to its GAAP equivalent measure in the appendix. Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
11
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
Tenant SF 9/30/2016 Escalated Annual Rent New Annual Rent Expected Commencement Incremental Annual Rent Date
Wolfgang's Restaurant 13,828 $ 0.00 M $0.60 M
$0.60 M Ingram Book Group, Inc. 9,808 0.00 M 0.54 M
0.54 M Precision for Value, Inc. 17,942 0.00 M 1.00 M
1.00 M Grant Thorton 12,377 0.00 M 0.53 M
0.53 M National Cinemedia, LLC 21,892 0.00 M 1.36 M
1.36 M JCDecaux North America, Inc. 23,385 0.00 M 1.52 M
1.52 M Sisense, Inc. 24,169 0.00 M 1.43 M May 2017 1.43 M Michael J. Fox Foundation 86,492 0.35 M 5.23 M
4.88 M Other SLNC 44,115 0.00 M 2.57 M
2.57 M Total 254,008 $0.35 M $14.78 M $14.43 M Total al Contrac acted d Annual nualized d Gr Growth $ h $14.43 M M
$ 39.15 $ 58.80 $ 37.95 $ 60.46
Prev. Escalated Rent PSF New Starting Base Rent PSF Prev. Escalated Rent PSF New Starting Base Rent PSF
381.5% 65.4% 76.4% 81.8%
1350 Broadway 111 W. 33rd 250 W. 57th OGCP
Manhattan office submarket avg. occupancy¹
Lease-up of ESRT’s vacant space Strong re-leasing spreads²
12 WITHIN MANHATTAN OFFICE PORTFOLIO
90.0% 90.0% 90.6% 89.7%
Source: Market data per Cushman & Wakefield as of September 30, 2016. Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
1 90.0%, 89.7% and 90.6% occupancies represent the overall occupancy of the Penn Station, Grand Central and West Side submarkets, respectively, as ofSeptember 30, 2016.
2 Based on Manhattan office portfolio. 3 Previous escalated rent PSF is adjusted for space remeasurement.New leas ases Q3 2 2016
Managing rent roll to execute repositioning strategy
All ll le leases Q Q3 2 2016
313 COMPARED TO PEER GROUP 50.2% 13.2% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 2016 Q3 Manhattan office leasing spreads ESRT Peer Group
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016. Reflects new and renewal leases. Peer group includes SL Green, Vornado Realty Trust and Paramount Group.
14 CURRENT 2016 MARKET RENT VS. CURRENT FULLY ESCALATED RENT 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Current fully escalated rent PSF1 $ 51 $ 48 $ 52 $ 48 $ 50 Leased square feet expiring2 155,944 489,542 560,419 446,235 702,527 Weighted average starting rent PSF3 $ 58 $ 55 $ 56 $ 57 $ 60 Embedded growth4 13.7% 14.6% 7.7% 18.8% 20.0%
1 Fully escalated rents are as of September 30, 2016, exclude SLNC and are adjusted for space re-measurement. 2 Excludes SLNC. 3 Starting rents reflect rates as of 2016 without ascribing any future growth. Weighted average starting rent is management’s estimate fornew, renewal and below market short term rentals for cash flow purposes and includes both office and storage. The above does not give consideration for downtime to vacate, redevelop and lease.
4 Reflects embedded growth as of 2016 without ascribing any future growth.PIO 0 SF 0% Undeveloped 35,000 SF 17% Off Market 16,000 SF 8% Broadcasting 6,000 SF 3% Storage 24,000 SF 11% Whitebox / Demo 36,000 SF 17% Prebuilt 92,000 SF 44% PIO 42,000 SF 5% Undeveloped 127,000 SF 16% Off Market 72,000 SF 9% Broadcasting 5,000 SF 1% Storage 41,000 SF 5% Whitebox / Demo 189,000 SF 24% Prebuilt 318,000 SF 40%
15 MANHATTAN OFFICE PORTFOLIO
Current vacancy (Manhattan Office / ESB) 794,000 SF / 209,000 SF Weighted average starting rent (Manhattan Office /ESB) $61 PSF / $66 PSF
Weighted average starting rent is management’s estimate for new leases. Excludes SLNC. Vacant developed space consists of the sum of the categories of Whitebox/Demo, Prebuilt and PIO. PIO represents “Prepared for Immediate Occupancy”.
EMPIRE STATE BUILDING
16 INVENTORY OF CURRENT VACANT SPACE AND EXPECTED SPACE TO BE VACATED BY YEAR-END 2016 Square Feet Total portfolio vacant space 1,229,000 Less signed leases not commenced (244,000) Total portfolio net vacant space 985,000 Retail vacant space 83,000 GNYMA vacant space 108,000 Manhattan office vacant space, excluding SLNC 794,000 Less current redeveloped Manhattan office space (549,000) Less space held off market for consolidation / redevelopment (72,000) Space being planned for redevelopment, storage and other 173,000 Manhattan office expected space to be vacated by year-end 2016 at fully escalated rent
159,0001
1 Includes 92,00 square feet vacated by Aeropostale that had been leased at average fully escalated rent of $45.70 PSFCompany data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
17 EMBEDDED, DE-RISKED GROWTH
Tenant space to be redeveloped
Empire State Building 340,000 SF Balance of Manhattan office portfolio 1,020,000 SF Total 1,360,000 SF 100,000 200,000 300,000 Remaining in 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Occupied Retail Vacant
70,000 SF 145,000 SF 210,000 SF 85,000 SF 170,000 SF
Probable Renovations of Undeveloped Space through 2020
(SF)
Based upon current views and assumptions, which are subject to change. Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
18 REDEVELOPMENT CASE STUDY
2014
Adjacent tenants are grouped by lease expiration dates Spaces are vacated as expired leases are not renewed Floors 55-58 leased to only 2 tenants Floors 55-58 originally had 42 tenants
19 NEARING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF COMMON AREA RENOVATIONS, $698 MILLION SPENT TO DATE
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
Before After Before After
20 AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE RETURNS ON INVESTMENTS
1 While a white-box space when vacated typically requires a full new installation upon the signing of a new lease, pre-built spaces typically require smallrefreshment costs of paint, carpet, and appliances at the end of each lease term, and are intended to last for up to 25 years of occupancy by one or more tenants over their lifetime.
2 Based on anticipated 2016-2017 activity and current fully-escalated and market rents.White Box Pre-Built
Low High Low High INVESTMENT PER SQUARE FOOT Tenant space: Base building $37 $65 $37 $65 Tenant allowance / improvement1 $65 $80 $115 $130 Leasing commission $25 $29 $16 $21 TOTAL AL I INVES NVESTMENT ENT $127 $174 $168 $216 RETURN - INCREMENTAL NOI PER SQUARE FOOT Mark-to-market future renovated space2 $19 $28 $16 $33 RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) 11% 22% 7% 20%
21
›
New construction and existing
›
Asking rents of $85-$230 PSF
›
Existing
›
Asking rents of $58-66 PSF
›
Pre-war trophies in great locations
›
Trophy Class A costs more
›
Class B offers less
DOMINANT POSITION WITH LITTLE COMPETITION
22 ATTRACTING TENANTS FROM ALL PARTS OF NYC AND BEYOND OVER PAST 12 MONTHS
From Outside Manhattan 13 Tenants Representing 52,329 SF From Midtown (East) (Grand Central, Murray Hill, Park Avenue) 15 Tenants Representing 175,070 SF From Midtown South and Downtown (Chelsea, Financial District, Madison Square, SoHo) 13 Tenants Representing 80,860 SF From Midtown (West) (Madison/Fifth, Penn Station/ Times Square South, Rockefeller Center, West Side) 19 Tenants Representing 215,307 SF From Internal Expansion/Renewals 24 Tenants Representing 78,518 SF
›
707,000 SF of total retail space
›
86.3% occupied
›
Annualized fully escalated rent of $85.5 million
›
81,000 SF of retail space available to lease in 15 high traffic locations
›
112 W. 34th Street, Broadway corridor, and Empire State Building
23
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
24 CURRENT 2016 MARKET RENT VS. CURRENT FULLY ESCALATED RENT Vacant 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Current fully escalated rent PSF1 N/A $228 $149 $66 $147 $140 Leased square feet expiring2 81,167 900 20,895 13,174 31,135 29,918 Weighted average starting rent PSF3 $143 $303 $169 $85 $268 $169 Embedded growth4 N/A 32.9% 13.4% 28.8% 82.3% 20.7%
1 Fully escalated rents are as of September 30, 2016, exclude SLNC and are adjusted for space re-measurement. 2 Excludes SLNC. 3 Starting rents reflect rates as of 2016 without ascribing any future growth. Weighted average starting rent is management’s estimate fornew, renewal and below market short term rentals for cash flow purposes and includes both office and storage. The above does not give consideration for downtime to vacate, redevelop and lease.
4 Reflects embedded growth as of 2016 without ascribing any future growth.EMPIRE STATE BUILDING CASE STUDY Utility costs represent the third largest component of tenant expenses after salaries and rent Skanska energy savings of 57% | Coty saves $1 million over lease term 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Base Building Measures Tenant Space Measures
Annual energy savings (kbtu)
Retrofit of chiller plant Largest cutting edge wireless BMS in the world Tenant day lighting system VAV air handling units Tenant energy
6,514 retrofitted windows
6,514 insulated reflective radiative barriers Demand control ventilation
25
›
Annual savings of $4.4 M
›
3.1 year payback
›
Energy Star 84
›
Quantifiable transparent results
›
Visit
www.esbsustainability.com
26
› 100% of portfolio has undergone whole building energy retrofit analysis Energy Efficiency › 79% of portfolio has a full or partial building management system in-place Building Certification › 100% of portfolio has waste recycling; green cleaning and pest control; low/no off-gassing paints and wall coverings; water conservation; and recycled paper product use Day to Day Green Practices › 100% of portfolio has annual and long-term sustainability targets Sustainability Programs Example
Visit www.esbsustainability.com and www.empirestaterealtytrust.com/about-us/sustainability for more details
27 QUALITY ASSETS AND TENANTS
95 684 287Westport White Plains Harrison Stamford Norwalk
66-99 Main St 103-107 Main St ~30 miles to Midtown Manhattan
Highway Metro-North Railroad Metro-North Train Stop
First Stamford Place Metro Center 383 Main Avenue 10 Bank Street 500 Mamaroneck Avenue Office Standalone Retail
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
›
Best assets located near major transportation hubs
›
Full amenities
›
12.0% of YTD 2016 NOI
›
18.4% of total SF
›
93.4% occupied
›
94.2% leased
Add
5.8% 0.8% 0.9% 7.5% 12.7% 13.3% 13.0% 46.0%
Available SLNC 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter
28 WELL LADDERED GREATER NY METROPOLITAN PORTFOLIO LEASE EXPIRATIONS
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
35.2 35.3 37.8 39.9 42.7 43.8 46.0 47.1 45.8 48.8 50.9 52.7 54.3 56.4 58.3 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Domestic Visitors International Visitors
$25.0 $29.6 $33.4 $40.0 $50.1 $56.3 $62.9 $72.2 $71.6 $78.9 $80.6 $91.9 $101.8 $111.5 $112.2 $84.5 $91.1
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD 2015 YTD 2016
29 CONSISTENT PERFORMANCE THROUGH ECONOMIC CYCLES AND NEW ATTRACTIONS
29
‘01 – ‘15 CAGR 11.3%
Source: NYC & Company.
Observatory annual revenue (millions)
Company Data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
Positive tourism trends to New York City (millions)
‘01 – ‘15 CAGR 3.7% 9/11 Top of the Rock Reopens 2.2 Million Visitors (estimated 2015) Financial Crisis Hits 9/11 Memorial Opens 5 Million Visitors (2013) 9/11 Museum Opens 3 Million Visitors (annualized 2015) One World Observatory Opens 2.3 Million Visitors (annualized 2015)
International vs. Domestic: 65% International, 35% Domestic Age Group: 55% 18-34 years old Male vs. Female: 57% Female, 43% Male
30
International 65% Domestic 35%
Data from ESRT customer polling.
Top 6 foreign countries:
France Italy China Germany England/ Scotland/ Wales Canada
Direct sales at full price is largest source
31 ACTIVE MANAGEMENT OF TICKET MIX TO MAXIMIZE MARGINS
Pricing Adult Senior (62+)
Child (6-12)
Main Deck Only (86th Floor) $32.00 $29.00 $26.00 Main Deck Only (86th Floor) Express $65.00 $65.00 $65.00 Main Deck + Top Deck (86th & 102nd Floors) $52.00 $49.00 $46.00 Main Deck + Top Deck Express (86th & 102nd Floors - No Waiting) $85.00 $85.00 $85.00 Sunrise Experience (86th Floor) $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 Premium Experience – Guided Tour (86th & 102nd Floors – No Waiting) $175.00 $175.00 $175.00
32 SUM OF THE PARTS VALUES BOTH RENTAL REVENUE AND RESIDUAL PROFIT STREAMS
›
If ESRT did not operate the Observatory and leased it to a third party, an operator would have to pay rent. Potential rent would be at least what ESRT pays in intercompany rent and this potential rent would be valued at an appropriate cap rate for Manhattan office and retail properties.
›
The residual NOI would be valued as an operating business similar to a gated attraction.
Intercompany Rent Capitalized at a Market Cap Rate Residual NOI Multiplied by a Gated Attraction Business Multiple Total Observatory Implied Value Observatory Results – 3Q 2016 Trailing Twelve Months In $MM Revenue 119 Less Operating Expenses 31 NOI 88 Intercompany rent expense 72 NOI after intercompany rent 16
Company Data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
950MM
MEDIA IMPRESSIONS
$1.2MM
AD VALUE
38MM
SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRESSIONS 33
A CELEBRATION HONORING 90 YEARS OF ICONIC MUSIC FROM TONY BENNETT ›
Lighting Ceremony with Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga
›
Lady Gaga and Tony Bennett “flipped the switch” at Tony Bennett’s birthday party to kick off the music-to-light show
›
ESB lighting integrated into 90th birthday concert televised worldwide
950MM
MEDIA IMPRESSIONS
$1.2MM
AD VALUE
38MM
SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRESSIONS
M E D I A C O V E R A G E
34
Data for media impressions and ad value is from Cision and data for social media impressions is from Brandwatch.
CO-BRANDING CASE STUDY 35
415MM
MEDIA IMPRESSIONS
$5.1MM
AD VALUE
489MM
SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRESSIONS
N E W Y O R K P R I M A R Y L I G H T I N G R E S U L T S
Financial Times
@FT
New York’s Empire State Building was turned blue when Hillary Clinton was name the winner
›
On-air use of ESB lighting to announce results
›
Total social media integration
BBC News US
@BBCNewsUS
New York’s Empire State Building turns red for Donald Trump’s win bbc.in/1Su2MM0 CBS New York
@CBSNewYork
Empire State Building Lit Up In Red And Blue To Honor New York Primaries
Data for media impressions and ad value is from Cision and data for social media impressions is from Brandwatch.
FINANCIAL STRATEGY Access to a variety of forms
Low leverage with laddered debt maturities
36 CAPITAL STRUCTURE STRATEGY
Significant cash
37 STEADY IMPROVEMENT THROUGH PERFORMANCE Net Debt / Enterprise Value
3.1 x 6.7x
14% 4% 36 36%
PEERS Net Debt / EBITDA
1 2013 based on fourth quarter EBITDA annualized. 2014, 2015 and 2016 EBITDA are calculated based on trailing twelve months EBITDA. Net debt is as ofDecember 31, 2013, 2014, 2015, and of September 30, 2016. Peer group includes Boston Properties, Paramount Group, SL Green and Vornado Realty Trust.
5.7X 5.4X 4.9X 3.1X
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 2013 2014 2015 2016
Net Debt to EBITDA1
Repaid $580 million in mortgage loans, adding approximately 5.9 million square feet to the unencumbered pool since IPO
38 UNENCUMBERING THE PORTFOLIO
0% 50% 100%
Portfolio SF
At IPO
41% 59% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Portfolio SF
September 2016
Repaid $580 million, including mortgage loans securing: › Empire State Building › 250 W. 57th St. › 500 Mamaroneck › 501 7th Avenue › 69-97 Main Street › 1359 Broadway › One Grand Central Place
99% <1% Encumbered Unencumbered Encumbered Unencumbered
39
$300 $103 $193 $88 $92 $381 $403 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
WEIGHTED AVERAGE MATURITY INCREASED FROM 3.1 YEARS AT IPO TO 4.9 YEARS
($ millions)
$350 $128 $336 $262 $250 $0 $0 $265 $0 $478 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 and thereafter Unsecured private placement Mortage Debt Exchangable Notes Revolving Credit Facility Term Loan
CURRENT DEBT MATURITY PROFILE (AS OF SEPTEMBER 2016) Prior DEBT MATURITY PROFILE (AT IPO OCTOBER 2013)
($ millions)
Company data and filings as of September 30, 2016.
N / A $0 N / A
40 BALANCE SHEET STRENGTH AND FLEXIBILITY ›
Net debt / enterprise value: 14%
›
Net debt / EBITDA: 3.1x
›
Interest coverage: 5.7x
›
Attractive in place mortgage debt
›
Weighted average interest rate of 4.2%
›
Weighted average debt maturity of 4.9 years
›
$594 million cash and cash equivalents
›
$0 drawn on $1.1 billion unsecured credit facility with accordion feature allowing for maximum aggregate principal balance of $1.25 billion
›
Untapped debt capacity embedded in many low-levered assets
›
Well-laddered and long-dated debt maturities
Low Leverage Liquidity
Exchangeable Senior Unsecured Notes $250 mm 3% Senior Unsecured Notes $350 mm 4% $1.1bn Credit Facility $0 mm 0% Equity $6,266 mm 80% Senior Unsecured Term Loan $265 mm 3% Private Perpetual Preferred $26 mm <1% Mortgage Debt $756 mm 10%
Capital Structure1
1 Based on stock price of $20.95 as of September 30, 2016 and 299.1 million fully diluted shares outstanding. Net debt as of September 30, 2016 of $1.03 billion.Average Trading Volume in 2016YTD: 1,039,813 shares Average Trading Volume in 2015: 844,333 shares Average Trading Volume in 2014: 590,317 shares Class A common shares now comprise 52% of the operating partnership, driven by conversion requests from OP units and Class B shares totaling 27.1 million Class A shares1 and the QIA investment in 29.6 million Class A shares 41 DAILY VOLUME, FLOAT, AND COMPARABLE PERFORMANCE
Daily Volume
1 As of September 30, 2016, the Company had conversion requests from operating partnership units and Class B common shares to Class A common sharestotally 27.1 million shares, or approximately $568 million at the closing share price of $20.95 on September 30, 2016. This represents a 33% increase in the number of Class A shares since our IPO.
2 Data as of IPO Date 10/2/2013 to 11/2/2016.Float Comparable Performance
ESRT Total Return Since IPO: 54.4%2 vs. RMS Total Return Since IPO: 32.8%2
42
43
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES