NOVEL NYLON/HALOGENATED BUTYL RUBBER BLENDS IN PROTECTION AGAINST - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

novel nylon halogenated butyl rubber blends in protection
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NOVEL NYLON/HALOGENATED BUTYL RUBBER BLENDS IN PROTECTION AGAINST - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NOVEL NYLON/HALOGENATED BUTYL RUBBER BLENDS IN PROTECTION AGAINST WARFARE AGENTS Marek Gnatow ski, Polymer Engineering Company Ltd, Burnaby, B.C., Canada J.D. ( Jack) Van Dyke, Trinity Western University, Langley, B.C., Canada Andrew Burczyk,


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

NOVEL NYLON/HALOGENATED BUTYL RUBBER BLENDS IN PROTECTION AGAINST WARFARE AGENTS

Marek Gnatow ski, Polymer Engineering Company Ltd, Burnaby, B.C., Canada J.D. ( Jack) Van Dyke, Trinity Western University, Langley, B.C., Canada Andrew Burczyk, Defence R&D Canada-Suffield, AB, Canada

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Special Gear to Protect Humans and Resources Against an Aggressive and Hostile Environment

Space Underwater Natural or man made disasters War

Polymeric Materials in Protective Gear

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Polymeric Materials are Used in Protective Gear for the Following Reasons:

  • Wide range of mechanical properties
  • Relatively resistant to hostile and aggressive environment

(if properly selected)

  • Easy moulding
  • Wide range of coefficient of friction
  • Light weight
  • Variety of colours

Polymeric Materials in Protective Gear

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Polymeric Materials in Protective Gear

Materials Properties

Material Elastom eric Behaviour Modulus of Elasticity MPa Density g/ cm 3 Coefficient

  • f Friction

Barrier Properties

Yes

(in selected materials)

Variable Excellent Excellent No No Polymers

10 – 40,000 0.8 – 2.3 0.05 - 4

Metals

300 – 400,000 2 - 20 0.15 - 5

Ceramics and Glasses

200,000 – 450,000 2.5 - 6 0.6 - 1

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Polymeric Materials in Protective Gear

Properties of selected commercial polymeric materials

4 – excellent 3 – good 2 – acceptable 1 – unacceptable

  • a. immersion in hot water
  • b. requires modification
  • c. ebonite
  • d. CW – chemical warfare agent

* long term exposure

Resistance to Mechanical Behaviour CWd Water* Oil and Fuels Engineered Plastic Elastomer Butyl, Halogenated Butyl Rubber (C,B) IIR 4 4 1 1 4 2-3 Natural Rubber (polyisoprene) NR 1 1-3 1 1(3)c 4 2-3 Chloroprene CR 1-2 2-3 4 1 4 2-3 Nitrile Rubber NBR 1-2 3 4 1 4 2-3 Santoprene (PP/EPDM) TPE 1 3 1-2 1 4 4 Polyurethane Elastomer PU 1-2 2-3 3-4 1 4 3-4 Polyamides (Nylons) PA 3-4 3 (1)a 4 4 1 3-4 Aromatic Polyesters (PBT, PET) PET, PBT 4 4 (2)a 4 4 1 3-4 Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVOH) PVA 2-4 1 4 3 1 1-3b Polystyrene PS 1 4 1 2-3 1 4 HDPE HDPE 1 4 3-4 2-3 1 4 Processing Friendly Material

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Polymeric Materials in Protective Gear

Compression moulding Injection moulding Extrusion

Easy Moulding

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Materials Selection for Blending

  • A. Nylon 12
  • Excellent barrier properties
  • Excellent mechanical properties
  • Relatively low processing

temperature (190 – 220oC)

  • Commercially available
  • B. (Halogenated)

Butyl Rubber

  • Good mechanical properties
  • Good warfare agent resistance
  • Commercially available
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Nylon Chlorobutyl Rubber Blend

Challenges in Blending

Physical incompatibility of nylon and

halogenated butyl rubbers

Incorporation of over 50% rubber into the

blend

Maintaining thermoplastic properties and

good mechanical properties of blend

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Nylon Chlorobutyl Rubber Blend

Extrusion Batch Mixing Blending Procedure

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Dynamic Vulcanization Process

regular blending dynamic vulcanization

Nylon Chlorobutyl Rubber Blend

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Nylon Chlorobutyl Rubber Blend

Potential Compatibilization of Blend

O O N H N H O N H CH2* O O N H N H O N H

+

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nylon Chlorobutyl Rubber Blend

20 40 60 80 100 120 Butyl Bromobutyl Chlorobutyl % Insolubles

Non Vulcanized Dynamically Vulcanized % Insolubles – Non-vulcanized vs. Dynamically Vulcanized

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Nylon Chlorobutyl Rubber Blend

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 P A 1 2 / B I I R P A 1 2 / B I I R D V P A 1 2 / C I I R P A 1 2 / C I I R D V P A 1 2 / I I R P A 1 2 / I I R D V Ultim ate Tensile Strength (MPa)

Comparison of Tensile Strength Non-vulcanized vs. Dynamically Vulcanized

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Nylon Chlorobutyl Rubber Blend

Comparison of Elongation Non-vulcanized and Dynamically Vulcanized

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 P A 1 2 / B I I R P A 1 2 / B I I R D V P A 1 2 / C I I R P A 1 2 / C I I R D V P A 1 2 / I I R P A 1 2 / I I R D V Elongation at Break (%)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Nylon Halogenated Rubber Blend

Swelling index and elongation at break for dynamically vulcanized blends in CHCl3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Polyamide

Swelling Index

50 100 150 200 250 300

Elongation at Break

Swelling Index Elongation at Break

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Nylon Halogenated Rubber Blend

Blend Microstructure

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Nylon-Chlorinated Butyl Rubber Blend

Effect of Moulding Conditions on Tensile Strength and Elongation at Break

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Injection Moulding Compression Extrusion Injection Moulding Compression Extrusion

Tensile Strength at Break (MPa)

50 100 150 200 250 300

Elongation at Break (% )

PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60

Tensile strength at break Elongation at break (Video)

PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60 Testing according to ASTM D 638M, specimen type M-III

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Nylon-Chlorinated Butyl Rubber Blend

Effect of Moulding Conditions on Tensile Modulus

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 I n j e c t i

  • n

M

  • u

l d i n g C

  • m

p r e s s i

  • n

E x t r u s i

  • n

I n j e c t i

  • n

M

  • u

l d i n g C

  • m

p r e s s i

  • n

E x t r u s i

  • n

Modulus (Mpa)

PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60

PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60 Testing according to ASTM D 638M, specimen type M-III

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Nylon-Chlorinated Butyl Rubber Blend

Effect of Moulding on Hardness

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Injection Moulding Compression Extrusion Injection Moulding Compression Extrusion Shore D Hardness

PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60

PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60 Testing according to ASTM D 638M, specimen type M-III

slide-21
SLIDE 21

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 As Moulded cut from Impact Bar As Moulded cut from Impact Bar Tensile Strength at Break (MPa) 50 100 150 200 250 300 Elongation at Break (%)

PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 As Moulded cut from Impact Bar As Moulded cut from Impact Bar

M

  • d

u lu s (M p a )

PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12CIIR 40/60

Injection moulded Die cut

Nylon-Chlorinated Butyl Rubber Blend

Effect of Flow in Mould on Mechanical Properties

Tensile strength at break (Mpa) Elongation at break (Video) (%) PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60 PA12/CIIR 30/70 PA12/CIIR 40/60

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Nylon-Chlorinated Butyl Rubber Blend

Effect of Flow on Blend Microstructure

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Nylon-Chlorinated Butyl Rubber Blend

Penetration* for all samples was 0 µg at testing conditions

* method of testing described in C.L. Stevens presentation “Nylon-12 Nanocomposite Thin Films as Protective Barriers”

Reemission* vs. Nylon Content in Blends

10 20 30 40 50 60 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Nylon Content (Wt%) Re-emission (µg)

Sulfur ZDEDC / ZnO

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Polymeric Materials in Protective Gear

  • Increase protection efficiency
  • Decrease the burden on personnel
  • Decrease manufacturing costs

New Development of Special Polymeric Materials Will Bring Revolutionary Changes to Protective Equipment

Post World War II 1980’s The Future

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Conclusions

1. Nylon can be blended with butyl or halogenated butyl rubber to obtain material with thermoplastic elastomer properties 2. Properties of the blends depend on nylon/ rubber ratio, mixing conditions, and vulcanizing agent used 3. Mechanical properties also depend on moulding conditions and mould geometry 4. Nylon-chlorobutyl thermoplastic elastomers showed excellent resistance to penetration and reemission of warfare agents 5. Nylon-chlorobutyl blends showed significantly better resistance to hydrocarbon and chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents than could be expected from the rubber content in the blend

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Acknowledgments

Laboratory Support

Polymer Engineering Company

  • Andrew Koutsandreas
  • Dave Lesewick
  • Christine Mah
  • Beverley Start
  • Kate Mao

Trinity Western University

  • Andrea Lengkeek
  • Leanne Edwards
  • Sebastian Temple

DRDC - Dockyard Laboratory Pacific

  • Bruce Kaye

DRDC – Suffield

  • Benoit Lacroix

Materials Suppliers

  • Exxon Mobil
  • Bayer
  • EMS Grivory