NORTH STEM HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS MAY 9, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

north stem high school educational specifications may 9
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NORTH STEM HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS MAY 9, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NORTH STEM HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS MAY 9, 2017 TODAYS AGENDA The STEM High School Educational Specification is on the Boards agenda this month The purpose of this presentation is to: Review the process used to engage


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NORTH STEM HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS MAY 9, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TODAY’S AGENDA

The STEM High School Educational Specification is on the Board’s agenda this month The purpose of this presentation is to:

  • Review the process used to engage our business,

education, and community leaders

  • Highlight some of the findings from our process
  • Provide a high-level review of the proposed program
  • Discuss Next Steps – “More than a building”
slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

I N T R O D U C T I O N

WHAT IS AN EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATION?

A written communication from the

  • wner or the educator to the design

professionals, particularly the architect, describing the current and future educational activities that the school facility should accommodate.

Purpose, Users, Activities Space Types, Quantities, Sizes & Descriptions Spatial Relationships, Illustrations, and Adjacencies Descriptions of Aesthetics, Safety & Security, Sustainability and other key design considerations Key deliverables

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

C O N S U LTA N T S

COOPERATIVE STRATEGIES, LLC

KERRIANNE WOLF Director, Ed. Specs. 614.798.8828 kwolf@coopstrategies.com DAVID STURTZ Partner 614.798.8828 dsturtz@coopstrategies.com

>25 years experience >30 service lines >2,000 School Districts >15 Billion in Bonds 48 States & D.C. Experience >300 Educational Specifications >300 Facilities Master Plans Backgrounds: Education, technology, facilitation, and management

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

O U R S T EM H I G H S C H O O L

VISION: The STEM Focused Campus (Alpharetta) is a high school dedicated to providing rigorous and relevant instruction with focused interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math that will prepare students for college and career readiness through academics, career-related courses, internships, and industry certifications. OBJECTIVE: To provide students with unique and authentic instructional experiences in STEM fields; specifically, in the areas of healthcare science, engineering/manufacturing, and information technology OBJECTIVE: To build strategic partnerships between Fulton County Schools and the business community that will provide industry experiences and internship opportunities for students OBJECTIVE: To provide students with multiple industry certification opportunities that will prepare them to be college and career ready

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

MAJORS, THE SCHOOLS OF…, COURSES

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6

ED U C AT I O N A L S P EC I F I C AT I O N S

PROCESS

Visioning

 Defining the model  Defining roles  Defining space & time

COS

 Based on Curriculum Leader interviews  “Disney World Budget”

Layouts

 Benefits/ Challenges of adjacency models

COS

 Additional input

Adjacency

 Model program and site using COS & preferred adjacency model(s)

Requirements

 Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment (FFE)

Curriculum Leaders Interviews

 Vision of curriculum delivery and spaces to support

Lab 1

Mar 16 & 17

Lab 2

Mar 29 Community Meeting

 Update on Process, Define Success, Suggested Modifications

Feb 14 Mar 28 Business Advisory Meeting

 Reviewed Vision & Objectives, Discussed Programs, Delivery, & Spaces

Mar 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

KEY FACILITY COMPONENTS

  • Professional work environment
  • Hands-on instruction, industry

and project labs

  • Collegiate feel to the facility
  • Schedule aligned to learning not a

clock

  • Synergy among career fields and

areas of expertise

  • Teachers & departments working

together

  • Multi-year projects
  • Learning on display – see

“doing…”

  • Businesses partnerships in

learning, projects, and governance

  • Instructional transparency
  • Some visual & auditory privacy
  • Facility supports personalized

learning

  • Flexibility at classroom and

facility wide level

  • Variety of facility spaces
  • Mobility (facility & furnishings &

equipment)

PROCESS OUTCOMES

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

F LE X I B L E S PA C E S

 Individual / quiet work  Small group work with visual supervision  Breakout areas  Mobile walls for flexible classrooms

PROCESS OUTCOMES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

M U LT I P LE U S E / D I F F ER EN T S PA C ES

 Central space, “Student Center”,

  • r “Touchdown” space

 Combines functions of library and cafeteria into a learning area  Extended learning spaces  Lecture halls  Fitness Center instead of gyms

PROCESS OUTCOMES

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10

P R O P O S ED P R O G R A M

Approximately

243,000

With Auditorium

Gross SF 1,500 Capacity

~152 to ~162 gsf/student

EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

Program Area Square Feet IU Core Academics & Special Education 68,498 58 Student Center 14,200 1 Music & Performing Arts 11,275 1 Visual Arts 3,600 2 Physical Education 6,000 1 Administration 8,025 1 Food Service 5,600

  • Custodial

300

  • CTE: Healthcare Science

12,400 6 CTE: Information Technology 7,900 5 CTE: Engineering and Manufacturing 19,000 4 Subtotal 156,798 79 Building Services & Circulation

  • 1.55

Grand Total 243,037 COMPILATION OF SPACE SUMMARY Approximately

228,661

Without Auditorium

Gross SF

slide-12
SLIDE 12

11

STUDENT CENTER

Student Center IU Quantity SF Total Library / Cafeteria 1 1 12,000 12,000 Micro Maker Space (AV, Laser engraver, 3D printer, etc.) 5 200 1,000 Circulation Desk 1 100 100 Office 1 100 100 Huddle Room 3 200 600 Storage 1 100 100 Telecommunications Room & Technology Safe Vault 1 300 300 Student Center Subtotal 1 14,200

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12

CORE ACDEMICS & SPECIAL EDUCATION

Core Academics & Special Education IU Quantity SF Total Classrooms 45 45 800 36,000 Science Labs 12 12 1,255 15,060 Science Prep / workroom 12 100 1,200 Lecture Hall 2 1,500 3,000 Teacher Planning/Conference Room 3 1,000 3,000 Extended Learning Areas 3 1,500 4,500 General & Secured Storage 1 3,138 3,138 ESOL Classroom 1 1 800 800 Resource Huddle Room 9 200 1,800 Core Academics & Special Education Subtotal 58 68,498

EXTENDED LEARNING LECTURE HALL TEACHER COLLABORATION OFFICE HUDDLE ROOM

slide-14
SLIDE 14

13

SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY LAB

CTE: HEALTHCARE SCIENCES

AMBULANCE BAY CONTROL ROOM NURSING PATIENT CARE LAB MANNEQUIN SIMULATION

CTE: Healthcare Science IU Quantity SF Total Biotechnology Lab 1 1 2,000 2,000 Health IT: Computer Lab / Theory Classroom 1 1 1,300 1,300 Surgical Technology / Simulation / Sterilization Lab 1 1 2,250 2,250 Nursing (Patient Care) Lab 1 1 2,000 2,000 Mannequin Simulation Lab 1 1 450 450 Control Room 1 100 100 EMS Lab 1 1 2,000 2,000 Ambulance Bay 1 500 500 Laundry 1 300 300 Equipment Storage 3 500 1,500 CTE: Healthcare Science Subtotal 6 12,400

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14

CTE: ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING

CTE: Engineering and Manufacturing IU Quantity SF Total Energy Systems Lab 1 1 4,000 4,000 Engineering & Technology Lab 1 1 4,000 4,000 Manufacturing Lab 1 1 4,000 4,000 Mechatronics Lab 1 1 4,000 4,000 Tool & Material Storage 1 1,500 1,500 Project Storage 1 1,500 1,500 CTE: Engineering and Manufacturing Subtotal 4 19,000

ENERGY SYSTEMS LAB MECHATRONICS LAB MANUFACTURING LAB ENGINEERING LAB

slide-16
SLIDE 16

15

CTE: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

CTE: Information Technology IU Quantity SF Total Networking Lab 1 1 1,500 1,500 Computer Science Lab 2 2 1,300 2,600 Storage 1 800 800 Cybersecurity Lab 1 1 1,500 1,500 Game Design Lab 1 1 1,500 1,500 CTE: Information Technology Subtotal 5 7,900

NETWORKING LAB GAME DESIGN LAB

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16

PHYSICAL EDUCATION

Physical Education IU Quantity SF Total Locker Rooms 2 1,000 2,000 Fitness Center / Weight Room 1 1 4,000 4,000 Physical Education Subtotal 1 6,000

slide-18
SLIDE 18

17

MUSIC & PERFORMING ARTS AND VISUAL ARTS

MEDIA ARTS LAB

Music & Performing Arts IU Quantity SF Total Music Instruction Room 1 1 2,000 2,000 Auditorium (Large Presentation Space) 1 5,000 5,000 Auditorium Stage & Wing Space 1 2,475 2,475 Storage 1 1,800 1,800 Music & Performing Arts Subtotal 1 11,275 Visual Arts IU Quantity SF Total Visual Arts Lab (2D & 3D) 1 1 1,600 1,600 Media Arts Lab (print, video, animation, graphic design, web design, sound design) 1 1 1,600 1,600 Visual Arts Storage 1 400 400 Visual Arts Subtotal 2 3,600

slide-19
SLIDE 19

18

S PA C ES F O R F U T U R E EX PA N S I O N

  • Gymnasium
  • Additional Music & Performing

Arts support spaces

  • Facility should be located on the

site to allow for future construction of these spaces

EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

Add Alternates Square Feet IU Future CTE Course TBD 5,000 1 Vocal music classroom 2,000 1 Music Practice Rooms 100

  • Staff Dining

800

  • School Store

350

  • Auditorium Support Space (Makeup/Dressing & Green Room)

1,000

  • Gymnasium (one court with bleachers for 600)

8,000 1 Add Alternates Subtotal 17,250 3

slide-20
SLIDE 20

19

ADJACENCIES & SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20

NON PROGRAMMATIC HIGHLIGHTS

EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS

 Aesthetics

  • Variety of materials &

textures

  • Exterior courtyards
  • Balance visual & auditory

privacy with open spaces  Community Use

  • Access to auditorium
  • City of Alpharetta EMT

interface with Healthcare Sciences

  • Training site for businesses

 Site Issues

  • Building should be sited for

expansion

  • Athletic fields already in

place

  • Level site with traffic flow

ease  Technology

  • May require professional

development

  • Budget for continuous

upgrades

  • Highly technology rich

school

slide-22
SLIDE 22

21

M O R E T H A N A B U I LD I N G

PROJECT INVOLVES MANY WORKFLOWS

STEM HS PROGRAM

CURRICULUM BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS STUDENT RECRUITMENT / RETENTION BUILDING TALENT STRATEGY MARKETING (ALL SCHOOLS)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

22

N EX T S T EP S

  • Working Committee will bring forward a

master schedule with key workflows, deliverables, and business process owners

  • Architect selection is on the agenda
  • Schematic Design is scheduled for

completion in August

slide-24
SLIDE 24

23

Q U ES T I O N S & A N S W ER S

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24

P R ES E N TAT I O N A P P E N D I X

slide-26
SLIDE 26

25

C U R R I C U LU M LEA D ER S I N T ERV I EW S

FEBRUARY 14

  • Directors:
  • Capital Planning
  • Humanities, ELA & SS
  • Junior ROTC
  • Learning & Teaching
  • Coordinators:
  • Health & Physical

Education

  • Performing Arts
  • Virtual Learning
  • Program Specialists:
  • CTAE
  • Instructional Technology / Personalized Learning
  • Media Services
  • Virtual Learning
  • World Languages
  • Advanced Studies (IB, AP, AVID, Magnets, Etc.)
  • Asst. Supt., Learning & Teaching
  • CTE Analyst/Support Specialist (EMT)
  • Executive Director of CTAE
  • Instructional technology / digital content
  • STEM Director, Mathematics
  • Visual Art, Media Arts, Dance and Theatre
  • Work-Based Learning Administrator
slide-27
SLIDE 27

26

B U S I N ES S A D V I S O RY M EET I N G

MARCH 7

Fulton County Schools

  • Yalanda Bell
  • Patrick Burke
  • Doug Carey
  • Melanie Conley
  • Ashley Garrison
  • Annette Higgins
  • David Knotts

Business Advisors: IT, Engineering & Manufacturing

  • Alpharetta Technical

Community College

  • Cisco
  • Greater North Fulton Chamber
  • f Commerce
  • Gwinnett Tech
  • Hire Dynamics

Business Advisors: Healthcare

  • Emory Healthcare
  • Georgia Hospital

Association

  • Northside Hospital
  • McKesson
  • Well Star Health System
slide-28
SLIDE 28

27

B U S I N ES S A D V I S O RY M EET I N G A G EN D A

 Welcome and Introductions

  • Fulton County Schools Administration

 Presentation: Cooperative Strategies 1. Vision & Objectives: Opportunities & Challenges 2. What to Offer: Review Clusters/Pathways/Courses 3. How to Deliver: Real-Life Project Based Learning Opportunities (PBL) 4. Where to Deliver: Spaces, furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FFE) for a “satellite

  • peration” apprenticeship setting
slide-29
SLIDE 29

28

B U S I N ES S A D V I S O RY M EET I N G

HIGHLIGHTS

 Soft skills - communication & presentation  Keep updated: program, facility, & FFE  Attract students District wide  Coordinate schedules: school day, school year, summer, etc.  Common definitions of: apprenticeship, internship, externship, experiential learning, etc.  Healthcare as business  Healthcare intersect with other CTE clusters to provide cross- curricular instruction such as healthcare administration, finance, IT, and telehealth  “Healthcare Peer Acceptance” Project: Healthcare vs. sick care, year-long & school wide  Provide space for:  Robotics competitions – exterior fields  Presentations  Simulated healthcare settings – clinical rooms  Telepresence/conference  Huddle rooms  Industry sponsorship  Video & film studio

slide-30
SLIDE 30

PLANNING LAB #1 AGENDA

DAY ONE  VISION & OBJECTIVE CONFIRMATION  DECONSTRUCTING THE INDUSTRIAL MODEL  TIME & MASTERY  THE ROLE OF THE TEACHER DAY TWO  THE THIRD TEACHER  CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES, & TOOLS  FACILITY IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONALIZED LEARNER  HABITS & HABITATS  DEFINING THE COMPILATION OF SPACE & SHARED SPACES

slide-31
SLIDE 31

30

P LA N N I N G LA B PA RT I C I PA N T S

MARCH 16 & 17 AND MARCH 29

Rob Anderson Susan Baker Tessa Barbazon Amy Barger Donna Barrett-Williams Yalanda Bell Partrick Burke Cherisse Campbell Doug Carey Travis Chapman Joseph Clements Melanie Conley Kibbey Crumbley Stephen Davis Tim Dunn Michelle Easley Mark Elsey Betsy Eppes Shannon Flounnory Rick Gaddy Ashley Garrison Lizann Gibson Tasha Guadalupe Susan Hale Scott Hanson Freda Hardage April Hardy Annette Higgins Austin Hillam Kelly Hopkins Pat Horton Karen Howell Ehab Jaleel Mark Jensen Sandra Jewell Bob Just Scott Kent David Knotts Nancy Kroph Najuana Lee Oscar Lee Dale Lineberry Andrea Little Tim Maley Brian Mould Jamie Patterson Keena Ryals-Jenkins Cristy Smith Ed Spurka Rachael Stowall Steve Sweigart Caroline Truax Indira Tyler Rebecca Tyson George Vail Heather Van Looy David Vendwalker Ron Wade Olivia Watson Kelly Webb Hoke Wilcox Brittany Wilson Michelle Wilson Michelle Young Jimmy Zoll

slide-32
SLIDE 32

31

P E R S O N A L I Z E D L E A R N I N G M O D E L S

HOW MODELS THINK ABOUT SCHOOL STRUCTURES DIFFERENTLY

Facilities Schedule Use of Instructional Time Offline/Online Content Teacher Roles & Expectations

Class Size & Student Grouping

slide-33
SLIDE 33

32

H O W M O D E L S I N C O R P O R AT E P E R S O N A L I Z E D L E A R N I N G

WHAT ARE THE FACILITY IMPLICATIONS FOR ADOPTING THESE PERSONALIZED LEARNING STRATEGIES?

Choice and Voice Just-in-time Direct Instruction Mastery-Based Assessments Choice for Demonstrating Learning Flexible Pacing Co-Planning Learning Varied Strategies

slide-34
SLIDE 34

33

DECONSTRUCTING THE INDUSTRIAL MODEL

ALTERNATIVES TO THE INDUSTRIAL MODEL

Source: Ken Robinson’s “Changing Educational Paradigms”

  • Business office setting
  • Alternative scheduling ideas,

college for example

  • Mastery demonstration
  • Teachers are “guide on the

side”

  • Hands-on instruction
  • Lab settings
  • No “cells & bells”
  • Personalized learning
  • Synergy between career fields

and areas of expertise

  • Teachers & departments

working together

slide-35
SLIDE 35

34

  • Multi-year project
  • Business representatives

consult on projects

  • Daylong access to food
  • ptions
  • Health care vs sick care
  • Student driven time
  • Mobility (facility &

furnishings & equipment)

  • Flexibility (time, teachers &

students)

MATH 50 Minutes SCIENCE 50 Minutes ENGLISH 50 Minutes LAB 50 Minutes PHYS ED 50 Minutes BALANCING - SKILL & SCALE,

  • TIME & MASTERY

KEY LEARNING VARIABLES

slide-36
SLIDE 36

35

R O LE O F T H E T EA C H ER

  • Interpersonal & soft

skills emphasized instead of “content” deliverer

  • Encourager
  • Authenticity
  • Empowering
  • High expectations
  • Inviting
  • Motivating
  • Passionate
  • Relatable

Source: Derek Muller, Veritasium, “This will revolutionize education”

slide-37
SLIDE 37

36

DEFINING AN IDEAL STEM HS

  • Breakout spaces
  • Student Center “Touchdown” space
  • Huddle spaces
  • Fitness Center
  • Lecture spaces
  • Flexibility at classroom and facility

wide level

  • Exterior instruction spaces
  • Individual space to work

T H E T H I R D T EA C H ER

slide-38
SLIDE 38

37

H A B I T S & H A B I TAT S

MODELING ADJACENCIES

  • A. Double-loaded corridor
  • B. Pods
  • C. Multi-modal instructional space
slide-39
SLIDE 39

38

BENEFITS TO BUILD UPON & CHALLENGES TO MITIGATE

  • Ability to expand for

future construction

  • Collaboration
  • Common areas
  • Community building
  • Cost efficient
  • Display student work
  • Ease of navigation
  • Flexible
  • Instructional

transparency

  • Mimics professional

work environment

  • Minimize distractions
  • Natural daylighting
  • Organized
  • Short transition times
  • Staff development
  • Student centered
  • Supports personalized

learning

  • Visual & auditory

privacy

  • Visual supervision
slide-40
SLIDE 40

COMMUNITY MEETING SUMMARY

 Over 100 community members attended  Presentation  Review Process & Timeline to date  Key Components of Project  SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TOPIC#1: In your opinion, Define what would be a Successful Fulton County STEM High School.  SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TOPIC #2: What modifications to the proposed plan might you suggest? What other academic or facility factors should be considered as the plan nears completion?  Questions & Answers – focused on curriculum offerings & delivery

slide-41
SLIDE 41

SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TOPIC #1

In your opinion, Define what would be a Successful Fulton County STEM High School.

 Choice, flexibility, options, innovation, and opportunities were among the most cited concepts for success.  Creation of vertical alignment of programs elementary through high school was also mentioned as a measure of success.  There was strong support of developing relationships with the professional community and students graduating with certifications.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TOPIC #2: PART ONE

What modifications to the proposed plan might you suggest?  A branding opportunity lies in the naming of the school.  Students should be given a choice to explore before committing to a pathway.  Include finance in the curriculum and provide STEM focused clubs.  There should be a programmatic refresh every 5 years or so based on technology and job developments.  A community governing board, including colleges, should be put in place.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

What other academic or facility factors should be considered as the plan nears completion?  Facility Factors - phasing and completion:  Have a phasing plan to expand if the enrollment rises above 1,500 students.  Partial completion to open in 2019 to synchronize with the new students in Fulton Academy of Science and Technology.  Academic Factors - preparation of students and recruitment of teachers:  Consider preparing students for these programs before high school.  There is a need to prepare students and teachers for this change in learning environment.  It is important to recruit/retain the right type of educator.

SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION TOPIC #2: PART TWO

slide-44
SLIDE 44

PLANNING LAB #2 AGENDA

 Planning Lab #1 Review & Community Meeting Highlights  Reviewed Compilation of Space & Value Engineering Exercise  Draft Program Area Illustrations & Overall Ideal Facility Adjacencies  Non-Programmatic Issues: Site Specific Refinements of District Wide Standards

  • Aesthetics
  • Community Use
  • Site Issues
  • Technology