Nitrate Detector Gaston Day School iGEM Team Our Team Seniors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nitrate detector
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nitrate Detector Gaston Day School iGEM Team Our Team Seniors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Red Fluorescent Nitrate Detector Gaston Day School iGEM Team Our Team Seniors Juniors Spencer Jones Sophomores Parth Patel Steven Allen Gordon Ellison Samuel Du Bois Our Lab Gaston Day School iGEM lab Our New


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Red Fluorescent Nitrate Detector

Gaston Day School iGEM Team

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Our Team

  • Seniors
  • Juniors

– Spencer Jones

  • Sophomores

– Parth Patel – Steven Allen – Gordon Ellison – Samuel Du Bois

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Our Lab

Gaston Day School iGEM lab

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Our New Autoclave!

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nitrates

  • NO3
  • Federal Standard = 10mg/L

– May be little safety factor

  • Problems occur when NO3 is converted to

NO2 (Nitrite)

  • Possible for Nitrites to combine with

amines to form nitrosamines

– Known carcinogen

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Metabolism of Nitrates

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nitrate Dangers

  • Human effects

– Spontaneous abortion – Cancers resulting from chronic consumption – Methemoglobinemia or “Blue Baby Syndrome”

  • 10-20% methemoglobin causes cyanosis,

respiratory, and digestive problems

  • 20-30% methemoglobin causes anoxia in tissues

due to reduced oxygen carrying capacity

  • Over 30% can cause brain damage or death
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Nitrate Dangers

  • Animal effects

– Most dangerous in ruminants (cows and sheep) – Labored breathing – Vomiting – Still births – Death

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Sources of Nitrates in North Carolina

  • Mechanized farming

– Fertilizer use and run-off – Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations

  • Feed lots

– Livestock waste

  • Leaking lagoons
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Sources of Nitrates in North Carolina

  • Human waste

– Septic tanks or defective sewage systems

  • Urban areas

– Combustion engines

  • Over 5.2 million North Carolinians drank

nitrate-polluted water between 1997-2003

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Our BioBrick

  • Biological Nitrate Detector

– Nitrate sensitive promoter linked to Red Fluorescent Protein reporter

  • Relatively easy to detect and quantitate
  • Cost-effective alternative method
slide-12
SLIDE 12

What Happens with the E.coli

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Process

  • Combine nitrate sensitive promoter with

RFP to produce E. coli that turn red in the presence of elevated nitrate levels

– RFP coding region (K081014) and PyeaR promoter (K216005) from BioBrick collection – Gingko/NEB BioBrick Assembly Kit

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Construction Process

E X P S PyeaR E X P S mRFP E X S/X P S Ampr Ampr Chlorr

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Working Construct

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Potential Marketing

  • Small farmer or less developed areas

– Testing for runoff from their farms

  • After fertilization
  • Downstream of hog lagoons
  • Easy to use
  • Easy to interpret results
  • Simple and safe use and disposal
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Simple and Safe

  • Kit is self-contained
  • Household bleach used for

decontamination

  • E. coli supplied in the kit are attenuated

and relatively safe for the public

  • Recommend 15 minute treatment with

10% bleach

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Easy To Use

  • Kit would include all necessary components

– Lyophilized bacteria, sterile broth, comparative solutions (positive, negative, and control), bleach, reagent tubes, and filter – Instructions with pictures

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Easy to Interpret

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Me? Read Directions?

  • But what if I don’t…

– Treat with bleach for 15 minutes?

  • Our tests showed complete elimination of viable

bacteria by 5 minutes

– Treat with bleach at all?

  • There is no guarantee of safely disposing it
  • Best case scenario: Municipal water supply
  • Worst case scenario: Local pond/stream
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Dumping Down the Drain

  • What we thought:

– The Municipal water supply is chlorinated and chlorine should kill bacteria

  • What Happened:

– After 60 minutes in tap water, it was plated and produced viable cultures with no large difference between the number of colonies for the 0 and 60 minute plates

slide-22
SLIDE 22

What May Result

  • Bacteria is still viable

– May conjugate with other, more harmful bacteria and give them antibiotic resistance

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Possible Explanation

  • Lack of sufficient residual chlorine

– Chlorinated tap water should have residual chlorine levels of 0.3-0.5 mg/L – Should kill bacteria within 10 - 15 minutes

  • Assuming pH near 7 and temperature over 10˚C
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Where Do We Go From Here?

  • Problem 1: Not sensitive enough

– Legal limit is approximately 0.15mM – Our detector only works at or above 10mM

  • Possible solutions:

– Use amplifiers developed by 2009 Cambridge team – Use fnrL28H-narG promoter

slide-25
SLIDE 25

narG/L28H-fnr Promoter

  • narG promoter

– Regulates nitrate reductase gene in E. coli – Expression only under anaerobic conditions – Secondary regulation by transcription factor fnr

  • L28H-fnr

– Mutant fnr provided to allow aerobic expression of narG promoter

  • Gift of Dr. Steven Lindow at UC Berkeley
  • Not in BioBrick format
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Where Do We Go From Here?

  • Problem 2: Bacterial survival in the

environment

– Bacteria survive in tap water and likely in any fresh water source – May spread antibiotic resistance to other bacteria

  • Possible solution:

– Add “cell suicide gene” to increase safety

  • University of Hong Kong 2010 system
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Sponsors

Sandra and Bill Hall Ivana Chan and Family Gaston Day School New England BioLabs Teknova USA Scientific