New non chartered membership grade Sam Teague Director of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

New non chartered membership grade

Sam Teague – Director of Governance & Institute Legal Secretary Ros Thorpe – Director of Education & Standards

1

Overview

• Background information
• Why a new grade is considered
• The Research
• The Audience
• What the grade might look like
• Next steps
• Timeline
• Your input – what we want from today

2

Background

• The Grade Review
• The Aims of the Grade Review
• The outcomes of the Grade Review

3

The Rationale

• Move towards technical qualifications in the UK and international markets

an opportunity to broaden our church

• To engage and support apprentices/ early careers professionals across the

world

• To engage and support small and medium sized companies
• A home for those completing our regulated qualifications at levels 3,4 and

5

• To provide career progression pathways to this large and important

international constituency

• Future jobs are not necessarily mainly graduate roles

4

Research

• We commissioned a consultation with

the following groups

• Students studying towards sub

degree/technical qualifications

• Employers
• Current Associates and Incorporates

5

How attractive would a new non-chartered grade be?

extremely attractive Somewhat attractive Not attractive not sure 6

The most useful products and services for the non chartered grade

7

Products/Services ranked first by sub groups

Member Type Product/Service ranked first Proportion Students of non degree /technical qualifications Online CPD 18% Careers Advice 16% CPD Events 14% Mentoring 14% Associate CPD Events 20% CM/GCR magazines 19% Post Nominals 18% Incorporated Post Nominals 21% CPD Events 20% Online CPD 17%

8

Industry research

• Qualitative research
• Involved short interviews

with a range of companies

• Statistically insignificant

sample due to Covid 19

• Will require further

consultation

9

5 companies

• All 5 companies employ non graduates
• Typical roles are site engineer, estimator, site supervisor or manager
• Four companies pay non chartered subscription fees
• Three companies thought the proposal was a valuable one
• Two were not sure

10

The Audience

• Envisaged as an early career

professional qualification for those in a technical or non managerial role

• Apprentices are a key constituency
• Will encompass an international

audience

• Seamless progression routes to

enable movement towards chartership for those progressing their qualifications/careers

11

What would the pathway look like?

• Would require a qualifying award – a sub degree qualification
• Would include an assessment of relevant competencies and

professional behaviours at a technical level

• Would include post nominals
• Strict conditions of entry to ensure that it does not overlap/compete

with chartered membership through prescribing the qualifying awards and experience

• Holds candidates to rules and regulations of professional conduct

12

Timeline

Develop proposal Test proposal through mini consultation Board of Trustees approval of concept Full member consultation Board of Trustees approval of proposal EGM/Privy Council

13

Any Questions?

14

What do we want from you?

• Would a non chartered grade for earlier careers/technical levels be

attractive in your region?

• Are there any considerations such as licensing that we need to take in

account?

• Will this proposal in your opinion help the CIOB to reach a wider audience?
• What should the non chartered grade be called?
• What sort of roles/qualifications/organisations in your region should the

working group consider in this work?

15