NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REED SITE, ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

new elementary school
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REED SITE, ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REED SITE, ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONCEPT DESIGN BLPC + PFRC JOINT MEETING BUILDING LEVEL PLANNING COMMITTEE PUBLIC FACILITIES REVIEW COMMITTEE 1. Welcome / Opening remarks 2. Updates 3. County Update


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

REED SITE, ARLINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS CONCEPT DESIGN

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BLPC + PFRC JOINT MEETING

April 4, 2018 BUILDING LEVEL PLANNING COMMITTEE PUBLIC FACILITIES REVIEW COMMITTEE

1. Welcome / Opening remarks 2. Updates 3. County Update 4. Transportation and Parking

  • a. Vehicular traffic to/from school
  • b. Traffic capacity at nearby intersections
  • c. School buses
  • d. Potential Improvements
  • e. Follow-up from Meeting #1

5. BLPC/PFRC Discussion 6. Public Comments 7. Next Steps & Adjourn

slide-3
SLIDE 3

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

3

WELCOME / OPENING REMARKS

slide-4
SLIDE 4

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

4

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

4

PROJECT PARAMETERS

  • 1. Create a new neighborhood elementary school with an attendance zone

2. Support APS Strategic Plan Goals, specifically Goal #4 – Provide Optimal Learning Environments 3. Address capacity by providing at least 725 seats 4. Open by start of school 2021 5. Spend a maximum project cost $49 million, with options for less

CORE MISSION

slide-5
SLIDE 5

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

5

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

5

BIDDING

OVERALL PROJECT TIMELINE

Mar 2018

Concept Design SB Approval

CONCEPT DESIGN SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

July 2018

Schematic Design SB Approval

Nov 2018

Design Development Submission

Jun 2019

Final Design SB Approval

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION

Sep 2021

School Opens

CONSTRUCTION Building Permit Approval Use Permit Approval NOV 2018 MAY 2019

Mar 2019

Construction Document Submission

slide-6
SLIDE 6

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

6

UPDATES

slide-7
SLIDE 7

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

8

COUNTY UPDATE

slide-8
SLIDE 8

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

9

TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING

slide-9
SLIDE 9

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

10

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

10

Overall Schedule March 22nd Information Item to School Board April 5th Action Item to School Board April through June Schematic Design OVERVIEW

TRANSPORTATION SCHEDULE

Transportation Schedule January 24th Finalized Scoping Agreement February 8th Traffic Data Collection February 21st BLPC/PFRC Transportation Meeting April 4th BLPC/PFRC Transportation Meeting Early May Draft Transportation Report Released May & June Transportation Report Comments and Revisions After Schematic Design TDM, Parking and Arrival/Dismissal Plans

slide-10
SLIDE 10

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

11

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

11

MEETING 1: 02-21-2018 APS Go! Survey data What is it telling us? Pedestrian access and walking routes How can we improve and expand the walk zone? Parking demand Estimates and thoughts on supply needs Parent drop-off and pick-up Estimates and thoughts on accommodations and

  • perations

OVERVIEW

TOPICS

MEETING 2: 04-04-2018 Vehicular traffic to/from school How much and when? Traffic capacity at nearby intersections Implications on school access School buses Initial thoughts on routing and maneuvering Potential Improvements Roadway geometry & operations Responses to comments from Meeting #1

slide-11
SLIDE 11

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

12

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

12

Goal: Recommend ways that a new 725 seat ES can have an efficient and safe transportation network, and minimize impacts to the surrounding street network and neighborhood. Transportation Planning Principles Spread out transportation demand

  • -- over modes
  • -- over time
  • -- over location (routing)

Minimize conflicts between

  • -- modes
  • -- user groups
  • -- vehicle types

Minimize impact of site traffic on adjacent street traffic OVERVIEW

BEFORE WE GET STARTED…

Definitions: Vehicular Trip – a car traveling to or from the site Teacher parking = one trip Parent dropping off student = two trips Peak Traffic – a distinct time frame where traffic levels are higher than average (e.g. AM and PM commuter peak) Site peak = peak traffic from Reed site Adjacent street peak = traffic within study area in general Volume – number of cars over a certain timeframe Capacity – maximum volume that can be accommodated in system

slide-12
SLIDE 12

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

13

NEW ES VEHICULAR TRAFFIC

slide-13
SLIDE 13

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

14

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

14

  • Nearby ESs have bell

times of 9am to 3:41pm

  • Swanson MS, the

closest school to the site has bell times of 7:50am to 2:24pm

  • Starting assumption

for the new ES at Reed is bell times of 9am to 3:41pm TRAFFIC

Bell Times

slide-14
SLIDE 14

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

15

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

15

  • Current vehicular trips into

and out of the Reed site

  • Includes all traffic to /from

the Northwest and 18th Street parking lots

Existing Trip Generation

TRAFFIC

slide-15
SLIDE 15

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

16

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

16

  • The library currently

doesn’t generate a lot of traffic to/from and site

  • This is partly due to some

patrons parking on-street

Just Library Traffic

TRAFFIC

slide-16
SLIDE 16

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

17

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

17

  • New trips estimates

based on data from similar APS schools

  • Most new trips to and

from the school will be from parents dropping-

  • ff and picking-up

students

  • This traffic is acute -

significant but short

  • Morning peaks higher

than afternoon due to after-school activities and after care programs

  • Noticeable traffic

impacts from Schools are usually from this type of traffic

With Parent Drop-off & Pick-up

TRAFFIC

slide-17
SLIDE 17

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

18

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

18

  • Staff trips are much less

significant than drop-off & pick-up trips

  • Majority of staff arrive

before and depart after parent traffic peaks

  • Visitor traffic is negligible

compared to other sources

Full Reed Site

TRAFFIC

slide-18
SLIDE 18

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

19

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

19

  • Morning peak on Wash

Blvd is pretty level between 7:30 and 9:00 AM

  • Morning ES traffic will
  • verlap regardless of bell

time

  • Impacts from ES will likely

be noticeable during this time

  • Afternoon peak on

Washington Blvd is 4:45 to 6:00 pm

  • Afternoon ES traffic will

avoid this peak

  • ES traffic could extend

peak but will likely not increase it

Patterns vs. Wash Blvd

TRAFFIC

Washington Blvd Traffic

slide-19
SLIDE 19

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

20

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

20

  • Location of access impacts

how traffic arrives and departs the site

  • Staff and parent drop-
  • ff/pick-up have very

different traffic patterns, and thus different access needs

  • Parent drop-off/pick-up

access should be located

  • n streets higher in the

hierarchy, avoiding residential streets

  • Staff parking access can

be located on a ‘quieter’ street, as it is less intense and contains regular drivers ROUTING

Routing & Access

slide-20
SLIDE 20

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

21

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

21

  • The Site has 4

frontages, McKinley/18th, Lexington, Washington, and 18th Street behind the library

  • Access on McKinley &

18th St avoids residential streets more than access behind library

  • Only staff parking should

be accessed where NW lot is today (without mitigation)

  • Access off Lexington

would be acceptable, though not as preferred as 18th/McKinley

  • Access on Washington

is less desirable ROUTING

McKinley/18th

Routes to 18th Street near NW Lot Routes to McKinley Rd/18th Street

slide-21
SLIDE 21

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

22

INTERSECTION CAPACITY

slide-22
SLIDE 22

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

23

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

23

  • Counts taken 2/1/18, during

morning, afternoon, and evening peak periods

  • Daily volumes estimated

using counts of peak periods

  • Data collected per industry

standards (a single Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday, when schools are in session)

  • Washington Blvd has by far

the highest amount of traffic in the study area

TRAFFIC CAPACITY

Overview of Traffic Volumes

1,000 veh/day 5,000 veh/day 10,000 veh/day 15,000 veh/day

slide-23
SLIDE 23

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

24

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

24

  • Highest Volume to

Capacity ratio at each study intersection

  • Quick way to see what

intersections have room to accommodate more traffic

  • Regular drivers to a site

tend to use routes that have available capacity TRAFFIC CAPACITY

AM Traffic Capacity

Highest volume to capacity ratio at intersection

0.31 x.xx 0.82 0.09 0.19 0.09 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.02

slide-24
SLIDE 24

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

25

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

25

  • Traffic models have

more detailed metrics than volume to capacity

  • ratios. Most commonly

used are delay/car due to intersection control and queuing

  • AM models show two

issues of concern (1) southbound traffic on 18th trying to turn onto westbound Washington Blvd, and (2) queuing going westbound on Washington Blvd from traffic signal at McKinley TRAFFIC CAPACITY

AM Traffic Capacity

#1 #2

slide-25
SLIDE 25

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

26

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

26

  • Observations showed that

conditions in the study area matched traffic models, except that the traffic signal at Washington Blvd & McKinley Road looks better than the traffic models

  • Traffic models have

difficulty with ‘grey’ areas (e.g. cars going around cars waiting to turn left, ambiguously marked asphalt, etc…)

  • Need to keep this in mind

when interpreting the numbers TRAFFIC CAPACITY

AM Traffic Capacity

slide-26
SLIDE 26

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

27

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

27

  • Similar results as AM

peak

  • More detailed metrics

had similar findings as AM also TRAFFIC CAPACITY

PM Traffic Capacity

Highest volume to capacity ratio at intersection

0.14 x.xx 0.73 0.07 0.15 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.04 0.01

slide-27
SLIDE 27

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

28

BUS LOADING/UNLOADING

slide-28
SLIDE 28

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

29

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

29

  • Loading/unloading –

how much room to buses need, and where’s the best place to put them on site?

  • Routing – what’s the

best way to approach the site?

  • Maneuvering– what

adjacent streets are best suited to handle bus traffic? BUSES

BUSES

slide-29
SLIDE 29

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

30

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

30

BUSES

School Buses

A bus turn-around takes up substantial room May be viable as part of a parking lot, but given space constrains on site, a curbside solution may be best

slide-30
SLIDE 30

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

31

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

31

BUSES

School Buses

Seven (7) school buses can fit on western blockface of Lexington Street Addition of “No Parking” signs during certain hours would be needed Adequate street width to accommodate school buses exists Could require wider sidewalks to facilitate loading/unloading Long walk to the school site

slide-31
SLIDE 31

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

32

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

32

BUSES

School Buses

Seven (7) school buses can fit on northern blockface of 18th Street Addition of “No Parking” signs during certain hours would be needed Adequate street width to accommodate school buses exists Could require wider sidewalks to facilitate loading/unloading Possible issue with of the crosswalk at 18th Street and Longfellow

slide-32
SLIDE 32

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

33

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

33

BUSES

School Buses

Seven (7) school buses can fit on northern blockface of McKinley Road Currently accommodates buses at curbside Adequate street width to accommodate school buses exists Has wide sidewalks to facilitate loading/unloading Issue with curve in roadway

slide-33
SLIDE 33

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

34

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

34

  • 18th Street north of the site is too

narrow for buses

  • Remaining adjacent streets have

similar cross-sections, with adequate room to accommodate buses at the curb STREET CROSS SECTIONS

Adjacent Streets

0' 10' 20' 30' 40' 50' 60'

Cross Section A

(18th Street N)

Sid idewalk lk + + land ndscap aping ng

9'

WB/EB EB

7'

Cross Section B

(McKinley Road)

WB

8' 10'

EB EB

70'

22'

Sid idewalk lk + + land ndscap aping ng

10'

Sid idewalk lk + + land ndscap aping ng

8' 8'

Par arking ng Par arking ng Par arking ng Par arking ng

Cross Section C

(18th Street N)

WB

8' 10'

EB EB

14'

Sid idewalk lk + + land ndscap aping ng

10' 7'

Par arking ng Par arking ng

Cross Section D

(N Lexington Street)

8'

Sid idewalk lk + + land ndscap aping ng WB

8' 10'

EB EB

10'

Sid idewalk lk + + land ndscap aping ng

8' 8'

Par arking ng Par arking ng N S N S N S W E

0' 10' 20' 30' 40' 50' 60' 70'

A B C D

slide-34
SLIDE 34

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

35

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

35

STREET CROSS SECTIONS

Issues with Curve on McKinley Road

Lane restriping on McKinley likely needed in any scenario Detailed recommendation to mitigate this will be included in traffic study Tight spacing for two cars passing each other Buses cannot make it through without encroaching

slide-35
SLIDE 35

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

36

SUMMARY

slide-36
SLIDE 36

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

37

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

37

SUMMARY

Summary of Findings

Current location of NW parking lot – only good for staff parking (without mitigation) 18th Street lot – good location for additional parking, parent drop-

  • ff/pick-up, and buses

Probably best to accommodate buses at the curb Traffic will likely approach from Patrick Henry side, avoiding Washington Blvd Significant capacity exists

  • n nearby roadways to

accommodate school traffic

slide-37
SLIDE 37

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

38

UPDATES FROM MEETING #1

slide-38
SLIDE 38

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

39

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

39 161 Survey responses and several detailed emails (THANKS!). Meeting on March 19th to review comments. Concerns: Crossing with 18th Street and:

  • Washington Blvd
  • Lexington St
  • Patrick Henry Drive

Missing sidewalks

  • Community noted missing

sidewalks in PUs 15010, 15020, 16090 (on western area of potential Walk Zone)

  • 18th Street west of Reed site

UPDATES FROM MEETING #1

Public Comments

slide-39
SLIDE 39

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

40

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

40

UPDATES FROM MEETING #1

Updated Pedestrian Walk Zones

Original Preliminary Walk Zones Revised Preliminary Walk Zones

Preliminary Walk Zone Expandable Walk Zone Collaborative Walk Zone (PUs with general agreement) Walk Zones for Further Evaluation (for splitting PU)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

41

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

41

Additional parking counts are planned Waiting for after Spring Break and good weather Plan to cover ‘Story-time’ at the Library Will revise/update parking demand estimates with the new data UPDATES FROM MEETING #1

PARKING COUNTS

slide-41
SLIDE 41

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

42

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

42

UPDATES FROM MEETING #1

Parking Strategy

Updated thoughts on

  • verall parking strategy:

(1) Accommodate buses further away from retail/library to free up on- street parking 1

slide-42
SLIDE 42

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

43

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

43

UPDATES FROM MEETING #1

Parking Strategy

Updated thoughts on

  • verall parking strategy:

(1) Accommodate buses further away from retail/library to free up on- street parking (2) Use time limits on on- street parking close to library/retail 1 2

Currently unrestricted parking

slide-43
SLIDE 43

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

44

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

44

UPDATES FROM MEETING #1

Parking Strategy

Updated thoughts on

  • verall parking strategy:

(1) Accommodate buses further away from retail/library to free up on- street parking (2) Use time limits on on- street parking close to library/retail (3) Take advantage of on- street parking available nearby for overflow staff parking (4) Sign on-site parking supply so it can accommodate ES visitors and library patrons 1 2 3

85% of the homes on these blocks have driveways

slide-44
SLIDE 44

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

45

RECOMMENDED PLAN

slide-45
SLIDE 45

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

46

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

46

COMBINED TRANSPORTATION & PARKING STRATEGY

Combined Strategy

First take at compiling all

  • f the individual thoughts

per topic onto the recommended plan All numbers and ideas presented tonight are first

  • passes. We will need to go

back and forth with the design team a few more times before finalizing designs (including final numbers).

slide-46
SLIDE 46

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

47

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

47

COMBINED TRANSPORTATION & PARKING STRATEGY

Parent Queuing

Make room for queuing in the expanded 18th Street lot. Convert the lot to a one- way loop and remove one

  • f the driveways, to

provide more curbside spaces and fewer pedestrian conflict points. Queuing for 30 cars in a flexible configuration Remove driveway (provides more curbside space) Visitor parking in queueing area off-peak

slide-47
SLIDE 47

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

48

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

48

COMBINED TRANSPORTATION & PARKING STRATEGY

Buses

Place bus queuing on 18th, but further away from Washington Blvd Explore altering curb to provide more maneuvering room for buses. Widen sidewalks to accommodate bus passenger queuing/movement

slide-48
SLIDE 48

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

49

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

49

COMBINED TRANSPORTATION & PARKING STRATEGY

Library Parking

Dedicate some parking in expanded NW lot to library staff/volunteers Dedicate some library visitor/patron parking in the expanded 18th St lot Some library visitor/patron parking expected to take place on-street in front of the library 15 spaces marked for library staff/volunteer only 18 spaces for library visitor parking Total library parking demand of 43 cars 33 parking in lots 10 parked on-street Do not pursue access on Washington

  • Blvd. Traffic benefit is minimal –

would rather have the parking spaces and fewer pedestrian/vehicle conflicts

slide-49
SLIDE 49

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

50

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

50

COMBINED TRANSPORTATION & PARKING STRATEGY

New ES Parking

Park ES staff in expanded NW lot and expanded 18th Street lot Some use of on-street parking, occurring further away from Washington Blvd Visitor parking in expanded 18th St lot, including time restricted visitor spaces in the queuing area (minimum of 10 spaces) New ES school On-Site: 100 On-Street: 19 Total: 119 Library On-Site: 33 On-Street: 10 Total: 43 Total On-Site: 133 On-Street: 29 Total 162

slide-50
SLIDE 50

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

51

BLPC / PFRC DISCUSSION

slide-51
SLIDE 51

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

52

PUBLIC COMMENTS

slide-52
SLIDE 52

04.04.2018 BLPC + PFRC

53

NEXT STEPS & ADJORN

slide-53
SLIDE 53

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

54

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

54

NEXT STEPS

NEXT STEPS

  • Transportation:
  • Work with design team to refine parking/access components of site plan
  • Conduct second parking occupancy count
  • Run traffic models with Recommended Plan (including parking locations and access per
  • ur discussion tonight)
  • Develop recommendations for external improvements based on traffic model results
  • Develop recommendations for pedestrian improvements based on latest walk zone

analysis

  • Draft report (expected approximately one month from now)
slide-54
SLIDE 54

12.13.2017 BLPC + PFRC

55

04.04.2018 PRFC + BLPC

55

ADJORN

ADJOURN

  • Provide feedback to APS via project email: engage@apsva.us
  • For further information, please contact:

APS Project Manager Ajibola (Aji) Robinson PMP 703-228-7738 ajibola.robinson@apsva.us County Project Manager Nicole Boling 703-228-3945 nboling@arlingtonva.us

  • BLPC, PFRC, and Community Meeting dates are scheduled and posted on the

APS project website: https://www.apsva.us/design-and-construction/new- elementary-school-at-reed-building/

  • Provide feedback and comments to Arlington County:

https://commissions.arlingtonva.us/planning-commission/public-facilities-review- committee-pfrc/school-projects/walter-reed/