Neutrino-driven explosions of ultra-stripped type Ic supernovae - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

neutrino driven explosions of ultra stripped type ic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Neutrino-driven explosions of ultra-stripped type Ic supernovae - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Neutrino-driven explosions of ultra-stripped type Ic supernovae generating binary neutron stars Yudai Suwa 1, 2 1 Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto U. 2 Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Garching Collaboration with: T. Yoshida,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Neutrino-driven explosions of ultra-stripped type Ic supernovae generating binary neutron stars

Yudai Suwa1, 2

1Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto U. 2Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Garching

Collaboration with: T. Yoshida, M. Shibata (YITP), H. Umeda, K. Takahashi (U. Tokyo)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Binary neutron stars

  • ne of the best candidates of strong gravitational wave (GW) sources

will be detected by GW in a couple of years (?) estimated merger rates ~1-4000 /gal/Myr, large uncertainty! let me remind you that NSs are born to supernovae (SNe) supernova surveys might be able to give constraint on NS merger rates

2 credit: NASA Abadie+ 2010

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Binary evolutions

There are two SNe

fjrst one may be usual (type- Ibc or type II) second one explodes after close binary interactions, e.g. common envelope phase (if they are close enough)

How does a second SN look like? Is there any difgerence from normal SNe?

3 Tauris & van den Heuvel 2006

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Ultra-stripped supernovae?

Tauris, Langer, Podsiadlowski (2015) “We therefore suggest to define ultra-stripped SNe as exploding stars whose progenitors are stripped more than what is possible with a non-degenerate companion. In other words, ultra- stripped SNe are exploding stars which contain envelope masses 0.2 M⊙ and having a compact star companion.”

4

< ~

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Small ejecta mass

5 Tauris+ 2013 Mej 0.2M⊙ 0.1M⊙

SN 2005ek

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Rapidly evolving supernovae

early samples (05ek, 10X, 05E)+10 more discoveries by Pan-STARRS t1/2<12 day difgusion time; τc∝Mej3/4 EK-1/4 (Arnett 1982) small Mej

6 Drout+ 2014 Drout+ 2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

What we have done

7

arXiv:1506.08827

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Stellar evolution code for massive stars Nucleosynthesis and energy generation

network with ~300 species

Initial condition

bare CO cores (mimicking mass loss) composition: central abundance of massive stars just after He burning

XC(C) = 0.33 - 0.36 MCO=1.45, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 M⊙

Stellar evolutionary simulations-1: setups

8

P Mr = GMr 4r4 1 4r4 2r t2 , r Mr = 1 4r2, ln T ln P = min(ad, rad), Lr Mr = nucl ν + grav.

(Umeda, Yoshida, Takahashi 2012; Takahashi, Yoshida, Umeda 2013; Yoshida, Okita, Umeda 2014)

MS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Stellar evolution code for massive stars Nucleosynthesis and energy generation

network with ~300 species

Initial condition

bare CO cores (mimicking mass loss) composition: central abundance of massive stars just after He burning

XC(C) = 0.33 - 0.36 MCO=1.45, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 M⊙

Stellar evolutionary simulations-1: setups

8

P Mr = GMr 4r4 1 4r4 2r t2 , r Mr = 1 4r2, ln T ln P = min(ad, rad), Lr Mr = nucl ν + grav.

(Umeda, Yoshida, Takahashi 2012; Takahashi, Yoshida, Umeda 2013; Yoshida, Okita, Umeda 2014)

MS Fe Si O,Ne,Mg C+O He H

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Stellar evolution code for massive stars Nucleosynthesis and energy generation

network with ~300 species

Initial condition

bare CO cores (mimicking mass loss) composition: central abundance of massive stars just after He burning

XC(C) = 0.33 - 0.36 MCO=1.45, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 M⊙

Stellar evolutionary simulations-1: setups

8

P Mr = GMr 4r4 1 4r4 2r t2 , r Mr = 1 4r2, ln T ln P = min(ad, rad), Lr Mr = nucl ν + grav.

(Umeda, Yoshida, Takahashi 2012; Takahashi, Yoshida, Umeda 2013; Yoshida, Okita, Umeda 2014)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Stellar evolution code for massive stars Nucleosynthesis and energy generation

network with ~300 species

Initial condition

bare CO cores (mimicking mass loss) composition: central abundance of massive stars just after He burning

XC(C) = 0.33 - 0.36 MCO=1.45, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 M⊙

Stellar evolutionary simulations-1: setups

8

P Mr = GMr 4r4 1 4r4 2r t2 , r Mr = 1 4r2, ln T ln P = min(ad, rad), Lr Mr = nucl ν + grav.

(Umeda, Yoshida, Takahashi 2012; Takahashi, Yoshida, Umeda 2013; Yoshida, Okita, Umeda 2014)

C+O

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Stellar evolution code for massive stars Nucleosynthesis and energy generation

network with ~300 species

Initial condition

bare CO cores (mimicking mass loss) composition: central abundance of massive stars just after He burning

XC(C) = 0.33 - 0.36 MCO=1.45, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 M⊙

Stellar evolutionary simulations-1: setups

8

P Mr = GMr 4r4 1 4r4 2r t2 , r Mr = 1 4r2, ln T ln P = min(ad, rad), Lr Mr = nucl ν + grav.

(Umeda, Yoshida, Takahashi 2012; Takahashi, Yoshida, Umeda 2013; Yoshida, Okita, Umeda 2014)

C+O Fe Si O,Ne,Mg C+O

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Stellar evolutionary simulations-2: results

9

Ofg center Si-burning Ofg center Ne-burning Ofg center O-burning Si shell-burning C-burning

Time before core collapse (year)

MCO=1.45 M⊙

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

2D (axial symmetry) (ZEUS-2D; Stone & Norman 92) MPI+OpenMP hybrid parallelized Hydrodynamics+spectral neutrino transfer

(neutrino-radiation hydrodynamics)

Isotropic difgusion source approximation (IDSA) for neutrino transfer

(Liebendörfer+ 09)

Ray-by-ray plus approximation for multi-D transfer (Buras+ 06)

EOS: Lattimer-Swesty (K=180,220,375MeV) / H. Shen

Explosion simulations-1: setups

10

See Suwa et al., PASJ, 62, L49 (2010) Suwa et al., ApJ, 738, 165 (2011) Suwa et al., ApJ, 764, 99 (2013) Suwa, PASJ, 66, L1 (2014) Suwa et al., arXiv:1406.6414 Suwa et al., arXiv:1506.08827 for more details

hydrodynamics ν transfer

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Explosion simulations-2: movie

11 entropy [kB/baryon]

|v|/c

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Explosion simulations-3: results

12

ALL models explode Final NS mass ~1.3-1.6M⊙ (baryonic) ~1.2-1.4M⊙ (gravitational) Ejecta mass=MCO-MNS ~ O(0.1)M⊙ Explosion energy ~O(1050) erg Ni mass ~O(10-2)M⊙

Tauris+ 2013

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Implications

small kick velocity due to small ejecta mass small eccentricity (e~0.1), compatible with binary pulsars J0737-3039 (e=0.088 now and ~0.11 at birth of second NS) even rate (~1% of core-collapse SN)

SN surveys (e.g., HSC, PTF, Pan-STARRS, and LSST) will give constraint on NS merger rate

radiation transfer simulations will be done based on our model

13

Piran & Shaviv 05 Tauris+13, 15, Drout+ 13, 14

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Yudai Suwa, MG14 @ Univ. of Rome /14 14/7/2015

Summary

Ultra-stripped SN might be second explosion in close binary forming binary NSs To test this conjecture, we performed

stellar evolutionary simulations of bare C/O cores hydrodynamic simulations for neutrino-driven explosions

Compatible with parameters explaining observations

Eexp=O(1050) erg Mej~O(0.1) M⊙ MNi~O(10-2)M⊙ MNS~1.2-1.4M⊙ (gravitational)

14

Drout+ 13, Tauris+13

See Suwa, Yoshida, Shibata, Umeda, Takahashi arXiv:1506.08827 for more details