Neut rinos f rom St ored Muons STORM physics with a storage ring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

neut rinos f rom st ored muons storm
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Neut rinos f rom St ored Muons STORM physics with a storage ring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Neut rinos f rom St ored Muons STORM physics with a storage ring The Collaborat ion P. Kyberd, 1 D.R. Smit h, 1 L. Coney, 2 S. Pascoli, 3 C. Ankenbrandt , 4 S.J . Brice, 4 A.D. Bross, 4 H. Cease, 4 J . Kopp, 4 N. Mokhov, 4 J . Morf


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Neut rinos f rom St ored Muons νSTORM

ν physics with a μ storage ring

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The “Collaborat ion”

  • P. Kyberd,1 D.R. Smit h,1 L. Coney,2 S. Pascoli,3 C. Ankenbrandt ,4 S.J .

Brice,4 A.D. Bross,4 H. Cease,4 J . Kopp,4 N. Mokhov,4 J . Morf in,4 D. Neuf er,4 M. Popovic,4 P. Rubinov,4 S. St riganov,4 A. Blondel,5 A. Bravar,5 E. Noah,5 R. Bayes,6 F.J .P. Soler,6 A. Dobbs,7 K. Long,7 J . Past ernak,7 E. Sant os,7 M.O. Wascko,7 S.K. Agarwalla,8 S.A. Bogacz,9

  • Y. Mori,10 J .B. Lagrange,10 A. de Gouvêa,11 Y. Kuno,12 A. Sat o,12
  • V. Blackmore,13 J . Cobb,13 C. D. Tunnell,13 J .M. Link,14 P. Huber,14 and
  • W. Wint er 15

1Brunel Universit y, 2Universit y of Calif ornia, Riverside, 3I nst it ut e f or Part icle Physics Phenomenology, Durham Universit y 4Fermi Nat ional Accelerat or Laborat ory, 5Universit y of Geneva 6Universit y of Glasgow, 7I mperial College London, 8I nst it ut o de Fisica Corpuscular, CSI C and

Universidad de Valencia, 9Thomas J ef f erson Nat ional Accelerat or Facilit y, 10Kyot o Universit y,

11Nort hwest ern Universit y, 12Osaka Universit y, 13Oxf ord Universit y, Subdepart ment of Part icle

Physics, 14Cent er f or Neut rino Physics, Virginia Polyt echnic I nst it ut e and St at e Universit y

15I nst it ut f ür t heoret ische Physik und Ast rophysik, Universit ät Würzburg

2

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Mot ivat ion

  • The idea of using a muon st orage ring t o produce

neut rino beams f or experiment s is not new

  • 50 GeV beam – Koshkarev @ CERN in 1974
  • 1 GeV – Neuf f er in 1980
  • The f acilit y/ program I will describe here can:
  • Address t he large ∆m2 oscillat ion regime and make a maj or

cont ribut ion t o t he st udy of st erile neut rinos

  • Eit her allow f or precision st udy, if t hey exist in t his regime
  • Or great ly expand t he dis-allowed region
  • Make precision νe and νe-bar cross-sect ion measurement s
  • Provide a t echnology t est demonst rat ion ( µ decay ring) and µ

beam diagnost ics t est bed

  • Provide a precisely underst ood ν beam f or det ect or st udies

3

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Short -baseline ν oscillat ion st udies

  • St erile neut rinos arise

nat urally in many ext ensions of t he St andard Model.

  • GUT models
  • Seesaw mechanism f or n

mass

  • Cosmological models of

evolut ion of early universe

  • “Dark” sect or
  • Experiment al hint s
  • LSND
  • MiniBooNE
  • React or “anomaly”

4

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

Global const raint s on st erile ν in a 3+1 model

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

10-100kW

I DS-NF Single baseline, Lower E

This is t he simplest implement at ion

  • f t he NF

And DOES NOT Require t he Development of ANY New Technology 150 m

Neut rinos f rom STORed Muons

slide-6
SLIDE 6

µ-based ν beams

  • Flavor cont ent f ully known
  • “Near Absolut e” Flux Det erminat ion is possible in a st orage ring
  • Beam current , polarizat ion, beam divergence monit or, µp

spect romet er

  • Overall, t here is t remendous cont rol of syst emat ic uncert aint ies

wit h a well designed syst em

6

e e

e e ν ν µ ν ν µ

µ µ − − + +

→ →

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Oscillat ion channels

7

8 out of 12 channels pot ent ially accessible

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Facilit y

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Baseline(s)

  • 100 kW Target St at ion
  • Assume 60 GeV prot on
  • Fermilab PI P era
  • Ta t arget
  • Opt imizat ion on-going
  • Horn collect ion af t er t arget
  • Li lens has also been explored
  • Collect ion/ t ranspor t channel
  • Two opt ions
  • St ochast ic inj ect ion of π
  • Kicker wit h π → µ decay channel
  • At present NOT considering

simult aneous collect ion of bot h signs

  • Decay ring
  • Large apert ure FODO
  • Racet rack FFAG
  • I nst rument at ion
  • BCTs, mag-Spec in arc, polarimet er

9

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

150 m

slide-10
SLIDE 10

π product ion

10

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

I n moment um range 4.5 < 5.0 < 5.5 Obt ain ≈ 0.11 π±/ pot wit h 60 GeV p

Target / capt ure opt imizat ion ongoing

slide-11
SLIDE 11

I nj ect ion Concept

  • π’s are in injection orbit
  • separat ed by chicane
  • μ’s are in ring circulat ing orbit
  • lower energy - ~3.8 GeV/ c
  • ~30cm separat ion bet ween

11

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

  • Concept works f or FODO lat t ice
  • Work in progress f or RFFAG
slide-12
SLIDE 12

FODO Decay ring

12

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

3.8 GeV/ c ± 10% moment um accept ance, circumf erence = 350 m

slide-13
SLIDE 13

FFAG Racet rack

13

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

δp/ p ≈ 15%

3.8 GeV/ c Low dispersion in st raight

slide-14
SLIDE 14

RFFAG Tracking St udies

14

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FFAG Tracking

15

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

> 90% dynamic apert ure

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FODO vs. RFFAG

16

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The Physics Reach

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Assumpt ions

  • Nµ = (POT) X (π/ POT) X εcollect ion X εinj X (µ/π) X Adynamic X Ω
  • 1021 POT in 5 years of running @ 60 GeV in Fermilab PI P era
  • 0.1 π/ POT (FODO)
  • εcollect ion = 0.8
  • εinj = 0.8
  • µ/π = 0.08 (γct X µ capt ure in π → µ decay) [π decay in

st raight ]

Might do bet t er wit h a π → µ decay channel

  • Adynamic = 0.75 (FODO)
  • Ω = St raight / circumf erence rat io (0.43) (FODO)
  • This yields ≈ 1.7 X 1018 usef ul µ decays

18

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Eν spect ra (µ+ st ored)

19

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

νe νµ-bar

Event rat es/ 100T at ND hall 50m f rom st raight wit h µ+ st ored

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Experiment al Layout

20

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

Must rej ect t he “wrong” sign µ wit h great ef f iciency

Appearance Channel:

νe → νµ

Golden Channel

Why νµ → νe Appearance Ch. not possible

150

~ 1500 m

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Baseline Det ect or

Super B I ron Neut rino Det ect or: SuperBI ND

  • Magnet ized I ron
  • 1.3 kT
  • Following MI NOS ND

ME design

  • 1-2 cm Fe plat e
  • 5 m diamet er
  • Ut ilize superconduct ing

t ransmission line f or excit at ion

  • Developed 10 years

ago f or VLHC

  • Ext ruded scint illat or

+SiPM

21

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

20 cm hole For 3 t urns

  • f STL
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Event Candidat es in SuperBI ND

22

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

Hit s R vs. Z

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Simulat ion – νµ appearance

  • Full GEANT4 Simulat ion
  • Ext rapolat ion f rom I SS and I DS-NF

st udies f or t he MI ND det ect or

  • Uses GENI E t o generat e t he neut rino

int eract ions.

  • I nvolves a f lexible geomet ry t hat allows

t he dimensions of t he det ect or t o be alt ered easily (f or opt imizat ion purposes, f or example).

  • Does not yet have t he det ailed B f ield,

but paramet erized f it is very good

  • Event select ion/ cut s
  • Cut s-based analysis
  • Mult ivariat e t o come lat er

23

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Event reconst ruct ion ef f iciency

25

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

Lef t : 1 cm plat es, Right : 2 cm plat es

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Backgrounds

26

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

Lef t : 1 cm plat es Right : 2 cm plat es

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Raw Event Rat es

27

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

3+1 Assumpt ion Appearance channels

slide-28
SLIDE 28

νe → νµ appearance CPT invariant channel t o MiniBooNE

28

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

2 cm plat e

slide-29
SLIDE 29

νe → νµ appearance CPT invariant channel t o MiniBooNE

29

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

3+1 Assumpt ion

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Required µ charge mis-I D rat e needed f or given sensit ivit y

30

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Disappearance Experiment s

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Raw Event Rat es

32

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

3+1 Assumpt ion Appearance channels Tremendous St at ist ical Signif icance

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Disappearance channels But : Need self -consist ent t wo-det ect or simulat ion including (bin-t o-bin) uncorrelat ed shape error ~ 10% A challenge: t here may be oscillat ions already in near det ect ors

Geomet ry import ant f or ∆m2 ~ 101 – 103 eV2

Suit abilit y (& opt imizat ion) of SuperBI ND f or νe channels st ill needs t o be st udied

33

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Cross-Sect ion Measurement s

slide-35
SLIDE 35

ν Cross-sect ion measurement s

Cross-sect ion measurement s

  • µ st orage ring present s only way t o measure νµ & νe &

( ) x-sect ions in same experiment

Support s f ut ure long-baseline experiment s

Eν mat ched well t o needs of t hese experiment s

35

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

and ν ν

νe

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Proj ect Considerat ions

slide-37
SLIDE 37

I mpact St at ement s

PPD

I t is underst ood t hat LBNE may not proceed

wit h near det ect or hall in Phase I . However, we believe t hat regardless of t he f inal decision regarding t he ND in LBNE Phase I , st udies/ simulat ion will occur and t hey will be synergist ic wit h t he needs of νSTORM

AD

We agree t hat AP0 is not appropriat e and

t his opt ion is dropped. I will address t he sit ing plan next .

37

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Sit ing

  • The f avored concept

is t o f ollow t he plan t hat was developed f or t he NuMI Proj ect (no not t hat one) – SBL MI -40, short BL ντ (1994).

  • Ut ilize MI abort line

38

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Sit ing Concept

39

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-40
SLIDE 40

A Perf ect νSTORM?

  • LAr1 in D0 pit
  • SuperBI ND f it s in

t he D0 high bay

  • νµ beam (f r. π decay,

Turn 1)

  • µ decay ν beam
  • Wit h 40k evt s/ t on

add small LAr det ect or at near hall in addit ion t o t he 1-200T of SuperBI ND

40

Alan Br oss MI CE CM 33 J une 25, 2012

  • νµ appearance in SuperBI ND
  • νµ and νe disappearance in bot h SuperBI ND & LAr
  • νe appearance in LAr f rom νµ f rom π decay
  • Upgrade – magnet ize t he LAr
  • νµ appearance LAr
  • νe appearance (f rom νµ → νe) in LAr ?
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Preliminary Cost Est imat e

Maj or Component s

Beamline, Target St at ion & Horn Transport line Decay ring Det ect ors (Far & Near) Proj ect Of f ice Tot al

  • Basis of Est imat ion (BOE)
  • Took exist ing f acilit ies (MiniBooNE beam line and t arget

st at ion, MI NOS det ect or, vet t ed magnet cost ing models, µ2e civil const ruct ion cost s, EuroNu det ect or cost ing, have added all cost loading f act ors and have escalat ed t o 2012 $ when necessary.

41

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

$30M 9 54 18 15 $126M

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Moving Forward

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Moving f orward:

  • Facilit y
  • Target ing, capt ure/ t ransport & I nj ect ion
  • Need t o complet e det ailed design and simulat ion
  • Decay Ring opt imizat ion
  • Cont inued st udy of bot h RFFAG & FODO decay rings
  • Decay Ring I nst rument at ion
  • Def ine and simulat e perf ormance of BCT, polarimet er, Magnet ic-

spect romet er, et c.

  • Produce f ull G4Beamline simulat ion of all of t he above t o

def ine ν f lux

  • And verif y t he precision t o which it can be det ermined.

43

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Moving f orward:

  • Det ect or simulat ion
  • For oscillat ion st udies, cont inue MC st udy of backgrounds &

syst emat ics

  • St art st udy of disappearance channels
  • I n part icular t he event classif icat ion in t he reconst ruct ion needs
  • pt imizat ion.
  • Current ly assumes "longest t rack" is int eract ion muon.
  • Plan t o assign hit s t o and f it mult iple t racks.
  • Vert ex def init ion must also be improved.
  • Mult ivariat e analysis.
  • For cross-sect ion measurement s need det ect or baseline design
  • Learn much f rom det ect or work f or LBNE & I DS-NF
  • I ncreased emphasis on νe int eract ions, however

Produce Full Proposal

44

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Est imat e ef f ort t o produce f ull proposal

45

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-46
SLIDE 46

νSTORM: Conclusions

The Physics case:

  • I nit ial simulat ion work indicat es t hat a L/ E ≈ 1 oscillat ion experiment

using a muon st orage ring can conf irm/ exclude at 10σ (CPT invariant channel) t he LSND/ MiniBooNE result

  • νµ and (νe ) disappearance experiment s delivering at t he <

1% level look t o be doable

  • Syst emat ics need caref ul analysis
  • Det ailed simulat ion work on t hese channels has not yet st art ed
  • Det ect or implicat ions?
  • Cross sect ion measurement s wit h near det ect or(s) of f er a unique
  • pport unit y

The Facilit y:

  • Present s very manageable ext rapolat ions f rom exist ing t echnology
  • But can explore new ideas regarding beam opt ics and inst rument at ion
  • Of f ers opport unit ies f or ext ensions
  • Add RF f or bunching/ accelerat ion/ phase space manipulat ion
  • Provide µ source f or 6D cooling experiment wit h int ense pulsed beam

46

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-47
SLIDE 47

νSTORM : Conclusions I I

The Det ect or:

  • I s based on demonst rat ed t echnology and f ollows engineering

principles f rom exist ing det ect ors

  • Technology ext rapolat ions (scint illat or readout ) are perf ect ly

aligned wit h development work wit hin Fermilab’s exist ing program (µ2e)

  • Magnet izat ion is based on t echnology t hat was f ully vet t ed over

10 years ago

  • But has been in a dormant st at e

νSTORM :

  • Delivers on t he physics f or t he st udy of st erile ν
  • Of f ering a new approach t o t he product ion of ν beams set t ing a

10 σ benchmark t o conf irm/ exclude LSND/ MiniBooNE

  • Can add signif icant ly t o our knowledge of ν cross-sect ions,

part icularly f or νe int eract ions

  • Provides an accelerat or t echnology t est bed
  • Provides a powerf ul ν det ect or t est f acilit y

47

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-48
SLIDE 48

νSTORM : St erile ν

Of t he 30+ concept s t hat have recent ly been discussed in t he lit erat ure t o search f or/ st udy st erile neut rinos, νSTORM is t he only one t hat can do all of t he f ollowing:

  • Make a direct t est of t he LSND and MiniBooNE

anomalies.

  • Provide st ringent const raint s f or bot h νe and νµ

disappearance t o over const rain 3+N oscillat ion models and t o t est t he Gallium and react or anomalies direct ly.

  • Test t he CP- and T-conj ugat ed channels as well, in
  • rder t o obt ain t he relevant clues f or t he underlying

physics model, such as CP violat ion in 3 + 2 models.

48

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-49
SLIDE 49

END

Thank You

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Back Ups

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Det ect or Considerat ions

  • Ot her opt ions
  • Tot ally Act ive Scint illat or - TASD
  • LAr
  • Present opport unit y t o measure νe appearance?
  • Must be Magnet ized, however
  • A hybrid approach (ext ernal µ spect romet er) is a possibilit y

51

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

Fine-Resolut ion Tot ally Act ive Segment ed Det ect or (I DS-NF)

Simulat ion of a Tot ally Act ive Scint illat ing Det ect or (TASD) using Noνa and Minerνa concept s wit h Geant 4

3 cm 1.5 cm 15 m

u

3333 Modules (X and Y plane)

u

Each plane contains 1000 slabs

u

Total: 6. 7M channels

  • Momenta between 100 MeV/ c to 15 GeV/ c
  • Magnetic f ield considered: 0. 5 T
  • Reconstructed position resolution ~ 4. 5 mm

15 m B = 0. 5T 35 kT Tot al Mass

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Magnet - Concept f or I DS-NF

  • VLHC SC Transmission

Line

  • Technically proven
  • Af f ordable

1 m iron wall thickness. ~2. 4 T peak f ield in the iron. Good f ield unif ormity R&D t o support concept Has not been f unded

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

TASD Perf ormance

ν Event Reconst ruct ion ε Muon charge mis-I D rat e

Excellent σE

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Det ect or Opt ions

Fid Volume B Recon Costing Model SuperBI ND ☑ ☑ ☑ ☑ Mag-TASD ☑ ☑ ☑ ☑ Mag-LAr ☑ ☑ ☑ ☑

55

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

☑ Yes - OK ☑ Maybe ☑ Not Yet

Technology check List

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Cost ing Det ails

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Beamline & Target St at ion

  • Based on MiniBooNE
  • Horn & PS, misc elect rical equipment

$6.0M

  • I nst rument at ion

.5

  • Civil (~ 2XMiniBooNE)

6.3

  • Beam line

1.5

  • Tot al

$14.3

  • Escalat ing f act ors
  • 1.5 – t o include f ully loaded SWF
  • 1.35 – in 2012 $
  • Tot al: $30M

57

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Decay Ring

  • Magnet s (Used St rauss & Green Cost ing Model) – V. Kashikhin

58

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

nuSt or m Super conduct ing Magnet s cost est imat ion J une 14, 2012 Pole f ield Lengt h Aper t ur e Quant it y Gr adient Magnet Cost * Tot al cost 3.142 Cr yo Name Type Bp, T Lm, m Da, m Qt y G, T/ m C, M$ Tot al C, M$ Cr ,M$ D1 Dipole 3.9 0.85 0.3 24 0.4787 11.488 1.56 Q1 Quadr upole 3.8 0.5 0.3 30 6.33 0.2070 6.210 1.95 Q2 Quadr upole 1.6 0.6 0.3 33 2.67 0.1295 4.273 2.145 Q3 Quadr upole 0.4 0.6 0.3 63 0.67 0.0526 3.313 4.095 150 25.3 M$ 9.8 * - magnet cost calculat ed using t he magnet ic f ield ener gy volume wher e Lm is t he magnet lengt h

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Decay Ring – Est imat e I I

19 J une 2012 – KBB May 15 13:20 Ring_new.opt qt y name Lcm apert ure Bkgcm[i] Bkgcm[i] widt h[cm] height [cm] radius[cm] st oredenergy[MJ ] cost / ea cost / t ype 24 dAin 85 15 38.9138 15 15 0.1184 $30,804 $739,303 4 qD1 50 15
  • 2.68838
15 0.1143 $290,562 $1,162,249 4 qD2 50 15
  • 2.56058
15 0.1037 $263,594 $1,054,374 4 qD3 50 15
  • 2.43127
15 0.0935 $237,643 $950,571 2 qD4 50 15
  • 2.45204
15 0.0951 $241,720 $483,441 12 qDD 60 30
  • 0.108
30 0.0035 $9,003 $108,041 2 qDDa 30 30
  • 0.108
30 0.0018 $4,502 $9,003 28 qDS 60 15
  • 1.086
15 0.0224 $56,898 $1,593,151 4 qF1 50 15 2.38574 15 0.0900 $228,825 $915,302 4 qF2 50 15 2.48112 15 0.0974 $247,488 $989,951 4 qF3 50 15 2.57227 15 0.1047 $266,006 $1,064,023 4 qF4 50 15 2.53313 15 0.1015 $257,972 $1,031,889 12 qFD 60 30 0.108 30 0.0035 $9,003 $108,041 36 qFS 60 15 1.086 15 0.0224 $56,898 $2,048,337 2 qFSa 30 15 1.086 15 0.0112 $28,449 $56,898 2 qMD1 50 15
  • 0.804088
15 0.0102 $25,994 $51,987 2 qMD2 50 15 1.10154 15 0.0192 $48,782 $97,564 2 qMD3 50 15
  • 0.76149
15 0.0092 $23,312 $46,625 2 qMD4 50 15 0.354415 15 0.0020 $5,050 $10,100 2 qMS1 50 15
  • 2.05816
15 0.0670 $170,301 $340,601 2 qMS2 50 15 1.87905 15 0.0559 $141,950 $283,900 2 qMS3 50 15
  • 1.61757
15 0.0414 $105,192 $210,385 2 qMS4 50 15 1.41665 15 0.0317 $80,683 $161,366

$13,517,101.53

59

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

  • From Alex Bogacz (ring designer)
slide-60
SLIDE 60

Decay Ring

  • Used bigger number f or magnet s
  • PS & I nst rument at ion - $1M
  • Vacuum - $2M
  • Civil - $15.7M
  • Based on µ2e t unnel cost s (&dept h) ($9.5k/ f oot ) t imes 1.5 t o f ully

load, EDI A…

  • Tot al: 53.8M
  • Not e: Transport line cost ed at 17% (by lengt h) of DR - $9M

60

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Det ect ors

  • Assumed t ot al of 1.5 kT mass
  • Opt ion 1
  • Took MI NOS as built and added overhead t o SWF (includes all R&D)

and escalat ed t o 2012 $ (1.35) - $10M/ kT and t hen added $3M f or STL R&D – Tot al $18M

  • Opt ion 2
  • Took EuroNu cost model f or NF det ect or – magnet ized iron neut rino

det ect or (MI ND), added OH t o SWF - $8M/ kT

  • Technology changes f rom MI NOS:
  • SiPMs
  • ASI C elect ronics
  • STL magnet izat ion
  • Used Bigger Number

61

Alan Br oss Fer milab Physics Advisor y Commit t ee J une 21, 2012