nanofiber base refrigeration
play

Nanofiber-base Refrigeration Alexandria Trevino and Bret Flanders - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nanofiber-base Refrigeration Alexandria Trevino and Bret Flanders Department of Physics Kansas State University Thermoelectric Refrigeration Seebeck Effect T C T H V Directional Growth of polypyrrole and polythiophene wires Prem S. Thapa,


  1. Nanofiber-base Refrigeration Alexandria Trevino and Bret Flanders Department of Physics Kansas State University

  2. Thermoelectric Refrigeration Seebeck Effect T C T H ∆V

  3. Directional Growth of polypyrrole and polythiophene wires Prem S. Thapa, Deok Jin Yu, James P. Wicksted, Jeffrey A. Hadwiger, Joseph N. Barisci, Ray H. Baughman, and Bret N. Flanders • Voltage-amplitude and frequency induces growth • Knobby structure 𝑚 𝐹𝑚𝑓𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑗𝑑𝑏𝑚 𝑑𝑝𝑜𝑒𝑣𝑑𝑢𝑗𝑤𝑗𝑢𝑧 = • 𝑆𝐵 Directional electrochemical nanowire assembly Thapa, P. S., Yu, D. J., Wicksted, J. P., Hadwiger, J. A., Barisci, J. N., Baughman, R. H., & Flanders, B. N. (2009). Directional growth of polypyrrole and polythiophene wires. Applied Physics Letters,94 (3), 033104. doi:10.1063/1.3072611

  4. PEDOT:Heparin Growth Monomer Solution AU, WE AU, CE AU, WE Voltage AU, CE 40 μ m 20 μ m

  5. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) 595 nm wire 1 µm 963 nm wire 5 μ m

  6. 50 40 L=74.66 𝜈 m L=52.70 𝜈 m 30 L=47.23 𝜈 m Count 20 10 0 400 600 800 1000 1200 Diameter (nm) ∆𝑊 − The voltage drop across R when I flows though it

  7. 100 𝜈 M Heparin content Length ( 𝛎 m) Resistance (M 𝞩 ) Diameter (nm) Conductivity (S cm^-1) Wire 1 64.03 993 1.07 0.770 Wire 2 64.30 830 0.988 1.20 Wire 3 62.96 964 0.813 1.06 Wire 4 44.55 973 0.858 0.698 Wire 5 57.15 960 1.13 0.700 Wire 6 49.81 622 1.26 1.30

  8. 10 𝜈 m Heparin content L=44.09 𝜈 m L=62.78 𝜈 m L=42.68 𝜈 m L=43.64 𝜈 m Length ( 𝛎 m) Resistance (M 𝞩 ) Diameter (nm) Conductivity (S cm^-1) Wire 1 42.68 1362 0.322 0.910

  9. Heparin Conclusion • The electrical conductivity does not depend on diameter, resistance, and length. • We should see a consistency with the electrical conductivity of wires grown at the same conditions. Future Work PEDOT • Continue pursing decreasing the heparin content • Test the electrical conductivity of PEDOT: Heparin at different temperatures • Test the thermal conductivity • PEDOT: Tosylate

  10. Acknowledgements • Bret Flanders • Krishna • Gobind • NSF • K-State • REU students

  11. Questions? Length Diameter Resistance Conductivity ( 𝛎 m) (M 𝞩 ) (nm) (S cm^-1) L=74.66 𝜈 m L=52.70 𝜈 m Wire 1 42.68 1362 0.322 0.910 L=47.23 𝜈 m 5 μ m 50 L=44.09 𝜈 m L=62.78 𝜈 m 40 L=42.68 𝜈 m 30 Count L=43.64 𝜈 m Length Diameter Resistance Conductivity 20 ( 𝛎 m) (M 𝞩 ) (nm) (S cm^-1) 10 0 Wire 1 64.03 993 1.07 0.770 400 600 800 1000 1200 Diameter (nm) Wire 2 64.30 830 0.988 1.20 Wire 3 62.96 964 0.813 1.06 Wire 4 44.55 973 0.858 0.698 Wire 5 57.15 960 1.13 0.700 20 μ m 1 µm Wire 6 49.81 622 1.26 1.30

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend