Multistate Collaborative to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Multistate Collaborative to Advance Learning Outcomes Assessment (MSC) Results from 2015-2016 Demonstration Year Tara Rose, Ph.D., Director, Office of University Assessment The results are not generalizable in any way. Please use appropriately .
Tara Rose, Ph.D., Director, Office of University Assessment
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Civic Engagement Critical Thinking Quantitative Literacy Written Communication
2.24 2.21 3.34 2.74 2.16 1.81 3.17 2.86
Average Rubric Score
UK Overall
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 External Internal
2.24 2.16
Score
Civic Engagement Score
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
2.5 2.56 2.31 2.5 1.69 1.88 2.65 2.41 2.35 1.94 1.59 2
Score
Civic Engagement by Criteria
External Score Internal Score
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Male Female
3.08 2.12 2.58 2.1
Score
Civic Engagement by Gender
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 18-25 26-30 31+
2.19 2.17 3 2.11 2.33 2.5
Score
Civic Engagement by Age
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Asian White or Caucasian Unknown
2.75 2.14 2.5 3.08 2.05 1.83
Score
Civic Engagement by Race
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Yes No
1.83 2.27 2.25 2.14
Score
Civic Engagement by PELL Eligibility
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 External Internal
2.21 1.81
Score
Critical Thinking Score
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Explanation of Issues Evidence Influence of Context and Assumptions Student's Position Conclusions and Related Outcomes
2.38 2.28 1.99 2.19 2.18 2.57 1.89 1.33 1.44 1.81 Score Critical Thinking by Criteria
External Scores Internal Score
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Male Female
2.03 2.52 1.57 2.28
Score
Critical Thinking by Gender
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 18-25 26-30
2.26 1.6 1.85 1.51
Score
Critical Thinking by Age
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Asian Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Multi-Racial White or Caucasian Decline to Respond Unknown
2 1.6 3.2 2.13 2.2 2.8 1.83 0.6 2.9 2.4 1.75 2.4 1.8
Score
Critical Thinking by Race
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Yes No
1.76 2.33 1.64 1.86
Score
Critical Thinking by PELL Eligibility
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 External Internal
3.34 3.17
Score
Quantitative Literacy Score
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
3.53 3.55 3.44 3.28 2.72 3.53 3.34 3.24 3… 3.02 2.84 3.25
Average Rubric Score
Quantitative Literacy by Criteria
External Scores Internal Scores
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Male Female
3.35 3.33 3.19 3.13
Score
Quantitative Literacy by Gender
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 18-25 26-30 31+
3.34 3.25 3.5 3.17 2.75 3.83
Average Rubric Score
Quantitative Literacy by Age
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Asian Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Multi-Racial White or Caucasian Decline to Respond Unknown
2.96 3.38 2.9 3.08 3.44 3.46 2.88 3.13 3.13 3.07 2.5 3.22 2.92 3.2
Score
Quantitative Literacy by Race
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Yes No
3.65 3.3 3.3 3.15
Score
Quantitative Literacy by PELL Eligibility
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 External Internal
2.74 2.86
Score
Written Communication Score
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Context of and Purpose for Writing Content Development Genre and Disciplinary Conventions Sources and Evidence Control of Syntax and Mechanics
3.07 2.86 2.74 2.29 2.73 3.21 2.88 2.79 2.85 2.56
Score
Written Communication by Criteria
External Scores Internal Scores
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Male Female
2.62 2.77
2.64 2.92
Score
Written Communication by Gender
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 18-25 26-30 31+
2.71 2.91 2.84 2.87 2.81 2.74
Score
Written Communication by Age
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Asian Black or African American Hispanic or Latino Multi-racial White or Caucasian Unknown
2.69 2.75 2.37 2.27 2.78 2.25 2.91 2.68 3.17 2.3 2.88 2.75
Score
Written Communication by Race
External Internal
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Yes No
2.58 2.8 2.91 2.84
Score
Written Communication by PELL Eligibility
External Internal