moving towards zero safety action plan
play

Moving Towards Zero Safety Action Plan Steve Brown, P. Eng Manager - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Moving Towards Zero Safety Action Plan Steve Brown, P. Eng Manager Traffic and Data Management Moving Towards Zero: Action Plan May 2016 - initial update December 2016 detailed strategy Annual updates Moving Towards Zero:


  1. Moving Towards Zero Safety Action Plan Steve Brown, P. Eng Manager – Traffic and Data Management

  2. Moving Towards Zero: Action Plan • May 2016 - initial update • December 2016 – detailed strategy • Annual updates

  3. Moving Towards Zero: Action Plan 1. Enhanced Data 2. Evaluate and Prioritize Locations 3. Engineering Action Plan 4. Education & Public Outreach 5. Enforcement 6. Next Steps

  4. 1. Enhanced Data: Current Data Sources • Transportation Related Fatalities – VPD o Summary reports as they occur o Annual review • Collisions involving – ICBC o 2014-15 data received in mid 2016 o Serious injury data – included since 2014 o Annual review • NEW- Hospital injury data-Vancouver Coastal Health

  5. Traffic-Related Fatalities - Summary Population 40 700,000 Increasing 39 35 600,000 34 Traffic Related Fatalities Traffic Related Fatalities Traffic Related Fatalities Traffic Related Fatalities 32 30 30 500,000 Traffic Related 25 Fatalities Decreasing Population Population Population Population 26 25 25 25 25 400,000 23 20 21 19 19 300,000 15 16 16 15 15 14 13 200,000 10 9 100,000 5 0 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: VPD Traffic Fatality Data (1996-2016)

  6. Hospital Injury Data Pilot Patient Totals 9,522 10,000 9,000 8,000 Totals Under Review 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 1,452 2,000 1,000 427 72 0 VGH St. Paul's / Mt. St. Joseph BC Children's Serious injury Minor injury Source: VGH, SPH, MSJ Traffic Injury Data (2011- Jun 2016) BCCH Traffic Injury Data (2011- 2013)

  7. Hospital Injury Data Pilot VGH VGH VGH VGH Fatal & Serious Injury Patients by Mode and Year Source: VGH Traffic Injury Data (2011-2015)

  8. Hospital Injury Data Pilot VGH Fatal & Serious Injury Patients per 10,000 Daily T VGH Fatal & Serious Injury Patients per 10,000 Daily VGH Fatal & Serious Injury Patients per 10,000 Daily VGH Fatal & Serious Injury Patients per 10,000 Daily T Trips T rips rips rips Cyclist Vehicle Occupant Pedestrian 10 10,000 daily trips 10,000 daily trips 10,000 daily trips Patients per 10,000 daily trips 9 8 7 6 5 Patients per Patients per Patients per 4 3 2 1 0 2011 2013 2014 2015 Sources: Translink Trip Diary 2011 , COV Panel Survey 2013-15, VGH Traffic Injury Data 2011-15

  9. Hospital Injury Data Pilot Benefits: Challenges: Quarterly updates VGH Incidents Only • • Demographics Data Quality • • Serious injuries o Location (i.e. outside • Non- Motor Vehicle COV) • Collisions o Description o ICBC – only motor o Miscoding (i.e. sports, vehicle related falls) o 53% of cycling injuries o Returning patients do not involve a motor vehicle (BICE Study)

  10. 1. Enhanced Data: Summary 2015 Statistics: 2015 Statistics: 2015 Statistics: 2015 Statistics: Fatalities 14 Serious ~300 Injuries ~3,000 Minor Injuries ~10,000 Property ~45,000 Damage Source of Data: VPD Hospitals ICBC *Injuries and property damage are based on number of collisions, Fatalities are total number of people

  11. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations • Identified Priority Identified Priority Identified Priority Identified Priority Intersections & Intersections & Intersections & Intersections & Corridors Corridors Corridors Corridors o Top locations for deep dive o By vulnerable road users (i.e. seniors, children, etc.)

  12. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations Top Intersections for Top Intersections for Top Intersections for Top Intersections for Deep Dive Deep Dive Deep Dive Deep Dive (10) (10) (10) *based on collision model using ICBC , Hospital and VPD data

  13. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations Top Corridors for Top Corridors for Top Corridors for Top Corridors for Deep Dive Deep Dive Deep Dive Deep Dive *based on collision model using ICBC , Hospital and VPD data

  14. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations Seniors: Higher risk of fatality & serious injuries Fatalities by Age Serious Injuries by Age 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% 0-14 15-24 25-34 35-54 55-64 >=65 0-14 15-24 25-34 35-54 55-64 >=65 % of Fatalities % of Total Population % Serious Injuries % of Total Population Source: VPD Traffic Fatality Data (2011-2015), VGH Traffic Injury Data (2011-2015 )

  15. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations Top Senior Locations Top Senior Locations Top Senior Locations Top Senior Locations 15 locations of focus Sources of data: VGH senior collisions • ICBC data around: • High senior o density areas Senior housing o

  16. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations • Hospital data 2 2 2 2 0.4% 0.4 0.4 0.4 % % % o Most children treated at BCCH 72 72 72 72 14.4% 14.4 14.4 14.4 % % % o No location info Fatal Severe • ICBC data Minor o Collisions adjacent to 427 427 427 427 85.2 85.2 85.2 85.2% % % % schools & during school days Source: BCCH Traffic Injury Data 2011-13 o ~2% of all City collisions

  17. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations Top Schools Top Schools Top Schools Top Schools 10 schools selected Schools selected: Adjacent to two arterial • roads Adjacent to signalized • intersections High exposure •

  18. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations Non- Non Non Non - - motorized: - motorized: motorized: motorized: Serious injuries S S S erious injuries erious injuries erious injuries locations locations locations locations (14) ( 6 ) (78)

  19. 2. Evaluate & Prioritize Locations Conduct detailed safety Conduct detailed safety Conduct detailed safety Conduct detailed safety studies at priority studies at priority studies at priority studies at priority locations locations locations locations • Monitor locations to identify potential conflicts • Automated video conflict analysis at priority ranked locations • Identify strategies to reduce injuries

  20. 3. Engineering Action Plan Develop best safety practices toolkit & select the Develop best safety practices toolkit & select the Develop best safety practices toolkit & select the Develop best safety practices toolkit & select the most effective solutions to address priority most effective solutions to address priority most effective solutions to address priority most effective solutions to address priority locations locations locations locations • Validate toolkit • New Pilot Programs • Develop countermeasure based strategy • Action plan for high priority areas

  21. Toolkit Validation: Pedestrian Safety Improvements Validated through Vancouver Implementation Upgrades Upgrades Upgrades Upgrades Locations Locations Locations Locations Collision Reduction Collision Collision Collision Reduction Reduction Reduction Completed Completed Completed Completed Pedestrian Pedestrian Pedestrian Pedestrian All All All All (Fatal & Injury) (Fatal & Injury) (Fatal & Injury) (Fatal & Injury) New Pedestrian 2 -96% -20% Signals LT Arrows 5 -38% -26% LED Lighting 18 -27%* -46%* Countdown Timers 33 -28% -10% Slower Walking 4 -12% Speeds *After dark collisions only

  22. Toolkit Validation: Cycling Spot Improvements Validated through Vancouver Implementation Upgrades Upgrades Upgrades Upgrades Locations Locations Locations Locations Collision Reduction Collision Reduction Collision Reduction Collision Reduction Completed Completed Completed Completed Cycling Cycling Cycling Cycling All All All All (Fatal & Injury) (Fatal & Injury) (Fatal & Injury) (Fatal & Injury) Removal of traffic 2 -100% -60% circles Median extension 1 -42%** -33%** – RT more difficult Adding lighting 1 -25% * 0%* Green Paint at 6 Data not sufficient to assess Conflict Areas *After dark collisions only ** RT collisions only

  23. Engineering Action Plan: New Pilot Programs Accessible Pedestrian Signals 4 locations in pilot 4 locations in pilot 4 4 locations in pilot locations in pilot Leading Pedestrian Intervals Rectangular Rapid 1 1 location in pilot location in pilot 1 1 location in pilot location in pilot Flashing Beacons 3 locations in pilot 3 locations in pilot 3 locations in pilot 3 locations in pilot

  24. Engineering Action Plan: Evaluate Pilot Programs • Increased driver yielding compliance • Increased distance of yielding • Positive feedback (surveys, webpage & 311) • Evaluating reliability of solar power, technical issues at one location • Concerns from Disabilities committee - audibles Yielding Compliance Yielding Compliance Yielding Compliance Yielding Compliance 98% 97% 100% 92% 88% 86% 80% 60% Before 47% 47% Rectangular After 6m 40% Rapid Flashing After 1y Beacons 20% 3 locations in 3 locations in 3 locations in 3 locations in pilot pilot pilot pilot 0% Elliott & Waverley W Boulevard & 42nd Victoria & Grant

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend