Modification 0525 Enabling EU Compliant Interconnection Agreements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

modification 0525 enabling eu compliant interconnection
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Modification 0525 Enabling EU Compliant Interconnection Agreements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Modification 0525 Enabling EU Compliant Interconnection Agreements 1 Aims Explain the Modification Why change Proposed solution Run through draft initial legal text IA consultations Indemnity Future governance


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Modification 0525 – Enabling EU Compliant Interconnection Agreements

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Aims

 Explain the Modification

 Why change  Proposed solution

 Run through draft initial legal text

 IA consultations  Indemnity  Future governance  Termination of CSEP Ancillary Agreements

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

 EU Codes introduce new arrangements for TSOs and consequently provisions within the Interconnection Agreements

 Capacity bundling;  Matching of nominations;  Allocate as nominate;

 Subsequently the Agents’ role disappears at IPs  As does the requirement for CSEP Ancillary Agreements

 Communications in exceptional events;  Furthermore there is a need to address consequential changes:

 IA change control;  Liability; and  Certain arrangements for the Moffat Interconnection Point (IP)

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Interconnection Agreement Consultations

4

Why change Proposed solution Interoperability Code requires Shippers to be consulted 2-months prior to new Interconnection Agreements (IA) going live Transition text to enable a time bound one-off set of consultations for IAs It is not possible to complete the Modification and proceed to consultation Shipper consultation for each of the IAs followed by a review Changes requested by Shippers will be discussed with the Adjacent TSOs New terms for matching of nominations etc. are not included within UNC Allows National Grid NTS to include these new provisions within the consultations

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Future Governance

5

Why change Proposed solution UNC does not include the new provisions for Shippers to be consulted on:

  • Capacity bundling
  • Nominations matching
  • Allocation rules
  • Communications in exceptional

events Introduce a new clause to include all

  • f the areas from IAs which affect

Shippers:

  • NEnPs and NExPs
  • Capacity bundling
  • Nominations matching
  • Allocation rules
  • Communications in exceptional

events Ability to consult on NEnPs and NExPs currently held in TPD Sections I and J Disapply current consultation provisions for IAs that currently flow from TPD Sections I and J Bring together all IA material into one section of UNC - EID

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Indemnities

6

Why change Proposed solution TSOs will be responsible for matching nominations and allocating as nominated Introduce a clause to indemnify the Adjacent TSO for claims in tort for failures to comply Reciprocal IA contractual obligations between TSOs for indemnity against claims in tort Shippers agree not to make claims in tort against the Adjacent TSO and indemnify National Grid NTS if they do make such claims Would not apply where a Shipper has a contract with the Adjacent TSO

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CSEP Ancillary Agreements

7

Why change Proposed solution Agent role no longer required post 1st October CSEP Ancillary Agreements (AAs) contain clauses pertaining to:

  • Agent role
  • NEnPs and NExPs
  • Flow rate limits
  • References to other Sections of

UNC Termination of the AAs Legal text drafted to be added to the AAs to allow their termination Transfer of clauses for flow rate limits and TPD references into UNC

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Moffat Interconnection Point

8

Why change Proposed solution EID drafting assumes a 1:1 TSO relationship Moffat does not fit this model To introduce text into EID that allows treatment of an IP as if it were 2 IPs Interconnection Agreement with BGE (UK) Recognition that the counterparty to the IA is not the same parties who have a commercial relationship with Shippers in NI and RoI Treat Moffat as if it were 2 Interconnection Points for UNC purposes Stranraer DN Offtake Work in progress

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Moffat Interconnection Point

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Physical Network

Moffat IP Belfast Loughshinny Gormanston National Grid NTS Stranraer DN Offtake

Irish Sea

~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~

slide-11
SLIDE 11

National Grid NTS Contractual

Moffat IP Belfast Loughshinny Gormanston National Grid NTS Stranraer DN Offtake

Moffat Interconnection Agreement National Grid NTS – BGE (UK) For UNC purposes Irish Sea

~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Regulatory

Moffat IP Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) National Grid NTS Ofgem Authority for Utility Regulation NIAUR

Irish Sea l~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~

Stranraer DN Offtake

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Moffat

 BGE(UK) is the licensed entity in respect of the pipeline connected to the NTS at Moffat  Shipper relationships are held by the downstream system operators

 Gas Networks Ireland (GNI formerly Gaslink) for the Republic of Ireland; and  Premier Transmission Limited (PTL) for Northern Ireland

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Draft Initial Legal Text

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Draft Initial Legal Text

 Text has been developed for:

 IA consultations;  Indemnity;  Future governance; and  Termination of CSEP Ancillary Agreement

 Work in progress

 Flow rate limits and references to TPD from CSEP Ancillary Agreements; and  Moffat specific arrangements including Stranraer

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Any Questions

Please contact Debbie Brace on 01926 653233 or deborah.brace@nationalgrid.com