MODELS OF VOLCANIC ASH FIELDS RECONSTRUCTION Raputa V.F., - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

models of volcanic ash fields reconstruction raputa v f
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MODELS OF VOLCANIC ASH FIELDS RECONSTRUCTION Raputa V.F., - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MODELS OF VOLCANIC ASH FIELDS RECONSTRUCTION Raputa V.F., Yaroslavtseva T.V. Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB RAS, Novosibirsk Vulcan Puyeue (Chile), June 2011 1. Experimental studies Fig. 1. Paramushir


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MODELS OF VOLCANIC ASH FIELDS RECONSTRUCTION

Raputa V.F., Yaroslavtseva T.V. Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics SB RAS, Novosibirsk

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Vulcan Puyeue (Chile), June 2011

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. Experimental studies
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Fig. 1.

Paramushir Island. Volcanoes.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Eruption of 2003, 2007

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tephra eruptions after 1853 and 1986

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 

1

, 1 , ( 1)

n n aw m

a n N w w e n a Г n w

 

    

( , ) ( , ,0, , ) ( ) x y w q x y w t N w dwdt 

 

  

2 2 2 2

( )

x y

q q q q q u z w K K t x z x y              

  • 1. Problem statement

(1) (2) (3)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

( ) ( ) ( )

t

q Q x y z H   

 

; 0 , , ,

z H

q q x y t

     

2 2

, , 1 ( ) ( )

x z y z H z

H z H z K U K U w w U z u d H z           

(5) (4)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

3

( ) ( ,0) 2 HU Q H U N x x x       

2 2 1 2 3 1

( , ) ( ) exp H h h P x Q h dh x x x H                  

 

1 1 2 3

, 1 , 2 ( 1)

n

aU n aU Г n    

     

(6) (7) (8)

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 2. Kinematic model estimation
  • f ash fallout thickness

H x w U 

(9)

 

2 2

2

1 , 2

y x

f x y e x



(10)

   

1

, 1, 1

n n aw m

a n N w w e n a Г n w

 

    

(11)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

   

2 2 1

, , min

M j j j j j

J r P x y

  

   

      

(13)

 

2

2 3 4 1 2

, , exp , y P x y x x x

            

   

1 1 2 3 4 2

1 , 1, , 2 2 1

n n

T a U H n aU H Г n      

      

(12)

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Fig. 2. The scheme of tephra sampling in the vicinity of the

volcano Chikurachki, eruption in 1853. Recovered from model (12) field fallout. ● - position of sampling points.

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Fig. 3.

The scheme of tephra sampling in the vicinity of the volcano Chikurachki, eruption in 1986. Recovered from model (12) field fallout.

  • - position of

sampling points.

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Fig. 4. Measured and numerical reconstruction of tephra

fallout thickness at sampling points : a) eruption of 1853, b) eruption of 1986

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 3. Model estimation of particle size of tephra

 

2 2

2 ( )

1 , , 2 ( )

y x

f x y e x

 

2 2

k x   

0.5  

2

w cd 

w HU d c c x  

 

2

2 3 1 2

, , exp y P x y x x

 

          

1 2 3

1 , 0.5 , 2 2 k HU c k         

(14) (15) (16)

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Fig. 5. Measured and numerically reconstructed particle size
  • f tephra by volcanic axes ashfalls for 1853.
  • - support points, ● - control points of observation
slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Fig. 6. Measured and numerically reconstructed particle size
  • f tephra eruption for 1986
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Conclusion

  • to reconstruct the fields of ash deposition thickness

and particle size developed polydisperse models with small number parameters;

  • was carried out testing of these models on field data

in the vicinity of the volcano Chikurachki;

  • to restore the field deposition can be used in a very

limited number of measurement points, it creates certain advantages for the analysis of available data.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Thanks for attention