model coupling across scales
play

Model coupling across scales An introduction to methodological - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Model coupling across scales An introduction to methodological aspects related to model coupling Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 04. December 2014 | Heidi U. Heinrichs Agenda Flexibility Definition Needs Approaches


  1. Model coupling across scales An introduction to methodological aspects related to model coupling Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 04. December 2014 | Heidi U. Heinrichs

  2. Agenda Flexibility  Definition  Needs  Approaches  Model coupling  Energy system models  Types  Dimensions  Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Challenges & limits  Conclusions  Institute for Energy and Climate Research 1 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  3. Flexibility… „… ability to respond to – and to balance – supply and demand under rapid and large imbalances...“ [Gracceva & Zeniewski, 2014] “…expresses the extent to which a power system can modify electricity production or consumption in response to variability, expected or otherwise.” [IEA, 2011] Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft [IEA, 2012] Different definitions of flexibility of energy systems exist. Institute for Energy and Climate Research 2 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  4. The need to address flexibility Past High share of thermal power plants = sufficient flexibility Increasing share of volatile renewable energy sources Trend (RES) = (short- and long-term) uncertainties Mainly forecast deviations (i.e. wind feed-in, electricity Source exchange, end-use demand, fuel prices) Demand response, grid and storage expansion, excess Options capacity, curtailment of RES Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Previous sources of flexibility decrease. New sources and options need to be taken into account in analysis approaches. Institute for Energy and Climate Research 3 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  5. Approaches to address flexibility (Basic) heuristics Model coupling Specific indicators Availability factors Energy system Loss of Load    model Probability (LOLP) Reserve factors  Unit commitment Loss of Load Function of RES    /dispatch model Expectation (LOLE) penetration level Macroeconomic Magnetic & kinetic Operating reserve    models reserves (H mag , requirements H kin ) Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft focus on model coupling including the systems here: perspective (= energy system model) Institute for Energy and Climate Research 4 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  6. Typical characteristics of energy system models Full energy system  Technology-rich (bottom-up)  Medium- to long-term, multiple period time horizon  Aggregation  Temporal = time slices (i.e. from 6 to 144)  Spatial = limited number of regions  Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft No direct account of short-term uncertainties possible. Institute for Energy and Climate Research 5 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  7. Types of model coupling Unidirectional Iterative   model A model B model A model B More than 2 Semi (derive heuristics)   Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft model A model B model C model A model B Institute for Energy and Climate Research 6 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  8. Types of model coupling – example I Unidirectional  TIMES PLEXOS Case study: Ireland, 2020  Motivation of coupling: accepting that one specific modelling  tool cannot model everything Results:  Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Crosschecking the technical appropriateness  Most important technical constraint = start costs  Institute for Energy and Climate Research 7 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  9. Types of model coupling – example I Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft [Deane et al., 2012] Institute for Energy and Climate Research 8 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  10. Types of model coupling – example II Iterative + more than 2  EV-PEN/LVP PERSEUS-EU PERSEUS-DE Case study: Germany, until 2030  Motivation of coupling: to cover divergent trends and their  interdependencies Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Results:  Equilibria between electricity costs & EV market share and  between national & European power plant expansions Institute for Energy and Climate Research 9 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  11. Types of model coupling – example II EV electricity demand electricity imports and exports of DE EV load shifting potential CO 2 certificate prices .  Electric mobility model Energy system model PERSEUS-EMO* EU 1 incl. ETS 2 EU EV market penetration DE + T-grid mobility surveys passenger road transport technical EV potential economic EV potential EV market penetration Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft electricity and power plant CO 2 certificate prices expansion in DE *PERSEUS-EMO: Program Packages for Emission Reduction Strategies for Energy Use and Supply – Electric Mobility, [Heinrichs, 2013] 1 EU: only those countries who mainly influences the German energy system, 2 ETS: Emission Trading System Institute for Energy and Climate Research 10 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  12. Dimensions of differences Temporal Spatial   … … System boundary Method   Optimization  macroeconomics Simulation  energy system Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Heuristic supply distribution demand  sector sector sector …  Institute for Energy and Climate Research 11 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  13. Dimensions of differences – example I Spatial System boundary Temporal Method Germany  grid energy system  time slices  LP  nodes electricity grid hours simulation grid IKARUS model Case study: Germany, until 2030  Motivation: to analyse the impacts of EV on the German grid  Results:  Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft simple heuristic for spatial distribution of new power plants  no need for new power plant sites  Institute for Energy and Climate Research 12 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  14. Dimensions of differences – example I legend new power plant legend Gas power plants 2030 Lignite Lignite Coal Gas Coal power plants 2010 Nuclear Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Lignite Gas Coal Institute for Energy and Climate Research [Linssen et al., 2012] 13 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  15. Dimensions of differences – example II Spatial System boundary Temporal Method Germany  energy system  time slices  LP  Europe road transport years simulation COMIT PERSEUS Case study: Germany, until 2030  Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Motivation: to analyse sectoral interdependencies of including  road transport in the EU ETS Results: cross sectoral efficient CO 2 abatement strategies  Institute for Energy and Climate Research 14 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  16. Dimensions of differences – example II allowance demand of road transport, EV market penetration and electricity demand uranium hydro ‐ river/reservoir/small lignite wind ‐ on/off worldgas Freight road transport CO 2 emission trading localgas biomass/ ‐ gas/ ‐ waste worldcoal Agent from ‐ storage localcoal geothermal worldoil cc ‐ regional fuelmarket cc ‐ cc ‐ CO 2 market industrial industrial cc ‐ cc ‐ cc ‐ ZEW lignite producers heatgrid industrial indigenous regional certificate heavy ‐ / supply demand resources fuelnode fueloil cc ‐ ind. cc ‐ ind. hydro ‐ small uranium gas powergrid powergrid Agents coal wind ‐ on/off hydro ‐ river/ ‐ exp ‐ imp biomass/ oil reservoir fuel price oil companies ‐ gas/ ‐ waste geothermal logit choice cc ‐ cc ‐ cc ‐ utility cc ‐ utility cc ‐ utility green district producers producers producers fuel price fuel demand/ Agents generators heating fossil hydro nuclear neigh ‐ fuel demand/ CO 2 demand shipper, haulier CO 2 demand bouring train and IWW district ‐ districtheat heat or carrier cc ‐ utilitysupply country cc ‐ Passenger road transport cc ‐ district ‐ heat/ Agents renew ‐ cc ‐ internalgridnode heat heat ‐ transport ables smallchp households demand Class cc ‐ company external cars cc ‐ electr ‐ district ‐ cc ‐ heat ‐ MOP gridnode demand demand Class vehicles cc ‐ cc ‐ cc ‐ cc ‐ cc ‐ private car demand districtheat electricity heat pumped dc_cable ‐ car demand With: cars consumers consumers consumers storage node information flows Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft ZEW shipment database (Agents) heat_use electricity_use to_storage IWW inland waterways car companies MOP German Mobility Panel database regional energy carrier electricity electricity demand world market fuels heat heat demand CO 2 marginal cost [Heinrichs et al., 2014] Institute for Energy and Climate Research 15 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

  17. Challenges & limits of model coupling General: Global optimum  Convergence in iterative model coupling (bang-bang)  Computational capacity requirements (hard- & software, time)  Expertise in each modelling tool  Data basis  Obligation of confidentiality (in collaborations)  Different base years/ calibration (possibly high effort)  Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Different methods (i.e. costs & end user prices)  Institute for Energy and Climate Research 16 Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend