mobility35 aesthetics
play

MOBILITY35 AESTHETICS Aesthetics Working Group 3 March 29, 2016 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MOBILITY35 AESTHETICS Aesthetics Working Group 3 March 29, 2016 Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 What we heard regarding three themes Art: Nature: Connectivity: Blank canvas Authentic natural Improve east/west option with


  1. MOBILITY35 AESTHETICS Aesthetics Working Group 3 March 29, 2016 Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016

  2. What we heard regarding three themes Art: Nature: Connectivity:  Blank canvas  Authentic natural  Improve east/west option with murals elements pedestrian later OR  Simple walls connections  Walls & periodic  Terracing  Safe and well art – panel (1)  Creek/stream marked designed by artist themes to be repeated  Local identity  Nature as a buffer along the corridor defined by between roadway or several smaller concrete panels and bike/ped repeating designs  Tie-in as applicable  Maximize  Trellis or panels with downtown landscaped areas with art on wayfinding east/west  Sturdy/native crossings plantings Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 2

  3. What we heard regarding green infrastructure and sustainability Working Group would like to see:  Use of native plantings which require minimal or no irrigation  Wildflowers and no-mow areas  Planting choices that support pollinators and wildlife  Bio-swales  Lighter colored concrete to reduce heat island effect  LED lighting which minimizes energy usage Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 3

  4. Aesthetics Working Group schedule and goals We are here Meeting 1 Meeting 2 Meeting 3 December 1, 2015 February 2, 2016 March 29, 2016 Project overview Develop up to Develop up to • • • Corridor assets three potential three draft • Themes aesthetic themes aesthetic concepts • Public input needed! Second Take online survey online survey Dec. 3, 2015 Spring to Jan. 15, 2016 2016 Next steps Meeting 5 Meeting 4 Fall 2016 Design team develops: Summer 2016 Summer 2016 Final working group • Review final draft Determine • • summary report of refined preferred draft Final aesthetic • preferred concept concept guideline document Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 4

  5. Revisit elements that could have substantial impact  East/west crossings  Shared use path environment  Landscape design (hard/soft) and performance*  Bridges as viewed from the mainlanes*  Wayfinding*  Lighting*  Vertical walls * Elements added by the working group during Meeting #2 Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 5

  6. Connectivity – east/west cross street under I-35 mainlanes The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 6

  7. Connectivity – shared use path environment The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 7

  8. Connectivity – east/west cross street over I-35 mainlanes The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 8

  9. Connectivity – I-35 mainlanes under east/west cross street The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 9

  10. Connectivity theme – considerations  Over-signage could create a cluttered look and adjacent wayfinding such as the city of Austin’s program must be considered  Location-specific items such as unique signage could be more costly to fabricate and replace over time  Landscaping along corridor requires partnership with city of Austin for maintenance Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 10

  11. Connectivity – theme boards The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 11

  12. Nature – east/west cross street under I-35 mainlanes The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 12

  13. Nature – shared use path environment The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 13

  14. Nature – east/west cross street over I-35 mainlanes The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 14

  15. Nature – I-35 mainlanes under east/west cross street The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 15

  16. Nature theme – considerations  Landscaping along corridor requires partnership with city of Austin for maintenance  Constrained urban environment and space provide limited opportunities for planting and maintaining robust natural features  Water usage may be a concern for city under water restrictions Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 16

  17. Nature – theme boards The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 17

  18. Art – east/west cross street under I-35 mainlanes The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 18

  19. Art – shared use path environment The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 19

  20. Art – east/west cross street over I-35 mainlanes The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 20

  21. Art – I-35 mainlanes under east/west cross street The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 21

  22. Art theme – considerations  Artists/partners need to be identified to create, install, and fund pieces  Timing of art installations needs to coincide with construction to avoid providing blank pallet for graffiti  Art along the corridor requires partnership with city of Austin for maintenance  Graffiti/defacement of art may trigger painting over with minimal opportunity for artist to repair  Artworks may only be installed where they are not a distraction to drivers Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 22

  23. Art – theme boards The artist renderings shown are conceptual in nature and are for discussion purposes only. Final alignments and construction elements may vary. Actual project details will be subject to design constraints and funding availability. Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 23

  24. Aesthetics Working Group schedule and goals We are here Meeting 1 Meeting 2 Meeting 3 December 1, 2015 February 2, 2016 March 29, 2016 Project overview Develop up to Develop up to • • • Corridor assets three potential three draft • Themes aesthetic themes aesthetic concepts • Public input needed! Second Take online survey online survey Dec. 3, 2015 Spring to Jan. 15, 2016 2016 Next steps Meeting 5 Meeting 4 Fall 2016 Design team develops: Summer 2016 Summer 2016 Final working group • Review final draft Determine • • summary report of refined preferred draft Final aesthetic • preferred concept concept guideline document Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 24

  25. Next steps  Internal finalization and refinement of up to 3 concepts based on your input received tonight  Public outreach survey will open spring 2016, includes 3 community outreach opportunities  Aesthetics Working Group 4 meeting date: June 28, June 29, July 6 or July 7  Feedback on tonight (comment forms) Mobility35 Aesthetics 03/29/2016 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend