MINNESOTA EDUCATION FINANCE 101 Key Items to Review 1. Education - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

minnesota education finance 101 key items to review
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

MINNESOTA EDUCATION FINANCE 101 Key Items to Review 1. Education - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MINNESOTA EDUCATION FINANCE 101 Key Items to Review 1. Education Budget: Big Picture 2. Defining Revenue, Forecast, and Targets 3. Counting Students 4. Formula Funding 5. General Education Revenue 6. Categorical Revenue 7. School


slide-1
SLIDE 1

MINNESOTA EDUCATION FINANCE – 101

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Key Items to Review

  • 1. Education Budget: Big Picture
  • 2. Defining Revenue, Forecast, and Targets
  • 3. Counting Students
  • 4. Formula Funding
  • 5. General Education Revenue
  • 6. Categorical Revenue
  • 7. School Property Taxes
  • 8. Early Learning Programs
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Budget Breakdown – Big Picture (FY18)

  • Total Education Funding: $11.25 billion (FY18, estimated)
  • 78% State Aid ($8.8 billion)
  • 15% Local Levy ($1.7 billion)
  • 7% Federal Funds ($750 million)
  • Share of Spending; State Budget (excluding federal funds)
  • State pays about 84% per pupil.
  • Total estimated revenue = $10.5 billion (FY18)
  • Total combined aid = $8.8 billion (FY18)
  • Education is the largest portion of the state’s general fund

budget at 41% (HHS is 30%).

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Education Revenue

  • Education Revenue = State Aid and Local Levies
  • State Aid = Money appropriated by the state.
  • Local Levy = Tax revenue for the school district.
  • FY18 Revenue per Pupil (estimated) = $12,227
  • FY18 State Aid per Pupil (estimated) = $10,268
  • Revenue and Aid Varies by District or Charter
  • Minneapolis Revenue = $15,123/pupil
  • Elk River Revenue = $10,797/pupil
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Base/Forecast vs. Target

  • Most education aid is an entitlement: automatically adjusts to

reflect changes in student enrollment.

  • February Forecast adjusts spending projections based on

changes in student enrollment to set base funding levels.

  • Targets (aid and levy) are relative to forecasted base.
  • Example:
  • FY18/19 base increase = $860 million (over FY16/17)
  • FY18/19 “target” over base increase = $483 million
  • FY18/19 total increase = $1.34 billion
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Counting Students – ADM or APU

State funding formula does not just count the number of students in the schools (Adjusted Average Daily Membership), but counts students using weights to calculate Adjusted Pupil Units used in formula funding or other funding streams.

Details:

  • VPK/SR+ = 0.412 to 0.60 pupils
  • Half-Day Kindergarten = 0.55 pupils
  • K – 6 = 1.0 pupils
  • 7 – 12 = 1.2 pupils
  • Extended Time Programs = 0.2 pupils (Except Charters)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Formula Funding

The “formula” is based on “Basic Formula Aid” as the foundation with other spending items “linked” to basic formula dollar amount. An increase in basic formula increases the “linked” items. Formula funding includes:

  • Basic Formula Aid ($6,188/pupil FY18);
  • Compensatory Revenue;
  • Declining Pupil Aid;
  • Sparsity (elementary, secondary, transportation);
  • PSEO Aid Payments;
  • Nonpublic Pupil (aid, transportation);
  • ECFE.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

More Money on the Formula

For FY18/19, the Legislature funded a 2% & 2% formula increase:

  • Basic formula aid increased by 2% in FY18; and 2% in FY19.
  • Triggers increases in the linked items.

Formula increases are “expensive” over the biennium with the first year’s increase paid for twice, followed by another 2% in the second

  • year. A 2% & 2% is a net 4% increase, but the state pays for 6%.

Example: (Rule of Thumb) $1 on the formula cost $1 million. A $100 basic formula increase costs $100 million in FY18, and $200 million in

  • FY19. Schools see a net $200 million increase, but the state paid

$300 million for the two-year budget.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Payments to Schools: Aid & Levy Shift

  • The 90/10 Payment Shift: 90% of funding paid from July through

June in current fiscal year; 10% paid August through October of following fiscal year.

  • Purpose of 90/10 Shift: Pays anticipated entitlement based on

projected enrollments. 10% hold-back serves as ”clean-up” to balance the books when actual enrollments are reported. Avoids state claw back of overpayment.

  • Charters have a modified schedule to speed up cash flow.
  • Tax Recognition: taxes collected in the spring are assigned to the

fiscal year beginning July 1 to join the fall tax payments for the same fiscal year. (Taxes payable 2017; revenue FY18)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Major Revenue Streams

  • General Education Revenue: available to all district and charter

schools, with some exceptions, to pay for general operations and core education programs.

  • Categorical Revenue: program specific revenue either available

through state mandate or voluntary participation.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

General Education Revenue

Key Components:

  • Basic Formula Aid = $6,188 (FY18); $6,312 (FY19) per APU
  • Compensatory (funding based on students in poverty)
  • Referendum Revenue (locally determined)
  • Sparsity Revenue (limited to certain districts)
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Compensatory Revenue

  • After Basic Formula Aid, Compensatory Revenue is the largest

component of general education (and the formula) funding.

  • Compensatory revenue calculations with the “concentration

factor” for high poverty schools remains in place.

  • Changes:
  • Formula funding increases dedicated to extended time programming.

[$35.5 million for FY18/19]

  • Compensatory Pilots made permanent: Anoka-Hennepin, Brooklyn

Center, Osseo, Robbinsdale, Rochester, South Washington, and Albert

  • Lea. [$13.9 million for FY18/19]
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Categorical Revenue

Examples:

  • Special Education
  • Achievement and Integration (rules determine funding)
  • Q Comp (voluntary; spending capped)
  • Long-Term Facilities Maintenance Revenue
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Special Education

  • Funded with federal and state dollars.
  • Funding not based on enrollment, but identified services.
  • IEP and 504 Plans
  • Slow move toward census-based formula funding
  • Cross-subsidy: Schools are funded for only a portion of their

total costs. Schools “subsidize” special education by ”crossing” over general education funding.

  • A student’s home or “Resident” district is responsible for 90%
  • f unreimbursed costs when the student open enrolls.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Charter School Funding

  • General Education Revenue per pupil, minus 4.66% of basic

formula, unless the charter provides transportation services.

  • Modified Extended Time Revenue
  • No levy or bonding authority, but receives the referendum

equalization aid for each enrolling student.

  • Special Education funding similar to school districts, except charters

may bill back 90% of eligible unreimbursed costs to resident district (with exception for charters with 90% or more special education students).

  • Building Lease Aid; LTFMR (may be used for any school related

purpose).

  • Other aids, grants, revenues similar to school district, unless the

funding requires a levy.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Community Education

  • Funded separately from general education often using a

mixture of state aid, local levies, and/or participants fees.

  • Examples include:
  • Adult Basic Education
  • School-age care
  • Youth development programs (before and after school)
  • School Readiness
  • Early Childhood Family Education (ECFE)
slide-17
SLIDE 17

School Property Taxes

School levies are paid by local property taxpayers, and are voter approved in most cases. Most levies are equalized (subsidized) with state aid including referendum and debt

  • service. Levies calculated either on RMV or ANTC.

Examples:

  • Referendum Revenue (voter approved)
  • Local Optional Revenue (board opt-out)
  • Debt Service Levy (approved by school bonds)
  • AIM (70% aid/30% levy) ; Q Comp ($169 aid/$91 levy)
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Local Tax Base

  • Referendum Market Value (RMV)
  • Residential homes, including “house/garage and one-acre”
  • Operating Referendums
  • Local Optional Revenue ($424/pupil)
  • Equity Revenue
  • Adjusted Net Tax Capacity (ANTC)
  • Residential; seasonal/recreational; agricultural; commercial
  • Debt Service Levies
  • Q Comp; AIM; Safe Schools, etc.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Referendum Equalization Aid

  • Three Tiers of Equalization
  • Tier 1; first $300/pupil = $880,000 RMV per pupil
  • Tier 2; next $460/pupil = $510,000 RMV per pupil
  • Tier 3; > $760/pupil = $290,000 RMV per pupil
  • Example: $440,000 RMV/Pupil with $1,000/pupil levy
  • Tier 1 = $150/pupil Levy; $150/pupil Aid (50% levy)
  • Tier 2 = $395/pupil Levy; $65/pupil Aid (86% levy)
  • Tier 3 = $240/pupil Levy; $0/pupil Aid (100% levy)
  • Total Levy = $785; Total Aid = $215
  • LOR ($424/pupil) Equalized at Tier 2
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Debt Service Equalization Aid

  • Tier 1 = combined debt below 15.74% district’s ANTC
  • No equalization
  • Tier 2 = portion between 15.74% and 26.24% districts ANTC
  • Greater of $4,430 or 55.33% ANTC/Pupil
  • Tier 3 = remaining portion
  • Greater of $8,000 or 100% ANTC/Pupil
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Early Learning Programs

The education budget funds a variety of early learning programs that are operated by public schools; child care centers; family child care providers; or Head Start. Examples (FY18):

  • School Readiness Aid ($33.7 million)
  • Voluntary PreK ($23.5 million)
  • School Readiness Plus ($50 million for FY18/19; shared with VPK)
  • Early Learning Scholarships ($70.2 million)
  • Early Childhood and Family Education ($30.5 million)
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Funding Early Learning

  • VPK/SR+ funded similar to formula funding; SR+ uses sliding fee

scale

  • School Readiness based on census of 4-year-olds residing in school

district and FRL%; prorated from state cap; sliding fee scale authorized (excludes Charters).

  • Early Learning Scholarships: up to $7,500/participant provided

directly via Pathway 1 or to selected programs via Pathway 2 (PW2 capped at FY17 levels)

  • ECFE funded through state aid, local levy ($22.135M), and fees.
  • Head Start: Federal funds ($105M); State Funds ($25M)
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Questions and Comments… Thank You!

Jody Withers: jwithers@edalliesmn.org