Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014
Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014 Agen enda da - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014 Agen enda da - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014 Agen enda da I. ACTION ITEMS A. Medical Center Acquisition of 500 Ray C. Hunt Drive II. REPORTS A. Treasury Report B. University of Virginia Investment Management Company Report on the
Agen enda da
- I. ACTION ITEMS
- A. Medical Center Acquisition of 500 Ray C. Hunt Drive
- II. REPORTS
- A. Treasury Report
- B. University of Virginia Investment Management Company Report on the
Long-Term Pool – Market Value and Performance as of 9/30/2104
- C. Interim Academic Division Financial Report for 9/30/2104
- D. AccessUVa Metrics Annual Report
- E. Executive Vice President’s Remarks
2
PAT R I C K D . H O G AN E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R
MEDICAL CENTER ACQUISITION
OF OF 500 RAY AY C. HUNT DRIVE
Medi dical cal Center ter Acq cquis isitio ition n of
- f 500 Ray
y C. Hunt t Drive
- Establish Fontaine as predominately
clinical and research park.
- Relocate clinical activities to provide
better patient services:
– Modern clinical space for Urology – Comprehensive clinical space for Cardiology
- $12.0 - $14.0 million acquisition cost
from Hospital Funds, reflects fair market value
- $17.15 - $21.0 million total
renovation cost from Hospital Funds
4
J AM E S M AT T E O A S S O C I AT E V I C E P R E S I D E N T & T R E A S U R E R
TREASURY
RY REPORT
Opportune time to consider changes to debt portfolio:
- Historically low interest rate environment
- Upcoming financing in early 2015
- Provides possible lever to fund University needs
6
Debt t Por
- rtf
tfoli
- lio
- Optim
timization ization
Optimization Considerations
- Reduce liquidity risk
- Diversify bank counterparties
- Better aligning ST debt with ST assets
- Lessen remarketing risk
- Reduce interest expense, where possible
7
Pot
- tential
ential Bo Bond d Fin inan ancin cing g Com
- mponents
- nents
Refinancing of Commercial Paper Refunding of Series 2005 Bonds Refunding of VCBA Series 2004B Bonds Restructuring of Series 2003A Bonds $36 million callable on June 1, 2015 $18 million currently callable $78 million variable rate bonds outstanding supported by operating
- liquidity. Restructure to mitigate put risk and reduce reliance on
- perating liquidity.
Estimated $200 million outstanding at time of refinancing Series 2015 Bond Issue Size Up to $332 million of refunded debt
8
Con
- nsi
sider derations ations for
- r Fu
Futu ture e Fin inan ancin cings gs
- Appropriate mix of Fixed vs. Variable balances risk and cash opportunity
through interest cost savings
- Fixed rate debt vs. Variable rate debt:
Variable Rate Debt
- Historically attractive short-term interest rates
- Creates near-term cash flow savings
- Results in better match between short-term assets and
short-term liabilities
- Historically attractive long-term interest rates
- Higher cost of capital in the near-term
- Locks in low long-term rates
Fixed Rate Debt
- The University cannot
predict future interest rates; however, we can evaluate historical market conditions to help project possible future trends
- Consideration should be
given to historical interest rates and the predicted future rates as inherently shown in the future yield curve
9
Evalu aluatin ating g Inter terest est Rat ate Envi vironm
- nment
ent
Tax-exempt Yield Curve vs Historical Average * Maturity Year
* Assumes market rates as of November 5, 2014 compared to historical average AAA tax-exempt rates since January 1, 1991
- Attempt to take advantage of historically low long-term fixed rates
with the next bond issue
- Consider “averaging in” more variable rate debt over time
- Target a medium-term goal of better matching ST assets and ST
liabilities as a risk management tool.
10
Debt t Issu ssuan ance ce Objecti jectives es
11
Hi Hist stori
- rical
cal Debt t Mix ix
* Long-term Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. Assumes all variable rate debt is hedged at fixed payer swap rate. Source: Wells Fargo.
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Fixed Rate $853,065 $839,645 $1,015,847 $994,608 $1,065,064 $1,052,073 Synthetic Fixed 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Unhedged Variable 38,425 52,710 58,860 106,102 118,232 184,432 % Variable 4% 5% 5% 9% 9% 14% Total 991,490 992,355 1,174,707 1,200,710 1,283,296 1,336,505 Long-term WACC * 4.24% 4.24% 4.16% 4.16% 4.17% 4.17%
12
Proj
- ject
ected ed Debt t Mix ix – Pas ast t Practice actice
- The University has historically refinanced its commercial paper with fixed rate bonds
- Over time, variable rate exposure has fluctuated as commercial paper is drawn and then permanently
financed
* Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield.
6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 Long-term WACC * 4.17% 4.14% 4.14% 4.13% 4.30%
13
Fin inan ancin cing g Optio tion n 1 – Ac Accelera celerate ted d Var ariabl iable
- The University can issue long-term variable rate debt to refinance outstanding commercial paper
- In FY18, the University would issue $80 million in fixed rate bonds to achieve 20% unhedged long-term
variable rate debt
* Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield.
6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 Long-term WACC * 4.17% 3.73% 3.74% 3.74% 3.69%
14
Fin inan ancin cing g Optio tion n 2 – Ba Bala lance ced d Ap Approac
- ach
- The University can issue $120 million variable rate and $80 million fixed rate in FY 15 to refinance
- utstanding commercial paper
- In a rising interest rate environment, this approach results in a lower WACC and also mitigates risks
associated with variable rate debt
* Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield.
6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 Long-term WACC * 4.17% 3.90% 3.90% 3.90% 3.62%
- At February 2015 meeting:
– Seek BOV Authorizing Resolution for bond issue – Seek BOV Approval to Amend the University’s Debt Policy to address:
- Remarketing Procedures
- Diversification of bank exposure
- Staggered expiration of credit facilities
- Staggered maturities of put-able debt
- Reintroduction of debt burden ratio (as required by the Commonwealth)
- Consider Drafting a Liquidity Policy:
– Formalizing liquidity targets would provide transparency and help ensure support from rating agencies and investors
15
Next xt St Step eps
L AR RY K O C H AR D C H I E F E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E R O F U V I M C O
ENDOWMENT REPORT: MARKET VALUE AND PERFORMANCE AS
AS OF OF
JUNE 30, 2014
Outl tline ine
- Governance and Staffing
- Performance Review
- Asset Allocation
- Risk Management
- Going Forward
17
Gover ernance ance an and Sta d Staffin ffing
Board of Directors
- 11 members led by David MacFarlane as Chair, three appointed by the
BOV, and one by the President
- BOV representatives are Mac Caputo, John Harris, and John Macfarlane
- Meets four times a year
Staff
- 32 UVIMCO team members
- Investment team comprised of CEO/CIO, three Managing Directors, three
Associates, three Senior Analysts, and one Analyst
- Average of 20 years of investment experience among senior staff
18
Perf rfor
- rman
mance ce Re Revie view
As of June 30, 2014 $ Millions % 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR 20 YR Long Term Pool 6,950 100.0 19.0 12.4 15.2 10.8 12.6 Policy Benchmark 100.0 16.6 8.9 12.4 7.5 7.6 Equity Public 1,530 22.0 26.8 15.9 22.9 14.4 12.9 Long / Short 1,611 23.2 11.3 11.7 10.7 9.8 10.2 Buyout 996 14.3 28.3 15.1 19.8 14.3
- Venture Capital
384 5.5 61.8 30.2 29.4 12.6 21.1 Total Equity 4,521 65.1 23.3 15.0 17.9 12.6 14.9 MSCI All Country World Equity 60.0 23.6 10.9 14.9 8.0 7.6 Real Assets Real Estate 527 7.6 14.7 12.1 1.0 (1.2) 3.8 Resources 340 4.9 27.1 11.6 26.0 21.2
- Total Real Assets
867 12.5 19.3 11.5 15.5 10.7 11.8 MSCI Real Estate 10.0 11.6 9.7 18.6 8.7 8.6 Fixed Income, Cash & MAC Marketable Alternatives and Credit 761 10.9 14.6 11.1 12.9 7.4 8.1 Government Bonds 605 8.7 0.4 0.3 1.5 4.6 6.6 Cash & Currency 195 2.8 0.1 (0.0) 0.1
- Total Fixed Income, Cash & MAC
1,561 22.4 7.4 5.3 7.4 5.8 7.3 Barclays Aggregate Bond 30.0 4.8 4.1 4.7 4.9 6.2 Market Value Annualized
19
Perf rfor
- rman
mance ce Re Revie view
Annualized Returns of the Long Term Pool Versus Benchmarks and Peers
Periods Ending June 30, 2014 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR 20 YR Long Term Pool 19.0 12.4 15.2 10.8 12.6 Policy Portfolio Benchmark 16.6 8.9 12.4 7.5 7.6 Comparative Industry Data TUCS All Master Trusts Top Quartile (1) 17.6 10.5 13.4 7.7 9.2 TUCS All Master Trusts Median 15.7 9.4 12.1 7.0 8.6 TUCS All Master Trusts Bottom Quartile 12.6 7.6 10.2 6.3 8.0
(1)
Trust Universe Comparison Service (TUCS) reports performance of over 900 institutions representing $3.5 trillion in assets under management
20
As Asse set t Al Allo location cation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
As of June 30, 2014
Public Equity Long/Short Equity Private Equity Real Estate Resources Marketable Alternatives & Credit Bonds & Cash
22.0% 23.2% 19.8% 7.6% 4.9% 10.9% 11.5% 30% Fixed
Income
10% Real Assets 60% Equity Policy Portfolio
21
Ri Risk sk Man anagemen ement
Risk is the likelihood of a random, undesirable outcome
- For the University of Virginia, risk is the impact that a portfolio loss may
have on the operations of the institution
- Short term – volatility in payout from the endowment
- Long term – decline in the real value of the endowment
- Trade-off between short term and long term risk
- We bear risks only if doing so generates higher long-term returns
- Types of Risk: Market, Manager, and Liquidity
- Risk Committee
22
Go Goin ing g Fo Forwar ard
- Constantly reassess the current portfolio
- Recent analyses include real estate, resources, and public equity
- A deep dive into long/short equity scheduled for December
- Manage risk and rebalance
- Be opportunistic
- Most important, understand our edge
23
M E L O D Y B I AN C H E T TO A S S O C I AT E V I C E P R E S I D E N T F O R F I N A N C E
SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 ACADEMIC DIVISION INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
Se Sept ptemb ember er 30, 0, 2014 14 Ac Academic demic Divisi ision
- n Interim
terim Fin inancial ancial Re Repor port
25
- Unaudited, modified GAAP-basis Financial Statements
- Statement of Net Position, compared to 6/30/14
- Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position,
compared to 9/30/13
- Cash-basis Comparative Statement of Operating Sources and
Uses, actual results as compared to the budget plan through 9/30/14
Ac Academic demic Division ision Interim terim Fin inancial ancial Re Repo port t Hi Highli hlights ghts Modified dified GAA AAP-Bas Basis is Fin inancial ancial Sta Statement tement
(U (Unaud udite ited, d, in millions ns)
26
Statement of Net Position 9/30/14 6/30/14 Net Assets $ 6,547.0 $ 6,336.9 Statement of Revenue, Expenses, Change in Net Position 9/30/14 9/30/13 Net Tuition $ 251.6 $ 237.4 Grants & Contracts 86.8 85.1 State Appropriations 135.7 137.1 Gifts 37.9 28.2 Other 76.9 63.3 Operating Revenues 588.9 551.1 Operating Expenses 374.3 354.1 Net Operating Margin 214.5 197.1 Net Non-Operating Activity (4.4) 134.4 Change in Net Assets $ 210.1 $ 331.5
Ac Academic demic Division ision Interim terim Fin inancial ancial Re Repo port t Hi Highli hlights ghts Ca Cash sh-Bas Basis is Ope peratin rating g So Sour urces ces and d Us Uses es, Bu Budget et vs. . Ac Actual tual
(in millions) ions)
9/30/14 Budget 9/30/14 Actual Net Tuition and Fees $ 258.1 $ 259.8 Grants & Contracts 70.0 68.6 Endowment Distribution and Gifts 106.0 108.2 State Appropriations 142.6 135.7 Other 111.0 112.1 Sources of Funds 687.7 684.4 Instruction 76.0 75.4 Research and Public Service 90.0 90.3 Academic Support 48.0 48.3 Other Education and General 70.5 69.1 Financial Aid, Auxiliary, Debt, and Other 114.5 112.1 Uses of Funds 399.0 395.2 Net Sources in Excess of Uses $ 288.7 $ 289.2
27
ACCESSUV UVA METRICS ANNUAL REPORT
PAT R I C K D . H O G AN E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R
Ac Acce cessUV ssUVa
29
“Need-blind” admission policy Commitment to meet 100% of students’ demonstrated financial need
UVa is one of only two public universities with need-blind admissions and a guarantee to meet 100% of all students’ demonstrated financial need
Acc ccess ess Affordabi dability ity
Ensurin suring g Ac Acce cess ss and d Af Affor
- rdabilit
dability y th through
- ugh Ac
Acce cessUV ssUVa
Goals: Attracting, enrolling, and graduating a socio- economically diverse student body Ensuring financial support to students demonstrating financial need Preserving AccessUVa program’s position as one of the strongest commitments to guaranteed need- based aid in the country
30
23.7% 33.3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Fall 2005 Fall 2007 Fall 2009 Fall 2011 Fall 2013
Ac Access essUV UVa a Key y Inf nformatio mation
31
PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WITH NEED
Since the inception of the AccessUVa program, the percentage of undergraduate students with financial need has grown from 24% to 33%.
UVa Fir irst st-Year ear Underg dergraduate raduate To Total tal Pric ice e of At Atte tendance ndance Ac Academic demic Yea ear r 2014 14-15 15
Tuition & Fees $12,998 Orientation Fee 210 Room 5,492 Board 4,560 Books, Travel, Other 4,157 Total $27,417 % students on aid: 34% For students on aid: Average Grant Package $10,587 Average Net Price $16,830 Maximum Loan Offered Low-income: $3,500 Others with Need: $7,000 Tuition & Fees $42,184 Orientation Fee 210 Room 5,492 Board 4,560 Books, Travel, Other 5,390 Total $57,836 % students on aid 32% For students on aid: Average Grant Package $27,659 Average Net Price $30,177 Maximum Loan Offered $7,000
In-State Out-of-State
32
Ac Acce cessUV ssUVa a Measur easures es
Pell grant recipients Need-based financial aid recipients Student indebtedness Graduation rates
33
UVa has been successful in increasing socioeconomic diversity, maintaining top graduation rates, and meeting 100% of need while limiting student indebtedness.
34
To Total al Und nderg rgradu raduate ate Pell ll Gr Gran ant Recipients ipients
Since the beginning of AccessUVa, the percentage of Pell Grant recipients among the total undergraduate population has almost doubled.
Source: Student Information System and financial aid applications. NCES College Navigator for peer data. 7.5% 13.2%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
In-State Total Out-of-State
Fall Terms
AccessUVa Begins AccessUVa Fully Implemented
35
Und nderg rgra raduate duate Stud udent nt Ind ndebted tedness ness
- UVa’s average total 2013-14 student debt
($22,933) is lower than the following 2011-12 averages (most recent data available):
- State of Virginia
$25,017
- Public four-year
$29,309
- United States
$29,400
- A reflection of UVa’s low net price and robust
AccessUVa program, 35% of UVa students borrow, compared to the national average of 71% and the State of Virginia average of 60%.
In line with national trends, UVa’s average undergraduate student indebtedness has risen from $15,176 to $22,933, an increase of 51%. This is due to increased cost of attendance, economic downturn, and funding pressures for financial aid.
Source: US News and World Report
$- $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000
Average Total Student Debt upon Graduation (includes all education loans)
Und nderg rgra raduate duate Six ix-Year ear Gr Grad aduatio uation n Rates ates
36
- UVa has the highest overall graduation
rate of any public institution in the nation.
- UVa has the second highest graduation
rate of Pell recipients among any public institution in the nation.
Source: Institutional Assessment & Students and US News & World Report dataset
Objective is to bring the Pell recipient graduation rate up to the level of students without need by:
- providing robust student programming
to guide incoming students’ transition to and persistence in the University,
- monitoring academic performance, and
- providing one-to-one support
throughout their University career.
50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Includes all 1st-time 1st-year students who entered in the given year.
Students without Need Students With Need but not Pell Pell Recipients Entering Fall Term
Lookin
- king
g Ah Ahead ead
AccessUVa continues to be the premier need-based aid program for a public institution in the United States, supporting the University’s efforts to increase socioeconomic diversity. Focused Effort:
Bringing graduation rates of Pell recipients to the level of undergraduate students without need Moderating student indebtedness, mindful of the rising cost of attendance
An important challenge going forward is meeting the increasing need of middle-income families through an appropriate balance of grants and loans.
37
The following five slides outline AccessUVa funding sources and provide a demographic breakdown of the undergraduate need-based financial aid recipients, as well as the institutional funds distributed to support their financial aid.
38
Ac Acce cessUV ssUVa a Key Infor
- rmation
mation
Sour urces ces of Fu Fund ndin ing
39
Most notable areas of growth include tuition grants and loans.
Und nderg rgra raduate duate Need-Based Based Fin inan ancial ial Ai Aid Re Reci cipi pients ents Fal all l 20 2014 14 Al All U l Und nderg rgrad raduate uate Stud udents nts
40
SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies
Notes:
- 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines
as of November 6, 2014.
- 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used
above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four.
- 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race.
All Undergraduate Students Students with Need (AccessUVa Recipients) 15,544 5,179 $0 - 46,100 1,069 1,051 $46,101 - $92,200 700 668 >92,200 1,284 605 Did not Apply for Aid 1,485 Subtotal 4,538 2,324 $0 - 46,100 798 750 $46,101 - $92,200 823 759 >92,200 3,222 1,346 Did not Apply for Aid 6,163 Subtotal 11,006 2,855
All Undergraduate Students
Total Minority Students Other Students
33% of undergraduate student population
Und nderg rgra raduate duate Need-Based Based Fin inan ancial ial Ai Aid Re Reci cipi pients ents Fal all l 20 2014 14 In In-State tate Und nderg rgrad raduate uate Stud udents ents
41
SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies
All Undergraduate Students Students with Need (AccessUVa Recipients) 10,742 3,680 $0 - 46,100 783 767 $46,101 - $92,200 536 508 >92,200 1,028 427 Did not Apply for Aid 1,201 Subtotal 3,548 1,702 $0 - 46,100 632 592 $46,101 - $92,200 628 569 >92,200 2,292 817 Did not Apply for Aid 3,642 Subtotal 7,194 1,978
In-State Undergraduate Students
Total Minority Students Other Students
Notes:
- 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines
as of November 6, 2014.
- 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used
above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four.
- 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race.
Und nderg rgra raduate duate Need-Based Based Fin inan ancial ial Ai Aid Re Reci cipi pients ents Fal all l 20 2014 14 Out ut-of
- f-State
State Und ndergrad raduate uate Stud udents ents
42
SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies
All Undergraduate Students Students with Need (AccessUVa Recipients) 4,802 1,499 $0 - 46,100 286 284 $46,101 - $92,200 164 160 >92,200 256 178 Did not Apply for Aid 284 Subtotal 990 622 $0 - 46,100 166 158 $46,101 - $92,200 195 190 >92,200 930 529 Did not Apply for Aid 2,521 Subtotal 3,812 877
Out-of-State Undergraduate Students
Total Minority Students Other Students
Notes:
- 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines
as of November 6, 2014.
- 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used
above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four.
- 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race.
43
2013-2014 2014-2015 AccessUVa
# Students, with federal need # Diverse Students, with federal need Institutional Funds # Students, with federal need # Diverse Students, with federal need Institutional Funds
In-state - family income range: $0 - $46,100 1,355 754 $ 9,009,931 1,359 767 $ 8,776,797 In-state - family income range: $46,100 - $92,200 1,109 513 5,817,453 1,077 508 6,720,086 In-state - family income range: above $92,200 1,158 391 1,075,992 1,244 427 1,385,509
Total In-State
3,622 1,658 15,903,376 3,680 1,702 16,882,392 Out-of-state - family income range: $0 - $46,100 441 266 15,745,217 442 284 15,042,740 Out-of-state - family income range: $46,100 - $92,200 326 149 7,949,898 350 160 9,162,273 Out-of-state - family income range: above $92,200 711 190 6,114,866 707 178 6,965,775
Total Out-of-State
1,478 605 29,809,981 1,499 622 31,170,788
Total In-State and Out-of-State
5,100 2,263 $ 45,713,357 5,179 2,324 $ 48,053,180 Notes: The schedule shows how only unrestricted dollars from tuition and unrestricted private funds are distributed through the AccessUVa program. In addition, roughly an additional $30M in grants funded from federal, state, external, and restricted gifts and endowment sources are distributed. From all sources, more than half of all grants are allocated to in-state students and half of all grants are allocated to out-of-state students each year. In-state tuition is used only for aid to in-state students, while out-of- state tuition is used only for aid to out-of-state students. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines. The income ranges used above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four. Data as of 11/06/14. SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies
Underg dergraduate raduate Nee eed-Based Based Fin inancial ancial Ai Aid d Re Reci cipients pients and d Institutional stitutional Fu Funds nds, Fall ll 2013 13-14 14 and d 2014 14-15 15
PAT R I C K D . H O G AN E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT’S REMARKS
Executive Vice President’s Remarks
- Merit Salary Increases
45
Res Result lts s of Rec Recent ent Mer erit it-Based Based Co Compens pensation ation Ad Adjust ustments ments Oct ctob
- ber
er 2014 14
- Teaching & Research Faculty – Board-approved 4.75% merit pool
- University Staff, Professional Research Staff and A&P Faculty – Board-
approved 3% merit pool
- Classified Staff – 0%, not legislatively-authorized
Faculty and Staff Merit-Based Salary Increases
- Total investment $15.4 million
– $7.3 million other sources (grants, contracts, auxiliary, etc.) – $8.1 million BOV-authorized funds
46
Res Result lts s of Rec Recent ent Mer erit it-Based Based Co Compens pensation ation Ad Adjust ustments ments Oct ctob
- ber
er 2014 14
Employee Type Total # Eligible # Received Increase % Received Increase Average % Increase Teaching + Research Faculty
2,293 1,679* 73% 4.5%
Professional Research Staff
327 217 66% 2.6%
Administrative + Professional Faculty
468 398 85% 3.1%
University Staff
2,987 2,718 91% 2.9%
TOTAL
6,075 5,012 83%
47
*Excludes SOM clinical faculty with the opportunity for compensation increases through UPG. Note: In 2013-14, UVa’s compensation ranking among AAU peer institutions was #27. The goal is to reach the 20th position.