Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014 Agen enda da - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

meeting of the finance committee november 13 2014 agen
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014 Agen enda da - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014 Agen enda da I. ACTION ITEMS A. Medical Center Acquisition of 500 Ray C. Hunt Drive II. REPORTS A. Treasury Report B. University of Virginia Investment Management Company Report on the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Meeting of the Finance Committee November 13, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agen enda da

  • I. ACTION ITEMS
  • A. Medical Center Acquisition of 500 Ray C. Hunt Drive
  • II. REPORTS
  • A. Treasury Report
  • B. University of Virginia Investment Management Company Report on the

Long-Term Pool – Market Value and Performance as of 9/30/2104

  • C. Interim Academic Division Financial Report for 9/30/2104
  • D. AccessUVa Metrics Annual Report
  • E. Executive Vice President’s Remarks

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

PAT R I C K D . H O G AN E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R

MEDICAL CENTER ACQUISITION

OF OF 500 RAY AY C. HUNT DRIVE

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Medi dical cal Center ter Acq cquis isitio ition n of

  • f 500 Ray

y C. Hunt t Drive

  • Establish Fontaine as predominately

clinical and research park.

  • Relocate clinical activities to provide

better patient services:

– Modern clinical space for Urology – Comprehensive clinical space for Cardiology

  • $12.0 - $14.0 million acquisition cost

from Hospital Funds, reflects fair market value

  • $17.15 - $21.0 million total

renovation cost from Hospital Funds

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

J AM E S M AT T E O A S S O C I AT E V I C E P R E S I D E N T & T R E A S U R E R

TREASURY

RY REPORT

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Opportune time to consider changes to debt portfolio:

  • Historically low interest rate environment
  • Upcoming financing in early 2015
  • Provides possible lever to fund University needs

6

Debt t Por

  • rtf

tfoli

  • lio
  • Optim

timization ization

Optimization Considerations

  • Reduce liquidity risk
  • Diversify bank counterparties
  • Better aligning ST debt with ST assets
  • Lessen remarketing risk
  • Reduce interest expense, where possible
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Pot

  • tential

ential Bo Bond d Fin inan ancin cing g Com

  • mponents
  • nents

Refinancing of Commercial Paper Refunding of Series 2005 Bonds Refunding of VCBA Series 2004B Bonds Restructuring of Series 2003A Bonds $36 million callable on June 1, 2015 $18 million currently callable $78 million variable rate bonds outstanding supported by operating

  • liquidity. Restructure to mitigate put risk and reduce reliance on
  • perating liquidity.

Estimated $200 million outstanding at time of refinancing Series 2015 Bond Issue Size Up to $332 million of refunded debt

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Con

  • nsi

sider derations ations for

  • r Fu

Futu ture e Fin inan ancin cings gs

  • Appropriate mix of Fixed vs. Variable balances risk and cash opportunity

through interest cost savings

  • Fixed rate debt vs. Variable rate debt:

Variable Rate Debt

  • Historically attractive short-term interest rates
  • Creates near-term cash flow savings
  • Results in better match between short-term assets and

short-term liabilities

  • Historically attractive long-term interest rates
  • Higher cost of capital in the near-term
  • Locks in low long-term rates

Fixed Rate Debt

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • The University cannot

predict future interest rates; however, we can evaluate historical market conditions to help project possible future trends

  • Consideration should be

given to historical interest rates and the predicted future rates as inherently shown in the future yield curve

9

Evalu aluatin ating g Inter terest est Rat ate Envi vironm

  • nment

ent

Tax-exempt Yield Curve vs Historical Average * Maturity Year

* Assumes market rates as of November 5, 2014 compared to historical average AAA tax-exempt rates since January 1, 1991

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Attempt to take advantage of historically low long-term fixed rates

with the next bond issue

  • Consider “averaging in” more variable rate debt over time
  • Target a medium-term goal of better matching ST assets and ST

liabilities as a risk management tool.

10

Debt t Issu ssuan ance ce Objecti jectives es

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Hi Hist stori

  • rical

cal Debt t Mix ix

* Long-term Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. Assumes all variable rate debt is hedged at fixed payer swap rate. Source: Wells Fargo.

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Fixed Rate $853,065 $839,645 $1,015,847 $994,608 $1,065,064 $1,052,073 Synthetic Fixed 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Unhedged Variable 38,425 52,710 58,860 106,102 118,232 184,432 % Variable 4% 5% 5% 9% 9% 14% Total 991,490 992,355 1,174,707 1,200,710 1,283,296 1,336,505 Long-term WACC * 4.24% 4.24% 4.16% 4.16% 4.17% 4.17%

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Proj

  • ject

ected ed Debt t Mix ix – Pas ast t Practice actice

  • The University has historically refinanced its commercial paper with fixed rate bonds
  • Over time, variable rate exposure has fluctuated as commercial paper is drawn and then permanently

financed

* Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield.

6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 Long-term WACC * 4.17% 4.14% 4.14% 4.13% 4.30%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Fin inan ancin cing g Optio tion n 1 – Ac Accelera celerate ted d Var ariabl iable

  • The University can issue long-term variable rate debt to refinance outstanding commercial paper
  • In FY18, the University would issue $80 million in fixed rate bonds to achieve 20% unhedged long-term

variable rate debt

* Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield.

6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 Long-term WACC * 4.17% 3.73% 3.74% 3.74% 3.69%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Fin inan ancin cing g Optio tion n 2 – Ba Bala lance ced d Ap Approac

  • ach
  • The University can issue $120 million variable rate and $80 million fixed rate in FY 15 to refinance
  • utstanding commercial paper
  • In a rising interest rate environment, this approach results in a lower WACC and also mitigates risks

associated with variable rate debt

* Long-term WACC does not take into consideration outstanding commercial paper. FY15 fixed rate borrowing based on market rates as of October 14, 2014. FY18 fixed rate borrowing assumed at current market rates plus 200 bps yield.

6/30/2014 6/30/2015 6/30/2016 6/30/2017 6/30/2018 Long-term WACC * 4.17% 3.90% 3.90% 3.90% 3.62%

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • At February 2015 meeting:

– Seek BOV Authorizing Resolution for bond issue – Seek BOV Approval to Amend the University’s Debt Policy to address:

  • Remarketing Procedures
  • Diversification of bank exposure
  • Staggered expiration of credit facilities
  • Staggered maturities of put-able debt
  • Reintroduction of debt burden ratio (as required by the Commonwealth)
  • Consider Drafting a Liquidity Policy:

– Formalizing liquidity targets would provide transparency and help ensure support from rating agencies and investors

15

Next xt St Step eps

slide-16
SLIDE 16

L AR RY K O C H AR D C H I E F E X E C U T I V E O F F I C E R O F U V I M C O

ENDOWMENT REPORT: MARKET VALUE AND PERFORMANCE AS

AS OF OF

JUNE 30, 2014

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Outl tline ine

  • Governance and Staffing
  • Performance Review
  • Asset Allocation
  • Risk Management
  • Going Forward

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Gover ernance ance an and Sta d Staffin ffing

Board of Directors

  • 11 members led by David MacFarlane as Chair, three appointed by the

BOV, and one by the President

  • BOV representatives are Mac Caputo, John Harris, and John Macfarlane
  • Meets four times a year

Staff

  • 32 UVIMCO team members
  • Investment team comprised of CEO/CIO, three Managing Directors, three

Associates, three Senior Analysts, and one Analyst

  • Average of 20 years of investment experience among senior staff

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Perf rfor

  • rman

mance ce Re Revie view

As of June 30, 2014 $ Millions % 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR 20 YR Long Term Pool 6,950 100.0 19.0 12.4 15.2 10.8 12.6 Policy Benchmark 100.0 16.6 8.9 12.4 7.5 7.6 Equity Public 1,530 22.0 26.8 15.9 22.9 14.4 12.9 Long / Short 1,611 23.2 11.3 11.7 10.7 9.8 10.2 Buyout 996 14.3 28.3 15.1 19.8 14.3

  • Venture Capital

384 5.5 61.8 30.2 29.4 12.6 21.1 Total Equity 4,521 65.1 23.3 15.0 17.9 12.6 14.9 MSCI All Country World Equity 60.0 23.6 10.9 14.9 8.0 7.6 Real Assets Real Estate 527 7.6 14.7 12.1 1.0 (1.2) 3.8 Resources 340 4.9 27.1 11.6 26.0 21.2

  • Total Real Assets

867 12.5 19.3 11.5 15.5 10.7 11.8 MSCI Real Estate 10.0 11.6 9.7 18.6 8.7 8.6 Fixed Income, Cash & MAC Marketable Alternatives and Credit 761 10.9 14.6 11.1 12.9 7.4 8.1 Government Bonds 605 8.7 0.4 0.3 1.5 4.6 6.6 Cash & Currency 195 2.8 0.1 (0.0) 0.1

  • Total Fixed Income, Cash & MAC

1,561 22.4 7.4 5.3 7.4 5.8 7.3 Barclays Aggregate Bond 30.0 4.8 4.1 4.7 4.9 6.2 Market Value Annualized

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Perf rfor

  • rman

mance ce Re Revie view

Annualized Returns of the Long Term Pool Versus Benchmarks and Peers

Periods Ending June 30, 2014 1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR 20 YR Long Term Pool 19.0 12.4 15.2 10.8 12.6 Policy Portfolio Benchmark 16.6 8.9 12.4 7.5 7.6 Comparative Industry Data TUCS All Master Trusts Top Quartile (1) 17.6 10.5 13.4 7.7 9.2 TUCS All Master Trusts Median 15.7 9.4 12.1 7.0 8.6 TUCS All Master Trusts Bottom Quartile 12.6 7.6 10.2 6.3 8.0

(1)

Trust Universe Comparison Service (TUCS) reports performance of over 900 institutions representing $3.5 trillion in assets under management

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

As Asse set t Al Allo location cation

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

As of June 30, 2014

Public Equity Long/Short Equity Private Equity Real Estate Resources Marketable Alternatives & Credit Bonds & Cash

22.0% 23.2% 19.8% 7.6% 4.9% 10.9% 11.5% 30% Fixed

Income

10% Real Assets 60% Equity Policy Portfolio

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Ri Risk sk Man anagemen ement

Risk is the likelihood of a random, undesirable outcome

  • For the University of Virginia, risk is the impact that a portfolio loss may

have on the operations of the institution

  • Short term – volatility in payout from the endowment
  • Long term – decline in the real value of the endowment
  • Trade-off between short term and long term risk
  • We bear risks only if doing so generates higher long-term returns
  • Types of Risk: Market, Manager, and Liquidity
  • Risk Committee

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Go Goin ing g Fo Forwar ard

  • Constantly reassess the current portfolio
  • Recent analyses include real estate, resources, and public equity
  • A deep dive into long/short equity scheduled for December
  • Manage risk and rebalance
  • Be opportunistic
  • Most important, understand our edge

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

M E L O D Y B I AN C H E T TO A S S O C I AT E V I C E P R E S I D E N T F O R F I N A N C E

SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 ACADEMIC DIVISION INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Se Sept ptemb ember er 30, 0, 2014 14 Ac Academic demic Divisi ision

  • n Interim

terim Fin inancial ancial Re Repor port

25

  • Unaudited, modified GAAP-basis Financial Statements
  • Statement of Net Position, compared to 6/30/14
  • Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position,

compared to 9/30/13

  • Cash-basis Comparative Statement of Operating Sources and

Uses, actual results as compared to the budget plan through 9/30/14

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Ac Academic demic Division ision Interim terim Fin inancial ancial Re Repo port t Hi Highli hlights ghts Modified dified GAA AAP-Bas Basis is Fin inancial ancial Sta Statement tement

(U (Unaud udite ited, d, in millions ns)

26

Statement of Net Position 9/30/14 6/30/14 Net Assets $ 6,547.0 $ 6,336.9 Statement of Revenue, Expenses, Change in Net Position 9/30/14 9/30/13 Net Tuition $ 251.6 $ 237.4 Grants & Contracts 86.8 85.1 State Appropriations 135.7 137.1 Gifts 37.9 28.2 Other 76.9 63.3 Operating Revenues 588.9 551.1 Operating Expenses 374.3 354.1 Net Operating Margin 214.5 197.1 Net Non-Operating Activity (4.4) 134.4 Change in Net Assets $ 210.1 $ 331.5

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Ac Academic demic Division ision Interim terim Fin inancial ancial Re Repo port t Hi Highli hlights ghts Ca Cash sh-Bas Basis is Ope peratin rating g So Sour urces ces and d Us Uses es, Bu Budget et vs. . Ac Actual tual

(in millions) ions)

9/30/14 Budget 9/30/14 Actual Net Tuition and Fees $ 258.1 $ 259.8 Grants & Contracts 70.0 68.6 Endowment Distribution and Gifts 106.0 108.2 State Appropriations 142.6 135.7 Other 111.0 112.1 Sources of Funds 687.7 684.4 Instruction 76.0 75.4 Research and Public Service 90.0 90.3 Academic Support 48.0 48.3 Other Education and General 70.5 69.1 Financial Aid, Auxiliary, Debt, and Other 114.5 112.1 Uses of Funds 399.0 395.2 Net Sources in Excess of Uses $ 288.7 $ 289.2

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

ACCESSUV UVA METRICS ANNUAL REPORT

PAT R I C K D . H O G AN E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Ac Acce cessUV ssUVa

29

“Need-blind” admission policy Commitment to meet 100% of students’ demonstrated financial need

UVa is one of only two public universities with need-blind admissions and a guarantee to meet 100% of all students’ demonstrated financial need

Acc ccess ess Affordabi dability ity

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Ensurin suring g Ac Acce cess ss and d Af Affor

  • rdabilit

dability y th through

  • ugh Ac

Acce cessUV ssUVa

Goals: Attracting, enrolling, and graduating a socio- economically diverse student body Ensuring financial support to students demonstrating financial need Preserving AccessUVa program’s position as one of the strongest commitments to guaranteed need- based aid in the country

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

23.7% 33.3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Fall 2005 Fall 2007 Fall 2009 Fall 2011 Fall 2013

Ac Access essUV UVa a Key y Inf nformatio mation

31

PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS WITH NEED

Since the inception of the AccessUVa program, the percentage of undergraduate students with financial need has grown from 24% to 33%.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

UVa Fir irst st-Year ear Underg dergraduate raduate To Total tal Pric ice e of At Atte tendance ndance Ac Academic demic Yea ear r 2014 14-15 15

Tuition & Fees $12,998 Orientation Fee 210 Room 5,492 Board 4,560 Books, Travel, Other 4,157 Total $27,417 % students on aid: 34% For students on aid: Average Grant Package $10,587 Average Net Price $16,830 Maximum Loan Offered Low-income: $3,500 Others with Need: $7,000 Tuition & Fees $42,184 Orientation Fee 210 Room 5,492 Board 4,560 Books, Travel, Other 5,390 Total $57,836 % students on aid 32% For students on aid: Average Grant Package $27,659 Average Net Price $30,177 Maximum Loan Offered $7,000

In-State Out-of-State

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Ac Acce cessUV ssUVa a Measur easures es

Pell grant recipients Need-based financial aid recipients Student indebtedness Graduation rates

33

UVa has been successful in increasing socioeconomic diversity, maintaining top graduation rates, and meeting 100% of need while limiting student indebtedness.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

To Total al Und nderg rgradu raduate ate Pell ll Gr Gran ant Recipients ipients

Since the beginning of AccessUVa, the percentage of Pell Grant recipients among the total undergraduate population has almost doubled.

Source: Student Information System and financial aid applications. NCES College Navigator for peer data. 7.5% 13.2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014

In-State Total Out-of-State

Fall Terms

AccessUVa Begins AccessUVa Fully Implemented

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Und nderg rgra raduate duate Stud udent nt Ind ndebted tedness ness

  • UVa’s average total 2013-14 student debt

($22,933) is lower than the following 2011-12 averages (most recent data available):

  • State of Virginia

$25,017

  • Public four-year

$29,309

  • United States

$29,400

  • A reflection of UVa’s low net price and robust

AccessUVa program, 35% of UVa students borrow, compared to the national average of 71% and the State of Virginia average of 60%.

In line with national trends, UVa’s average undergraduate student indebtedness has risen from $15,176 to $22,933, an increase of 51%. This is due to increased cost of attendance, economic downturn, and funding pressures for financial aid.

Source: US News and World Report

$- $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000

Average Total Student Debt upon Graduation (includes all education loans)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Und nderg rgra raduate duate Six ix-Year ear Gr Grad aduatio uation n Rates ates

36

  • UVa has the highest overall graduation

rate of any public institution in the nation.

  • UVa has the second highest graduation

rate of Pell recipients among any public institution in the nation.

Source: Institutional Assessment & Students and US News & World Report dataset

Objective is to bring the Pell recipient graduation rate up to the level of students without need by:

  • providing robust student programming

to guide incoming students’ transition to and persistence in the University,

  • monitoring academic performance, and
  • providing one-to-one support

throughout their University career.

50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Includes all 1st-time 1st-year students who entered in the given year.

Students without Need Students With Need but not Pell Pell Recipients Entering Fall Term

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Lookin

  • king

g Ah Ahead ead

AccessUVa continues to be the premier need-based aid program for a public institution in the United States, supporting the University’s efforts to increase socioeconomic diversity. Focused Effort:

Bringing graduation rates of Pell recipients to the level of undergraduate students without need Moderating student indebtedness, mindful of the rising cost of attendance

An important challenge going forward is meeting the increasing need of middle-income families through an appropriate balance of grants and loans.

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The following five slides outline AccessUVa funding sources and provide a demographic breakdown of the undergraduate need-based financial aid recipients, as well as the institutional funds distributed to support their financial aid.

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Ac Acce cessUV ssUVa a Key Infor

  • rmation

mation

Sour urces ces of Fu Fund ndin ing

39

Most notable areas of growth include tuition grants and loans.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Und nderg rgra raduate duate Need-Based Based Fin inan ancial ial Ai Aid Re Reci cipi pients ents Fal all l 20 2014 14 Al All U l Und nderg rgrad raduate uate Stud udents nts

40

SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies

Notes:

  • 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines

as of November 6, 2014.

  • 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used

above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four.

  • 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race.

All Undergraduate Students Students with Need (AccessUVa Recipients) 15,544 5,179 $0 - 46,100 1,069 1,051 $46,101 - $92,200 700 668 >92,200 1,284 605 Did not Apply for Aid 1,485 Subtotal 4,538 2,324 $0 - 46,100 798 750 $46,101 - $92,200 823 759 >92,200 3,222 1,346 Did not Apply for Aid 6,163 Subtotal 11,006 2,855

All Undergraduate Students

Total Minority Students Other Students

33% of undergraduate student population

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Und nderg rgra raduate duate Need-Based Based Fin inan ancial ial Ai Aid Re Reci cipi pients ents Fal all l 20 2014 14 In In-State tate Und nderg rgrad raduate uate Stud udents ents

41

SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies

All Undergraduate Students Students with Need (AccessUVa Recipients) 10,742 3,680 $0 - 46,100 783 767 $46,101 - $92,200 536 508 >92,200 1,028 427 Did not Apply for Aid 1,201 Subtotal 3,548 1,702 $0 - 46,100 632 592 $46,101 - $92,200 628 569 >92,200 2,292 817 Did not Apply for Aid 3,642 Subtotal 7,194 1,978

In-State Undergraduate Students

Total Minority Students Other Students

Notes:

  • 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines

as of November 6, 2014.

  • 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used

above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four.

  • 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race.
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Und nderg rgra raduate duate Need-Based Based Fin inan ancial ial Ai Aid Re Reci cipi pients ents Fal all l 20 2014 14 Out ut-of

  • f-State

State Und ndergrad raduate uate Stud udents ents

42

SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies

All Undergraduate Students Students with Need (AccessUVa Recipients) 4,802 1,499 $0 - 46,100 286 284 $46,101 - $92,200 164 160 >92,200 256 178 Did not Apply for Aid 284 Subtotal 990 622 $0 - 46,100 166 158 $46,101 - $92,200 195 190 >92,200 930 529 Did not Apply for Aid 2,521 Subtotal 3,812 877

Out-of-State Undergraduate Students

Total Minority Students Other Students

Notes:

  • 1. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines

as of November 6, 2014.

  • 2. Need and income categories above are based on federal need and federal income as reported on the FAFSA. The income ranges used

above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four.

  • 3. “Minority Students” includes African American, Native American, Asian, Hispanic, Native Hawaiian, and multi-race.
slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

2013-2014 2014-2015 AccessUVa

# Students, with federal need # Diverse Students, with federal need Institutional Funds # Students, with federal need # Diverse Students, with federal need Institutional Funds

In-state - family income range: $0 - $46,100 1,355 754 $ 9,009,931 1,359 767 $ 8,776,797 In-state - family income range: $46,100 - $92,200 1,109 513 5,817,453 1,077 508 6,720,086 In-state - family income range: above $92,200 1,158 391 1,075,992 1,244 427 1,385,509

Total In-State

3,622 1,658 15,903,376 3,680 1,702 16,882,392 Out-of-state - family income range: $0 - $46,100 441 266 15,745,217 442 284 15,042,740 Out-of-state - family income range: $46,100 - $92,200 326 149 7,949,898 350 160 9,162,273 Out-of-state - family income range: above $92,200 711 190 6,114,866 707 178 6,965,775

Total Out-of-State

1,478 605 29,809,981 1,499 622 31,170,788

Total In-State and Out-of-State

5,100 2,263 $ 45,713,357 5,179 2,324 $ 48,053,180 Notes: The schedule shows how only unrestricted dollars from tuition and unrestricted private funds are distributed through the AccessUVa program. In addition, roughly an additional $30M in grants funded from federal, state, external, and restricted gifts and endowment sources are distributed. From all sources, more than half of all grants are allocated to in-state students and half of all grants are allocated to out-of-state students each year. In-state tuition is used only for aid to in-state students, while out-of- state tuition is used only for aid to out-of-state students. The above figures include all undergraduate students who submitted a FAFSA and who had financial need based on federal guidelines. The income ranges used above correspond with the 2012 federal poverty guidelines for a family of four. Data as of 11/06/14. SOURCE: University of Virginia Institutional Assessment and Studies

Underg dergraduate raduate Nee eed-Based Based Fin inancial ancial Ai Aid d Re Reci cipients pients and d Institutional stitutional Fu Funds nds, Fall ll 2013 13-14 14 and d 2014 14-15 15

slide-44
SLIDE 44

PAT R I C K D . H O G AN E X E C U T I V E V I C E P R E S I D E N T A N D C H I E F O P E R AT I N G O F F I C E R

EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT’S REMARKS

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Executive Vice President’s Remarks

  • Merit Salary Increases

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Res Result lts s of Rec Recent ent Mer erit it-Based Based Co Compens pensation ation Ad Adjust ustments ments Oct ctob

  • ber

er 2014 14

  • Teaching & Research Faculty – Board-approved 4.75% merit pool
  • University Staff, Professional Research Staff and A&P Faculty – Board-

approved 3% merit pool

  • Classified Staff – 0%, not legislatively-authorized

Faculty and Staff Merit-Based Salary Increases

  • Total investment $15.4 million

– $7.3 million other sources (grants, contracts, auxiliary, etc.) – $8.1 million BOV-authorized funds

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Res Result lts s of Rec Recent ent Mer erit it-Based Based Co Compens pensation ation Ad Adjust ustments ments Oct ctob

  • ber

er 2014 14

Employee Type Total # Eligible # Received Increase % Received Increase Average % Increase Teaching + Research Faculty

2,293 1,679* 73% 4.5%

Professional Research Staff

327 217 66% 2.6%

Administrative + Professional Faculty

468 398 85% 3.1%

University Staff

2,987 2,718 91% 2.9%

TOTAL

6,075 5,012 83%

47

*Excludes SOM clinical faculty with the opportunity for compensation increases through UPG. Note: In 2013-14, UVa’s compensation ranking among AAU peer institutions was #27. The goal is to reach the 20th position.