Measuring Outcomes of Land habitat in different ways. Outcome - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

measuring outcomes of land
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Measuring Outcomes of Land habitat in different ways. Outcome - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Preliminary Report Regulations and acquisitions protect Measuring Outcomes of Land habitat in different ways. Outcome information for both is limited, and Acquisitions and Regulations can be improved. December 2017 Rachel Murata | Suzanna


slide-1
SLIDE 1

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 1

Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisitions and Regulations

Preliminary Report Regulations and acquisitions protect habitat in different ways. Outcome information for both is limited, and can be improved.

December 2017 Rachel Murata | Suzanna Pratt | Eric Thomas

slide-2
SLIDE 2

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 2

Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (RCO) Salmon Recovery Funding Board (RCO) Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration Program (PSP, RCO) Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program (PSP, RCO, WDFW) State Parks and Recreation Commission Trust Land Transfer program and other DNR expenditures Other programs that expand outdoor recreation

6 Acquisition Programs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 3

Growth management regulations regarding critical areas (Commerce) Wetland restrictions (Ecology) Shoreline management rules (Ecology) Forest practices regulation (DNR) Hydraulic Project Approval program (WDFW) Clean Water Act (Ecology) Flood plain management (Ecology)

7 Regulatory Programs

slide-4
SLIDE 4

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 4

Focus on habitat in six counties

Asotin Okanogan Kittitas King Jefferson Clark

slide-5
SLIDE 5

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 5

1 2 3

Key findings

Regulations and acquisitions protect habitat in different ways. Outcome information can be improved through statutory direction, agency planning and investments in monitoring. Land stewardship plans do not include measurable

  • utcomes.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 6

Choose one break slide option and use throughout presentation. Please use a high quality image relating to your study, or work with admin to find a neutral

  • image. Examples: Q:\Computer
  • IT\Graphics\Photos
  • 1. Regulation and

acquisition protect habitat in different ways

slide-7
SLIDE 7

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 7

Regulation or acquisition? Depends on goals

May be for reasons other than habitat protection Level of protection

  • General or targeted protection?
  • Restrict or prevent development?

Species’ habitat requirements

  • How much habitat does it need to

live (home range)?

  • Does species avoid edge of habitat?

Some species avoid habitat edges, reducing amount of usable habitat.

Usable Habitat Habitat

Edge buffer

slide-8
SLIDE 8

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 8

Acquisition

  • Can create more contiguous

protection Regulation

  • Creates narrow bands
  • f protection
  • Can be large gaps in

areas protected

Different patterns of protected areas

for regulations and acquisitions named in study and six counties

slide-9
SLIDE 9

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 9

Mapping analysis takeaways

New effort to map where regulations apply

  • Complements

existing conservation planning tools

Conservation goals should determine approach

  • Species needs
  • Approaches are not

mutually exclusive

  • Other conservation

tools available

Analysis does not evaluate outcomes

  • f protected area
slide-10
SLIDE 10

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 10

Choose one break slide option and use throughout presentation. Please use a high quality image relating to your study, or work with admin to find a neutral

  • image. Examples: Q:\Computer
  • IT\Graphics\Photos
  • 2. Outcome information can

be improved through statutory direction, and agency planning and investments in monitoring.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 11

Outcomes indicate how effective the program

  • r project is in meeting its goals

Action

  • Grants issued
  • Funding provided
  • Applications

approved

Output

  • Grant compliance
  • Acres acquired
  • Projects

completed

Outcome

  • Change in species

population

  • Maintain or

improve habitat quality

slide-12
SLIDE 12

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 12

Dedicated resources for monitoring Clear monitoring plan with goals, desired

  • utcomes, and metrics

Legal requirement to monitor outcome measures

Programs measuring outcomes share three traits

slide-13
SLIDE 13

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 13

Outcomes measured for five programs

Three salmon recovery acquisition programs: Three funded monitoring strategies: project effectiveness, population trends, and species level data. Forest practices regulations: DNR has an adaptive management program to ensure effective implementation and adjustments to rules. Clean Water Act regulations: Ecology has a long-term strategy for monitoring and analyzing water quality data.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 14

Outcome measures for acquisition programs required by statute, but not developed

Except for three salmon recovery programs, outcomes (how well programs work) not measured Statute requires OFM and RCO to use outcome-focused performance measures for grant programs

Actions Outputs Outcomes

Not available

slide-15
SLIDE 15

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 15

OFM and RCO should develop and submit a joint plan to the Legislature detailing the actions, costs, and timelines needed to comply with statutes that direct them to measure performance.

Legislative Auditor Recommendation #1

slide-16
SLIDE 16

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 16

Local governments implement state regulations

  • Local work varies widely
  • Some effectiveness studies
  • No comprehensive monitoring
slide-17
SLIDE 17

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 17

Local approaches vary

Legal requirement Clear monitoring plan

There is no systematic approach to statewide

  • utcome

measurement.

Dedicated resources No statutory requirement Local jurisdictions report limited capacity Guidance exists; some jurisdictions monitor

slide-18
SLIDE 18

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 18

If the Legislature wants reliable information about the outcomes of regulatory programs implemented at the local level, it should require that state agencies work with local governments to develop outcome-focused performance measures. Legislative Auditor Recommendation #2

slide-19
SLIDE 19

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 19

Choose one break slide option and use throughout presentation. Please use a high quality image relating to your study, or work with admin to find a neutral

  • image. Examples: Q:\Computer
  • IT\Graphics\Photos
  • 3. Land stewardship plans

do not include measurable

  • utcomes.
slide-20
SLIDE 20

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 20

Agency management plans include stewardship activities

Stewardship: activities that maintain or improve the quality of habitat and recreation resources.

Fence repair Infrastructure maintenance Forest thinning Weed control Habitat restoration Recreational development

slide-21
SLIDE 21

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 21

Plans vary in completeness, contents, updates

None of the plans include measureable stewardship outcomes

  • 20% of Natural Areas have plans.
  • No updates since funding eliminated in 2009.
  • 100% of Wildlife Areas have plans.
  • Updates every 2 years, currently rewriting all plans.
  • 80% of State Parks have plans.
  • Currently writing plans for all parks.

WDFW DNR State Parks

slide-22
SLIDE 22

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 22

Hypothetical example: forest management

F D C B A D A

Actions, resources, funding Current condition

  • High tree density
  • Insect infestation
  • Trees of similar age
  • Low plant species diversity

Desired condition

  • Lower tree density
  • No insect infestation
  • Variable tree age
  • High plant species diversity
slide-23
SLIDE 23

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 23

DNR, WDFW, and State Parks should provide the Legislature with a plan detailing the resources necessary to report stewardship needs.

Legislative Auditor Recommendation #3

slide-24
SLIDE 24

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 24

Land stewardship plans do not include measurable

  • utcomes

Outcome information can be improved Regulations and acquisitions protect habitat in different ways

Key findings

slide-25
SLIDE 25

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 25

3 Legislative Auditor recommendations

1 2 3

OFM and RCO should develop and submit a joint plan to the Legislature detailing the actions, costs, and timelines needed to comply with statutes that direct them to measure performance of acquisition programs. The Legislature should consider requiring state agencies to work with local governments to develop outcome-focused performance measures for regulatory programs implemented at the local level. DNR, WDFW, and State Parks should provide the Legislature with a plan detailing the resources necessary to report stewardship needs.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 26

Next Step Full Report

Proposed Final Report January 2018

leg.wa.gov/jlarc/reports/2017/HabitatLands/p/default.html

slide-27
SLIDE 27

December 2017 Preliminary Report: Measuring Outcomes of Land Acquisition and Regulation 27

Contact Us

Eric Thomas (360)786-5182 eric.thomas@leg.wa.gov John Woolley (360)786-5184 john.woolley@leg.wa.gov Research Analysts Audit Coordinator Suzanna Pratt (360)786-5106 suzanna.pratt@leg.wa.gov Rachel Murata (360)786-5293 rachel.murata@leg.wa.gov