Master Plan Process December 2018 Master Plan Components Facility - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

master plan process
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Master Plan Process December 2018 Master Plan Components Facility - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Master Plan Process December 2018 Master Plan Components Facility Condition Index (FCI) Process Enrollment Projection Study (ongoing now) Master Plan Development Steps Facility Condition Index (FCI) General Indicator of a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Master Plan Process December 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 Facility Condition Index (FCI) Process

  • Enrollment Projection Study (ongoing now)
  • Master Plan Development Steps

Master Plan Components

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • General Indicator of a facilities health
  • Uses repair cost estimated for next 5 years for a school
  • The higher the FCI the greater the need
  • FCI is only one indicator and is not the only factor to

consider when identifying renovation, replacement or closure candidates

Facility Condition Index (FCI)

Best Good

  • d Average
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Facility Condition Index (FCI) Examples

  • Nearly New School Building would have a nearly zero % FCI
  • Total Estimated Repair Cost (over next 5 years) = $405,641 (Interior, Mechanical)
  • Total Replacement Cost = $25,381,142
  • FCI % = $405,641 / $25,381,142 = 1.60 % FCI or nearly zero.
  • An older School Building would typically have a much higher FCI
  • Total Estimated Repair Cost = $2,565,911(Roof, Interior, Mechanical, Exterior)
  • Total Replacement Cost = $10,670,276
  • FCI % = $2,565,911 / $10,670,276 = 24.1% FCI
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Good; FCI % less than or equal to 10% Average; FCI % from 11% to 20% Below Average; FCI % from 21% to 30% Poor; FCI % from 31% to 50% Very Poor; FCI % from 51% to 65% Replacement; FCI % greater than 65%

FCI Ranges

slide-6
SLIDE 6

FCI Campus Scores by Range

All schools are still safe and operational for our students, but some have older,

  • utdated components. The FCI % reveals the cost to replace older building

systems and main components.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FCI Deficiencies by Building System

  • Mechanical; heating/ventilating/cooling equipment, exhaust fans, condensers,

BARD/window units, chillers, cooling towers

  • Interior; carpet, flooring, inside walls, ceilings, inside doors, locks, painting
  • Roofing; self-explanatory
  • Site; playgrounds, signage, parking lots, trees, sidewalks, fences, gates, exterior lighting,

bus loops, parent drop-off loops

  • Exterior; windows, outside doors and walls/veneers, painting
  • Fire and Life Safety; fire alarm systems, sprinkler, security systems, stage sprinklers
  • Electrical; power panels, wiring, lighting fixtures
  • Specialties; cabinetry, casework
  • Plumbing; pipes, faucets, toilets, showers
  • Technology; cabling, switches, distribution systems
  • Elevators (Conveyances); self-explanatory
  • Structural; Floor joists, floor settling, wall cracks
slide-8
SLIDE 8

FCI Deficiencies by Building System

  • Mechanical; $262M, 24.4%
  • Interior; $244M, 22.6%
  • Roofing; $129M, 12%
  • Site; $115M, 10.7%
  • Exterior; $96M, 8.9%
  • Fire and Life Safety; $61M, 5.6%
  • Electrical; $58M, 5.4%
  • Specialties; $58M, 5.4%
  • Plumbing; $30M, 2.8%
  • Technology; $17M, 1.6%
  • Elevators (Conveyances); $6M, 0.5%
  • Structural; $0.1M, nearly zero %
  • Total of $1.08B across entire District
slide-9
SLIDE 9

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus

  • The higher the FCI the more cost-effective to replace vs. repair
  • Campuses with FCIs greater than 65% are within Replacement category, 51% to 65% fall

within Very Poor category, 31% to 50% fall within Poor category

slide-10
SLIDE 10

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus

  • Campuses with FCIs between 21% to 30% fall within Below Average category
slide-11
SLIDE 11

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus

  • Campuses with FCIs between 11% to 20% fall within Average category, and less than

10% fall within the Good Category.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 1 – Honorable Cheryl Grymes

slide-13
SLIDE 13

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 2 – Honorable Elizabeth Andersen

slide-14
SLIDE 14

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 3 – Honorable Ashley Smith Juarez

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 4 – Honorable Darryl Willie

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 5 – Honorable Warren Jones

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 6 – Honorable Charlotte Joyce

slide-18
SLIDE 18

FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 7 – Honorable Lori Hershey

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Below table shows the historical rise rates of regular zoned

students (i.e., neighborhood schools)

  • Note 5 to 6 rise rates, loss of 25% of students entering middle

schools

  • Return of 10 to 15% of students shown in 8 to 9 rise rate

Enrollment Projection

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Note Charter School Growth above bottom line

Enrollment Projection

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Master Plan Development Steps - Tentative

School Board Workshops

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Utilize Enrollment Projection Report to help determine which action, if any, to choose.

Master Plan Development Steps - Past

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Master Plan Development Steps - Past

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Additional Factors to Consider
  • School Grade
  • Enrollment Projection
  • Impacts on Enrollment Growth/Loss
  • Campus Acreage for Add’l Buildings
  • Proximity of Nearby Schools
  • Impact on specific area of School District
  • Program Impacts
  • Transportation Costs

Master Plan Development Steps

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Questions?