Master Plan Process December 2018 Master Plan Components Facility - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Master Plan Process December 2018 Master Plan Components Facility - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Master Plan Process December 2018 Master Plan Components Facility Condition Index (FCI) Process Enrollment Projection Study (ongoing now) Master Plan Development Steps Facility Condition Index (FCI) General Indicator of a
Facility Condition Index (FCI) Process
- Enrollment Projection Study (ongoing now)
- Master Plan Development Steps
Master Plan Components
- General Indicator of a facilities health
- Uses repair cost estimated for next 5 years for a school
- The higher the FCI the greater the need
- FCI is only one indicator and is not the only factor to
consider when identifying renovation, replacement or closure candidates
Facility Condition Index (FCI)
Best Good
- d Average
Facility Condition Index (FCI) Examples
- Nearly New School Building would have a nearly zero % FCI
- Total Estimated Repair Cost (over next 5 years) = $405,641 (Interior, Mechanical)
- Total Replacement Cost = $25,381,142
- FCI % = $405,641 / $25,381,142 = 1.60 % FCI or nearly zero.
- An older School Building would typically have a much higher FCI
- Total Estimated Repair Cost = $2,565,911(Roof, Interior, Mechanical, Exterior)
- Total Replacement Cost = $10,670,276
- FCI % = $2,565,911 / $10,670,276 = 24.1% FCI
Good; FCI % less than or equal to 10% Average; FCI % from 11% to 20% Below Average; FCI % from 21% to 30% Poor; FCI % from 31% to 50% Very Poor; FCI % from 51% to 65% Replacement; FCI % greater than 65%
FCI Ranges
FCI Campus Scores by Range
All schools are still safe and operational for our students, but some have older,
- utdated components. The FCI % reveals the cost to replace older building
systems and main components.
FCI Deficiencies by Building System
- Mechanical; heating/ventilating/cooling equipment, exhaust fans, condensers,
BARD/window units, chillers, cooling towers
- Interior; carpet, flooring, inside walls, ceilings, inside doors, locks, painting
- Roofing; self-explanatory
- Site; playgrounds, signage, parking lots, trees, sidewalks, fences, gates, exterior lighting,
bus loops, parent drop-off loops
- Exterior; windows, outside doors and walls/veneers, painting
- Fire and Life Safety; fire alarm systems, sprinkler, security systems, stage sprinklers
- Electrical; power panels, wiring, lighting fixtures
- Specialties; cabinetry, casework
- Plumbing; pipes, faucets, toilets, showers
- Technology; cabling, switches, distribution systems
- Elevators (Conveyances); self-explanatory
- Structural; Floor joists, floor settling, wall cracks
FCI Deficiencies by Building System
- Mechanical; $262M, 24.4%
- Interior; $244M, 22.6%
- Roofing; $129M, 12%
- Site; $115M, 10.7%
- Exterior; $96M, 8.9%
- Fire and Life Safety; $61M, 5.6%
- Electrical; $58M, 5.4%
- Specialties; $58M, 5.4%
- Plumbing; $30M, 2.8%
- Technology; $17M, 1.6%
- Elevators (Conveyances); $6M, 0.5%
- Structural; $0.1M, nearly zero %
- Total of $1.08B across entire District
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus
- The higher the FCI the more cost-effective to replace vs. repair
- Campuses with FCIs greater than 65% are within Replacement category, 51% to 65% fall
within Very Poor category, 31% to 50% fall within Poor category
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus
- Campuses with FCIs between 21% to 30% fall within Below Average category
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus
- Campuses with FCIs between 11% to 20% fall within Average category, and less than
10% fall within the Good Category.
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 1 – Honorable Cheryl Grymes
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 2 – Honorable Elizabeth Andersen
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 3 – Honorable Ashley Smith Juarez
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 4 – Honorable Darryl Willie
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 5 – Honorable Warren Jones
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 6 – Honorable Charlotte Joyce
FCI, Utilization, & School Grade by Campus District 7 – Honorable Lori Hershey
- Below table shows the historical rise rates of regular zoned
students (i.e., neighborhood schools)
- Note 5 to 6 rise rates, loss of 25% of students entering middle
schools
- Return of 10 to 15% of students shown in 8 to 9 rise rate
Enrollment Projection
- Note Charter School Growth above bottom line
Enrollment Projection
Master Plan Development Steps - Tentative
School Board Workshops
Utilize Enrollment Projection Report to help determine which action, if any, to choose.
Master Plan Development Steps - Past
Master Plan Development Steps - Past
- Additional Factors to Consider
- School Grade
- Enrollment Projection
- Impacts on Enrollment Growth/Loss
- Campus Acreage for Add’l Buildings
- Proximity of Nearby Schools
- Impact on specific area of School District
- Program Impacts
- Transportation Costs