Mandatory Pre-SOQ Meeting April 26, 2017 Regional Environmental - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Gravity Pipeline Mandatory Pre-SOQ Meeting April 26, 2017 Regional Environmental Sewer Conveyance Upgrade Agenda Introduction and RESCU Overview Gravity Pipeline Project RFQ/RFP Process Overview RFQ Sections
Regional Environmental Sewer Conveyance Upgrade
Owner’s Representative Teresa Herrera Front of Plant Project Manager Bill Bryan Owner’s Advisor Brown & Caldwell Quality Assurance Tanner Pacific Progressive Design Builder To be determined Gravity Pipeline Project Manager Bruce Burnworth Owner’s Advisor Kennedy Jenks/COWI Quality Assurance Tanner Pacific Progressive Design Builder To be determined Operations & Maintenance Financial Legal Environmental CEQA
Regional Environmental Sewer Conveyance Upgrade
WEST BAY SANITARY DISTRICT SAN CARLOS BELMONT
MENLO PARK WOODSIDE
EMERALD HILLS
REDWOOD CITY
Front of Plant
Selected Alternative
– EPB TBM 15’ OD, 17,600 feet long – 100 year Service Life – Diurnal and Seasonal Equalization
4 pump stations with a Booster Pump Station and Influent Lift Pumps Joints every 12’ in RCP Force Main thru YBM
repair . . . potentially catastrophic.
Pipe cracked (not a joint separation) Raw sewage flowing from separated and offset joint
Adjacent to airport . . . valve bonnet blew off . . . . . . raw sewage into the air
2013/2014 Open Cut in Street Open Cut in Levee Lay in Slough Lay in Lagoon Microtunnel (shallow) 2014/2015 Microtunnel (deep) Tunnel Boring Machine (deep)
From SVCW Plant From near Airport
Sliplining (w/ bypass) Parallel Smaller Pipes Pipe Bursting (w/ bypass) Pipe Splitting (w/bypass) Swege (w/bypass) Replace in place (w/bypass)
Front of Plant
Selected Alternative
“Success” - collaboratively implementing an appropriate balance of the following:
the goals of the Program at the lowest practical capital and lifecycle cost.
maintain.
present level of service with existing facilities.
concerns, and implement a Program that best meets the combined needs of stakeholders while reaching the Program’s goals.
receive, convey and equalize wastewater flows ranging from 2 mgd to 103 mgd in full compliance with environmental requirements.
the Project at the lowest practical capital and lifecycle cost. Provide early and ongoing total Gravity Pipeline cost predictability.
so that the existing failing pipeline and pump stations can be taken out of operation as early as reasonably possible.
anticipate and control. Assign to SVCW the risks that the Design-Builder cannot reasonably anticipate and control.
performance of all services under Stage 1 and Stage 2. SVCW to provide a single point of accountability for all direction to the Design-Builder.
management, engineering, operations and maintenance as well as the Design-Build contractor and engineer to develop a design that optimally achieves SVCW success factors and Gravity Pipeline requirements.
Pipeline goals.
10 AC Site Receiving Lift Station
Front of Plant
Odor Control Headworks Electrical Infrastructure
– Screens – Grit Removal
~2 mgd to 23 mgd
are about 100 mgd
18 mgd with peak storm flows remaining ~103 mgd
– Dry weather diurnal flows (constant ~10-13 mgd) – Wet weather equalization (max.~60mgd) – Wet weather equalization appears feasible with 11’ ID pipeline and use of Drying Bed A or 13’ ID pipeline alone
San Carlos Drop Structure
Shaft
– FRP in tunnel – HDPE lining
– HDPE lined segments
– Multiple layers of defense
Sewers
Denmark
differential equations and Monte Carlo simulations
physical processes, inter-phase mass transport as well as wastewater and air hydraulics
by more than $40 million
schedule by more than a year
life
weather equalization
RFQ Section 3.6 Gravity Pipeline Budget
$170 million is CIP amount budgeted for Gravity Pipeline PDB work Stages 1 and 2 (includes design, construction and contingency) $163 million is current construction cost estimate for the Gravity Pipeline as described in the EIR (does not include project management, design, construction management
Lowest practical capital and lifecycle cost to provide a complete functional gravity pipeline and inlet facilities that meet the goals of the Project
(much shorter needed)
Risks
February rail survey
months) Benefits
– BCDC – California F&WS
– Four private owners – Three public agencies
– SRF – WIFIA
– RFQ issuance, – Pre-submittal meeting – SOQ Submittal – Reference checking – Interviews with selected Respondents – Shortlisting of three (or up to four) Respondents
– RFP issuance to short-listed Respondents, – Pre-Proposal Meeting – Confidential Meetings with each short-listed Respondent – Proposal Submittal – Reference checking – Interviews – Selection of winning Respondent – Negotiation of Progressive Design Build Contract
– Collaboratively bring the design from a 5% to 10% level to a 60% to 70% level – Negotiate Stage 2 Contract Pricing and Schedule (in Phases)
– Final design – Construction – Testing and Start-up
– As needed to move project forward quickly
(FOP Schedule a few weeks different)
Questions on RFQ May 1 RFQ Responses May 8 SOQ Submission May 16 Interview list May 22 Interviews May 30-31 RFP Shortlist June 5 RFP Issued June 8 Pre-Proposal Meeting June 12 Confidential Meetings July 18-19 Proposals Due August 2 Interviews August 16-17 Election of preferred Respondent August 28 Stage 1 Approval October
Responsibility Matrix (P – Primary) Item / Task Responsibility Allocation Item / Task Definition SVCW Design- Builder Environmental Review P Completion and acceptance of Environmental Impact Report and CEQA review for project as currently defined Environmental Permits P Obtain COE, BCDC, CAFWS permits for project as currently defined Right of way P Obtain easements and agreements for alignment and staging areas for project as currently defined Modif dificat icatio ion n to CEQA, , Envir vironme
ntal al Permits mits and right t of way ay P Changes needed due to Design-Builder ideas that are different from project as defined in CEQA review and environmental permits Construction Permits P Construction permits after contract execution (e.g., city road excavation permits) Environmental Compliance P Compliance with applicable CEQA and permit conditions Design n integrati ation
between n FoP and GP P Contracts for the two projects will require design coordination from both teams to work together and with SVCW to establish construction “turnover” milestones for the RLS shaft Approval of “turnover” milestones and FoP compliance P SVCW responsible for approving the “turnover” milestones and for FoP compliance with the “turnover” milestones Design Liability P Preconstruction services scope will include task for Design-Builder to revie iew and accept cept or propos pose modif ificat ication ions to design n crit iteri ria a and design n conc ncepts pts previousl viously develope loped
Responsibility Matrix (P – Primary) Item / Task Responsibility Allocation Item / Task Definition SVCW Design- Builder Existing Geotechnical Information P SVCW will provide existing geotechnical information but will only allow Design-Builder to rely on data (not interpretation) Evaluation of existi ting g geotec technical informa mati tion P Design-Build team will be required to have its own geotechnical / foundation engineer for interpretation Site Investigation after Contract Finalization P Preconstruction services scope will include task for Design-Builder to conduct further er geotec technical and groundw dwater ter studi dies es Approval of Geotechnical Baseline Report P SVCW responsible for approving the GBR prep epare red d by Design gn-Bu Builde der r collabo bora rati tive vely with SVCW W during g Stage ge 1 Preconstru tructi tion Reasonably Foreseeable Site Conditions and Buried Utilities P Design-Builder will have respon ponsibi bility ty for conditi tions s that could be reasonabl bly y forese eseen en Site Conditions and Buried Utilities that could not be reasonably foreseen by Design-Builder P SVCW will have the risk of site conditions that could d not be reasonabl bly y forese eseen en by the Design-Builder (as defined in the contract) Condition Assessment of Existing Connection Points after Contract Finalization P Preconstruction services scope will include task for Design-Builder to conduct condition assessment of accessible connection points. Design-Builder will propose additional work required to utilize proposed connection points or alternatives Future Influent Characteristics P SVCW is responsible for changes in influent characteristics over time
Responsibility Matrix (P – Primary) Item / Task Responsibility Allocation Item / Task Definition SVCW Design- Builder Existing Influent Characteristics P Design-Builder responsible for confirming existing influent characteristics as needed to design for 100 service life Facility Life of 100 years Performance P Design-Builder responsible for achieving 100 0 year servi vice life with reasonabl ble e mainten tenance e and
rati tional paramete meters rs conside deri ring g life cycle e costs Project Scope and Quality Definition P SVCW responsible for defining project scope and quality
scope and quality Design Build Cost P Design-Builder will be responsible for designing and constructing project to be the lowest st practi tical capita tal and life cycle e cost to meet SVCW objectives and keep costs within SVCW CIP budget allocated to Design- Builder Construction Schedule P Design-Builder responsible for achieving the best t practi tical safe spee eed d to complete the tunnel and inlet structures so that the existing pipeline and pump stations can be taken out of operation as early as reasonably possible Delays to FoP project due to GP project P Delays due to failure of GP Design-Builder to meet turnover milestone at exit shaft Delays to GP project due to FoP project P Delays due to failure of FoP Design-Builder to make shaft available for TBM removal Construction Quality P Design-Builder risk responsible to meet standards established in contract Financing and Payment P SVCW is responsible for obtaining financing and timely payment to the Design-Builder Changes in Law P SVCW risk if laws or regulations change after contract execution Labor Relations P Design-Builder risk
Design-Builder’s proposal shall include a price proposal based on the project defined in the RFP with the following components:
through 60% completion).
construction and start-up costs) to cover the following:
– Home office overhead – Profit
to Stage 2 costs will remain fixed throughout the project unless changes are approved by the Authority.
(completion of design and all construction).
Stage 1 services (design through 60% completion) will be compensated
Stage 2 of the Project will proceed only if SVCW and the Design-Builder come to agreement on a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) or a lump sum for all remaining design and construction work during Stage
clause, which will entitle the Designer-Builder a percentage of any savings the Design-Builder achieves by reaching Final Completion under the GMP. All Stage 2 pricing information will be developed by the Design-Builder and shared with SVCW as an “open book.”
SVCW intends to obtain an Owner Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP) for the Project at SVCW's expense, including the following coverages:
Design-Builder will be required to enroll in the OCIP, if SVCW obtains an OCIP. In addition, Design-Builder will be required to carry the following insurance during all stages of the Project:
appendices) will be favorably considered. Also excludes cover letter and Table of Contents
and authorized signer)
design and construction of:
– EPB Tunneling – Shafts – Ancillary inlet facilities – Precast concrete tunnel segments and corrosion protection
qualifications
interview (based on scoring)
include:
– Presentation (25 minutes) – Q&A (45 minutes) – Closing (5 minutes)
approximately 3% of proposal score)
scored, approximately 7% of proposal score), markups memorialized in the
DB Agreement
– Indicative cost estimate envelope opened after completion of all
– For the Project as defined in the EIR/RFP – Estimating instructions will be in RFP – Evaluated subjectively based on project understanding demonstrated, clarity of cost estimate format, reasonableness of cost estimate, consistency with balance of proposal/meetings/interviews
– (approximately 5% of proposal score)
– Conceptual Designs – Geotechnical Data – Includes detailed cost estimates; capital and life cycle – Defines currently known outstanding issues
http://www.svcw.org/projects/SitePages/gravitypipeline.aspx
Regional Environmental Sewer Conveyance Upgrade