10/26/2015 1
Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis
Bilal Hameed, MD Division of Transplant Hepatology University of California, San Francisco
Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Bilal Hameed, - - PDF document
10/26/2015 Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Bilal Hameed, MD Division of Transplant Hepatology University of California, San Francisco I have no financial relationships to disclose within the past 12 months relevant to my
Bilal Hameed, MD Division of Transplant Hepatology University of California, San Francisco
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ascites (58%) Jaundice Encephalopathy GI hemorrhage Probability of developing event
60
20 40 80 100 120 140 160
Months
Gines et. al., Hepatology 1987.
60 40 80 100 120 140 160 40 60 80 20 20 100
Months Probability of survival All patients with cirrhosis Decompensated cirrhosis
180
Gines et. al., Hepatology 1987.
7-8%/year 7-8%/year 7-8%/year 7-8%/year
Merli et al. J Hepatol 2003;38:266 Merli et al. J Hepatol 2003;38:266
% Patients without bleeding % Patients without bleeding
100 100 50 50 25 25
12 12 24 24
75 75
36 36 12 12 24 24 36 36
Large Varices * * p<0.01 * p<0.01 *
No Varices Small Varices
*Merli et al., Hepatol 2003, **Conn et al., Hepatology 1991 *Merli et al., Hepatol 2003, **Conn et al., Hepatology 1991
Dig Dis. 2005;23:11-7.
liberal transfusion (Hgb <9)
increase portal pressure and rebleeding (11% vs 22%)
with restrictive transfusions
Villanueva et al, NEJM 2013 Control Antibiotic Absolute rate (n=270) (n=264) difference (95% CI) Infection 45% 14%
(-42 to –23) SBP / Bacteremia 27% 8%
(-26 to –11) Death 24% 15%
(-15 to –3) Control Antibiotic Absolute rate (n=270) (n=264) difference (95% CI) Infection 45% 14%
(-42 to –23) SBP / Bacteremia 27% 8%
(-26 to –11) Death 24% 15%
(-15 to –3)
Bernard et al., Hepatology 1999; 29:1655 Bernard et al., Hepatology 1999; 29:1655
Meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials
Hou M-C et al., Hepatology 2004 Hou M-C et al., Hepatology 2004
Prophylactic antibiotics (n=59) Prophylactic antibiotics (n=59) % free of variceal hemorrhage % free of variceal hemorrhage
1.0 1.0 0. 6 0. 6 0. 2 0. 2 0. 8 0. 8 1
No antibiotics (n=61) No antibiotics (n=61)
2 3 12 12 30 30
Follow-up (months) Follow-up (months)
18 18 24 24 0. 4 0. 4 Ofloxacin 200 mg iv q12 hr for 2 days, then oral 200 bid for 5 days Ofloxacin 200 mg iv q12 hr for 2 days, then oral 200 bid for 5 days
Greatest benefit in first 7 days
Gastroenterology 1995;109:1289-94 Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:S18-22 Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:S93-100
Hepatic vein Hepatic vein Portal vein Portal vein Splenic vein Splenic vein Superior mesenteric vein Superior mesenteric vein
esophageal varices
varices
combination endoscopic plus pharmacologic therapy (10-20%)
Gastric Varices Portal HTN Gastropathy Typical GAVE “watermelon stomach
56 yr with acute variceal bleed (1st episode) Bleeding controlled with band ligation No bleeding for 5 days Child score 10. MELD 15 MAP 90 mmHg
56 yr with acute variceal bleed (1st episode) Bleeding controlled with band ligation No bleeding for 5 days Child score 10. MELD 15 MAP 90 mmHg
(19 trials) (19 trials)(26 trials) (26 trials) (54 trials) (54 trials)
80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 Untreated Untreated - blockers - blockers Sclero- therapy Sclero- therapy (18 trials) (18 trials) Ligation Ligation (6 trials) (6 trials) HVPG- Responder s* HVPG- Responder s* (6 trials) (6 trials) -blockers + ISMN -blockers + ISMN (2 trials) (2 trials) Ligation + -blockers Ligation + -blockers Bosch and García-Pagán, Lancet 2003; 361:952 Bosch and García-Pagán, Lancet 2003; 361:952
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Planas et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006
Runyon, Hepatology 2004
(Suspicion for Infection)
Cell count & differential Culture (bedside) AFB Albumin Glucose Bilirubin Total Protein LDH Triglyceride Amylase Cytology Gram stain
Sodium restriction (<2 Gm/24 Hrs) and diuretics*
*Diuretics: Spironolactone 100 mg/day, furosemide 40 mg/day or bumetanide 1 mg/day; uptitrate stepwise to spironolactone 400 mg/day, furosemide 160 mg/day or bumetanide 4 mg/day as tolerated
volume paracentesis
Transplantation
Adapted from Runyon BA. Hepatology. 2009; 49:2087-2107.
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Bleeding Ascites Pre-op Decompression
Courtesy Dr.Jeanne M. LaBerge
Bernardi M, Carceni P et al. Hepatology 2012 Gines et al, Gastro 1988
Pache I et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005. Caldwell SH et al. Hepatology 2006.
Study N Results p Hospital Mortality
Cefotaxime vs ampicillin/ tobramycin 73 Cure 85% vs 56% <0.02 33% vs 43% Cefotaxime 5 vs 10 days 100 Cure 93% vs 91% Recurrence 12% vs 13% NS 33% vs 43% Oral ofloxacin vs cefotaxime 123 Resolution 84% vs 85% NS 19% vs 19% Cefotaxime with or without Albumin 126 Resolution 98% vs 94% Renal failure 10 vs 33% NS 0.002 10% vs 29%
Probability of SBP recurrence Months
Titó et al., Hepatology 1988; 8:27
Definition Na<130 in setting of intense sodium loss and contraction of intravascular volume Na<130 in setting of solute free water retention and expansion of ECF volume Clinical Findings Develops in a few days Signs of dehydration No ascites/edema Encephalopathy present May be transient Ascites/edema present Encephalopathy variable Causes Over diuresis Sodium loss Diarrhea Excess of solute-free water (spontaneous, fluid induced, drug induced, infections) Management Stop diuretics Treat diarrhea Give sodium cautiously Reduce fluid intake: free water restriction Increase free-water excretion
Definition Na<130 in setting of intense sodium loss and contraction of intravascular volume Na<130 in setting of solute free water retention and expansion
Clinical Findings Develops in a few days Signs of dehydration No ascites/edema Encephalopathy present May be transient Ascites/edema present Encephalopathy variable Causes Over diuresis Sodium loss Diarrhea Excess of solute-free water (spontaneous, fluid induced, drug induced, infections) Management Stop diuretics Treat diarrhea IV albumin Give sodium cautiously Reduce fluid intake: free water restriction Increase free-water excretion
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Mullen KD et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007. Poordad FF. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006. Bustamante J et al. J Hepatol. 1999.
1.
2.
3.
4.
GI hemorrhage Constipation Portosystemic shunt Deterioration in liver function Psychoactive Medications
Benzodiazepines Narcotics, sedatives
Dietary protein Noncompliance
Blei AT et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1968-1976. Mullen KD et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27(suppl 2):32-47.
Infection Shock Anemia Surgery Renal/electrolyte disturbances:
Renal failure Metabolic alkalosis Hypovolemia Hypokalemia Hyponatremia
Blei AT et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001.
Provide supportive care Identify and remove precipitating factors Reduce nitrogenous load from gut Assess need for long-term therapy
systemic collaterals)
* Neomycin (historical interest).
Adapted from Blei AT et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(7):1968-1976.
Drug Name Drug Class Indication Lactulose Poorly absorbed disaccharide
concentration
portal-systemic encephalopathy Rifaximin Non-aminoglycoside semi-synthetic, nonsystemic antibiotic Reduction in risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) recurrence in patients ≥ 18 years of age. Neomycin Aminoglycoside antibiotic Adjuvant therapy in hepatic coma Metronidazole Synthetic antiprotozoal and antibacterial agent Not approved for HE Vancomycin Aminoglycoside antibiotic Not approved for HE
Adapted from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/GastrointestinalDrugs AdvisoryCommittee/UCM203247.pdf, accessed 02/17/11
– A non-absorbable dissacharide – Bacterial flora metabolizes in the colon to lactic acid lowers the colonic pH
via retention enemas
stools per day
Mullen KD et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27(Suppl 2):32-47. Ferenci P. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27(suppl 2):10-17. Bajaj JS. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:537-547.
Bass NM. Semin Liver Dis. 2007.. Mullen KD et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 28 56 84 112 140 168
Rifaximin Placebo Proportion Without HE Breakthrough
0.77 0.53
Days Post-Randomization
58% in risk
breakthrough (P<.0001)
Bass et al. N Engl J Med. 2010.
Importance of preserving muscle mass Avoidance of protein restriction
Branch-chain amino acids (BCAA):
factors for adverse outcomes in patients with cirrhosis
year
Fede, J Hep 2012. Martin-Llahi, Gastro 2011. Tsien, Gut 2013.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) Hypotension, IV contrast, prolonged hepatorenal syndrome Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) Beta-lactam antibiotics (Zosyn, Augmentin), cephalosporins (ceftriaxone), NSAIDs IgA nephropathy* Cirrhosis, especially alcoholic Membranous nephropathy* Hepatitis B / C Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) / cryoglobulinemia* Hepatitis B / C
Diuretics Diuretics Diarrhea (lactulose) Diarrhea (lactulose) Acute GI bleed Acute GI bleed LVP w/o albumin LVP w/o albumin NSAIDs, ACE-I NSAIDs, ACE-I
Common causes of renal hypo- perfusion in cirrhotics:
Poor PO intake Poor PO intake
Tsien, Gut 2013. Arroyo, J Hep 2013.
Rapid (<2 weeks) Speed Slower course 2x baseline and >2.5 mg/dL Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL Typically SBP Associated with Refractory ascites Reversible Response to treatment May be reversible but usually recurs Extremely poor (days-weeks) Prognosis Poor (months)
International Ascites Club Guidelines.
100g/day max) for 2 days
medications
protein)
Gines and Schrier, NEJM 2009
STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3
x 2 days (max 100g/day)
Manage what you can
g/day)
Start vasoconstrictors
pressure (MAP) by >15 mmHg
TID, octreotide 200 mcg TID
Titrate
prognostic marker in cirrhotics
challenge and ruling out other causes of AKI
Pre-renal (most common) Intrinsic renal Post-renal
1.
2.
Fernandez J et al. Hepatology 2011; Arvaniti V et al. Gastroenterology 2010
Bajaj J et al. Hepatology 2012 CA: community acquired (blue) HCA: hospital acquired (brown) Noso: nosocomial (green)
Arabi YM et al. Hepatology 2012
Arabi YM et al. Hepatology 2012
Arabi YM et al. Hepatology 2012
Coagulopathy INR > 1.5 Encephalopathy No pre-existing liver disease Duration < 26 weeks
ALF Study Group, Jan 2015
*Schiødt FV, et al., Liver Transplant 2009
*Schiødt FV, et al., Liver Transplant 2009
Must have high index of suspicion at time
Condition progresses rapidly Changes in consciousness occur hour-by-
Admission or early transfer to ICU
Intensive care management of severe, rapidly
Only effective treatment: emergent liver
Order sets and daily checklists can be used No substitute for experience
Reduction of HVPG to <12 or at least by 20% reduces the risk of rebleeding from 46-65% to 0-13%
NO
Balloon Tamponade Balloon Tamponade
YES
YES
2nd Endoscopy 2nd Endoscopy
Further bleeding NO
NO
Surveillance Endoscopy and/or Life-long Pharmacotherapy Surveillance Endoscopy and/or Life-long Pharmacotherapy
YES NO YES
Initiate combination Rx Initiate combination Rx TIPS/Shunt Surgery TIPS/Shunt Surgery
Further bleeding
Is patient on EVL + Pharmacotherapy? Is patient on EVL + Pharmacotherapy?
Distribution of 1st Infection’s % of first & second infection (body sites)
CA: community acquired HCA: hospital acquired Noso: nosocomial Bajaj J et al. Hepatology 2012
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2002;5(6):471
Villanueva et al, NEJM 2013
Medical therapy Acute resuscitation IV Vasoactive drugs Antibiotic prophylaxis Endoscopic therapy Banding Injection therapy TIPS Covered stent
Garcia-Tsao G. NEJM 2010; 362: 823-832
for action. Secretion is impaired in cirrhosis
hyperkalemia
needed, maintaining ratio
parenchymal renal disease
Arroyo et al., Gastroenterology 2002; 122:1658
Months Creatinine (mg/dL)
Weeks
Therapeutic paracenteses Therapeutic paracenteses
Bustamante J et al. J Hepatol. 1999;30(5):890-895.
NM Bass, KD Mullen, S Sigal, A Sanyal, F Poordad, K Merchant, S Huang, A Shaw, E Bortey, WP Forbes Presented at: 44th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver; April 25, 2009; Copenhagen, Denmark.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Cirrhosis Non cirrhosis
30 day mortality %
Mortality in Sepsis
Fernandez et al. Hepatology 2006; Plessier et al. Liver Int 2003
Variceal hemorrhage Varix with red signs
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Hepatorenal syndrome
Knowledge of existing liver disease/portosystemic
Precipitating factors Altered mental state, hypertonicity, asterixis, fetor
Reversibility with treatment Testing to exclude other causes of altered mental
No consensus on diagnostic criteria
Mullen et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007 Blei et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001
HE can be avoided with 6 months
related HE can be avoided with 6 months of rifaximin (NNT=9)
Bass et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1071-1081.
Grabau CM et al. Hepatology 2004
cefotaxime alone versus cefotaxime plus 1.5 g albumin per kg body weight within 6 hours of enrollment and 1.0 g/kg on day 3. A decrease in mortality from 29% to 10% was reported
given when the serum creatinine is >1 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen >30 mg/dL, or total bilirubin >4 mg/dL but is not necessary in patients who do not meet these criteria.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
10 20 30 40 50 60
1980’s Non- cirrhotics Deschenes (1999) n=140
%
Fernandez (2002) n=1,567 32% 34% 20% 6% ~46% 41% Dupeyron (2001) n=589 Borzio (2001) n=405
Olson JC, Kamath PS. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011
Evans et al, Hepatology 2003: 3.5%
Gerber T, Schomerus H. Drugs. 2000;60:1353-1370; Mullen KD, Dasarathy S. In: Schiff ER, et al, eds. Schiff’s Disease of the Liver, ed 8. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1999, pp 545-581; Williams R, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:203-208.
140 consecutive
Randomized to
Primary endpoint = an
Follow-up 1-20 months
Lactulose resulted in a 58% reduction in the incidence of
INR Bilirubin Creatinine Baseline 1.5 3.0 1.2 Change in Labs 3 months later #1 3.0 3.0 1.2 #2 1.5 6.0 1.2 #3 1.5 3.0 2.4
Portal hypertension Splanchnic vasodilation Low effective arterial blood volume BP, no ascites, no edema
Adapted from Gines, NEJM 2009.
Reuken PA et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012