management in hospitalized
play

Management in Hospitalized, Non-Critical, Type 2 Diabetic Patients - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 17, 2022 •437 likes •823 views

Evaluation of Glycemic Management in Hospitalized, Non-Critical, Type 2 Diabetic Patients Caitlynn Tabaka, PharmD PGY-1 Pharmacy Resident, CoxHealth, Springfield, MO Midwest Pharmacy Residents Conference May 7 th , 2020 Disclosure Statement

  1. Evaluation of Glycemic Management in Hospitalized, Non-Critical, Type 2 Diabetic Patients Caitlynn Tabaka, PharmD PGY-1 Pharmacy Resident, CoxHealth, Springfield, MO Midwest Pharmacy Residents Conference May 7 th , 2020

  2. Disclosure Statement The speaker has no conflicts of interest to  disclose

  3. Learning Objective • To assess for appropriate glycemic management in hospitalized, non- critical, type 2 diabetic patients

  4. Cox Medical Center South  650-bed hospital in Southwest Missouri  Level-1 trauma center  Level-1 stroke center

  5. Diabetes 38% of all patients in the 34.2 million United States people have experience diabetes in the hyperglycemia United States during their hospitalization Lansang M, et al. Cleve Clin J Med . 2016; 83:S34-43 Mendez C, et al. Curr Diab Rep . 2016; 16(1):10

  6. American Diabetes Association (ADA) Guidelines • Blood glucose level > 140 Hyperglycemia mg/dL Hypoglycemia • Blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL Goal Glucose • 140 -180 mg/dL Range Ideal Insulin • Basal-bolus insulin +/- correction Regimens insulin American Diabetes Association Guidelines Umpierrez G, et al. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(9):2181-6

  7. Inpatient Glycemic Management Challenges • Fluctuating courses of acute illness • Unpredictable dietary schedules • Hospitalists varied knowledge and comfort in ordering insulin Complications • Length of stay • Cost • Infection risk • Mortality Bogun M, et al. Clin Ther. 2013;35:724 – 733 Mendez C, et al. Curr Diab Rep . 2016; 16(1):10 Gerard S, et al. J Nurs Care Qual . 2017; 32(3):267-271 Moghissi E, et al. Endocr Pract . 2009; 15(4):353-69 Lansang M, et al. Cleve Clin J Med . 2016; 83:S34-43

  8. Study Design Retrospective chart review Single center January 2019 – June 2019 IRB approved October 2019 IRB: International Review Board

  9. Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of appropriate glycemic management compared to inappropriate glycemic management in hospitalized, non-critical, type 2 diabetic patients

  10. Primary Outcome • Number of patients with blood glucose readings outside of the goal range (70 – 180 mg/dL) in comparative groups

  11. Secondary Outcomes • Rate of hyperglycemic (>180 mg/dL) episodes per patient stay • Rate of hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) episodes per patient stay • Mean blood glucose level per patient stay • Standard deviation of blood glucose levels • Mean daily basal-bolus insulin ratio administration • Rate of use of non-insulin glucose lowering agents • Length of stay

  12. Inclusion Criteria ≥18 years old Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes Admission to Cox Medical Center South from January 2019 through June 2019

  13. Exclusion Criteria Discharged within 48 hours of admission Admission to critical care unit Glycemic management consult Order for NPO status ≥24 hours Received an alternate source of nutrition ≥24 hours Diagnosis of end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis Patient did not require or refused insulin during hospital stay On hospice care NPO: Nothing by mouth

  14. Comparator Groups Inappropriate Glycemic Appropriate Glycemic Management (Group 2) Management (Group 1) • Anyone who does not • Initiated on basal and meet “Appropriate bolus insulin within 24 Glycemic hours from admission Management” criteria • Basal insulin: 50-70% • E.g. bolus insulin of total daily required monotherapy • Bolus insulin: 30-50% of total daily required

  15. Study Population ESRD: End stage renal disease NPO: Nothing by mouth DMT2: Diabetes myelitis type 2 ICU: Intensive care unit GM: Glycemic Management

  16. Baseline Characteristics Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=134) Mean Age [Range] 66 [46-80] 68 [41-96] Gender (%) Male 5 (45%) 60 (45%) Female 6 (55%) 74 (55%) Ethnicity (%) African American 2 (18%) 4 (3%) Asian 0 (0%) 1 (1%) Caucasian 8 (73%) 128 (95%) Hispanic 1 (9%) 1 (1%) Mean A1C [Range] 8.6 [6.5-10.9] 7.6 [4.3-12.7] Mean BMI [Range] 28.5 [25.7-50.3] 35.4 [21.7-85] Mean GFR [Range] 69 [26-139] 72 [16-174] Insulin-Naïve (%) 1 (9%) 75 (56%) GM: Glycemic Management

  17. Baseline Characteristics Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=134) Mean Age [Range] 66 [46-80] 68 [41-96] Gender (%) Male 5 (45%) 60 (45%) Female 6 (55%) 74 (55%) Ethnicity (%) African American 2 (18%) 4 (3%) Asian 0 (0%) 1 (1%) Caucasian 8 (73%) 128 (95%) Hispanic 1 (9%) 1 (1%) Mean A1C [Range] 8.6 [6.5-10.9] 7.6 [4.3-12.7] Mean BMI [Range] 28.5 [25.7-50.3] 35.4 [21.7-85] Mean GFR [Range] 69 [26-139] 72 [16-174] Insulin-Naïve (%) 1 (9%) 75 (56%) GM: Glycemic Management

  18. Baseline Characteristics Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=134) Mean Age [Range] 66 [46-80] 68 [41-96] Gender (%) Male 5 (45%) 60 (45%) Female 6 (55%) 74 (55%) Ethnicity (%) African American 2 (18%) 4 (3%) Asian 0 (0%) 1 (1%) Caucasian 8 (73%) 128 (95%) Hispanic 1 (9%) 1 (1%) Mean A1C [Range] 8.6 [6.5-10.9] 7.6 [4.3-12.7] Mean BMI [Range] 28.5 [25.7-50.3] 35.4 [21.7-85] Mean GFR [Range] 69 [26-139] 72 [16-174] Insulin-Naïve (%) 1 (9%) 75 (56%) GM: Glycemic Management

  19. Primary Outcome Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=134) Number of patients with blood glucose 11 (100%) 129 (96%) readings outside of goal range (%) GM: Glycemic Management

  20. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=129) Number of patients with hyperglycemic (>180 10 (91%) 129 (100%) mg/dL) episodes (%) Mean rate of hyperglycemic (>180 13 [2-24] 9 [1-33] mg/dL) episodes per patient stay [range] Range of hyperglycemic 181-494 181-438 (>180 mg/dL) episodes GM: Glycemic Management

  21. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=129) Number of patients with hyperglycemic (>180 10 (91%) 129 (100%) mg/dL) episodes (%) Mean rate of hyperglycemic (>180 13 [2-24] 9 [1-33] mg/dL) episodes per patient stay [range] Range of hyperglycemic 181-494 181-438 (>180 mg/dL) episodes GM: Glycemic Management

  22. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=129) Number of patients with hyperglycemic (>180 10 (91%) 129 (100%) mg/dL) episodes (%) Mean rate of hyperglycemic (>180 13 [2-24] 9 [1-33] mg/dL) episodes per patient stay [range] Range of hyperglycemic 181-494 181-438 (>180 mg/dL) episodes GM: Glycemic Management

  23. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=129) Number of patients with hyperglycemic (>180 10 (91%) 129 (100%) mg/dL) episodes (%) Mean rate of hyperglycemic (>180 13 [2-24] 9 [1-33] mg/dL) episodes per patient stay [range] Range of hyperglycemic 181-494 181-438 (>180 mg/dL) episodes GM: Glycemic Management

  24. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=129) Number of patients with hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) 1 (9%) 15 (12%) episodes (%) Mean rate of hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) episodes per patient stay 8 [8] 2 [1-6] [range] Range of hypoglycemic (<69 51-67 39-69 mg/dL) episodes

  25. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=129) Number of patients with hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) 1 (9%) 15 (12%) episodes (%) Mean rate of hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) episodes per patient stay 8 [8] 2 [1-6] [range] Range of hypoglycemic (<69 51-67 39-69 mg/dL) episodes

  26. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=129) Number of patients with hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) 1 (9%) 15 (12%) episodes (%) Mean rate of hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) episodes per patient stay 8 [8] 2 [1-6] [range] Range of hypoglycemic (<69 51-67 39-69 mg/dL) episodes

  27. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=129) Number of patients with hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) 1 (9%) 15 (12%) episodes (%) Mean rate of hypoglycemic (<70 mg/dL) episodes per patient stay 8 [8] 2 [1-6] [range] Range of hypoglycemic (<69 51-67 39-69 mg/dL) episodes

  28. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=134) Mean blood glucose level 198 [88-310] 175 [107-296] Standard deviation blood 59 39 glucose level Mean daily basal:bolus insulin 60:40 24:76 administration ratio Rate of use of non-insulin 5 (45%) 39 (29%) glucose lowering agents (%) Length of stay [range] 5 [3-9] 6 [3-26] GM: Glycemic Management

  29. Secondary Outcomes Appropriate GM Inappropriate GM Comparator Groups Group 1 (n=11) Group 2 (n=134) Mean blood glucose level 198 [88-310] 175 [107-296] Standard deviation blood 59 39 glucose level Mean daily basal:bolus insulin 60:40 24:76 administration ratio Rate of use of non-insulin 5 (45%) 39 (29%) glucose lowering agents (%) Length of stay [range] 5 [3-9] 6 [3-26] GM: Glycemic Management

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

14,735 positive cases 2,610 total hospitalized 784 currently hospitalized 72

14,735 positive cases 2,610 total hospitalized 784 currently hospitalized 72

COLORADO CASES 14,735 positive cases 2,610 total hospitalized 784 currently hospitalized 72 discharged in last 24 hours 56 counties 69,449 people tested 760 deaths 149 outbreaks DAILY CASE GROWTH RATE GROWTH RATE:

775 views • 35 slides
methadone or buprenorphine in the management of hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder

methadone or buprenorphine in the management of hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder

Review of a protocol for methadone or buprenorphine in the management of hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder Tess Larson, PGY1 Pharmacy Resident Providence Alaska Medical Center IRB Approved 1 Disclosure Potential conflicts of

276 views • 26 slides
Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Bilal Hameed, MD Division of Transplant

Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Bilal Hameed, MD Division of Transplant

10/26/2015 Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Bilal Hameed, MD Division of Transplant Hepatology University of California, San Francisco I have no financial relationships to disclose within the past 12 months relevant to my

1.03k views • 80 slides
Management of the Hospitalized Patient Nephrology Cases Kerry C. Cho, MD Associate Professor of

Management of the Hospitalized Patient Nephrology Cases Kerry C. Cho, MD Associate Professor of

Management of the Hospitalized Patient Nephrology Cases Kerry C. Cho, MD Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine Fellowship Program Director Division of Nephrology October 16, 2015 Case 1: Hyponatremia HPI: 49 yo M without significant

617 views • 32 slides
Management of Gilead, Genfit, Conatus and Intercept Hospitalized Patients with Advisory: Gilead

Management of Gilead, Genfit, Conatus and Intercept Hospitalized Patients with Advisory: Gilead

11/7/2017 Disclosure Research Support: Management of Gilead, Genfit, Conatus and Intercept Hospitalized Patients with Advisory: Gilead Cirrhosis Bilal Hameed, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Division of Transplant Hepatology

482 views • 29 slides
A clinical decision support tool to aid in the management of hospitalized cirrhotic patients

A clinical decision support tool to aid in the management of hospitalized cirrhotic patients

A clinical decision support tool to aid in the management of hospitalized cirrhotic patients Osman Ahmed MD &amp; Mayur MD FRCPC Department of Medicine: Division of Gastroenterology Toronto General Hospital Toronto, Canada Background The

246 views • 9 slides
Remote patient management after discharge of hospitalized heart failure patients: the Better

Remote patient management after discharge of hospitalized heart failure patients: the Better

Remote patient management after discharge of hospitalized heart failure patients: the Better Effectiveness After Transition - Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) study Michael K Ong MD PhD 1, 9 , Patrick S Romano MD MPH 2 , Sarah Edgington MA 1 , Harriet U

329 views • 15 slides
20 th Annual Management of the Hospitalized Patient Hyatt Regency Embarcadero San Francisco,

20 th Annual Management of the Hospitalized Patient Hyatt Regency Embarcadero San Francisco,

20 th Annual Management of the Hospitalized Patient Hyatt Regency Embarcadero San Francisco, California October 20-22, 2016 Conference Chair: Robert M. Wachter, MD Professor of Medicine and Chief of the Division of Hospital Medicine; Chair,

223 views • 10 slides
FEVER IN THE ICU Management of the Hospitalized Patient October 2015 Jennifer Babik, MD, PhD

FEVER IN THE ICU Management of the Hospitalized Patient October 2015 Jennifer Babik, MD, PhD

10/26/2015 FEVER IN THE ICU Management of the Hospitalized Patient October 2015 Jennifer Babik, MD, PhD Assistant Clinical Professor Division of Infectious Diseases, UCSF Disclosures I have no disclosures. 1 10/26/2015 Learning

587 views • 47 slides
Top Curbside Consult Questions in Inpatient ID Management of the Hospitalized Patient October 2015

Top Curbside Consult Questions in Inpatient ID Management of the Hospitalized Patient October 2015

10/26/2015 Top Curbside Consult Questions in Inpatient ID Management of the Hospitalized Patient October 2015 Jennifer Babik, MD, PhD Assistant Clinical Professor Division of Infectious Diseases, UCSF Disclosures I have no disclosures. 1

673 views • 36 slides
The high 5 Disclosures I have nothing to disclose 1 2/6/2020 5. When can my hospitalized

The high 5 Disclosures I have nothing to disclose 1 2/6/2020 5. When can my hospitalized

2/6/2020 Infection Control Questions: Inpatient and Outpatient The high 5 Disclosures I have nothing to disclose 1 2/6/2020 5. When can my hospitalized patient with C. difficile come off contact precautions? What are the recommended

392 views • 14 slides
Effectiveness of PCV13 in Adults Hospitalized with Pneumonia Using Centers for Medicare &amp;

Effectiveness of PCV13 in Adults Hospitalized with Pneumonia Using Centers for Medicare &amp;

National Center for Immunization &amp; Respiratory Diseases Effectiveness of PCV13 in Adults Hospitalized with Pneumonia Using Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services Data, 2014-2017 Fernanda Lessa, MD, MPH Michael (Trey) Spiller, PhD

496 views • 27 slides
Neurologic Emergencies Case #1 A 67F is hospitalized with a community-acquired pneumonia. On

Neurologic Emergencies Case #1 A 67F is hospitalized with a community-acquired pneumonia. On

Neurologic Emergencies Case #1 A 67F is hospitalized with a community-acquired pneumonia. On Day#3 she is feeling much better awaiting discharge when her nurse finds her unresponsive with rhythmic shaking of all limbs. PMHx: COPD

502 views • 13 slides
Five Common Errors in the ICU I have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Management of the

Five Common Errors in the ICU I have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Management of the

10/21/17 Disclosures Five Common Errors in the ICU I have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Management of the Hospitalized Patient October 21, 2017 Bombarded with more Solution than 7,000 independent pieces of information per More

148 views • 13 slides
Leadership 10% of NZ and Australian hospitalized patients experienced Managing difficult an

Leadership 10% of NZ and Australian hospitalized patients experienced Managing difficult an

Australian and NZ data Leadership 10% of NZ and Australian hospitalized patients experienced Managing difficult an adverse event, of which nearly situations half were considered preventable (2014) Anne Evans-Murray

110 views • 10 slides
ICU Updates: Delirium in Hospitalized Patients Recognizing and preventing delirium to improve

ICU Updates: Delirium in Hospitalized Patients Recognizing and preventing delirium to improve

5/28/2013 ICU Updates: Delirium in Hospitalized Patients Recognizing and preventing delirium to improve patient outcomes James A. Frank, MD Associate Professor Pulmonary and Critical Care UCSF Dept. of Medicine No conflicts of interest or

501 views • 20 slides
How to Comply with the CMS Conditions for Coverage on Emergency Preparedness Bob Loeper, VP

How to Comply with the CMS Conditions for Coverage on Emergency Preparedness Bob Loeper, VP

How to Comply with the CMS Conditions for Coverage on Emergency Preparedness Bob Loeper, VP Operations Support Business Continuity/Disaster Response Fresenius Kidney Care November 9, 2018 Facilities Impacted by the Emergency Preparedness Rule

929 views • 45 slides
Stephen Marks Consultant Paediatric Nephrologist Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and

Stephen Marks Consultant Paediatric Nephrologist Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and

Transplant first Stephen Marks Consultant Paediatric Nephrologist Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children and UCL GOS Institute of Child Health, London, UK BAPN /KQuIP Paediatric Nephrology Multi-Disciplinary Quality Improvement Day,

474 views • 26 slides
Impaired Health: Maryland Perspectives Pennsylvania Climate Change Advisory Committee April 30 th

Impaired Health: Maryland Perspectives Pennsylvania Climate Change Advisory Committee April 30 th

Climate Change, Extreme Events, and Impaired Health: Maryland Perspectives Pennsylvania Climate Change Advisory Committee April 30 th , 2020 Amir Sapkota, PhD Professor University of Maryland School of Public Health amirsap@umd.edu Outline

497 views • 17 slides
2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results &amp; APM Technical Changes Update Sarah Lindberg

2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results &amp; APM Technical Changes Update Sarah Lindberg

2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results &amp; APM Technical Changes Update Sarah Lindberg Michele Degree February 26, 2020 2018 All-Payer Total Cost of Care Results 2 Conclusions This is the first year for Medicare and Commercial

396 views • 26 slides
Welcome to Kaiser Permanente Presenting Medicare 101 and Kaiser Permanente Senior Advantage (HMO)

Welcome to Kaiser Permanente Presenting Medicare 101 and Kaiser Permanente Senior Advantage (HMO)

Welcome to Kaiser Permanente Presenting Medicare 101 and Kaiser Permanente Senior Advantage (HMO) Fresno Unified School District Yolanda Smith Retiree Consultant September 2014 Basics of Medicare What is Medicare? Medicare is a

497 views • 18 slides
MEDICARE 2019 BEN HUDSON, SHIP TRAINING DIRECTOR Understanding Medicare WHAT IS SHIP?

MEDICARE 2019 BEN HUDSON, SHIP TRAINING DIRECTOR Understanding Medicare WHAT IS SHIP?

Ind ndiana ana St Stat ate e Hea ealth th Ins nsuran rance ce Ass ssistance stance Pr Prog ogram ram *A Division of the Department of Insurance MEDICARE 2019 BEN HUDSON, SHIP TRAINING DIRECTOR Understanding Medicare WHAT IS

579 views • 26 slides
Healthcare Conference Jos (Joe) E. Almeida, Chairman &amp; Chief Executive Officer January 13,

Healthcare Conference Jos (Joe) E. Almeida, Chairman &amp; Chief Executive Officer January 13,

38th Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference Jos (Joe) E. Almeida, Chairman &amp; Chief Executive Officer January 13, 2020 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation includes forward- looking statements concerning the companys preliminary

647 views • 21 slides
Working to Improve Healthcare Quality Holly Standhardt February 21, 2020 Empowering patients,

Working to Improve Healthcare Quality Holly Standhardt February 21, 2020 Empowering patients,

Working to Improve Healthcare Quality Holly Standhardt February 21, 2020 Empowering patients, families and caregivers to achieve health care quality improvement Objectives Introduce Superior Health Quality Alliance (Superior Health)

750 views • 33 slides

More recommend