Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell plc
Management Day
#MakeTheFuture
Delivering a world-class investment case
June 4–5, 2019
Management Day Delivering a world-class investment case Royal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Management Day Delivering a world-class investment case Royal Dutch Shell plc June 4 5, 2019 #MakeTheFuture Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Cautionary note Reserves: Our use of the term reserves in this presentation means SEC
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell plc
#MakeTheFuture
Delivering a world-class investment case
June 4–5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Reserves: Our use of the term “reserves” in this presentation means SEC proved oil and gas reserves. Resources: Our use of the term “resources” in this presentation includes quantities of oil and gas not yet classified as SEC proved oil and gas reserves. Resources are consistent with the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) 2P + 2C definitions. This presentation contains the following forward-looking Non-GAAP measures: Organic Free Cash Flow, Free Cash Flow, Capital Investment, CCS Earnings, CCS Earnings less identified items, Gearing, Underlying Operating Expenses, ROACE, Capital Employed and Divestments. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of the above forward-looking Non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures because certain information needed to reconcile the above Non-GAAP measure to the most comparable GAAP financial measure is dependent on future events some which are outside the control of the company, such as oil and gas prices, interest rates and exchange rates. Moreover, estimating such GAAP measures consistent with the company accounting policies and the required precision necessary to provide a meaningful reconciliation is extremely difficult and could not be accomplished without unreasonable effort. Non-GAAP measures in respect of future periods which cannot be reconciled to the most comparable GAAP financial measure are calculated in a manner which is consistent with the accounting policies applied in Royal Dutch Shell plc’s financial statements. The presented 2020 outlook is an average for 2019-2021. The presented 2025 outlook is an average for 2024-2026. All forward-looking numbers are on an IFRS 16 basis unless stated otherwise. 2020 presented organic free cash flow range of $28-33 billion is equivalent to $25-30 billion on an IAS 17 basis. 2020 presented cash capex range of $24-29 billion is equivalent to the previous outlook of $25-30 billion capital investment on an IAS 17 basis. Presented earnings is clean CCS earnings excluding identified items unless stated otherwise. Presented ROACE (return
by strategic themes represent a notional allocation of ROACE, capital employed, capital investment, free cash flow, organic free cash flow and underlying operating expenses of Shell’s strategic themes for the purpose of Management Day presentations. Shell’s segment reporting under IFRS 8 remains Integrated Gas, Upstream, Downstream and Corporate. Also, in this presentation we may refer to Shell’s “Net Carbon Footprint”, which includes Shell’s carbon emissions from the production of our energy products, our suppliers’ carbon emissions in supplying energy for that production and our customers’ carbon emissions associated with their use of the energy products we sell. Shell only controls its own emissions. But, to support society in achieving the Paris Agreement goals, we aim to help such suppliers and consumers to likewise lower their emissions. The use of the term Shell’s “Net Carbon Footprint” is for convenience only and not intended to suggest these emissions are those of Shell or its subsidiaries. This presentation contains data and analysis from Shell’s new Sky scenario. Unlike Shell’s previously published Mountains and Oceans exploratory scenarios, the Sky scenario is based on the assumption that society reaches the Paris Agreement’s goal of holding the rise in global average temperatures this century to well below two degrees Celsius (2°C) above pre-industrial levels. Unlike Shell’s Mountains and Oceans scenarios, which unfolded in an open-ended way based upon plausible assumptions and quantifications, the Sky scenario was specifically designed to reach the Paris Agreement’s goal in a technically possible manner. These scenarios are a part of an ongoing process used in Shell for over 40 years to challenge executives’ perspectives on the future business environment. They are designed to stretch management to consider even events that may only be remotely
The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate legal entities. In this presentation “Shell”, “Shell Group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in
subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this presentation refer to entities over which Royal Dutch Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. Entities and unincorporated arrangements over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to as “joint ventures” and “joint operations”,
after exclusion of all third-party interest. This presentation contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “aim”, “ambition”, ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, “schedule”, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this presentation, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. No assurance is provided that future dividend payments will match or exceed previous dividend payments. All forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this presentation and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation, June 4-5,
inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this presentation that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov.
Cautionary note
2
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Key messages
3
◼ Portfolio positioned for the future of energy ◼ Reduce the Net Carbon Footprint of our energy products ◼ Sustaining Upstream; growing market-facing businesses ◼ Capital discipline provides sustainability and value growth ◼ Improving returns and growing shareholder distributions ◼ Deepening trust with society, shareholders and customers ◼ Ethics, compliance and safety as foundation for continued success ◼ Providing customers with the products they want and need
Thrive in the energy transition World-class investment case Strong licence to operate
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
2025 outlook
Confidence in 2020 delivery, catalyst to growth in 2021-2025
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. All amounts are “per annum” unless specified. Post-2020 cash capex range excludes major inorganic spend and includes minor acquisitions up to $1 billion. Share buybacks subject to further progress with debt reduction and oil price conditions. 4
2020 DE-RISKED
$24-29 billion $28-33 billion ~10%
share buybacks 2018-20
$25 billion
CASH CAPEX ORGANIC FREE CASH FLOW SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTIONS
SUSTAINING CEILING
ROACE GEARING
2025 STRONG OUTLOOK
~$30 billion
average over 2021-25
$125+ billion >12% ~$35 billion
$20 billion $32 billion
potential total distributions 2021-25
15-25%
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Delivery
Strong competitive position
Peer range comprises of ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP and Total. Competitive financial data as published and Shell analysis. Free cash flow: cash flow from operations less cash used in investing activities, corrected for interest paid for Shell. CFFO excl. working capital corrected for interest received (in CFFI) and interest paid (CFFF) for Shell. ROACE: Earnings on CCS basis excluding identified items (or equivalent) for European companies, reported earnings excluding special non-operating items for US companies. Adjusted for after-tax interest expense. Capital employed on gross debt basis, including lease liabilities. Brand value as per Oil & Gas 50 2019 Report.
$ billion % $ billion $ billion
20 40 16Q1 16Q3 17Q1 17Q3 18Q1 18Q3 19Q1 2 4 6 8 10 16Q1 16Q3 17Q1 17Q3 18Q1 18Q3 19Q1 10 20 30 40 50 16Q1 16Q3 17Q1 17Q3 18Q1 18Q3 19Q1 10 20 30 40 2016 2017 2018 5
Free cash flow – 4 quarters rolling Clean CCS ROACE – 4 quarters rolling CFFO excl. working capital – 4 quarters rolling Brand value
Thrive in the energy transition World-class investment case Strong licence to
Shell Peer range
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
No harm Good products Trusted company
Trust
Strong societal licence to
6
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Energy outlook
Changes in consumer patterns drive a shift in the primary energy mix
7
Global end-use energy consumption
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100
Electricity Solid Liquid Gaseous
Exajoules
More people Lower carbon More prosperity
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Strategic themes
Competitively positioned for the future of energy
8
Core Upstream themes
◼ Strong cash generation ◼ Fully sustain through the coming decades
Leading Transition themes
◼ Extend leadership ◼ Capitalise on Energy Transition
Emerging Power theme
◼ Capture value from evolving
consumption patterns
◼ Prove investment case and then scale up
Capital allocation
◼ Value- and returns-driven ◼ Diversify risk and opportunity
Portfolio resilience
◼ Balanced cash generation ◼ Enables low-carbon future
Integration
◼ Optimise value chains ◼ Unlock superior value
Customer orientation
◼ Create, meet new demand ◼ Key differentiator
Clear portfolio strategy Industry-leading returns per strategic theme Core strengths
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Strategic themes
Shell’s strategy by theme
9
Deep Water
Leading portfolio, strong growth funnel Sustained high-margin production
Shales
Growing production in high-margin basins Competitive delivery
Conventional Oil & Gas
High-graded portfolio with longevity Growth potential in deep resource base
Power
New sources of value emerging Returns drive pace of scaling up
Chemicals
Strong demand growth despite growing recycling Focus on base, derivative and performance chemicals
Oil Products
Most successful mobility retailer, #1 in lubricants Competitive/high-quality refining backbone
Integrated Gas
Extend market leadership Unique portfolio optimisation capability
Core Upstream themes Leading Transition themes Emerging Power theme
World-class asset operatorship Leverage customer proximity and intimacy Trading optimisation through integration
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
2025 outlook
Business milestones underpin cash flow growth through 2025 and beyond
10 Major projects 2019-25: more than $500 million lifecycle capex. Upstream major projects include Shales development decisions. Marketing growth targets are relative to 2018.
FIDs
Start-ups
FIDs
Start-ups
New retail sites
New customers
FIDs
Start-ups
Upstream major projects Downstream major projects Integrated Gas major projects Marketing growth
Appomattox – USA
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
$ billion per annum 2020 Organic FCF (IAS 17) 2021-25 Sustaining cash capex (IFRS 16) 2021-25 Total cash capex (IFRS 16) 2025 Organic FCF (IFRS 16) 2025 ROACE % Conventional Oil & Gas 5 – 6 4.5 4 – 5 5 – 6 Deep Water 6 – 7 4 4 – 5 7 – 8 Shales 1 – 2 2.5 3 – 4 2 – 3 Core Upstream themes 12 – 15 11 11 – 13 14 – 17 12-14% Integrated Gas 8 – 10 4.5 6 – 7 9 – 10 Chemicals 1 3 – 4 2 – 3 Oil Products 6 – 7 3.5 5 – 6 8 – 9 Leading Transition themes 14 – 17 9 14 – 16 19 – 22 11-15% Power (2) – (1) 2 – 3 (2) – (1) Emerging Power theme (2) – (1) 2 – 3 (2) – (1) 8-12%
Total
25 – 30 20 Average ~30 ~35 >12%
2025 outlook
Capital allocation to grow cash flow through 2025 and beyond
11 Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Post-2020 cash capex range excludes major inorganic spend and includes minor acquisitions up to $1 billion. Total cash capex capped at the top of range indicated for each strategic theme grouping. Power returns of 8-12% represent returns for on-stream integrated power business, ROACE for Power business (including development stage costs) expected to be around 6%.
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Cumulative cash potential for shareholders
2025 outlook
Increasing potential shareholder distributions
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2021-25 cash potential for shareholders assumes ~$20 billion divestments and gearing at ~20%. Share buybacks subject to further progress with debt reduction and oil price conditions. 12
◼ Fully committed to current
and growing dividend per share
◼ Resilient dividend per share
growth
◼ Dividend per share growth when
there is line of sight to completing the current $25 billion share buyback programme
2011–15
$51.6 bln
$97/bbl average 2016–20
$90+ bln
$60/bbl RT16
2021–25
$60/bbl RT16
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
2025 outlook
Key levers for delivery
13 Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Major projects 2019-25: more than $500 million lifecycle capex. Upstream major projects include Shales development decisions. Upstream break-even prices on forward-looking basis.
per barrel Upstream unit
Marketing opex yield
billion Additional CFFO in 2025 vs. 2018
Major project FIDs
Net Carbon Footprint reduction by end-2021
Transition themes’ share of organic free cash flow
per barrel Average Upstream project break-even prices
per MMBtu Integrated Gas average unit technical cost
CFFO growth and delivery Capital efficiency Opex competitiveness Portfolio for the future
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Delivery
Establishing a strong track record
14 Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Share buybacks subject to further progress with debt reduction and oil price conditions. Additional cash flow from operations from new projects in 2018 compares with 2014, and 2020 compares with 2018.
+
Scrip dividend cancelled
+
$25 billion share buyback programme started
+
Disciplined and efficient capital allocation: ~$25 billion capital investment per annum
+
Net debt reduced by $28 billion since end 2016
+
$30 billion divestment programme completed
+
$10 billion CFFO from new projects delivered
+
Operating expenses reduced by ~$10 billion, BG synergies delivered
Delivery in 2016-2018
+
$28-33 billion organic free cash flow per year
+
Complete $25 billion share buyback programme: $7.5 billion completed as of May 25, 2019
+
Cash capex of $24-29 billion per annum
+
Gearing ~25%
+
>$10 billion divestments
+
Further $5 billion CFFO from new projects
Delivery on track for 2019-2020
Post-IFRS 16
Financial framework delivery Portfolio & project delivery
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Delivery
2020 outlook
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Post-2020 cash capex range excludes major inorganic spend and includes minor acquisitions up to $1 billion. Shareholder distributions 2019-20 assuming completion of current $25 billion share buyback programme and dividend per share at 2018 level. Share buybacks subject to further progress with debt reduction and oil price conditions.
$ billion $ billion $ billion $ billion %
10 20 30 40 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 10 20 30 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-20 avg p.a. 10 20 30 25 50 75 100 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020
2020 outlook: $28-33 billion
$24-29 billion cash capex $25 billion share buybacks ~25% gearing
15
Organic free cash flow: growing trend Cash capex: capital discipline remains Shareholder distributions: continued focus Debt reduction: resiliency and flexibility
Cash dividends Share buybacks Net debt (at year-end) Gearing: IAS 17 (RHS)
$71 $54 $44 $52 $99 $60 RT16
Gearing: IFRS 16 (RHS) Organic free cash flow IFRS 16 impact
$ Average Brent price per barrel 10 20 30 40 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-20 avg p.a.
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
People strategy Competitive portfolio Cost management Reshaping Shell to deliver a world-class investment case
16
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Competitive portfolio
Reshaping the portfolio
Divestments: headline as per announcement.
2021-25 outlook assumes $20 billion divestments – no hard target
17
Portfolio upgrade 2016-2018 Strengthened financial framework
◼ More than 50 transactions in 25 countries ◼ Business country exits in Argentina, Ireland, Gabon, Thailand,
Japan and New Zealand
◼ Continue divestments of at least $5 billion average per annum
in 2019-2020
◼ Net debt reduction ◼ Net liabilities (e.g. D&R) reduction ◼ Credit rating upgrades
Gabon onshore $0.9bln Oil Sands $7.3bln UK North Sea package up to $3.8bln Thailand Bongkot $0.8bln Showa Shell JV $1.4bln MOTIVA JV $2.2bln Woodside shares $2.6bln Downstream Argentina $1.0bln SADAF JV $0.8bln MLP $1.8bln Upstream Ireland up to $1.3bln Oil Sands Oil Products Chemicals MLP Deep Water Conventional Oil & Gas Shales Integrated Gas Top 20 divestments:
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
◼ Portfolio is more competitive: outcome of portfolio reshaping
(BG, divestments, new projects)
◼ Leading cash flow from operations per barrel ◼ Strong cash flow growth ◼ Balanced cash generation across the businesses
Competitive portfolio
Cash flow high-graded
Unit cash flow based on Shell internal analysis.
$ billion $/boe
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 20 40 60 18
CFFO excluding working capital Unit cash flow – Upstream & Integrated Gas
Upstream Integrated Gas Downstream Corporate
$
Average Brent price per barrel
$99 $71 $54 $44 $52
Shell Peer range
10 20 30 2016 2017 2018
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Capital Investment Committee (CIC)
Competitive portfolio
Capital discipline culture
19
Implemented as best practice from BG Central investment decision governance
◼ Material capital projects and inorganic
◼ Post-investment reviews and learning
dissemination Change in approach to capital allocation
◼ Specific forum led by CEO, CFO and
relevant Business Directors
◼ Group Strategy and Opportunity
Value Assurance teams
◼ Focused integrated decisions leveraging
broad experience and expertise Strategic Fit
◼ Fit with aspired portfolio and
enhance portfolio resilience ✓ Upstream, LNG, Trading & Supply portfolio diversity ✓ Supply diversification ✓ Estimated integrated project IRR ~13% ✓ Competitive cost of supply into Asia ✓ Upside potential ✓ Supported by First Nations ✓ Pipeline contractor expertise ✓ Module approach ✓ Contractor safety ✓ Designed to achieve the lowest carbon intensity
in operation today
Decision criteria Example: LNG Canada
Licence to Operate
◼ HSSE ◼ CO2 ◼ Ethics & Compliance
Value lens
◼ Competitiveness across the businesses ◼ Returns-accretive, integration value ◼ Break-even prices and cost competitiveness
Risks
◼ Upsides/downsides, stress testing ◼ Non-technical risks
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
People strategy
Highly engaged, diverse and productive workforce
20 SBO: Shell Business Operations. Workforce FTE numbers in 2015 and 2016 include BG. Workforce distribution shows share of top 5 employing countries as of 2018.
Thousand FTEs Index
Shell workforce evolution
Thousand FTEs %
Shell Business Operations growth
% %
Workforce distribution
◼ 22% reduction in cost of employment and
~17 thousand reduction in staff from 2015
◼ Our people are highly engaged ◼ Cultural shift to clear accountabilities and bottom-line
focus
◼ SBO staff now accounts for ~20% of all Shell
employees
◼ SBO increasingly handle complex processes,
becoming high-value execution centres
◼ Value from cultural diversity ◼ India now 3rd largest employing country for Shell
(up from 8th in 2015)
◼ Building the female talent pipeline
60 65 70 75 80 25 50 75 100 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 2015 2016 2017 2018 25 50 25 50 75 2015 2016 2017 2018
SBO FTEs as % of total (RHS) Finance IT HR Businesses & other Employee engagement score (RHS) Total FTEs SBO FTEs India Netherlands United Kingdom United States Philippines % female graduates recruited (RHS)
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Cost management
Strategic shift translating into cost optimisation
21 Global functions comprise Finance, HR, IT, External Relations, Real Estate and Legal.
Global functions: simplification and standardisation Global programmes improving ways of working
Fit for the Future Embed continuous improvement mindset in cost management PT2020 journey Optimise project costs with competitive scoping, using standard solutions and replicating designs Digitalisation Improve speed, efficiency and safety while reducing costs by employing modern technologies – blockchain, internet of things, robotics and machine learning Standardised asset management system Simplify and replicate standard processes across Shell Reduce redundancies and enable continuous improvement Enterprise-wide IT system for procurement and expenses Improve transparency, drive purchasing discipline and drive automation
10.0
2015
9.3
2016
7.8
2017
7.4
2018
7.2
2019-20
◼ Functional operational costs reduced by 26%
7.7
2015
6.2
2016
5.3
2017
4.9
2018
4.7
2019-20
◼ Projects and Technology operational costs reduced by 35%
$ billion
Projects and Technology: scoping efficiency
$ billion
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
World-class investment case
Competitive and resilient delivery
22
Sustain and grow value Financial resilience through the cycle Increase shareholder distributions
$
Thrive in the energy transition World-class investment case Strong licence to
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
42% 2% 56% 44% 56% 41% 8% 51% 51% 3% 46%
Sustain and grow value
Diversified and competitive through the Energy Transition
23 Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Oil Sands and Corporate segment excluded. Investments represent 2018 capital investment and 2025 cash capex.
◼ Core Upstream themes sustain strong CFFO
generation in 2025 (>40% of total)
◼ Growth in shales harvests almost doubles
CFFO in 2025 versus 2018
◼ Growing investments in Chemicals deliver
CFFO growth by more than 60% to 2025
◼ Growing Integrated Gas investments in 2025
to support CFFO growth in 2025+
◼ Continued investments in Core Upstream
themes (~40%)
◼ Investments in Power scaling up as we
demonstrate viable business models
Cash flow from
Investments
2025 >$60bln 2018 ~$50bln 2018 ~$24bln 2025 ~$30bln
Conventional Oil & Gas Deep Water Shales Power Oil Products Chemicals Integrated Gas Core Upstream themes Leading Transition themes Emerging Power theme
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Cash priorities 2021-2025
Sustain and grow value
Strong cash generation provides
Numbers are indicative to illustrate cash priorities. Post-2020 cash capex range excludes major inorganic spend and includes minor acquisitions up to $1 billion. De-gearing assumes gearing at ~20%. 24
20 40 60 80 CFFO Interest Dividend Sustaining cash capex De-gearing 15-25% Growth cash capex Additional shareholder distributions
Sustained Discretionary
Thrive in the energy transition World-class investment case Strong licence to
$ billion
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
◼ Maintain AA credit metrics ◼ Target gearing on average ~20% with a range of 15-25% through the cycle ◼ Flexibility for potential counter-cyclical acquisitions ◼ Resilient balance sheet to manage volatility
Financial resilience through the cycle
Continued focus on robust balance sheet
25
Gearing
BUILD RESILIENCE USE FLEXIBILITY
Supportive macro environment Challenging macro environment
<25% Gearing ~15%
10 20 30 25 50 75 100 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-20
$ billion %
Net debt and gearing through the cycle
Net debt (at year-end) Gearing: IAS 17 (RHS) Gearing: IFRS 16 (RHS)
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
The scope of Shell’s Net Carbon Footprint ambition
Net Carbon Footprint
Our ambition
Full life cycle of energy products, including consumption
26
Production Processing Distribution & sales Use of energy products by our customers
Third-party crude Third-party products Third-party gas Third-party products
15% of total emissions 85% of total emissions No emissions No emissions
CCS Natural sinks
Use of carbon sinks
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Net Carbon Footprint
Potential tools to achieve our ambition
27
Wind power Quest CCS Raízen biofuels Shell Recharge and New Motion Flare reduction Increased LNG Nature-based
Baseline Operational efficiency Natural gas shift Renewable power Biofuels Electric mobility CCS Natural sinks
◼ Ambition to reduce the
Net Carbon Footprint
we sell by around 20% by 2035 and by around 50% by 2050, in step with society
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Projects & Technology
Competitively differentiated capital efficiency
29 Upstream break-even prices on forward-looking basis. UDC benchmark based on external benchmarks (Woodmac, IPA, UIBC).
Differentiated capabilities Differentiated results
UDC ($ per boe) UDC benchmark ($ per boe) for 2018 FIDs
10 20 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
50%
REDUCTION
Better than industry mean Poorer than industry mean P50/Mean Best-in-class 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile Top Quartile
World-class capital efficiency factory
◼ Systematic and rigorous scope challenge ◼ Efficient execution focus ◼ Supply chain transformation ◼ Technology reduces scope or aids execution
Single P&T organisation integrated with business lines
◼ Global organisation, locally executed ◼ Delivering two thirds group capex annually
~20%
reduction in average break-even price at FID to ~$30 per boe in 2018
~75%
Best-in- Class/ Top Quartile for UDC
~33%
capital investment reduction from 2014 to 2018
50%
UDC reduction since 2014; Capital efficiency doubled since 2014
70%
Best-in-Class in 2018
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Projects & Technology
Competitively differentiated supply chain
Globally contracted spend benchmark based on Shell analysis, using market rates as a comparison. 30
Differentiated capabilities
◼ Global organisation, locally delivered ◼ Unique company-wide oversight of over $40 billion third party spend ◼ One standard purchasing platform across Shell, creating transparency and
driving purchasing discipline
◼ Smaller and stronger contracting and procurement workforce, driving deeper
competence and commercial culture
Differentiated results Growing degree of automation and standardisation
2015 2018
Increased cost-competitiveness enabled by rigorous benchmarking and spend pooling
Third party spend Globally contracted spend benchmarked most competitive Invoice and purchase
automation FTE efficiency
$65 billion
$40 billion
8%
50%
<50%
70% >15% reduction
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Projects & Technology
Competitively differentiated technologies
31
Differentiated results
Name
◼ Business-owned, centrally delivered ◼ Commercially savvy science ◼ Customer-centric product development ◼ Content-rich academic partnerships ◼ Making technology ventures grow ◼ Integrating digital with domain
knowledge through shell.ai
Innovation and digitalisation
Digital Twin World-Class Catalyst GeodesicTM
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
2018 LNG liquefaction volumes 34.3 mtpa 2025 Organic FCF $9-10 billion 2025 ROACE ~11% 2021-25 Average cash capex $6-7 billion p.a.
Integrated Gas Overview
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 33
Lead the market Run the engine Grow the engine
◼ Expand and diversify a strong position
in a growing market (LNG +4% per annum)
◼ Develop new demand and source
competitive supply
◼ Leverage portfolio optionality to create
additional value
◼ Focus on operational excellence to
generate superior cash flow
◼ Aim for > 90% LNG utilisation and top
quartile unit cost
◼ Invest ~$4-5 billion per annum to
sustain cash flow by maintaining existing and replacing declining assets
◼ Create new advantaged positions in
LNG and GTL through development
◼ Resilient growth funnel with a
competitive average delivered ex ship into Asia cost below $7/MMBtu
◼ Invest ~$2-3 billion per annum to
generate material cash flow growth beyond 2025
Gallina, LNG Ship Oman LNG – Oman Pearl GTL – Qatar
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Integrated Gas Thrive through the Energy Transition
34
Air quality improvement Carbon footprint reduction Methane emission reduction
◼ Strong policy push to replace coal with
gas and renewables to improve air quality
◼ China gas demand to grow by 6% per annum
until 2025
◼ Significant gas demand growth in India
anticipated
◼ Gas-fired replacing coal-fired power plants
with 45-55% lower greenhouse gas emissions
◼ LNG Canada designed to achieve lowest
carbon intensity of any LNG project operating today
◼ Shell initiated industry coalition to reduce
methane emissions
◼ Target methane emissions below 0.2% by 2025
in operated assets
◼ Methane leak detection and repair programme
gaining momentum
Source: Shell LNG Outlook.
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
◼ LNG demand growth driven by policy decisions to address air quality concerns and Energy Transition ◼ Growing gas demand largely driven by industrial and residential non-power sectors ◼ Increasing role for gas in supporting the integration of variable renewable electricity generation ◼ More supply investment and long-term contracts needed to avoid long-term supply deficit ◼ Evolving market dynamics with increasing liquidity and commoditisation
LNG supply
Integrated Gas LNG market is expected to double in size by 2035
35 Source: Shell LNG Outlook.
BCM
LNG demand outlook
Global gas demand (BCM)
Growth in non-power sectors
LNG supply (GWh/d) Power generation (GWh/h)
LNG complementing renewables
200 400 600 800 1,000 2018 Asia Europe Americas Mid-East & Africa 2035 59% 22% 10% 9% 3,300 3,400 3,500 3,600 2016 Power Non- power 2017 Power Non- power 2018 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 10 20
Wind (RHS) Solar (RHS)
4%
CAGR
Spain (December 2017)
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Integrated Gas Develop demand
Unlock new sources of demand and build deep gas value chains
36
Gas market access Power Downstream LNG
Regas terminals unlocking access to new markets Market for LNG in transport expected to grow rapidly Gas opportunities complementing Power strategy Mexico Argentina Australia Bahamas Brazil Canada Chile China India Japan Netherlands Norway Pakistan Panama Singapore Spain USA
Gas marketing and trading Power trading Gas-fired power generation LNG to marine bunkers LNG to/by road transport LNG market access
Peru Ivory Coast Belgium & Germany Gibraltar EU35
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Integrated Gas LNG supply & optimisation
37 Top-right graph: Shell analysis of Wood Mackenzie and IHS data.
LNG available for sale in 2018 (mtpa)
Leading position
LNG sales in 2018 (mtpa)
Balanced portfolio Deliver value from leading portfolio
25 50 75
Shell QP Exxon Petronas Total Chevron BP Cheniere
25 50 75 Sources Deliveries
Spot purchase Term purchase Liquefaction volumes Short-term ‘spot’ Gas hubs (e.g. NBP, HH) Oil linked: 3-6 months lag Equity lifting JV marketed LNG capacity Buy LNG import terminals (incl. capacity rights) LNG markets served LNG term supply sources (equity and offtake, existing and under construction)
Barcelona Hazira Gibraltar Dragon Rotterdam Altamira Costa Azul Sabine pass NLNG EGLNG ELNG QG4 OLNG SEIC Prelude NWS Gorgon QCLNG BLNG Cove Point Elba ALNG LNGC PLNG Lake Charles Singapore
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Integrated Gas Run the engine
Unit operating cost benchmark from Shell analysis of PTIA, McKinsey and Juran data.
% Unit operating cost ($ per ton) Unit technical cost ($ per MMBtu)
Operational excellence and strong portfolio drive competitive advantage
38
Improving LNG utilisation Operating at competitive cost Delivering competitive projects Harvesting the benefits of digitalisation
Integrated assets Midstream assets
4 8 12 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ambition
◼ Impactful through changing culture and business models ◼ Optimise shipping draft and speed for LNG tanker fleet ◼ Real-time production optimisation in NLNG and Pearl GTL ◼ Smart coal seam gas system in Queensland
Project average Project range
75 80 85 90 95 2016 2017 2018 Ambition 40 80 120 Shell Top Quartile 4th Quartile 40 80 120 Shell Top Quartile 4th Quartile
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Integrated Gas Financial performance
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2017 and 2018 actuals include New Energies.
Million tonnes $ billion $ billion $ billion %
25 50 75 2016 2017 2018 5 10 15 5 10 2016 2017 2018 5 10 15 20 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 4 8 12 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025
Resilient cash delivery 2020 ROACE: ~ 9% 2025 ROACE: ~ 11%
39
LNG liquefaction and sales Earnings and ROACE CFFO and cash capital expenditure Organic free cash flow
LNG sales LNG liquefaction ROACE (RHS) Clean earnings CFFO Cash capex
$71 $54 $44 $60 RT16 $60 RT16
$
Average Brent price per barrel
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
◼ LNG project funnel benchmarks well versus
competing projects including US exports
◼ Backfill projects in development with attractive
economics and average Unit Technical Cost below $5 per MMBtu
◼ Project execution is critical to maintaining
this competitiveness
Integrated Gas Competitive growth funnel
40 LNG delivered cost: Shell interpretation of Wood Mackenzie data for non-Shell projects.
LNG delivered cost to Asia by project, $ per MMBtu
Resilient funnel of competitive growth options
Focus on competitive project delivery
New capacity: ~8 mtpa Abadi Qatar Tanzania
Post FID Potential projects Development
New capacity: ~17 mtpa Lake Charles LNG Canada Expansion NLNG T7 Sakhalin T3 Oman integrated GTL New capacity: ~8 mtpa Prelude LNG Canada T1-2 Backfill: ALNG NWS – Browse Backfill: Sakhalin development Prelude – Crux Gorgon – Jansz Compression Arrow ALNG – Baracuda & Colibri Backfill: Gorgon Jansz Infill OPF Compression NWS Infill Arrow Infill
Disciplined maturation and investment decision making
High returns Material volume Capital- efficient CO2 competitive Resilience Trading integration
Shell or Shell aspired Non-Shell
5 10 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Integrated Gas Gas to Liquids: Ambition to expand
41
Leading competitive position
$ per boe
Product margins above Brent
GTL base oils, thousand tonnes
Capture demand growth
◼ 45 years of GTL experience ◼ High-value, differentiated, cleaner-burning products ◼ Shell-operated plants in Qatar (140 kboe/d GTL)
and Malaysia (15 kboe/d)
◼ Strong integrated value chain with Shell Downstream
Marketing and Trading
◼ Pearl GTL product margins averaged $14 per barrel of
◼ Develop and grow new markets and optimise product
slate towards higher value specialty products
◼ Supply/demand gap in mid-2020s to be captured
by capacity growth
◼ Enhance Pearl GTL base oil production ◼ Progress GTL opportunity funnel, including Oman
10 20 30 40 5 10 15 20 25 2016 2018 Ambition 500 1000 1500 2000 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027
Pearl GTL Margin above Brent Pearl GTL specialty products (RHS) Shell demand estimate Pearl GTL production outlook %
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Upstream
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016. 43
Deep Water Shales
Appomattox – USA Permian – USA
2018 Production 0.8 mboe/d 2025 Organic FCF $7-8 billion 2025 ROACE 10-12% 2021-25 Average cash capex $4-5 billion p.a. 2018 Production 0.4 mboe/d 2025 Organic FCF $2-3 billion 2025 ROACE 12-15% 2021-25 Average cash capex $3-4 billion p.a.
◼ Leading portfolio ◼ High margin production ◼ Competitive growth ◼ Growing production and FCF ◼ Competitive delivery ◼ Leading digital innovation
Conventional Oil & Gas
2018 Production 1.5 mboe/d 2025 Organic FCF $5-6 billion 2025 ROACE 12-15% 2021-25 Average cash capex $4-5 billion p.a.
◼ High-graded portfolio ◼ Portfolio longevity ◼ Growth potential
Ormen Lange – Norway
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
10 20 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025
Upstream
Improved financial delivery
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis.
$ billion $ billion Million boe per day $ billion $ per boe %
2025 outlook: $14-17 billion Organic FCF 12-14% ROACE
44
Cash flow from operations Organic free cash flow Costs and production Earnings and ROACE
10 20 30 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 10 15 1 2 3 2015 2016 2017 2018
5 10
5 10 2015 2016 2017 2018
Unit development cost (RHS) Unit operating costs (RHS) Production Conventional Oil & Gas Deep Water Other Shales ROACE (RHS)
$71 $54 $44 $52
$
Average Brent price per barrel Conventional Oil & Gas Deep Water Other Shales
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Upstream and Integrated Gas
Portfolio longevity
Production is Shell group entitlement share, excluding potential divestments. Commercial resources for peer group as per Wood Mackenzie (April 2019). Commercial resources for Shell represent 2P and 2C Development pending (December 2018). Decline represents the average compounded annual decline rate in production between 2019 and 2025, and includes production from existing fields, infill drilling and facilities debottlenecking.
Commercial resources, billion boe Unit development cost, $ per boe Thousand boe per day
◼ 2P and commercial 2C resource
base >20 years of production
◼ Largest share of high-margin
LNG and deep-water resources amongst peers
◼ Competitive scoping, efficient
execution, and supply chain driving UDC improvement
◼ Unit development cost reduced
by >40% since 2015
◼ Ambition to reduce by a further 20-30% ◼ Well reservoir facility management
(WRFM), infill and debottlenecking reduce decline to ~3% per annum through 2025
◼ Annual addition of ~100 thousand boe per
day from new fields sufficient to sustain production into the next decades
Strong FCF generation into the next decades
45
Reserves and resources
Developing at competitive cost
Sustained production
25 50 Exxon BP Shell Chevron Total 5 10 15 20 25 2015 2016 2017 2018 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 2018 2022 2026 2030
Conventional Oil & Gas, Oil Sands and others Deep Water LNG & GTL Deep Water Conventional Oil & Gas Base & WRFM Infill, debottlenecking, backfill, shales development New fields under construction Exploration & appraisal New fields pre-FID Shales Shales
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Exploration A value driven strategy
46 Value is defined as NPV divided by exploration expense after tax on a forward looking, post discovery basis. Gulf of Mexico industry leader data from Wood Mackenzie (April 2019), includes discoveries from January 2014 until April 2019.
Unit finding costs, $ per boe Multiple
Increasing value Gulf of Mexico industry leader
◼ Portfolio high-grading through new basin growth, heartland additions and tail management ◼ Acceleration of hydrocarbon maturation ◼ Improved well delivery
~$2 billion annual investment to 2025 >750 mmboe resource addition ambition per annum
Shell Others 2019 targets New acreage Deep Water Integrated Gas Conventional Oil & Gas
Albania Norway Russia UK Bulgaria Egypt Oman Brunei Malaysia Australia Morocco Mauritania Nigeria Brazil USA Mexico Bolivia Trinidad & Tobago
Wood Mackenzie reserves recoverable mmboe
Unit finding cost Value (RHS) PV (post-tax), $ billion
3 8 2016 2017 2018 1 2 3 100 200 300 400 500
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Deep Water
World class portfolio
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis. Production is Shell group entitlement share, excluding potential divestments. Peer range represents Wood Mackenzie estimate of Equinor, ExxonMobil, Chevron, Total, and BP production for oil, oil & gas hydrocarbons in water depth 500-3633m.
$ billion Thousand boe per day
5 10 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 300 600 900 1,200 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030
Leading IOC player in Deep Water
47
Organic free cash flow Production
◼ Leading deep-water portfolio with exciting development funnel and strong exploration acreage ◼ Targeting $7-8 billion organic free cash flow in 2025 at $4-5 billion cash capex per year ◼ Sustained production >900 thousand boe per day through 2025 ◼ Strengthened capital efficiency – doing more with less ◼ Differentiated delivery through integration
Base & WRFM Infill drilling, debottlenecking New fields under construction Exploration & appraisal New fields pre-FID Peer range
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Deep Water
Strong delivery
48 Upstream break-even prices on forward-looking basis.
Pre-FID funnel break-even price $ per boe
Project break-even prices Replication
$ per boe
Unit operating costs
◼ Pre-FID deep-water project average
forward-looking break-even price is ~$30 or lower
◼ Drilling time reduction by 40% since 2014 ◼ Variable spread rate reduction by 60% since 2014 ◼ Further upside with more standardisation,
replication and value driven appraisal strategies
◼ Whale discovery to first oil expected to take less than
6 years, supported by 80% replication from Vito design
◼ >30% reduction since 2015 ◼ Improved operational excellence ◼ 30% head count reduction and 80% dedicated fleet
reduction in the US Gulf of Mexico since 2015
◼ Ambition to reduce UOC further to $5-6 per boe
Significant sustainable cost reductions realised
5 10 15 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ambition
Whale image rendering Replication New scope 2014 2018
20 40 60 80 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of outstanding capital
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Deep Water
Expanding our US Gulf of Mexico heartland
49 Exploration map includes Shell operated assets.
Thousand boe per day
Filling the hubs: Mars Corridor Appraisal and development Exploration
◼ Continued growth ◼ Well reservoir facility management ◼ Waterflood ◼ Tie-backs ◼ Appomattox 40% under budget and ramping
up to production of 175 thousand boe per day
◼ Vito on schedule and tracking below cost ◼ Whale host decision taken and long leads
purchase in progress
◼ Powernap tieback progressing ◼ Near field exploration and lease acquisitions
support heartland growth
◼ Blacktip discovery with >400 feet of net oil pay ◼ King Embayment near-field success with tie-back into
Mars corridor
100 200 2015 2016 2017 2018 19Q1 4Q rolling +79%
Appomattox – USA Operating Exploration or Appraisal Under Construction Perdido Stones Auger Appomattox Coulomb Olympus Mars Ursa Vito Enchilada Salsa near Appomattox Vicksburg, Rydberg
near Mars corridor Powernap, King Embayment near Perdido Whale, Blacktip
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Deep Water
Continued delivery and growth in Brazil
50
Thousand boe per day
Production Development Exploration
◼ Largest foreign producer in Brazil ◼ 15 FPSOs currently onstream with P-68 expected
◼ Robust well productivity ◼ Ongoing infill drilling opportunities ◼ 7 FPSOs under development (2020+) -- including
4 for Mero
◼ Mero 1 expected onstream in 2021 and Mero 2
progressing towards FID
◼ Strong results from Mero early production system –
60 thousand boe per day
◼ Industry leading position with ~2.7 million acres ◼ Gato de Mato and Sagitário appraisal this year ◼ Alto do Cabo Frio Oeste, Saturno, and Três Marias
exploration planned
◼ Opportunities extend funnel
100 200 300 400 2015 2016 2017 2018 19Q1 4Q rolling
Libra FPSO “Pioneiro de Libra” – Brazil Alto de Cabo Frio Oeste Mero Berbigão Sururu Oeste de Atapu Três Marias Saturno C-M-791 Libra Gato do Mato Sul de Gato do Mato Sagitário Lapa Sapinhoá Entorno de Sapinhoá Lula Exploration Development Producing
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 1.1 1.6 2 4 6 35 30 36 20 40 60 80
Shales
A growth business
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis. Production is Shell group entitlement share, excluding potential divestments. Break-evens represent development-ready wells, no exploration or appraisal required, and are 2019 forward-looking.
Thousand boe per day $ billion Operated assets inventory break-even
Positioned to deliver resilient returns and cashflow
51
High-margin barrel growth Organic free cash flow Resilient break-evens
◼ Focusing on high-margin tight oil
positions and low cost gas assets
◼ Driving competitive cost structure and performance
improvements across all
◼ Deploying technology to further reduce operating
costs and enhance returns
◼ Targeting $2-3 billion organic free cash flow in
2025 at $3-4 billion cash capex per year
Gas Liquid rich
Western Canada Gas Western Canada LTO Appalachia Haynesville Permian Argentina
Gas Liquids
3 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 $ per MMBtu Top Quartile Permian Fox Creek Argentina Groundbirch Appalachia $ per boe 200 400 600 800
2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Shales
Enhancing competitiveness in Permian
52 Competitive metrics based on Shell operated assets in Delaware basin, Loving and Reeves County, Wolfcamp formation. Average pay-back years graph source: RS Energy Group.
Well drilling and completion cost, normalised to 7,500 ft lateral length, $
Sustainable performance
Average cumulative oil production by online date
Long-term value creation
◼ Top quartile well costs ◼ Track record of improved
efficiency and unit costs
◼ Multi-well pad development and longer
laterals underpins improvement
◼ Enhancing and preserving long term
value delivery
◼ Faster pay-back on
development costs than peers
◼ Scalable by replicating
a winning modular-design formula
◼ Competitive investment case
2015 2018 Ambition 1 2 3
Short-term cash delivery
Average pay-back years
6 12 18 24
◼ Technology underpins current
and long-term delivery
◼ Near-term technology further
improves cash flow
◼ Reduces HSSE risk
Subsurface Machine learning assists well design and execution Surface Multiphase meters and pumps, simplified processing facilities Surveillance Advanced analytics streamline operations and maintenance
A leading operator driving both cash and value
IOCs Shell Independents
Months
+60% 2018 Average 2015 Average
Top Quartile
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Conventional Oil & Gas
High-graded portfolio delivers longevity
53 Production is Shell group entitlement share, excluding potential divestments. Decline represents the average compounded annual decline rate in production between 2019 and 2025 and includes production from existing fields, infill drilling and facilities debottlenecking. Resource life: 2P and 2C resources, excluding 2C unclarified, non-viable, on hold and post-licence) over production.
Resource life, years
High-grading the portfolio
Thousand boe per day
Sustained production
1,000 2,000 2018 2022 2026 2030
◼ High-graded portfolio of assets with longevity and running room ◼ Operational excellence driving down cost and limiting decline rate to ~4% ◼ Deep familiarity with heartlands and experience in managing non-technical risk ◼ Targeting $5-6 billion organic free cash flow in 2025 at $4-5 billion cash capex per year
Simpler, more resilient portfolio with higher cash returns per barrel
Retained assets Divested since 2015 Portfolio action in progress or potential Base & WRFM Infill, debottlenecking, backfill New fields under construction Exploration & appraisal New fields pre-FID Countries with growing production
Albania Norway Russia Netherlands UK Iraq Egypt Oman Brunei Malaysia Nigeria Germany Kazakhstan Italy Tunisia Kuwait Philippines UAE USA (AERA)
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 5 10
15 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ambition
Conventional Oil & Gas
Capital efficiency enabling growth
54 Upstream break-even prices on forward-looking basis.
Unit development cost, $ per boe
Capital efficiency
Break-even price, $ per boe
Resilient portfolio
IRR, %
Attractive returns
◼ UDC reduced by almost 50% since 2015 through
competitive scoping and efficient execution
◼ Ambition to reduce further to $5-6 per boe ◼ Value of investable portfolio with forward-looking
break-even price of <$40 per boe has nearly doubled since 2016
◼ Average forward-looking break-even of planned new
development projects is below $30 per boe
◼ Attractive portfolio of infill and debottlenecking
projects: average IRR above 50%
◼ Strong returns from significant new developments
average IRR above 20%
Sustained FCF with $4-5 billion cash capex until 2025
10 20 30 40 50 Cumulative project NPV 20 40 60 Infill and debottlenecking Major new developments
2016 2017 2018
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Upstream
Robust development funnel
55 Projects listed have an expected future peak production of approximately 25 thousand boe per day or higher, Shell share. Upstream break-even prices on a forward-looking basis, excludes feasibility, research & development, decommissioning and restoration and idle rig expense. Shales break-even prices exclude gas assets.
Pre-FID funnel break-even price, $ per boe
Competitive options
◼ Healthy funnel of competitive and resilient
◼ Small projects add incremental >400 thousand boe
per day
Production Conventional Oil & Gas Deep Water
Pre FEED
~500 kboe/d
FEED
~240 kboe/d
Under construction
~470 kboe/d
Coming Onstream / Ramping up
~200 kboe/d
Exploration Mexico Brazil US GoM Mauritania Nigeria Malaysia Mauritania Nigeria Malaysia Albania Oman UK Egypt Mero 2 Mero 3 Bonga SW Powernap Jerun Salym southern hub Shales Vito P-70 Atapu 1 P-71 Mero 1 Penguins redevelopment Permian Fox Creek Vaca Muerta Appomattox P-68 Berbigão WDDM 9B Permian Mero 4 Gato de Mato Bonga main life extension Bonga north tranche 1 Fort Sumter Whale HI development Marjoram/ Rosmari Jackdaw Timi Val d’Agri future development Shales
Shales Liquids
10 20 30 40 50
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Downstream
57
Oil Products
2018 Oil products sales volumes 6.8 mboe/d 2018 Refinery processing intake 2.6 mboe/d 2025 Organic FCF $8-9 billion 2025 ROACE >15% 2021-25 Average cash capex $5-6 billion p.a. 2018 Chemicals sales volumes 17.6 mtpa 2025 Organic FCF $2-3 billion 2025 ROACE ~15% 2021-25 Average cash capex $3-4 billion p.a.
◼ Most successful mobility retailer, #1 in lubricants ◼ Competitive/high- quality refining backbone ◼ Trading optimises integrated value chains ◼ Strong demand growth despite growing recycling ◼ Focus on base, derivative and performance chemicals ◼ Leverage customer proximity and intimacy
Chemicals
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream.
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Oil Products
Transformed Oil Products is core to world-class investment case
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis.
$ billion Earnings, % Earnings, % Earnings, %
More predictable cash, high returns
58
Organic free cash flow growth Balanced geographical exposure Increasing Marketing exposure Growing non-fuel related income
5 10 2018 2020 2025 50 100 2018 2020 2025
Refining & Trading Marketing Non-fuel retail, lubricants, specialities Retail fuels and aviation Working capital movement Organic FCF excl. working capital
2018 2025
Americas Europe and Africa Asia and Oceania
50 100 2018 2025
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 40
50 60 2020 2025 2030 2035
Oil Products
Multiple
drive Oil Products’ transformation
Shell analysis unless otherwise indicated. Industrial production: Oxford Economics (2019). Convenience retail: Euromonitor (2019). 59
Index: 2020 = 100 Million boe per day
Kilometres driven expected to increase Absolute oil demand grows and shifts Marketing sectors show growth
50 100 150 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Kilometres driven Rest of World Asia
Shell thrives through the transitions
Goods mobility People mobility B2B customers
◼ More customer mobility ◼ Largest network ◼ More online, more deliveries ◼ Largest fleet solution player ◼ Technology transforming the industry ◼ Unique B2B footprint
2017 2025
+22%
Industrial production
+36%
Aircraft
+27%
Ship capacity
+39%
Convenience retail
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Retail brand value: Brand Finance Global 500 (2019). Lubricants market share: Kline & Company (2018). Lubricants brand share preference: Kantar, Motor Lubricants Tracker (2018) Global weighted Preference Passenger Car Motor Oil; weighted sample for Shell and BP Castrol #4212, for Mobil #4242; Markets = Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan (except for Mobil), Russia, Thailand, USA. Trading and optimisation: Shell analysis based on most recent competitor reports and publications.
Oil Products
Competitive strengths of brand, scale and capabilities
60
Retail Lubricants Trading and optimisation
42 44 2.2 5,290
Market share (%)
Number of sites in China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia (thousands) Number of sites (thousands) Brand value ($ billion) Shell Competitors: Total, BP Market share (%) in China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia Finished lubricants market share (%) Brand share preference (%) 22 11 8 Shell Competitors: Exxon Mobil, BP Shell Competitors: BP, Vitol, Glencore, Total Physical crude and energy products trading (Mboe per annum)
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Oil Products
Creates value by putting customers at the heart of everything we do
Gross margin excludes process oils, based on 2018 actual data. 61
Retail gross margin contribution Lubricants gross margin contribution
Direct and indirect markets globally (2018)
B2B customers served in total (2018) Customers at retail service stations daily
30m
2018
40m
2025
44k
2018
Shell-branded retail service stations
55k
2025
1/9
2018
Machinery and engines protected by Shell Lubricants
1/8
2025
900
2018
Airports in the Aviation network
1000
2025
50 100
Convenience Retail Fleet Solutions V-Power™ Loyalty Main-grade Fuels
% 50 100 %
Services and Digital B2B Premium Synthetics Pure Plus™ Global Accounts Mainstream Lubricants
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Oil Products
Marketing business growth maintains momentum and remains competitive
62 Shell analysis based on most recent competitor reports.
Earnings: Retail & Global Commercial Yield on cost and ROACE: competitive benchmark
$ billion Opex yield (%)
2 4 6 8 40 80 20 40 2025 2018 2013
ROACE >20% 24%
ROACE (%)
Retail & Global Commercial 2025 Retail & Global Commercial 2018 Walmart McDonald‘s Sainsbury‘s Euro Garages ACT Fuchs Akzo Nobel
Growth
Retail Global Commercial New revenues Resilient sectors New customers Grow base
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
2018 progress (vs. 2017)
Oil Products
Marketing business has delivered
strategy in 2018 vs. 2017
2025 targets as per 2018 Downstream Open House. 63
2025 targets
>7%
Increase in V-PowerTM margin contribution
>10%
Global accounts turnover growth
>55k
Workshops in China connected digitally
>1000
New convenience stores
>20%
Fleet solutions services margin growth
Lubricants volume growth – China, India, Indonesia, Mexico and Russia
>450
New sites in growth markets
Premium lubricants volume growth Grow base
◼ V-PowerTM ◼ 5,000 new sites ◼ Growth in premium lubricants
Resilient sectors
◼ Grow fleet solutions ◼ $1 billion investment in technology
New customers
◼ 5,000 new sites and market share
growth in China, India, Indonesia, Mexico and Russia
New revenues
◼ Grow convenience retail ◼ 5,000 new stores ◼ New customer offers ◼ Accelerate digital and services growth
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Oil Products
Marketing taking action to lead in digital, mobility and energy
64
Digitalising loyalty programmes serving >30 million members Expanding our fast- charging network Nature-based solutions in the Netherlands with more to come Developing E-Fluids through leading OEM partnerships Shell Fleet Hub supporting >550,000 active cards Decarbonising Aviation by introducing Bio Jet Shell Accuport: tracking >6,000 vessels; optimising product procurement
Energy Mobility Digital
China innovative digital solutions
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Oil Products
Trading and Supply, the integrator and optimiser for Shell
Crude Refining Power LNG/Gas Products Trading and Supply
Integrator and Optimiser
Power equity production calculated as power generation and long-term Power Purchase Agreements.
Crude
Products
48%
LNG
12%
Power
Our advantage Shell is the only company with material integration and optimisation activities globally that span the whole energy value chain
65
Sales volumes sourced from equity production
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Oil Products
Reshaping our refining portfolio
66 Non-energy cash costs based on 2016 Solomon world-wide fuels benchmarking. Refinery count includes refineries with ownership share above 10%.
$ million
Refining – non-energy cash costs
# refineries
Refining – capacity & number of refineries
2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 4th Quartile 3rd Quartile 2nd Quartile Top Quartile
Performance improving
2016 2025 2020 2018 2004
Million boe per day
54 19 ~15 ~10
Refinery or Chemical site Strategic review or partially divested in 2018 Chemical site under construction Trading offices/hubs/ Integrated performance units Pennsylvania Buenos Aires, Al Jubail, Karachi, Sarnia Houston, Rotterdam, London, Singapore
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Oil Products
Delivers on its commitments
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis. All historical financials exclude 2G Biofuels. 2020 financials onwards include 2G Biofuels.
$ billion $ billion $ billion $ billion
67
CFFO excluding working capital Organic free cash flow Earnings and ROACE Cash capital expenditure
5 10 2016 2017 2018
5 10 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 10 20 5 10 2016 2017 2018 5 10 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025
Marketing Refining & Trading ROACE (RHS) % Organic FCF excl. working capital Working capital movement
2025 outlook $8-9 billion Organic FCF >15% ROACE
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Oil Products
Transformed and core to the world-class investment case
68
Key component of world-class investment case Delivering transformational growth Leverage integration in key value chains through Trading and Supply Use mobility and digital transitions to meet the needs
Capability
Integrated value chain Ensures best value for Shell
Scale
Largest mobility retailer Over 44 thousand sites; nearly 80 countries
Brand
Iconic brand is valued significantly higher than any of our competitors
We place customers at the heart
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Chemicals
Petrochemicals and economic progress go hand-in-hand
69 Sources: IHS, McKinsey Global Institute, Shell analysis including Shell Mountains scenario 2018-50.
Alpha Olefins Low- temperature detergents Diphenyl Carbonate Phones, tablets and computer parts Polyolefins Light- weighting of transportation Glycol Textiles and clothing Styrene & Polyols Insulation and construction materials Polyolefins Energy efficiency materials
Part of our
everyday life
Linked to
GDP growth
Plays a role in
decarbonising society Chemicals consumption increases with GDP per capita growth
Country/region size = total demand
2018 Chemicals consumption per capita GDP per capita
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Chemicals
Demand growing, Shell plays a role in the solution
70
Petrochemicals demand is growing even with projections on the circular economy Global polymer demand (virgin resin)
Change in global GDP (real) and petrochemicals demand 2000-2035. Index: 2000 = 1.
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Petrochemicals GDP
Recycling base case Advanced Recycling case
300
million tonnes per annum in 2016
470
million tonnes per annum in 2030
300
million tonnes per annum in 2016
380
million tonnes per annum in 2030 Founding Member
Recycling base case Advanced Recycling case
Sources: IHS, McKinsey Global Institute, Shell analysis including Shell Mountains scenario 2018-50.
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Chemicals
Competitively differentiated
Delivery on track; Current projects represent 75% cash growth to end of 2025
71
Mono Ethylene Glycol Plant United States Cracker and derivatives Iraq
FUTURE
Pennsylvania Chemicals Nanhai phase II Geismar Alpha-Olefins 4
WORLD-SCALE ASSETS
Proprietary technology Advantaged feedstocks Market access
Future projects Current projects under construction or 2018-2019 start-up
FUTURE FUTURE
Further expansion
China
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Chemicals
Delivers on its commitments
Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis. Underlying costs defined as costs to serve, department fixed allocations, technology costs, exclude manufacturing fixed costs, non-business development costs and one-offs, and are inflation-adjusted.
Index, real: 2016 = 100 $ billion $ billion $ billion
72
Underlying costs Organic free cash flow Earnings and ROACE Cash capital expenditure
50 100 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025
1 2 3 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 10 20 5 2016 2017 2018 5 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025
Sustaining capex Growth capex Earnings ROACE (RHS) % Organic FCF excl. working capital Working capital movement
Continuing to invest $3-4 billion per annum through the next decade 2025 outlook $2-3 billion Organic FCF ~15% ROACE
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Chemicals
Evolution to include higher-value performance products
73
BASE CHEMICALS/ INTERMEDIATES
Differentiators
◼ Advantaged feedstocks ◼ Process technology ◼ Market access ◼ World-scale assets
Increase differentiation through:
◼ Product technology ◼ Brand ◼ Sustainability
PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS PUTTING THE CUSTOMER FIRST IN A COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
2019 2025
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
New energies and natural gas deliver lower-carbon energy solutions Disciplined New Energies growth within boundary conditions
New Energies
Overview
Power returns of 8-12% represent returns for on-stream integrated power business, ROACE for Power business (including development stage costs) expected to be around 6%. 75
New Fuels Power
Raízen – Brazil Mount Storm wind farm – USA
◼ Scalable investment contingent on technology,
regulatory landscape and demand
◼ Biofuels: Successful first generation (1G) operations and active
second generation (2G) R&D. Reporting within Downstream segment with target returns of >15%
◼ Hydrogen: Partnerships with governments and OEMs ◼ Trading, marketing and supply ◼ Lower-carbon generation, storage and electric mobility ◼ Core markets: Northwest Europe, USA, Australia
and select growth markets
◼ Target returns of 8-12% for on-stream integrated power business
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Power
A macro look at power
76
Why power? Electricity generation growth
◼ Global energy demand growing materially ◼ Deep electrification required to help meet the goals of the Paris Agreement ◼ Customers expect lower-carbon energy solutions including power ◼ Governments support this transition ◼ Most of the growth in power generation will come from renewables ◼ Provides security of supply to countries ◼ Lowest cost option for society to decarbonise at scale ◼ Significant clean power investments needed over the next decades ◼ Has the scale and longevity to be relevant to Shell
Thousand TWh
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2018 2025 2032 2039
+50% +75% +130%
Shell Sky Scenario IEA Current Policies Bloomberg New Energy Finance New Energy Outlook
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Power
Traditional power system
77
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Power
Evolution from the traditional power system
78 INCREASING CAPITAL INTENSITY
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Power
Building blocks of a material and profitable integrated power business
79
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Power
Shell’s competitive advantages
80
in renewables
Generating and trading renewable power
Leveraging the strongest energy brand in the world
Positive response from customers following rebranding of First Utility to Shell Energy in April 2019
power system & portfolio management
Leveraging adjacencies to build and connect positions in key markets
A leader in trading
Shell Energy North America has 20 years of experience in power trading and has been in the top 3 wholesalers for the past 10 years
Operations in
We have a diverse customer base, strong governmental and regulatory network and established footprint
Integrated energy
Provide complementary offerings to a range of customers
experience in powering mobility
Foundation to build EV charging services with New Motion and Greenlots
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Power
Aspirations and investment criteria
Power returns of 8-12% represent returns for on-stream integrated power business, ROACE for Power business (including development stage costs) expected to be around 6%.
Million customers Sales volumes (TWh) Operational capacity (GW)
Investment pace dependent on financial performance and boundary conditions Additional financial disclosures from 2021 2025 FCF: $(2) – (1) billion
Renewable generation
1 2 3 4 5 2016 2017 2018 2025 150 200 250 2016 2017 2018 2025 1 2 3 4 5 2016 2017 2018 2025
◼ On average $1-2 billion per annum to 2020 ◼ Power cash capex on average $2-3 billion per year for
2021-25
◼ On track to be self-funding by 2030 ◼ Investments hitting agreed financial milestones ◼ On-stream integrated power business demonstrating 8-12%
returns
81
Retail Investment: Power investment scale-up subject to: Trading Renewable generation
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Discovered Resources
Robust resource funnel
Commercial resources for peer group as per Wood Mackenzie (April 2019). Commercial resources for Shell represent 2P and commercial 2C (December 2018).
Commercial resource funnel and SEC Proved Developed Reserves in line with peers
83
Billion boe Billion boe
5 10 15 20 25 ◼ Valuable commercial resource base with significant
development options and a resource life that exceeds 20 years
◼ Total commercial resources in line with peers ◼ SEC Proved Developed Reserves in-line with peers ◼ SEC Proved Undeveloped Reserves lower than peers
because of unique characteristics of Shell’s portfolio:
◼ LNG: largest IOC market share; LNG supply
flexibility and volumes managed as a portfolio (e.g. LNG Canada)
◼ Deep Water: largest IOC portfolio; analogues
sometimes limited (e.g. Appomattox)
◼ Shales: Large Permian NOV position;
need 5 year development plan to book PUD; preference to take well-by-well decision Proved Developed & Undeveloped Reserves Commercial resources by theme
Shell Peers SEC Proved Developed Reserves (2018) SEC Proved Undeveloped Reserves (2018)
25 50 Exxon BP Shell Chevron Total
Conventional Oil & Gas, Oil Sands and others Deep Water LNG & GTL Shales
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Start-up Project Country Shell share [A] % Peak production 100% kboe/d LNG capacity 100% Mtpa Products 100% capacity Power output 100% MW Theme Shell
2019-2020
Atapu 1 (P-70) [B] Brazil 25 150
Deep Water Bakong / Gorek / Larak (SK408) Malaysia 30 75
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Berbigão and Sururu SW (P-68) [B] Brazil 25 150
Deep Water EA Further Development Nigeria 30 35
Conventional Oil & Gas Forcados Yokri Integrated Project (FYIP) Nigeria 30 40
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Gumusut-Kakap Phase 2 Malaysia 29 50
Deep Water
P
Permian & Fox Creek [C] United States & Canada various ~250
Shales
P
Rabab Harweel Integrated Project Oman 34 35
Conventional Oil & Gas Southern Swamp AG Nigeria 30 40
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Tempa Rossa Italy 25 50
Conventional Oil & Gas Vaca Muerta basin [D] Argentina ~90 ~70
Shales
P 2021+
Arran United Kingdom 45 30
Conventional Oil & Gas Assa North Nigeria 30 60
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Borssele 3 & 4 [E] The Netherlands 20 732
Power Delga Solar [E] Australia 100 120
Power
P
Gorgon – Jansz infill Australia 25 maintain capacity
Integrated Gas KBB Phase 2 Malaysia 30 60
Conventional Oil & Gas LNG Canada T1-2 Canada 40 14
Integrated Gas Mero 1 [B] Brazil 20 180
Deep Water P-71 [B] Brazil 25 150
Deep Water Pegaga Malaysia 20 95
Conventional Oil & Gas Penguins Redevelopment United Kingdom 50 45
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Pennsylvania cracker United States 100 1.5 mtpa C2
Chemicals
P
Troll Phase 3 Norway 8 255
Conventional Oil & Gas Tyra Future Denmark 37 80
Conventional Oil & Gas Vito United States 63 100
Deep Water
P
Projects under construction
84 [A] Direct and indirect share. [B] The Brazil accumulations are subject to unitisation agreements; production shown is FPSO oil capacity as per operator. [C] Fox Creek and Permian production represents Shell entitlement share of production and is the peak production expected between 2017 and 2019. [D] Sierras Blancas and Cruz de Lorena at 90% Shell share, Coiron Amargo SO at 80% Shell share. [E] Post-FID; pre-construction.
2019-20 Shell share: >250 kboe/d 2021+ Shell share: >250 kboe/d, 5.6 mtpa LNG 1.5 mtpa ethylene
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Phase Project Country Shell share [A] % Peak production 100% kboe/d LNG capacity 100% Mtpa Products 100% capacity Power output 100% MW Theme Shell
Define
Barracuda backfill Trinidad & Tobago 100 25
Integrated Gas
P
Bonga South West Nigeria 43 175
Deep Water
P
Gbaran Phase 3 Nigeria 30 50
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Lake Charles LNG United States 50 16.8
Integrated Gas
P
NLNG T7 Nigeria 26 7.4
Integrated Gas Pierce Depressurisation United Kingdom 93 20
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Powernap United States 100 35
Deep Water
P
Prelude – Crux Australia 82 maintain capacity
Integrated Gas
P
Salym Southern Hub Russia 50 65
Conventional Oil & Gas Uzu Development Nigeria 30 45
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Val d’Agri Future Development Italy 39 65
Conventional Oil & Gas
Assess/Select
Abadi Indonesia 35 244 9.5
Integrated Gas Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind United States 50 2500
Power Arrow backfill Australia 50 maintain capacity
Integrated Gas Bonga Main Life Extension & Upgrade Nigeria 55 80
Deep Water
P
Bonga North Tranche 1 Nigeria 55 119
Deep Water
P
Bukom upgrade Singapore 100 Gasoline
Oil Products
P
Cambo United Kingdom 30 40
Conventional Oil & Gas Clair South United Kingdom 28 60
Conventional Oil & Gas Colibri backfill Trinidad & Tobago 87 35
Integrated Gas
P
Dover United States 100 [C]
Deep Water
P
Fort Sumpter United States 100 [C]
Deep Water
P
Gato do Mato Brazil 80 99
Deep Water
P
Gorgon – Jansz compression Australia 25 maintain capacity
Integrated Gas HA Development Nigeria 30 60
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
HI Development Nigeria 40 75
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Pre-FID options (1)
85 [A] Direct and indirect share. [B] The Brazil accumulations are subject to unitisation agreements; production shown is FPSO oil capacity as per operator. [C] To be confirmed.
Shell share potential: >1000 kboe/d ~24 mtpa LNG ~200 GW
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019
Phase Project Country Shell share [A] % Peak production 100% kboe/d LNG capacity 100% Mtpa Products 100% capacity Power output 100% MW Theme Shell
Assess/Select
Jackdaw United Kingdom 74 40
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Jerun Malaysia 30 95
Conventional Oil & Gas Kalamkas Kazakhstan 17 55
Conventional Oil & Gas Kashagan CFP Kazakhstan 17 65
Conventional Oil & Gas KGK Expansion Phase 1 Kazakhstan 29 40
Conventional Oil & Gas LNG Canada Expansion Canada 40 14
Integrated Gas Marjoram/Rosmari Malaysia 75 100
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Mayflower Offshore Wind United States 50 1600
Power Mero 2 [B] Brazil 20 180
Deep Water Mero 3 [B] Brazil 20 180
Deep Water Mero 4 [B] Brazil 20 180
Deep Water Moerdijk NWE efficiency project The Netherlands 100 Ethylene
Chemicals
P
Nebras Iraq [C] [C]
Chemicals
[C]
Norco upgrade United States 100 Gasoline
Oil Products
P
NWS – Browse backfill Australia 27 [C]
Integrated Gas Okpokunou Cluster Development Nigeria 24 85
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Oman Integrated GTL Oman [C] [C] [C]
Integrated Gas
P
Ormen Lange Phase 3 Norway 18 80
Conventional Oil & Gas
P
Pearls Khazar Kazakhstan 55 40
Conventional Oil & Gas Sakhalin T3 Russia 28 5.4
Integrated Gas Tanzania Tanzania 30 [C] 12
Integrated Gas
P
Timi Malaysia 75 40
Conventional Oil & Gas Whale United States 60 100
Deep Water
P
Pre-FID options (2)
86 [A] Direct and indirect share. [B] The Brazil accumulations are subject to unitisation agreements; production shown is FPSO oil capacity as per operator. [C] To be confirmed.
Shell share potential: >1000 kboe/d ~24 mtpa LNG ~200 GW
Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Metric Abbreviation Definition Break-even price BEP The forward-looking break-even price for pre-FID projects is calculated based on all forward-looking costs associated with pre-FID projects in our development portfolio. Accordingly, this typically excludes exploration and appraisal costs, lease bonuses, exploration seismic and exploration-team overhead costs. The forward-looking break-even price for pre-FID projects is calculated based on our estimate of resources volumes that are currently classified as 2C under the Society of Petroleum Engineers’ Resource Classification System. Cash capital expenditure Cash capex Comprises the following lines from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: Capital expenditure, Investments in joint ventures and associates and Investments in equity securities. Capital Investment CI Comprises Capital expenditure, Investments in joint ventures and associates and Investments in equity securities, exploration expense excluding well write-offs, leases recognised in the period and other adjustments. Cash flow from operating activities excluding working capital movements CFFO excl. WC “Cash flow from operating activities” less the sum of the following items in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: (i) (increase)/decrease in inventories, (ii) (increase)/decrease in current receivables, and (iii) increase/(decrease) in current payables. Divestments Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and businesses, joint ventures and associates, and other Integrated Gas, Upstream and Downstream investments, reported in “Cash flow from investing activities”, adjusted onto an accruals basis and for any share consideration received or contingent consideration recognised upon divestment, as well as proceeds from the sale of interests in entities while retaining control (for example, proceeds from sale of interest in Shell Midstream Partners, L.P.), which are included in “Change in non-controlling interest” within “Cash flow from financing activities”. Earnings on a current cost of supplies basis CCS earnings Income for the period, adjusted for the after-tax effect of oil-price changes on inventory. Free Cash Flow FCF Defined as the sum of “Cash flow from operating activities” and “Cash flow from investing activities”. Gearing Net debt (current and noncurrent debt less cash and cash equivalents, adjusted for fair value of derivative financial instruments used to hedge foreign exchange and interest rate risks relating to debt, and associated collateral balances) as a percentage of total capital (net debt plus total equity). Organic free cash flow OFCF Free cash flow excluding inorganic capital investment and divestment proceeds. Operating costs Opex Underlying operating expenses, which are operating expenses less identified items. Opex yield Net earnings divided over operating costs (excluding depreciation, disposal proceeds, income from loans to Associates and other Investments). Return on average capital employed on a CCS basis excluding identified items Clean CCS ROACE Sum of CCS earnings excluding identified items for the current and previous three quarters, adjusted for after-tax interest expense, expressed as a percentage of the average capital employed for the same period. The after-tax interest expense is calculated using the effective tax rate for the same period. Capital employed consists of total equity, current debt and non-current debt. Unit cash flow CFFO/boe Integrated Gas and Upstream cash flow divided by total production. Calculation based on reported segment CFFO excl. WC, for Total: Upstream and Gas, Renewables and Power, for Shell: Upstream and Integrated Gas. Calculation for BP, Chevron end Exxon approximate, based on total CFFO excl. WC less Downstream and Corporate cashflows estimated by adding segment net income and segment depreciation, corrected for interest and special items. Unit development cost UDC Shell share of lifecycle capex spend, in real terms 2018, for major projects, divided by nominal Shell working interest share (SWIS) production Unit finding cost UFC Exploration expense before tax divided over viable contingent resources. Exploration expense excludes signature bonuses and associate spend. Contingent resources on a Shell group entitlement share. Unit operating cost UOC Shell share of operating cost divided by Shell Working Interest Share (SWIS) Production Unit technical cost UTC Unit technical cost defined as present value of real terms capital and operating expenditure divided by the production profile discounted to the reference date.
Definitions