Management Day Delivering a world-class investment case Royal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

management day
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Management Day Delivering a world-class investment case Royal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Management Day Delivering a world-class investment case Royal Dutch Shell plc June 4 5, 2019 #MakeTheFuture Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Cautionary note Reserves: Our use of the term reserves in this presentation means SEC


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Royal Dutch Shell plc

Management Day

#MakeTheFuture

Delivering a world-class investment case

June 4–5, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Reserves: Our use of the term “reserves” in this presentation means SEC proved oil and gas reserves. Resources: Our use of the term “resources” in this presentation includes quantities of oil and gas not yet classified as SEC proved oil and gas reserves. Resources are consistent with the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) 2P + 2C definitions. This presentation contains the following forward-looking Non-GAAP measures: Organic Free Cash Flow, Free Cash Flow, Capital Investment, CCS Earnings, CCS Earnings less identified items, Gearing, Underlying Operating Expenses, ROACE, Capital Employed and Divestments. We are unable to provide a reconciliation of the above forward-looking Non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures because certain information needed to reconcile the above Non-GAAP measure to the most comparable GAAP financial measure is dependent on future events some which are outside the control of the company, such as oil and gas prices, interest rates and exchange rates. Moreover, estimating such GAAP measures consistent with the company accounting policies and the required precision necessary to provide a meaningful reconciliation is extremely difficult and could not be accomplished without unreasonable effort. Non-GAAP measures in respect of future periods which cannot be reconciled to the most comparable GAAP financial measure are calculated in a manner which is consistent with the accounting policies applied in Royal Dutch Shell plc’s financial statements. The presented 2020 outlook is an average for 2019-2021. The presented 2025 outlook is an average for 2024-2026. All forward-looking numbers are on an IFRS 16 basis unless stated otherwise. 2020 presented organic free cash flow range of $28-33 billion is equivalent to $25-30 billion on an IAS 17 basis. 2020 presented cash capex range of $24-29 billion is equivalent to the previous outlook of $25-30 billion capital investment on an IAS 17 basis. Presented earnings is clean CCS earnings excluding identified items unless stated otherwise. Presented ROACE (return

  • n average capital employed) is clean CCS ROACE unless stated otherwise. Historical ROACE for individual segments presented as reported (not restated for Q1 2019 definition change). Shareholder distributions include cash dividends and potential share buybacks. The financial measures provided

by strategic themes represent a notional allocation of ROACE, capital employed, capital investment, free cash flow, organic free cash flow and underlying operating expenses of Shell’s strategic themes for the purpose of Management Day presentations. Shell’s segment reporting under IFRS 8 remains Integrated Gas, Upstream, Downstream and Corporate. Also, in this presentation we may refer to Shell’s “Net Carbon Footprint”, which includes Shell’s carbon emissions from the production of our energy products, our suppliers’ carbon emissions in supplying energy for that production and our customers’ carbon emissions associated with their use of the energy products we sell. Shell only controls its own emissions. But, to support society in achieving the Paris Agreement goals, we aim to help such suppliers and consumers to likewise lower their emissions. The use of the term Shell’s “Net Carbon Footprint” is for convenience only and not intended to suggest these emissions are those of Shell or its subsidiaries. This presentation contains data and analysis from Shell’s new Sky scenario. Unlike Shell’s previously published Mountains and Oceans exploratory scenarios, the Sky scenario is based on the assumption that society reaches the Paris Agreement’s goal of holding the rise in global average temperatures this century to well below two degrees Celsius (2°C) above pre-industrial levels. Unlike Shell’s Mountains and Oceans scenarios, which unfolded in an open-ended way based upon plausible assumptions and quantifications, the Sky scenario was specifically designed to reach the Paris Agreement’s goal in a technically possible manner. These scenarios are a part of an ongoing process used in Shell for over 40 years to challenge executives’ perspectives on the future business environment. They are designed to stretch management to consider even events that may only be remotely

  • possible. Scenarios, therefore, are not intended to be predictions of likely future events or outcomes and investors should not rely on them when making an investment decision with regard to Royal Dutch Shell plc securities.

The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate legal entities. In this presentation “Shell”, “Shell Group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in

  • general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These terms are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular entity or entities. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell

subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this presentation refer to entities over which Royal Dutch Shell plc either directly or indirectly has control. Entities and unincorporated arrangements over which Shell has joint control are generally referred to as “joint ventures” and “joint operations”,

  • respectively. Entities over which Shell has significant influence but neither control nor joint control are referred to as “associates”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect ownership interest held by Shell in an entity or unincorporated joint arrangement,

after exclusion of all third-party interest. This presentation contains forward-looking statements (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “aim”, “ambition”, ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, “schedule”, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this presentation, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. No assurance is provided that future dividend payments will match or exceed previous dividend payments. All forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional risk factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov). These risk factors also expressly qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this presentation and should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this presentation, June 4-5,

  • 2019. Neither Royal Dutch Shell plc nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or

inferred from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. We may have used certain terms, such as resources, in this presentation that the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov.

Cautionary note

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Key messages

3

◼ Portfolio positioned for the future of energy ◼ Reduce the Net Carbon Footprint of our energy products ◼ Sustaining Upstream; growing market-facing businesses ◼ Capital discipline provides sustainability and value growth ◼ Improving returns and growing shareholder distributions ◼ Deepening trust with society, shareholders and customers ◼ Ethics, compliance and safety as foundation for continued success ◼ Providing customers with the products they want and need

Thrive in the energy transition World-class investment case Strong licence to operate

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

2025 outlook

Confidence in 2020 delivery, catalyst to growth in 2021-2025

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. All amounts are “per annum” unless specified. Post-2020 cash capex range excludes major inorganic spend and includes minor acquisitions up to $1 billion. Share buybacks subject to further progress with debt reduction and oil price conditions. 4

2020 DE-RISKED

$24-29 billion $28-33 billion ~10%

share buybacks 2018-20

$25 billion

CASH CAPEX ORGANIC FREE CASH FLOW SHAREHOLDER DISTRIBUTIONS

SUSTAINING CEILING

ROACE GEARING

~25%

2025 STRONG OUTLOOK

~$30 billion

average over 2021-25

$125+ billion >12% ~$35 billion

$20 billion $32 billion

potential total distributions 2021-25

15-25%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Delivery

Strong competitive position

Peer range comprises of ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP and Total. Competitive financial data as published and Shell analysis. Free cash flow: cash flow from operations less cash used in investing activities, corrected for interest paid for Shell. CFFO excl. working capital corrected for interest received (in CFFI) and interest paid (CFFF) for Shell. ROACE: Earnings on CCS basis excluding identified items (or equivalent) for European companies, reported earnings excluding special non-operating items for US companies. Adjusted for after-tax interest expense. Capital employed on gross debt basis, including lease liabilities. Brand value as per Oil & Gas 50 2019 Report.

$ billion % $ billion $ billion

  • 20

20 40 16Q1 16Q3 17Q1 17Q3 18Q1 18Q3 19Q1 2 4 6 8 10 16Q1 16Q3 17Q1 17Q3 18Q1 18Q3 19Q1 10 20 30 40 50 16Q1 16Q3 17Q1 17Q3 18Q1 18Q3 19Q1 10 20 30 40 2016 2017 2018 5

Free cash flow – 4 quarters rolling Clean CCS ROACE – 4 quarters rolling CFFO excl. working capital – 4 quarters rolling Brand value

Thrive in the energy transition World-class investment case Strong licence to

  • perate

Shell Peer range

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

No harm Good products Trusted company

Trust

Strong societal licence to

  • perate

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Energy outlook

Changes in consumer patterns drive a shift in the primary energy mix

7

Global end-use energy consumption

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100

Electricity Solid Liquid Gaseous

Exajoules

More people Lower carbon More prosperity

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Strategic themes

Competitively positioned for the future of energy

8

01

Core Upstream themes

◼ Strong cash generation ◼ Fully sustain through the coming decades

02

Leading Transition themes

◼ Extend leadership ◼ Capitalise on Energy Transition

03

Emerging Power theme

◼ Capture value from evolving

consumption patterns

◼ Prove investment case and then scale up

Capital allocation

◼ Value- and returns-driven ◼ Diversify risk and opportunity

Portfolio resilience

◼ Balanced cash generation ◼ Enables low-carbon future

Integration

◼ Optimise value chains ◼ Unlock superior value

Customer orientation

◼ Create, meet new demand ◼ Key differentiator

Clear portfolio strategy Industry-leading returns per strategic theme Core strengths

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Strategic themes

Shell’s strategy by theme

9

Deep Water

Leading portfolio, strong growth funnel Sustained high-margin production

Shales

Growing production in high-margin basins Competitive delivery

Conventional Oil & Gas

High-graded portfolio with longevity Growth potential in deep resource base

Power

New sources of value emerging Returns drive pace of scaling up

Chemicals

Strong demand growth despite growing recycling Focus on base, derivative and performance chemicals

Oil Products

Most successful mobility retailer, #1 in lubricants Competitive/high-quality refining backbone

Integrated Gas

Extend market leadership Unique portfolio optimisation capability

Core Upstream themes Leading Transition themes Emerging Power theme

World-class asset operatorship Leverage customer proximity and intimacy Trading optimisation through integration

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

2025 outlook

Business milestones underpin cash flow growth through 2025 and beyond

10 Major projects 2019-25: more than $500 million lifecycle capex. Upstream major projects include Shales development decisions. Marketing growth targets are relative to 2018.

10+

FIDs

5+

Start-ups

25+

FIDs

25+

Start-ups

10k+

New retail sites

10m+

New customers

5+

FIDs

5+

Start-ups

Upstream major projects Downstream major projects Integrated Gas major projects Marketing growth

Appomattox – USA

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

$ billion per annum 2020 Organic FCF (IAS 17) 2021-25 Sustaining cash capex (IFRS 16) 2021-25 Total cash capex (IFRS 16) 2025 Organic FCF (IFRS 16) 2025 ROACE % Conventional Oil & Gas 5 – 6 4.5 4 – 5 5 – 6 Deep Water 6 – 7 4 4 – 5 7 – 8 Shales 1 – 2 2.5 3 – 4 2 – 3 Core Upstream themes 12 – 15 11 11 – 13 14 – 17 12-14% Integrated Gas 8 – 10 4.5 6 – 7 9 – 10 Chemicals 1 3 – 4 2 – 3 Oil Products 6 – 7 3.5 5 – 6 8 – 9 Leading Transition themes 14 – 17 9 14 – 16 19 – 22 11-15% Power (2) – (1) 2 – 3 (2) – (1) Emerging Power theme (2) – (1) 2 – 3 (2) – (1) 8-12%

Total

25 – 30 20 Average ~30 ~35 >12%

2025 outlook

Capital allocation to grow cash flow through 2025 and beyond

11 Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Post-2020 cash capex range excludes major inorganic spend and includes minor acquisitions up to $1 billion. Total cash capex capped at the top of range indicated for each strategic theme grouping. Power returns of 8-12% represent returns for on-stream integrated power business, ROACE for Power business (including development stage costs) expected to be around 6%.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Cumulative cash potential for shareholders

2025 outlook

Increasing potential shareholder distributions

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2021-25 cash potential for shareholders assumes ~$20 billion divestments and gearing at ~20%. Share buybacks subject to further progress with debt reduction and oil price conditions. 12

◼ Fully committed to current

and growing dividend per share

◼ Resilient dividend per share

growth

◼ Dividend per share growth when

there is line of sight to completing the current $25 billion share buyback programme

2011–15

$51.6 bln

$97/bbl average 2016–20

$90+ bln

$60/bbl RT16

2021–25

$125+ bln

$60/bbl RT16

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

2025 outlook

Key levers for delivery

13 Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Major projects 2019-25: more than $500 million lifecycle capex. Upstream major projects include Shales development decisions. Upstream break-even prices on forward-looking basis.

<$9

per barrel Upstream unit

  • perating cost

>65%

Marketing opex yield

>$10

billion Additional CFFO in 2025 vs. 2018

40+

Major project FIDs

2-3%

Net Carbon Footprint reduction by end-2021

  • vs. 2016 baseline

~56%

Transition themes’ share of organic free cash flow

~$30

per barrel Average Upstream project break-even prices

~$5

per MMBtu Integrated Gas average unit technical cost

CFFO growth and delivery Capital efficiency Opex competitiveness Portfolio for the future

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Delivery

Establishing a strong track record

14 Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Share buybacks subject to further progress with debt reduction and oil price conditions. Additional cash flow from operations from new projects in 2018 compares with 2014, and 2020 compares with 2018.

+

Scrip dividend cancelled

+

$25 billion share buyback programme started

+

Disciplined and efficient capital allocation: ~$25 billion capital investment per annum

+

Net debt reduced by $28 billion since end 2016

+

$30 billion divestment programme completed

+

$10 billion CFFO from new projects delivered

+

Operating expenses reduced by ~$10 billion, BG synergies delivered

Delivery in 2016-2018

+

$28-33 billion organic free cash flow per year

+

Complete $25 billion share buyback programme: $7.5 billion completed as of May 25, 2019

+

Cash capex of $24-29 billion per annum

+

Gearing ~25%

+

>$10 billion divestments

+

Further $5 billion CFFO from new projects

Delivery on track for 2019-2020

Post-IFRS 16

Financial framework delivery Portfolio & project delivery

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Delivery

2020 outlook

  • n track

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Post-2020 cash capex range excludes major inorganic spend and includes minor acquisitions up to $1 billion. Shareholder distributions 2019-20 assuming completion of current $25 billion share buyback programme and dividend per share at 2018 level. Share buybacks subject to further progress with debt reduction and oil price conditions.

$ billion $ billion $ billion $ billion %

  • 10

10 20 30 40 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 10 20 30 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-20 avg p.a. 10 20 30 25 50 75 100 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020

2020 outlook: $28-33 billion

  • rganic FCF

$24-29 billion cash capex $25 billion share buybacks ~25% gearing

15

Organic free cash flow: growing trend Cash capex: capital discipline remains Shareholder distributions: continued focus Debt reduction: resiliency and flexibility

Cash dividends Share buybacks Net debt (at year-end) Gearing: IAS 17 (RHS)

$71 $54 $44 $52 $99 $60 RT16

Gearing: IFRS 16 (RHS) Organic free cash flow IFRS 16 impact

$ Average Brent price per barrel 10 20 30 40 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-20 avg p.a.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

People strategy Competitive portfolio Cost management Reshaping Shell to deliver a world-class investment case

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Competitive portfolio

Reshaping the portfolio

Divestments: headline as per announcement.

2021-25 outlook assumes $20 billion divestments – no hard target

17

Portfolio upgrade 2016-2018 Strengthened financial framework

◼ More than 50 transactions in 25 countries ◼ Business country exits in Argentina, Ireland, Gabon, Thailand,

Japan and New Zealand

◼ Continue divestments of at least $5 billion average per annum

in 2019-2020

◼ Net debt reduction ◼ Net liabilities (e.g. D&R) reduction ◼ Credit rating upgrades

Gabon onshore $0.9bln Oil Sands $7.3bln UK North Sea package up to $3.8bln Thailand Bongkot $0.8bln Showa Shell JV $1.4bln MOTIVA JV $2.2bln Woodside shares $2.6bln Downstream Argentina $1.0bln SADAF JV $0.8bln MLP $1.8bln Upstream Ireland up to $1.3bln Oil Sands Oil Products Chemicals MLP Deep Water Conventional Oil & Gas Shales Integrated Gas Top 20 divestments:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

◼ Portfolio is more competitive: outcome of portfolio reshaping

(BG, divestments, new projects)

◼ Leading cash flow from operations per barrel ◼ Strong cash flow growth ◼ Balanced cash generation across the businesses

Competitive portfolio

Cash flow high-graded

Unit cash flow based on Shell internal analysis.

$ billion $/boe

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 20 40 60 18

CFFO excluding working capital Unit cash flow – Upstream & Integrated Gas

Upstream Integrated Gas Downstream Corporate

$

Average Brent price per barrel

$99 $71 $54 $44 $52

Shell Peer range

10 20 30 2016 2017 2018

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Capital Investment Committee (CIC)

Competitive portfolio

Capital discipline culture

19

Implemented as best practice from BG Central investment decision governance

◼ Material capital projects and inorganic

  • pportunities

◼ Post-investment reviews and learning

dissemination Change in approach to capital allocation

◼ Specific forum led by CEO, CFO and

relevant Business Directors

◼ Group Strategy and Opportunity

Value Assurance teams

◼ Focused integrated decisions leveraging

broad experience and expertise Strategic Fit

◼ Fit with aspired portfolio and

enhance portfolio resilience ✓ Upstream, LNG, Trading & Supply portfolio diversity ✓ Supply diversification ✓ Estimated integrated project IRR ~13% ✓ Competitive cost of supply into Asia ✓ Upside potential ✓ Supported by First Nations ✓ Pipeline contractor expertise ✓ Module approach ✓ Contractor safety ✓ Designed to achieve the lowest carbon intensity

  • f any large LNG plant

in operation today

Decision criteria Example: LNG Canada

Licence to Operate

◼ HSSE ◼ CO2 ◼ Ethics & Compliance

Value lens

◼ Competitiveness across the businesses ◼ Returns-accretive, integration value ◼ Break-even prices and cost competitiveness

Risks

◼ Upsides/downsides, stress testing ◼ Non-technical risks

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

People strategy

Highly engaged, diverse and productive workforce

20 SBO: Shell Business Operations. Workforce FTE numbers in 2015 and 2016 include BG. Workforce distribution shows share of top 5 employing countries as of 2018.

Thousand FTEs Index

Shell workforce evolution

Thousand FTEs %

Shell Business Operations growth

% %

Workforce distribution

◼ 22% reduction in cost of employment and

~17 thousand reduction in staff from 2015

◼ Our people are highly engaged ◼ Cultural shift to clear accountabilities and bottom-line

focus

◼ SBO staff now accounts for ~20% of all Shell

employees

◼ SBO increasingly handle complex processes,

becoming high-value execution centres

◼ Value from cultural diversity ◼ India now 3rd largest employing country for Shell

(up from 8th in 2015)

◼ Building the female talent pipeline

60 65 70 75 80 25 50 75 100 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 10 15 20 5 10 15 20 2015 2016 2017 2018 25 50 25 50 75 2015 2016 2017 2018

SBO FTEs as % of total (RHS) Finance IT HR Businesses & other Employee engagement score (RHS) Total FTEs SBO FTEs India Netherlands United Kingdom United States Philippines % female graduates recruited (RHS)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Cost management

Strategic shift translating into cost optimisation

21 Global functions comprise Finance, HR, IT, External Relations, Real Estate and Legal.

Global functions: simplification and standardisation Global programmes improving ways of working

Fit for the Future Embed continuous improvement mindset in cost management PT2020 journey Optimise project costs with competitive scoping, using standard solutions and replicating designs Digitalisation Improve speed, efficiency and safety while reducing costs by employing modern technologies – blockchain, internet of things, robotics and machine learning Standardised asset management system Simplify and replicate standard processes across Shell Reduce redundancies and enable continuous improvement Enterprise-wide IT system for procurement and expenses Improve transparency, drive purchasing discipline and drive automation

10.0

2015

9.3

2016

7.8

2017

7.4

2018

7.2

2019-20

◼ Functional operational costs reduced by 26%

7.7

2015

6.2

2016

5.3

2017

4.9

2018

4.7

2019-20

◼ Projects and Technology operational costs reduced by 35%

$ billion

Projects and Technology: scoping efficiency

$ billion

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

World-class investment case

Competitive and resilient delivery

22

Sustain and grow value Financial resilience through the cycle Increase shareholder distributions

$

Thrive in the energy transition World-class investment case Strong licence to

  • perate
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

42% 2% 56% 44% 56% 41% 8% 51% 51% 3% 46%

Sustain and grow value

Diversified and competitive through the Energy Transition

23 Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. Oil Sands and Corporate segment excluded. Investments represent 2018 capital investment and 2025 cash capex.

◼ Core Upstream themes sustain strong CFFO

generation in 2025 (>40% of total)

◼ Growth in shales harvests almost doubles

CFFO in 2025 versus 2018

◼ Growing investments in Chemicals deliver

CFFO growth by more than 60% to 2025

◼ Growing Integrated Gas investments in 2025

to support CFFO growth in 2025+

◼ Continued investments in Core Upstream

themes (~40%)

◼ Investments in Power scaling up as we

demonstrate viable business models

Cash flow from

  • perations

Investments

2025 >$60bln 2018 ~$50bln 2018 ~$24bln 2025 ~$30bln

Conventional Oil & Gas Deep Water Shales Power Oil Products Chemicals Integrated Gas Core Upstream themes Leading Transition themes Emerging Power theme

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Cash priorities 2021-2025

Sustain and grow value

Strong cash generation provides

  • ptionality

Numbers are indicative to illustrate cash priorities. Post-2020 cash capex range excludes major inorganic spend and includes minor acquisitions up to $1 billion. De-gearing assumes gearing at ~20%. 24

20 40 60 80 CFFO Interest Dividend Sustaining cash capex De-gearing 15-25% Growth cash capex Additional shareholder distributions

Sustained Discretionary

Thrive in the energy transition World-class investment case Strong licence to

  • perate

$ billion

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

◼ Maintain AA credit metrics ◼ Target gearing on average ~20% with a range of 15-25% through the cycle ◼ Flexibility for potential counter-cyclical acquisitions ◼ Resilient balance sheet to manage volatility

Financial resilience through the cycle

Continued focus on robust balance sheet

25

Gearing

BUILD RESILIENCE USE FLEXIBILITY

Supportive macro environment Challenging macro environment

+$

  • $

<25% Gearing ~15%

10 20 30 25 50 75 100 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019-20

$ billion %

Net debt and gearing through the cycle

Net debt (at year-end) Gearing: IAS 17 (RHS) Gearing: IFRS 16 (RHS)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

The scope of Shell’s Net Carbon Footprint ambition

Net Carbon Footprint

Our ambition

Full life cycle of energy products, including consumption

26

Production Processing Distribution & sales Use of energy products by our customers

Third-party crude Third-party products Third-party gas Third-party products

15% of total emissions 85% of total emissions No emissions No emissions

CCS Natural sinks

Use of carbon sinks

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Net Carbon Footprint

Potential tools to achieve our ambition

27

Wind power Quest CCS Raízen biofuels Shell Recharge and New Motion Flare reduction Increased LNG Nature-based

  • ffsets

Baseline Operational efficiency Natural gas shift Renewable power Biofuels Electric mobility CCS Natural sinks

◼ Ambition to reduce the

Net Carbon Footprint

  • f the energy products

we sell by around 20% by 2035 and by around 50% by 2050, in step with society

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Projects and Technology

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Projects & Technology

Competitively differentiated capital efficiency

29 Upstream break-even prices on forward-looking basis. UDC benchmark based on external benchmarks (Woodmac, IPA, UIBC).

Differentiated capabilities Differentiated results

UDC ($ per boe) UDC benchmark ($ per boe) for 2018 FIDs

10 20 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

50%

REDUCTION

Better than industry mean Poorer than industry mean P50/Mean Best-in-class 2nd Quartile 3rd Quartile 4th Quartile Top Quartile

World-class capital efficiency factory

◼ Systematic and rigorous scope challenge ◼ Efficient execution focus ◼ Supply chain transformation ◼ Technology reduces scope or aids execution

Single P&T organisation integrated with business lines

◼ Global organisation, locally executed ◼ Delivering two thirds group capex annually

~20%

reduction in average break-even price at FID to ~$30 per boe in 2018

~75%

  • f 2018 FIDs

Best-in- Class/ Top Quartile for UDC

~33%

capital investment reduction from 2014 to 2018

50%

UDC reduction since 2014; Capital efficiency doubled since 2014

70%

  • f all wells

Best-in-Class in 2018

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Projects & Technology

Competitively differentiated supply chain

Globally contracted spend benchmark based on Shell analysis, using market rates as a comparison. 30

Differentiated capabilities

◼ Global organisation, locally delivered ◼ Unique company-wide oversight of over $40 billion third party spend ◼ One standard purchasing platform across Shell, creating transparency and

driving purchasing discipline

◼ Smaller and stronger contracting and procurement workforce, driving deeper

competence and commercial culture

Differentiated results Growing degree of automation and standardisation

2015 2018

Increased cost-competitiveness enabled by rigorous benchmarking and spend pooling

Third party spend Globally contracted spend benchmarked most competitive Invoice and purchase

  • rder electronic

automation FTE efficiency

= =

$65 billion

$40 billion

8%

50%

<50%

70% >15% reduction

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Projects & Technology

Competitively differentiated technologies

31

Differentiated results

Name

◼ Business-owned, centrally delivered ◼ Commercially savvy science ◼ Customer-centric product development ◼ Content-rich academic partnerships ◼ Making technology ventures grow ◼ Integrating digital with domain

knowledge through shell.ai

Innovation and digitalisation

Digital Twin World-Class Catalyst GeodesicTM

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Integrated Gas

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

2018 LNG liquefaction volumes 34.3 mtpa 2025 Organic FCF $9-10 billion 2025 ROACE ~11% 2021-25 Average cash capex $6-7 billion p.a.

Integrated Gas Overview

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 33

Lead the market Run the engine Grow the engine

◼ Expand and diversify a strong position

in a growing market (LNG +4% per annum)

◼ Develop new demand and source

competitive supply

◼ Leverage portfolio optionality to create

additional value

◼ Focus on operational excellence to

generate superior cash flow

◼ Aim for > 90% LNG utilisation and top

quartile unit cost

◼ Invest ~$4-5 billion per annum to

sustain cash flow by maintaining existing and replacing declining assets

◼ Create new advantaged positions in

LNG and GTL through development

  • f competitive opportunities

◼ Resilient growth funnel with a

competitive average delivered ex ship into Asia cost below $7/MMBtu

◼ Invest ~$2-3 billion per annum to

generate material cash flow growth beyond 2025

Gallina, LNG Ship Oman LNG – Oman Pearl GTL – Qatar

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Integrated Gas Thrive through the Energy Transition

34

Air quality improvement Carbon footprint reduction Methane emission reduction

◼ Strong policy push to replace coal with

gas and renewables to improve air quality

◼ China gas demand to grow by 6% per annum

until 2025

◼ Significant gas demand growth in India

anticipated

◼ Gas-fired replacing coal-fired power plants

with 45-55% lower greenhouse gas emissions

◼ LNG Canada designed to achieve lowest

carbon intensity of any LNG project operating today

◼ Shell initiated industry coalition to reduce

methane emissions

◼ Target methane emissions below 0.2% by 2025

in operated assets

◼ Methane leak detection and repair programme

gaining momentum

Source: Shell LNG Outlook.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

◼ LNG demand growth driven by policy decisions to address air quality concerns and Energy Transition ◼ Growing gas demand largely driven by industrial and residential non-power sectors ◼ Increasing role for gas in supporting the integration of variable renewable electricity generation ◼ More supply investment and long-term contracts needed to avoid long-term supply deficit ◼ Evolving market dynamics with increasing liquidity and commoditisation

LNG supply

Integrated Gas LNG market is expected to double in size by 2035

35 Source: Shell LNG Outlook.

BCM

LNG demand outlook

Global gas demand (BCM)

Growth in non-power sectors

LNG supply (GWh/d) Power generation (GWh/h)

LNG complementing renewables

200 400 600 800 1,000 2018 Asia Europe Americas Mid-East & Africa 2035 59% 22% 10% 9% 3,300 3,400 3,500 3,600 2016 Power Non- power 2017 Power Non- power 2018 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 10 20

Wind (RHS) Solar (RHS)

4%

CAGR

Spain (December 2017)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Integrated Gas Develop demand

Unlock new sources of demand and build deep gas value chains

36

Gas market access Power Downstream LNG

Regas terminals unlocking access to new markets Market for LNG in transport expected to grow rapidly Gas opportunities complementing Power strategy Mexico Argentina Australia Bahamas Brazil Canada Chile China India Japan Netherlands Norway Pakistan Panama Singapore Spain USA

Gas marketing and trading Power trading Gas-fired power generation LNG to marine bunkers LNG to/by road transport LNG market access

Peru Ivory Coast Belgium & Germany Gibraltar EU35

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Integrated Gas LNG supply & optimisation

37 Top-right graph: Shell analysis of Wood Mackenzie and IHS data.

LNG available for sale in 2018 (mtpa)

Leading position

LNG sales in 2018 (mtpa)

Balanced portfolio Deliver value from leading portfolio

25 50 75

Shell QP Exxon Petronas Total Chevron BP Cheniere

25 50 75 Sources Deliveries

Spot purchase Term purchase Liquefaction volumes Short-term ‘spot’ Gas hubs (e.g. NBP, HH) Oil linked: 3-6 months lag Equity lifting JV marketed LNG capacity Buy LNG import terminals (incl. capacity rights) LNG markets served LNG term supply sources (equity and offtake, existing and under construction)

Barcelona Hazira Gibraltar Dragon Rotterdam Altamira Costa Azul Sabine pass NLNG EGLNG ELNG QG4 OLNG SEIC Prelude NWS Gorgon QCLNG BLNG Cove Point Elba ALNG LNGC PLNG Lake Charles Singapore

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Integrated Gas Run the engine

Unit operating cost benchmark from Shell analysis of PTIA, McKinsey and Juran data.

% Unit operating cost ($ per ton) Unit technical cost ($ per MMBtu)

Operational excellence and strong portfolio drive competitive advantage

38

Improving LNG utilisation Operating at competitive cost Delivering competitive projects Harvesting the benefits of digitalisation

Integrated assets Midstream assets

4 8 12 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ambition

◼ Impactful through changing culture and business models ◼ Optimise shipping draft and speed for LNG tanker fleet ◼ Real-time production optimisation in NLNG and Pearl GTL ◼ Smart coal seam gas system in Queensland

Project average Project range

75 80 85 90 95 2016 2017 2018 Ambition 40 80 120 Shell Top Quartile 4th Quartile 40 80 120 Shell Top Quartile 4th Quartile

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Integrated Gas Financial performance

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2017 and 2018 actuals include New Energies.

Million tonnes $ billion $ billion $ billion %

25 50 75 2016 2017 2018 5 10 15 5 10 2016 2017 2018 5 10 15 20 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 4 8 12 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025

Resilient cash delivery 2020 ROACE: ~ 9% 2025 ROACE: ~ 11%

39

LNG liquefaction and sales Earnings and ROACE CFFO and cash capital expenditure Organic free cash flow

LNG sales LNG liquefaction ROACE (RHS) Clean earnings CFFO Cash capex

$71 $54 $44 $60 RT16 $60 RT16

$

Average Brent price per barrel

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

◼ LNG project funnel benchmarks well versus

competing projects including US exports

◼ Backfill projects in development with attractive

economics and average Unit Technical Cost below $5 per MMBtu

◼ Project execution is critical to maintaining

this competitiveness

Integrated Gas Competitive growth funnel

40 LNG delivered cost: Shell interpretation of Wood Mackenzie data for non-Shell projects.

LNG delivered cost to Asia by project, $ per MMBtu

Resilient funnel of competitive growth options

Focus on competitive project delivery

New capacity: ~8 mtpa Abadi Qatar Tanzania

Post FID Potential projects Development

New capacity: ~17 mtpa Lake Charles LNG Canada Expansion NLNG T7 Sakhalin T3 Oman integrated GTL New capacity: ~8 mtpa Prelude LNG Canada T1-2 Backfill: ALNG NWS – Browse Backfill: Sakhalin development Prelude – Crux Gorgon – Jansz Compression Arrow ALNG – Baracuda & Colibri Backfill: Gorgon Jansz Infill OPF Compression NWS Infill Arrow Infill

Disciplined maturation and investment decision making

High returns Material volume Capital- efficient CO2 competitive Resilience Trading integration

Shell or Shell aspired Non-Shell

5 10 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Integrated Gas Gas to Liquids: Ambition to expand

41

Leading competitive position

$ per boe

Product margins above Brent

GTL base oils, thousand tonnes

Capture demand growth

◼ 45 years of GTL experience ◼ High-value, differentiated, cleaner-burning products ◼ Shell-operated plants in Qatar (140 kboe/d GTL)

and Malaysia (15 kboe/d)

◼ Strong integrated value chain with Shell Downstream

Marketing and Trading

◼ Pearl GTL product margins averaged $14 per barrel of

  • il equivalent above Brent in 2018

◼ Develop and grow new markets and optimise product

slate towards higher value specialty products

◼ Supply/demand gap in mid-2020s to be captured

by capacity growth

◼ Enhance Pearl GTL base oil production ◼ Progress GTL opportunity funnel, including Oman

10 20 30 40 5 10 15 20 25 2016 2018 Ambition 500 1000 1500 2000 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027

Pearl GTL Margin above Brent Pearl GTL specialty products (RHS) Shell demand estimate Pearl GTL production outlook %

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Upstream

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Upstream

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016. 43

Deep Water Shales

Appomattox – USA Permian – USA

2018 Production 0.8 mboe/d 2025 Organic FCF $7-8 billion 2025 ROACE 10-12% 2021-25 Average cash capex $4-5 billion p.a. 2018 Production 0.4 mboe/d 2025 Organic FCF $2-3 billion 2025 ROACE 12-15% 2021-25 Average cash capex $3-4 billion p.a.

◼ Leading portfolio ◼ High margin production ◼ Competitive growth ◼ Growing production and FCF ◼ Competitive delivery ◼ Leading digital innovation

Conventional Oil & Gas

2018 Production 1.5 mboe/d 2025 Organic FCF $5-6 billion 2025 ROACE 12-15% 2021-25 Average cash capex $4-5 billion p.a.

◼ High-graded portfolio ◼ Portfolio longevity ◼ Growth potential

Ormen Lange – Norway

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

  • 20
  • 10

10 20 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025

Upstream

Improved financial delivery

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis.

$ billion $ billion Million boe per day $ billion $ per boe %

2025 outlook: $14-17 billion Organic FCF 12-14% ROACE

44

Cash flow from operations Organic free cash flow Costs and production Earnings and ROACE

  • 10

10 20 30 2015 2016 2017 2018 5 10 15 1 2 3 2015 2016 2017 2018

  • 5

5 10

  • 5

5 10 2015 2016 2017 2018

Unit development cost (RHS) Unit operating costs (RHS) Production Conventional Oil & Gas Deep Water Other Shales ROACE (RHS)

$71 $54 $44 $52

$

Average Brent price per barrel Conventional Oil & Gas Deep Water Other Shales

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Upstream and Integrated Gas

Portfolio longevity

Production is Shell group entitlement share, excluding potential divestments. Commercial resources for peer group as per Wood Mackenzie (April 2019). Commercial resources for Shell represent 2P and 2C Development pending (December 2018). Decline represents the average compounded annual decline rate in production between 2019 and 2025, and includes production from existing fields, infill drilling and facilities debottlenecking.

Commercial resources, billion boe Unit development cost, $ per boe Thousand boe per day

◼ 2P and commercial 2C resource

base >20 years of production

◼ Largest share of high-margin

LNG and deep-water resources amongst peers

◼ Competitive scoping, efficient

execution, and supply chain driving UDC improvement

◼ Unit development cost reduced

by >40% since 2015

◼ Ambition to reduce by a further 20-30% ◼ Well reservoir facility management

(WRFM), infill and debottlenecking reduce decline to ~3% per annum through 2025

◼ Annual addition of ~100 thousand boe per

day from new fields sufficient to sustain production into the next decades

Strong FCF generation into the next decades

45

Reserves and resources

Developing at competitive cost

Sustained production

25 50 Exxon BP Shell Chevron Total 5 10 15 20 25 2015 2016 2017 2018 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 2018 2022 2026 2030

Conventional Oil & Gas, Oil Sands and others Deep Water LNG & GTL Deep Water Conventional Oil & Gas Base & WRFM Infill, debottlenecking, backfill, shales development New fields under construction Exploration & appraisal New fields pre-FID Shales Shales

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Exploration A value driven strategy

46 Value is defined as NPV divided by exploration expense after tax on a forward looking, post discovery basis. Gulf of Mexico industry leader data from Wood Mackenzie (April 2019), includes discoveries from January 2014 until April 2019.

Unit finding costs, $ per boe Multiple

Increasing value Gulf of Mexico industry leader

◼ Portfolio high-grading through new basin growth, heartland additions and tail management ◼ Acceleration of hydrocarbon maturation ◼ Improved well delivery

~$2 billion annual investment to 2025 >750 mmboe resource addition ambition per annum

Shell Others 2019 targets New acreage Deep Water Integrated Gas Conventional Oil & Gas

Albania Norway Russia UK Bulgaria Egypt Oman Brunei Malaysia Australia Morocco Mauritania Nigeria Brazil USA Mexico Bolivia Trinidad & Tobago

Wood Mackenzie reserves recoverable mmboe

Unit finding cost Value (RHS) PV (post-tax), $ billion

3 8 2016 2017 2018 1 2 3 100 200 300 400 500

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Deep Water

World class portfolio

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis. Production is Shell group entitlement share, excluding potential divestments. Peer range represents Wood Mackenzie estimate of Equinor, ExxonMobil, Chevron, Total, and BP production for oil, oil & gas hydrocarbons in water depth 500-3633m.

$ billion Thousand boe per day

  • 5

5 10 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 300 600 900 1,200 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030

Leading IOC player in Deep Water

47

Organic free cash flow Production

◼ Leading deep-water portfolio with exciting development funnel and strong exploration acreage ◼ Targeting $7-8 billion organic free cash flow in 2025 at $4-5 billion cash capex per year ◼ Sustained production >900 thousand boe per day through 2025 ◼ Strengthened capital efficiency – doing more with less ◼ Differentiated delivery through integration

Base & WRFM Infill drilling, debottlenecking New fields under construction Exploration & appraisal New fields pre-FID Peer range

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Deep Water

Strong delivery

48 Upstream break-even prices on forward-looking basis.

Pre-FID funnel break-even price $ per boe

Project break-even prices Replication

$ per boe

Unit operating costs

◼ Pre-FID deep-water project average

forward-looking break-even price is ~$30 or lower

◼ Drilling time reduction by 40% since 2014 ◼ Variable spread rate reduction by 60% since 2014 ◼ Further upside with more standardisation,

replication and value driven appraisal strategies

◼ Whale discovery to first oil expected to take less than

6 years, supported by 80% replication from Vito design

◼ >30% reduction since 2015 ◼ Improved operational excellence ◼ 30% head count reduction and 80% dedicated fleet

reduction in the US Gulf of Mexico since 2015

◼ Ambition to reduce UOC further to $5-6 per boe

Significant sustainable cost reductions realised

5 10 15 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ambition

Whale image rendering Replication New scope 2014 2018

20 40 60 80 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% % of outstanding capital

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Deep Water

Expanding our US Gulf of Mexico heartland

49 Exploration map includes Shell operated assets.

Thousand boe per day

Filling the hubs: Mars Corridor Appraisal and development Exploration

◼ Continued growth ◼ Well reservoir facility management ◼ Waterflood ◼ Tie-backs ◼ Appomattox 40% under budget and ramping

up to production of 175 thousand boe per day

◼ Vito on schedule and tracking below cost ◼ Whale host decision taken and long leads

purchase in progress

◼ Powernap tieback progressing ◼ Near field exploration and lease acquisitions

support heartland growth

◼ Blacktip discovery with >400 feet of net oil pay ◼ King Embayment near-field success with tie-back into

Mars corridor

100 200 2015 2016 2017 2018 19Q1 4Q rolling +79%

Appomattox – USA Operating Exploration or Appraisal Under Construction Perdido Stones Auger Appomattox Coulomb Olympus Mars Ursa Vito Enchilada Salsa near Appomattox Vicksburg, Rydberg

  • Ft. Sumter, Dover

near Mars corridor Powernap, King Embayment near Perdido Whale, Blacktip

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Deep Water

Continued delivery and growth in Brazil

50

Thousand boe per day

Production Development Exploration

◼ Largest foreign producer in Brazil ◼ 15 FPSOs currently onstream with P-68 expected

  • nstream in 2019

◼ Robust well productivity ◼ Ongoing infill drilling opportunities ◼ 7 FPSOs under development (2020+) -- including

4 for Mero

◼ Mero 1 expected onstream in 2021 and Mero 2

progressing towards FID

◼ Strong results from Mero early production system –

60 thousand boe per day

◼ Industry leading position with ~2.7 million acres ◼ Gato de Mato and Sagitário appraisal this year ◼ Alto do Cabo Frio Oeste, Saturno, and Três Marias

exploration planned

◼ Opportunities extend funnel

100 200 300 400 2015 2016 2017 2018 19Q1 4Q rolling

Libra FPSO “Pioneiro de Libra” – Brazil Alto de Cabo Frio Oeste Mero Berbigão Sururu Oeste de Atapu Três Marias Saturno C-M-791 Libra Gato do Mato Sul de Gato do Mato Sagitário Lapa Sapinhoá Entorno de Sapinhoá Lula Exploration Development Producing

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 1.1 1.6 2 4 6 35 30 36 20 40 60 80

Shales

A growth business

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis. Production is Shell group entitlement share, excluding potential divestments. Break-evens represent development-ready wells, no exploration or appraisal required, and are 2019 forward-looking.

Thousand boe per day $ billion Operated assets inventory break-even

Positioned to deliver resilient returns and cashflow

51

High-margin barrel growth Organic free cash flow Resilient break-evens

◼ Focusing on high-margin tight oil

positions and low cost gas assets

◼ Driving competitive cost structure and performance

improvements across all

  • perated positions

◼ Deploying technology to further reduce operating

costs and enhance returns

◼ Targeting $2-3 billion organic free cash flow in

2025 at $3-4 billion cash capex per year

Gas Liquid rich

Western Canada Gas Western Canada LTO Appalachia Haynesville Permian Argentina

Gas Liquids

  • 3

3 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 $ per MMBtu Top Quartile Permian Fox Creek Argentina Groundbirch Appalachia $ per boe 200 400 600 800

2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Shales

Enhancing competitiveness in Permian

52 Competitive metrics based on Shell operated assets in Delaware basin, Loving and Reeves County, Wolfcamp formation. Average pay-back years graph source: RS Energy Group.

Well drilling and completion cost, normalised to 7,500 ft lateral length, $

Sustainable performance

Average cumulative oil production by online date

Long-term value creation

◼ Top quartile well costs ◼ Track record of improved

efficiency and unit costs

◼ Multi-well pad development and longer

laterals underpins improvement

◼ Enhancing and preserving long term

value delivery

◼ Faster pay-back on

development costs than peers

◼ Scalable by replicating

a winning modular-design formula

◼ Competitive investment case

2015 2018 Ambition 1 2 3

Short-term cash delivery

Average pay-back years

6 12 18 24

◼ Technology underpins current

and long-term delivery

◼ Near-term technology further

improves cash flow

◼ Reduces HSSE risk

Subsurface Machine learning assists well design and execution Surface Multiphase meters and pumps, simplified processing facilities Surveillance Advanced analytics streamline operations and maintenance

Shell

iShale TM

A leading operator driving both cash and value

IOCs Shell Independents

Months

+60% 2018 Average 2015 Average

Top Quartile

  • 40%
slide-53
SLIDE 53

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Conventional Oil & Gas

High-graded portfolio delivers longevity

53 Production is Shell group entitlement share, excluding potential divestments. Decline represents the average compounded annual decline rate in production between 2019 and 2025 and includes production from existing fields, infill drilling and facilities debottlenecking. Resource life: 2P and 2C resources, excluding 2C unclarified, non-viable, on hold and post-licence) over production.

Resource life, years

High-grading the portfolio

Thousand boe per day

Sustained production

1,000 2,000 2018 2022 2026 2030

◼ High-graded portfolio of assets with longevity and running room ◼ Operational excellence driving down cost and limiting decline rate to ~4% ◼ Deep familiarity with heartlands and experience in managing non-technical risk ◼ Targeting $5-6 billion organic free cash flow in 2025 at $4-5 billion cash capex per year

Simpler, more resilient portfolio with higher cash returns per barrel

Retained assets Divested since 2015 Portfolio action in progress or potential Base & WRFM Infill, debottlenecking, backfill New fields under construction Exploration & appraisal New fields pre-FID Countries with growing production

Albania Norway Russia Netherlands UK Iraq Egypt Oman Brunei Malaysia Nigeria Germany Kazakhstan Italy Tunisia Kuwait Philippines UAE USA (AERA)

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 5 10

15 2015 2016 2017 2018 Ambition

Conventional Oil & Gas

Capital efficiency enabling growth

54 Upstream break-even prices on forward-looking basis.

Unit development cost, $ per boe

Capital efficiency

Break-even price, $ per boe

Resilient portfolio

IRR, %

Attractive returns

◼ UDC reduced by almost 50% since 2015 through

competitive scoping and efficient execution

◼ Ambition to reduce further to $5-6 per boe ◼ Value of investable portfolio with forward-looking

break-even price of <$40 per boe has nearly doubled since 2016

◼ Average forward-looking break-even of planned new

development projects is below $30 per boe

◼ Attractive portfolio of infill and debottlenecking

projects: average IRR above 50%

◼ Strong returns from significant new developments

average IRR above 20%

Sustained FCF with $4-5 billion cash capex until 2025

10 20 30 40 50 Cumulative project NPV 20 40 60 Infill and debottlenecking Major new developments

2016 2017 2018

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Upstream

Robust development funnel

55 Projects listed have an expected future peak production of approximately 25 thousand boe per day or higher, Shell share. Upstream break-even prices on a forward-looking basis, excludes feasibility, research & development, decommissioning and restoration and idle rig expense. Shales break-even prices exclude gas assets.

Pre-FID funnel break-even price, $ per boe

Competitive options

◼ Healthy funnel of competitive and resilient

  • pportunities

◼ Small projects add incremental >400 thousand boe

per day

Production Conventional Oil & Gas Deep Water

Pre FEED

~500 kboe/d

FEED

~240 kboe/d

Under construction

~470 kboe/d

Coming Onstream / Ramping up

~200 kboe/d

Exploration Mexico Brazil US GoM Mauritania Nigeria Malaysia Mauritania Nigeria Malaysia Albania Oman UK Egypt Mero 2 Mero 3 Bonga SW Powernap Jerun Salym southern hub Shales Vito P-70 Atapu 1 P-71 Mero 1 Penguins redevelopment Permian Fox Creek Vaca Muerta Appomattox P-68 Berbigão WDDM 9B Permian Mero 4 Gato de Mato Bonga main life extension Bonga north tranche 1 Fort Sumter Whale HI development Marjoram/ Rosmari Jackdaw Timi Val d’Agri future development Shales

Shales Liquids

10 20 30 40 50

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Downstream

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Downstream

57

Oil Products

2018 Oil products sales volumes 6.8 mboe/d 2018 Refinery processing intake 2.6 mboe/d 2025 Organic FCF $8-9 billion 2025 ROACE >15% 2021-25 Average cash capex $5-6 billion p.a. 2018 Chemicals sales volumes 17.6 mtpa 2025 Organic FCF $2-3 billion 2025 ROACE ~15% 2021-25 Average cash capex $3-4 billion p.a.

◼ Most successful mobility retailer, #1 in lubricants ◼ Competitive/high- quality refining backbone ◼ Trading optimises integrated value chains ◼ Strong demand growth despite growing recycling ◼ Focus on base, derivative and performance chemicals ◼ Leverage customer proximity and intimacy

Chemicals

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream.

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Oil Products

Transformed Oil Products is core to world-class investment case

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis.

$ billion Earnings, % Earnings, % Earnings, %

More predictable cash, high returns

58

Organic free cash flow growth Balanced geographical exposure Increasing Marketing exposure Growing non-fuel related income

5 10 2018 2020 2025 50 100 2018 2020 2025

Refining & Trading Marketing Non-fuel retail, lubricants, specialities Retail fuels and aviation Working capital movement Organic FCF excl. working capital

2018 2025

Americas Europe and Africa Asia and Oceania

50 100 2018 2025

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 40

50 60 2020 2025 2030 2035

Oil Products

Multiple

  • pportunities

drive Oil Products’ transformation

Shell analysis unless otherwise indicated. Industrial production: Oxford Economics (2019). Convenience retail: Euromonitor (2019). 59

Index: 2020 = 100 Million boe per day

Kilometres driven expected to increase Absolute oil demand grows and shifts Marketing sectors show growth

50 100 150 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Kilometres driven Rest of World Asia

Shell thrives through the transitions

Goods mobility People mobility B2B customers

◼ More customer mobility ◼ Largest network ◼ More online, more deliveries ◼ Largest fleet solution player ◼ Technology transforming the industry ◼ Unique B2B footprint

2017 2025

+22%

Industrial production

+36%

Aircraft

+27%

Ship capacity

+39%

Convenience retail

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Retail brand value: Brand Finance Global 500 (2019). Lubricants market share: Kline & Company (2018). Lubricants brand share preference: Kantar, Motor Lubricants Tracker (2018) Global weighted Preference Passenger Car Motor Oil; weighted sample for Shell and BP Castrol #4212, for Mobil #4242; Markets = Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan (except for Mobil), Russia, Thailand, USA. Trading and optimisation: Shell analysis based on most recent competitor reports and publications.

Oil Products

Competitive strengths of brand, scale and capabilities

60

Retail Lubricants Trading and optimisation

42 44 2.2 5,290

Market share (%)

Number of sites in China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia (thousands) Number of sites (thousands) Brand value ($ billion) Shell Competitors: Total, BP Market share (%) in China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia Finished lubricants market share (%) Brand share preference (%) 22 11 8 Shell Competitors: Exxon Mobil, BP Shell Competitors: BP, Vitol, Glencore, Total Physical crude and energy products trading (Mboe per annum)

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Oil Products

Creates value by putting customers at the heart of everything we do

Gross margin excludes process oils, based on 2018 actual data. 61

Retail gross margin contribution Lubricants gross margin contribution

>150

Direct and indirect markets globally (2018)

>1m

B2B customers served in total (2018) Customers at retail service stations daily

30m

2018

40m

2025

44k

2018

Shell-branded retail service stations

55k

2025

1/9

2018

Machinery and engines protected by Shell Lubricants

1/8

2025

900

2018

Airports in the Aviation network

1000

2025

50 100

Convenience Retail Fleet Solutions V-Power™ Loyalty Main-grade Fuels

% 50 100 %

Services and Digital B2B Premium Synthetics Pure Plus™ Global Accounts Mainstream Lubricants

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Oil Products

Marketing business growth maintains momentum and remains competitive

62 Shell analysis based on most recent competitor reports.

Earnings: Retail & Global Commercial Yield on cost and ROACE: competitive benchmark

$ billion Opex yield (%)

2 4 6 8 40 80 20 40 2025 2018 2013

ROACE >20% 24%

ROACE (%)

Retail & Global Commercial 2025 Retail & Global Commercial 2018 Walmart McDonald‘s Sainsbury‘s Euro Garages ACT Fuchs Akzo Nobel

Growth

Retail Global Commercial New revenues Resilient sectors New customers Grow base

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

2018 progress (vs. 2017)

Oil Products

Marketing business has delivered

  • n growth

strategy in 2018 vs. 2017

2025 targets as per 2018 Downstream Open House. 63

2025 targets

>7%

Increase in V-PowerTM margin contribution

>10%

Global accounts turnover growth

>55k

Workshops in China connected digitally

>1000

New convenience stores

>20%

Fleet solutions services margin growth

>8%

Lubricants volume growth – China, India, Indonesia, Mexico and Russia

>450

New sites in growth markets

>15%

Premium lubricants volume growth Grow base

◼ V-PowerTM ◼ 5,000 new sites ◼ Growth in premium lubricants

Resilient sectors

◼ Grow fleet solutions ◼ $1 billion investment in technology

New customers

◼ 5,000 new sites and market share

growth in China, India, Indonesia, Mexico and Russia

New revenues

◼ Grow convenience retail ◼ 5,000 new stores ◼ New customer offers ◼ Accelerate digital and services growth

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Oil Products

Marketing taking action to lead in digital, mobility and energy

  • pportunities

64

Digitalising loyalty programmes serving >30 million members Expanding our fast- charging network Nature-based solutions in the Netherlands with more to come Developing E-Fluids through leading OEM partnerships Shell Fleet Hub supporting >550,000 active cards Decarbonising Aviation by introducing Bio Jet Shell Accuport: tracking >6,000 vessels; optimising product procurement

Energy Mobility Digital

China innovative digital solutions

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Oil Products

Trading and Supply, the integrator and optimiser for Shell

Crude Refining Power LNG/Gas Products Trading and Supply

Integrator and Optimiser

Power equity production calculated as power generation and long-term Power Purchase Agreements.

22%

Crude

42%

Products

48%

LNG

  • f sales

12%

Power

  • f sales
  • f sales
  • f sales

Our advantage Shell is the only company with material integration and optimisation activities globally that span the whole energy value chain

65

Sales volumes sourced from equity production

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Oil Products

Reshaping our refining portfolio

66 Non-energy cash costs based on 2016 Solomon world-wide fuels benchmarking. Refinery count includes refineries with ownership share above 10%.

$ million

Refining – non-energy cash costs

# refineries

Refining – capacity & number of refineries

2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 4th Quartile 3rd Quartile 2nd Quartile Top Quartile

Performance improving

2016 2025 2020 2018 2004

Million boe per day

54 19 ~15 ~10

Refinery or Chemical site Strategic review or partially divested in 2018 Chemical site under construction Trading offices/hubs/ Integrated performance units Pennsylvania Buenos Aires, Al Jubail, Karachi, Sarnia Houston, Rotterdam, London, Singapore

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Oil Products

Delivers on its commitments

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis. All historical financials exclude 2G Biofuels. 2020 financials onwards include 2G Biofuels.

$ billion $ billion $ billion $ billion

67

CFFO excluding working capital Organic free cash flow Earnings and ROACE Cash capital expenditure

5 10 2016 2017 2018

  • 10
  • 5

5 10 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 10 20 5 10 2016 2017 2018 5 10 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025

Marketing Refining & Trading ROACE (RHS) % Organic FCF excl. working capital Working capital movement

2025 outlook $8-9 billion Organic FCF >15% ROACE

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Oil Products

Transformed and core to the world-class investment case

68

Key component of world-class investment case Delivering transformational growth Leverage integration in key value chains through Trading and Supply Use mobility and digital transitions to meet the needs

  • f our customers and society

01 02 03

Capability

Integrated value chain Ensures best value for Shell

Scale

Largest mobility retailer Over 44 thousand sites; nearly 80 countries

Brand

Iconic brand is valued significantly higher than any of our competitors

We place customers at the heart

  • f everything we do
slide-69
SLIDE 69

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Chemicals

Petrochemicals and economic progress go hand-in-hand

69 Sources: IHS, McKinsey Global Institute, Shell analysis including Shell Mountains scenario 2018-50.

Alpha Olefins Low- temperature detergents Diphenyl Carbonate Phones, tablets and computer parts Polyolefins Light- weighting of transportation Glycol Textiles and clothing Styrene & Polyols Insulation and construction materials Polyolefins Energy efficiency materials

01

Part of our

everyday life

02

Linked to

GDP growth

03

Plays a role in

decarbonising society Chemicals consumption increases with GDP per capita growth

Country/region size = total demand

2018 Chemicals consumption per capita GDP per capita

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Chemicals

Demand growing, Shell plays a role in the solution

70

Petrochemicals demand is growing even with projections on the circular economy Global polymer demand (virgin resin)

Change in global GDP (real) and petrochemicals demand 2000-2035. Index: 2000 = 1.

1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Petrochemicals GDP

Recycling base case Advanced Recycling case

300

million tonnes per annum in 2016

470

million tonnes per annum in 2030

300

million tonnes per annum in 2016

380

million tonnes per annum in 2030 Founding Member

Recycling base case Advanced Recycling case

Sources: IHS, McKinsey Global Institute, Shell analysis including Shell Mountains scenario 2018-50.

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Chemicals

Competitively differentiated

Delivery on track; Current projects represent 75% cash growth to end of 2025

71

Mono Ethylene Glycol Plant United States Cracker and derivatives Iraq

FUTURE

Pennsylvania Chemicals Nanhai phase II Geismar Alpha-Olefins 4

WORLD-SCALE ASSETS

Proprietary technology Advantaged feedstocks Market access

Future projects Current projects under construction or 2018-2019 start-up

FUTURE FUTURE

Further expansion

  • f Nanhai

China

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Chemicals

Delivers on its commitments

Outlook at $60 per barrel real terms 2016, mid-cycle Downstream. 2020 organic free cash flow outlook is on an IAS 17 basis. Underlying costs defined as costs to serve, department fixed allocations, technology costs, exclude manufacturing fixed costs, non-business development costs and one-offs, and are inflation-adjusted.

Index, real: 2016 = 100 $ billion $ billion $ billion

72

Underlying costs Organic free cash flow Earnings and ROACE Cash capital expenditure

50 100 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025

  • 1

1 2 3 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025 10 20 5 2016 2017 2018 5 2016 2017 2018 2020 2025

Sustaining capex Growth capex Earnings ROACE (RHS) % Organic FCF excl. working capital Working capital movement

Continuing to invest $3-4 billion per annum through the next decade 2025 outlook $2-3 billion Organic FCF ~15% ROACE

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Chemicals

Evolution to include higher-value performance products

73

BASE CHEMICALS/ INTERMEDIATES

Differentiators

◼ Advantaged feedstocks ◼ Process technology ◼ Market access ◼ World-scale assets

Increase differentiation through:

◼ Product technology ◼ Brand ◼ Sustainability

PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS PUTTING THE CUSTOMER FIRST IN A COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

2019 2025

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

New Energies

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

New energies and natural gas deliver lower-carbon energy solutions Disciplined New Energies growth within boundary conditions

New Energies

Overview

Power returns of 8-12% represent returns for on-stream integrated power business, ROACE for Power business (including development stage costs) expected to be around 6%. 75

New Fuels Power

Raízen – Brazil Mount Storm wind farm – USA

◼ Scalable investment contingent on technology,

regulatory landscape and demand

◼ Biofuels: Successful first generation (1G) operations and active

second generation (2G) R&D. Reporting within Downstream segment with target returns of >15%

◼ Hydrogen: Partnerships with governments and OEMs ◼ Trading, marketing and supply ◼ Lower-carbon generation, storage and electric mobility ◼ Core markets: Northwest Europe, USA, Australia

and select growth markets

◼ Target returns of 8-12% for on-stream integrated power business

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Power

A macro look at power

76

Why power? Electricity generation growth

◼ Global energy demand growing materially ◼ Deep electrification required to help meet the goals of the Paris Agreement ◼ Customers expect lower-carbon energy solutions including power ◼ Governments support this transition ◼ Most of the growth in power generation will come from renewables ◼ Provides security of supply to countries ◼ Lowest cost option for society to decarbonise at scale ◼ Significant clean power investments needed over the next decades ◼ Has the scale and longevity to be relevant to Shell

Thousand TWh

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2018 2025 2032 2039

+50% +75% +130%

Shell Sky Scenario IEA Current Policies Bloomberg New Energy Finance New Energy Outlook

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Power

Traditional power system

77

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Power

Evolution from the traditional power system

78 INCREASING CAPITAL INTENSITY

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Power

Building blocks of a material and profitable integrated power business

79

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Power

Shell’s competitive advantages

80

15+ years

  • f experience

in renewables

Generating and trading renewable power

Leveraging the strongest energy brand in the world

Positive response from customers following rebranding of First Utility to Shell Energy in April 2019

Integrated

power system & portfolio management

Leveraging adjacencies to build and connect positions in key markets

A leader in trading

Shell Energy North America has 20 years of experience in power trading and has been in the top 3 wholesalers for the past 10 years

Operations in

70+ countries

We have a diverse customer base, strong governmental and regulatory network and established footprint

Integrated energy

solutions

Provide complementary offerings to a range of customers

100+ years

experience in powering mobility

Foundation to build EV charging services with New Motion and Greenlots

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Power

Aspirations and investment criteria

Power returns of 8-12% represent returns for on-stream integrated power business, ROACE for Power business (including development stage costs) expected to be around 6%.

Million customers Sales volumes (TWh) Operational capacity (GW)

Investment pace dependent on financial performance and boundary conditions Additional financial disclosures from 2021 2025 FCF: $(2) – (1) billion

Renewable generation

1 2 3 4 5 2016 2017 2018 2025 150 200 250 2016 2017 2018 2025 1 2 3 4 5 2016 2017 2018 2025

◼ On average $1-2 billion per annum to 2020 ◼ Power cash capex on average $2-3 billion per year for

2021-25

◼ On track to be self-funding by 2030 ◼ Investments hitting agreed financial milestones ◼ On-stream integrated power business demonstrating 8-12%

returns

81

Retail Investment: Power investment scale-up subject to: Trading Renewable generation

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Appendix

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Discovered Resources

Robust resource funnel

Commercial resources for peer group as per Wood Mackenzie (April 2019). Commercial resources for Shell represent 2P and commercial 2C (December 2018).

Commercial resource funnel and SEC Proved Developed Reserves in line with peers

83

Billion boe Billion boe

5 10 15 20 25 ◼ Valuable commercial resource base with significant

development options and a resource life that exceeds 20 years

◼ Total commercial resources in line with peers ◼ SEC Proved Developed Reserves in-line with peers ◼ SEC Proved Undeveloped Reserves lower than peers

because of unique characteristics of Shell’s portfolio:

◼ LNG: largest IOC market share; LNG supply

flexibility and volumes managed as a portfolio (e.g. LNG Canada)

◼ Deep Water: largest IOC portfolio; analogues

sometimes limited (e.g. Appomattox)

◼ Shales: Large Permian NOV position;

need 5 year development plan to book PUD; preference to take well-by-well decision Proved Developed & Undeveloped Reserves Commercial resources by theme

Shell Peers SEC Proved Developed Reserves (2018) SEC Proved Undeveloped Reserves (2018)

25 50 Exxon BP Shell Chevron Total

Conventional Oil & Gas, Oil Sands and others Deep Water LNG & GTL Shales

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Start-up Project Country Shell share [A] % Peak production 100% kboe/d LNG capacity 100% Mtpa Products 100% capacity Power output 100% MW Theme Shell

  • perated

2019-2020

Atapu 1 (P-70) [B] Brazil 25 150

Deep Water Bakong / Gorek / Larak (SK408) Malaysia 30 75

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Berbigão and Sururu SW (P-68) [B] Brazil 25 150

Deep Water EA Further Development Nigeria 30 35

Conventional Oil & Gas Forcados Yokri Integrated Project (FYIP) Nigeria 30 40

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Gumusut-Kakap Phase 2 Malaysia 29 50

Deep Water

P

Permian & Fox Creek [C] United States & Canada various ~250

Shales

P

Rabab Harweel Integrated Project Oman 34 35

Conventional Oil & Gas Southern Swamp AG Nigeria 30 40

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Tempa Rossa Italy 25 50

Conventional Oil & Gas Vaca Muerta basin [D] Argentina ~90 ~70

Shales

P 2021+

Arran United Kingdom 45 30

Conventional Oil & Gas Assa North Nigeria 30 60

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Borssele 3 & 4 [E] The Netherlands 20 732

Power Delga Solar [E] Australia 100 120

Power

P

Gorgon – Jansz infill Australia 25 maintain capacity

Integrated Gas KBB Phase 2 Malaysia 30 60

Conventional Oil & Gas LNG Canada T1-2 Canada 40 14

Integrated Gas Mero 1 [B] Brazil 20 180

Deep Water P-71 [B] Brazil 25 150

Deep Water Pegaga Malaysia 20 95

Conventional Oil & Gas Penguins Redevelopment United Kingdom 50 45

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Pennsylvania cracker United States 100 1.5 mtpa C2

Chemicals

P

Troll Phase 3 Norway 8 255

Conventional Oil & Gas Tyra Future Denmark 37 80

Conventional Oil & Gas Vito United States 63 100

Deep Water

P

Projects under construction

84 [A] Direct and indirect share. [B] The Brazil accumulations are subject to unitisation agreements; production shown is FPSO oil capacity as per operator. [C] Fox Creek and Permian production represents Shell entitlement share of production and is the peak production expected between 2017 and 2019. [D] Sierras Blancas and Cruz de Lorena at 90% Shell share, Coiron Amargo SO at 80% Shell share. [E] Post-FID; pre-construction.

2019-20 Shell share: >250 kboe/d 2021+ Shell share: >250 kboe/d, 5.6 mtpa LNG 1.5 mtpa ethylene

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Phase Project Country Shell share [A] % Peak production 100% kboe/d LNG capacity 100% Mtpa Products 100% capacity Power output 100% MW Theme Shell

  • perated

Define

Barracuda backfill Trinidad & Tobago 100 25

Integrated Gas

P

Bonga South West Nigeria 43 175

Deep Water

P

Gbaran Phase 3 Nigeria 30 50

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Lake Charles LNG United States 50 16.8

Integrated Gas

P

NLNG T7 Nigeria 26 7.4

Integrated Gas Pierce Depressurisation United Kingdom 93 20

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Powernap United States 100 35

Deep Water

P

Prelude – Crux Australia 82 maintain capacity

Integrated Gas

P

Salym Southern Hub Russia 50 65

Conventional Oil & Gas Uzu Development Nigeria 30 45

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Val d’Agri Future Development Italy 39 65

Conventional Oil & Gas

Assess/Select

Abadi Indonesia 35 244 9.5

Integrated Gas Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind United States 50 2500

Power Arrow backfill Australia 50 maintain capacity

Integrated Gas Bonga Main Life Extension & Upgrade Nigeria 55 80

Deep Water

P

Bonga North Tranche 1 Nigeria 55 119

Deep Water

P

Bukom upgrade Singapore 100 Gasoline

Oil Products

P

Cambo United Kingdom 30 40

Conventional Oil & Gas Clair South United Kingdom 28 60

Conventional Oil & Gas Colibri backfill Trinidad & Tobago 87 35

Integrated Gas

P

Dover United States 100 [C]

Deep Water

P

Fort Sumpter United States 100 [C]

Deep Water

P

Gato do Mato Brazil 80 99

Deep Water

P

Gorgon – Jansz compression Australia 25 maintain capacity

Integrated Gas HA Development Nigeria 30 60

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

HI Development Nigeria 40 75

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Pre-FID options (1)

85 [A] Direct and indirect share. [B] The Brazil accumulations are subject to unitisation agreements; production shown is FPSO oil capacity as per operator. [C] To be confirmed.

Shell share potential: >1000 kboe/d ~24 mtpa LNG ~200 GW

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019

Phase Project Country Shell share [A] % Peak production 100% kboe/d LNG capacity 100% Mtpa Products 100% capacity Power output 100% MW Theme Shell

  • perated

Assess/Select

Jackdaw United Kingdom 74 40

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Jerun Malaysia 30 95

Conventional Oil & Gas Kalamkas Kazakhstan 17 55

Conventional Oil & Gas Kashagan CFP Kazakhstan 17 65

Conventional Oil & Gas KGK Expansion Phase 1 Kazakhstan 29 40

Conventional Oil & Gas LNG Canada Expansion Canada 40 14

Integrated Gas Marjoram/Rosmari Malaysia 75 100

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Mayflower Offshore Wind United States 50 1600

Power Mero 2 [B] Brazil 20 180

Deep Water Mero 3 [B] Brazil 20 180

Deep Water Mero 4 [B] Brazil 20 180

Deep Water Moerdijk NWE efficiency project The Netherlands 100 Ethylene

Chemicals

P

Nebras Iraq [C] [C]

Chemicals

[C]

Norco upgrade United States 100 Gasoline

Oil Products

P

NWS – Browse backfill Australia 27 [C]

Integrated Gas Okpokunou Cluster Development Nigeria 24 85

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Oman Integrated GTL Oman [C] [C] [C]

Integrated Gas

P

Ormen Lange Phase 3 Norway 18 80

Conventional Oil & Gas

P

Pearls Khazar Kazakhstan 55 40

Conventional Oil & Gas Sakhalin T3 Russia 28 5.4

Integrated Gas Tanzania Tanzania 30 [C] 12

Integrated Gas

P

Timi Malaysia 75 40

Conventional Oil & Gas Whale United States 60 100

Deep Water

P

Pre-FID options (2)

86 [A] Direct and indirect share. [B] The Brazil accumulations are subject to unitisation agreements; production shown is FPSO oil capacity as per operator. [C] To be confirmed.

Shell share potential: >1000 kboe/d ~24 mtpa LNG ~200 GW

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Royal Dutch Shell | June 4-5, 2019 Metric Abbreviation Definition Break-even price BEP The forward-looking break-even price for pre-FID projects is calculated based on all forward-looking costs associated with pre-FID projects in our development portfolio. Accordingly, this typically excludes exploration and appraisal costs, lease bonuses, exploration seismic and exploration-team overhead costs. The forward-looking break-even price for pre-FID projects is calculated based on our estimate of resources volumes that are currently classified as 2C under the Society of Petroleum Engineers’ Resource Classification System. Cash capital expenditure Cash capex Comprises the following lines from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: Capital expenditure, Investments in joint ventures and associates and Investments in equity securities. Capital Investment CI Comprises Capital expenditure, Investments in joint ventures and associates and Investments in equity securities, exploration expense excluding well write-offs, leases recognised in the period and other adjustments. Cash flow from operating activities excluding working capital movements CFFO excl. WC “Cash flow from operating activities” less the sum of the following items in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows: (i) (increase)/decrease in inventories, (ii) (increase)/decrease in current receivables, and (iii) increase/(decrease) in current payables. Divestments Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and businesses, joint ventures and associates, and other Integrated Gas, Upstream and Downstream investments, reported in “Cash flow from investing activities”, adjusted onto an accruals basis and for any share consideration received or contingent consideration recognised upon divestment, as well as proceeds from the sale of interests in entities while retaining control (for example, proceeds from sale of interest in Shell Midstream Partners, L.P.), which are included in “Change in non-controlling interest” within “Cash flow from financing activities”. Earnings on a current cost of supplies basis CCS earnings Income for the period, adjusted for the after-tax effect of oil-price changes on inventory. Free Cash Flow FCF Defined as the sum of “Cash flow from operating activities” and “Cash flow from investing activities”. Gearing Net debt (current and noncurrent debt less cash and cash equivalents, adjusted for fair value of derivative financial instruments used to hedge foreign exchange and interest rate risks relating to debt, and associated collateral balances) as a percentage of total capital (net debt plus total equity). Organic free cash flow OFCF Free cash flow excluding inorganic capital investment and divestment proceeds. Operating costs Opex Underlying operating expenses, which are operating expenses less identified items. Opex yield Net earnings divided over operating costs (excluding depreciation, disposal proceeds, income from loans to Associates and other Investments). Return on average capital employed on a CCS basis excluding identified items Clean CCS ROACE Sum of CCS earnings excluding identified items for the current and previous three quarters, adjusted for after-tax interest expense, expressed as a percentage of the average capital employed for the same period. The after-tax interest expense is calculated using the effective tax rate for the same period. Capital employed consists of total equity, current debt and non-current debt. Unit cash flow CFFO/boe Integrated Gas and Upstream cash flow divided by total production. Calculation based on reported segment CFFO excl. WC, for Total: Upstream and Gas, Renewables and Power, for Shell: Upstream and Integrated Gas. Calculation for BP, Chevron end Exxon approximate, based on total CFFO excl. WC less Downstream and Corporate cashflows estimated by adding segment net income and segment depreciation, corrected for interest and special items. Unit development cost UDC Shell share of lifecycle capex spend, in real terms 2018, for major projects, divided by nominal Shell working interest share (SWIS) production Unit finding cost UFC Exploration expense before tax divided over viable contingent resources. Exploration expense excludes signature bonuses and associate spend. Contingent resources on a Shell group entitlement share. Unit operating cost UOC Shell share of operating cost divided by Shell Working Interest Share (SWIS) Production Unit technical cost UTC Unit technical cost defined as present value of real terms capital and operating expenditure divided by the production profile discounted to the reference date.

Definitions

slide-88
SLIDE 88