lower extremity artery
play

Lower Extremity Artery: Left foot ulceration Physiologic Testing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Master Title Ultrasound for Initial Evaluation of Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusive Disease: WHY? Gregory L. Moneta MD Professor and Chief Knight Cardiovascular Institute Division of Vascular Surgery Oregon Health & Science University


  1. Master Title Ultrasound for Initial Evaluation of Lower Extremity Arterial Occlusive Disease: WHY? Gregory L. Moneta MD Professor and Chief Knight Cardiovascular Institute Division of Vascular Surgery Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon USA Lower Extremity Artery: Left foot ulceration Physiologic Testing Ankle Brachial Index Exercise Testing Segmental Pressures/Waveforms Phylesmography (Pulse Volume Recordings) 1

  2. Left leg claudication Sudden Onset left lower leg and foot pain Left foot ulceration Left foot ischemic pain 2

  3. Misconceptions: Lower Extremity Arterial Duplex Scanning Right Leg Claudication • Time consuming • Difficult • Adds little to physiologic testing 2016:OHSU Lower Extremity Vascular Lab Reality of Modern Arterial Duplex Scanning Arterial Testing • Efficient / Practical • $ CTA / MRA • Still do ABIs to establish presence of • Accurate disease. • More information than • Rare exercise testing for unclear cases physiologic testing. claudication. • More accurate than • Almost no segmental pressure studies. physiologic testing. • Better follow-up info. • More than 2000 lower extremity arterial duplex studies. • Techs prefer it to physiologic testing. Cannon Beach, Oregon 3

  4. Duplex Mapping (Clinical Categories from History/Physical Exam) • 150 patients with duplex and angiography CFA Mid AT • Group A: No significant occlusive disease • Group B: Aortoiliac occlusive disease Mid Peroneal Proximal SFA • Group C: Infrainguinal occlusive disease • Group D: Multilevel occlusive disease Mid PT Mid Popliteal Duplex Mapping Duplex Mapping Indication for Angiography Clinical Classification of Occlusive Disease 4

  5. Duplex Mapping: Proximal Arteries Duplex Mapping: Tibial Arteries • Visualization • Visualization • Distinguish <50% vs. >50% stenosis • Predict continuous patency to the ankle (PSV, velocity ratios, waveform analysis) • Overall and according to clinical disease • Distinguish stenosis from occlusion category • Overall and according to disease category Duplex Mapping Duplex Mapping 5

  6. Duplex Mapping: Suprageniculate Duplex Mapping: Suprageniculate Arteries (Sensitivity/Specificity/PPV/NPV) (Sensitivity/Specificity/PPV/NPV) Duplex Mapping: Tibial Arteries Duplex Mapping: Stenosis vs. Occlusion (Sensitivity/Specificity/PPV/NPV for predicting continuous patency) (Iliacs, Superficial Femoral, Popliteal) In 98% of comparisons duplex successfully distinguished stenosis from occlusion! 6

  7. Duplex vs Segmental Pressures Duplex vs. Segmental Pressures Technical Success: Examination of Iliac-Femoral-Popliteal Arteries •Angiography 100% •Segmental Pressures 100% •Duplex Mapping 99.8% Duplex vs Segmental Pressures Duplex vs Segmental Pressures Sensitivities and Positive Predictive Values (50-100% Specificities and Negative Predictive Values Stenosis, 151 Extremities) (50-100% Stenosis, 151 Extremities) Arterial Segment Sensitivity (%) PPV (%) Arterial Segment Sensitivity (%) PPV (%) SDP ADM SDP ADM SDP ADM SDP ADM Iliac/CFA 86 97 77 93 Iliac/CFA 59 88 72 94 Proximal SFA 80 100 65 92 Proximal SFA 73 95 85 100 Distal SFA/Popliteal 56 99 60 86 Distal SFA/Popliteal 48 78 45 98 SFA / Popliteal 53 100 55 83 SFA / Popliteal 85 93 83 100 7

  8. Duplex vs Segmental Pressures Duplex vs Segmental Pressures Missed 50-100% Stenosis By SDP and ADM in Total Agreement with Angiography Patients/Limbs With (A) and Without (B) Diabetes, Renal (151 Limbs) Failure or Previous Vascular Surgery Segmental Doppler Pressures Arterial Duplex Mapping Arterial Segment Segmental Pressures Arterial Duplex 52 (34%) 123 (82%) A(%) B(%) P-value A(%) B(%) P-value Iliac/CFA 33 43 0.712 13 3 0.007 Proximal SFA 32 22 0.468 7 8 0.789 P < 0.0001 Distal SFA/Popliteal 50 33 0.348 25 10 0.316 ABI and Progression of Atherosclerosis ABI and Progression of Atherosclerosis •114 patients • ABI is relatively insensitive to detect •193 extremities progression of atherosclerosis •Mean follow-up: 3.3 years • Duplex is better •76% of arteries initially patent by angiography 8

  9. ABI and Progression of Atherosclerosis ABI and Progression of Atherosclerosis Duplex Mapping: Conclusions • Highly accurate Coffin Nails • Better than segmental pressures and ABI • Preferred initial examination for evaluation of PAD 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend