Low Risk Cost Effective Efficient Fracture Evaluation Powered by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

low risk cost effective efficient fracture evaluation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Low Risk Cost Effective Efficient Fracture Evaluation Powered by - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Low Risk Cost Effective Efficient Fracture Evaluation Powered by Quad Neutron Technologies Ltd. Fracturing Evaluation Challenges Radioactive Fracture Tracing Materials High HSE risk Contamination control costs Radioactive tag


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Fracture Evaluation Low Risk Cost Effective Efficient

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Fracturing Evaluation Challenges

  • Radioactive Fracture Tracing Materials

– High HSE risk – Contamination control costs – Radioactive tag eventually expires – Cannot discriminate fracture direction

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Why Trace Your Frac?

  • Identify offset well interference
  • Identify frac stage interference
  • Identify zonal coverage
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Existing Frac Tracing Methods

  • Radioactive (RA) isotopes
  • Harmful to our health and our environment
  • Common Oilfield RA isotopes half life's

– Iridium 192, 74 days – Scandium 46, 84 days – Antimony 124, 60 days

  • RA Isotopes are not safe for 7 half life's

– Iridium-192, 518 days

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Quad Neutron & Boron Carbide Fracturing Evaluation Solution

  • Radioactive Fracture Tracing Materials

– High HSE risk – No exposure risk to personnel – Contamination control costs – No Radioactive sand disposal and monitoring – Radioactive tag eventually expires – No time limit / Boron Carbide never expires – Cannot discriminate fracture direction – Quad Neutron dual physics can be used to discriminate fracture direction

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Boron Carbide & Quad Neutron

  • Higher quality data to existing methods
  • No exposure risk to personnel
  • Matched to any proppent size
  • All frac types including N2
  • No time limit / Tag doesn’t expire
  • Near vs. Far tag placement using the

Quad Neutron

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Why Boron Carbide (CB4)?

  • Characteristics:

– Similar density as frac sand – Chemically inert – Large absorber of neutrons

  • Pros:

– Higher quality data to existing methods – No exposure risk to personnel – Matched to any proppant size – All frac types including N2 – No time limit / Tag doesn’t expire – Near vs. Far tag placement with Quad Neutron

  • Cons:

– Before pass required for neutron comparison – Only two tags available

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Neutron Neutron (cts) 10,000 Neutron Gamma (cts) 10,000

Quad Before Log Pump CB4 Tagged Pad Pump Untagged Proppant CB4 Tagged Proppant Post Frac Quad log Quad Frac Analysis

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Boron Carbide vs RA Tag

Radioactive Tag Packer Packer Frac Sleeve CB4 Tag

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

5 ton N2 frac with sand

5 ton energized N2 frac with sand

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Identifying Fracture Collapse

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Project Timeline Summary

  • Drill and case 2 HZ wells

– 750 ft spacing

  • Log Quad Neutron on each well before

fracturing

  • Fracture stimulation 1 well
  • Log Quad Neutron on each well
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Well Interference

Non Frac’d well Frac’d well

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Technologies Ltd.

Powered by Quad Neutron

Stage Interference