London Branch Meeting
Thursday 11 January 2018
London Branch Meeting Thursday 11 January 2018 Agenda: 15:00 - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
London Branch Meeting Thursday 11 January 2018 Agenda: 15:00 - Doors open 15:15 - Welcome and introduction 15:30 - Presentation: An Integrated Approach to Performance Measurement by John Nelson 16:00 - Questions and closing comments 16:15
Thursday 11 January 2018
15:00 - Doors open 15:15 - Welcome and introduction 15:30 - Presentation: An Integrated Approach to Performance Measurement by John Nelson 16:00 - Questions and closing comments 16:15 – IIRSM Update: IIRSM CEO Phillip Pearson 16:30 - Networking 16:45 - Close
IIRSM CEO: Phillip Pearson
Risk Management
and learn to reduce the missed opportunities and minimise risks.
Governance
achieve our strategic
Learning
sustainable improvements in all that we do
Prospect Sales Validation Delivery Testing & Commissioning Operation & Maintenance Handback
KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES
“formal measure of achievement; allows MAM to track progress against recognised standard” LEADING & LAGGING INDICATORS “hard data which may be analysed”
KEY OBJECTIVES
the “influencer “; accelerates
(achievement)
EFQM Excellence Model Risk Management Maturity Model Asset Management Excellence Model BS EN ISO 9004; Managing for the sustained success success of an organization Safety Culture Maturity Model
AMCL Asset Management Excellence Model: Maturity Scale (AMEM)
This diagram shows the Asset Management Maturity Scale. In order to achieve the Excellence Model an organisation needs to be scoring above 70%. The organisation is scoring just below 35%. By addressing all the PAS 55 Major & Minor non-conformances (see next slide) the organisation will be moving closer to the Excellence model. These actions were completed through the implementation of Project TOM.
This diagram shows the score against each of the PAS 55 requirements (24) In order to achieve the excellence model we needed to hit 70% on all subjects. In order to see if we were moving towards the Excellence Model we looked at all Major & Minor non conformances. The diagram also shows the PAS 55 clauses that were being addressed via the implementation of Project TOM, therefore moving beyond both PAS 55 and closer to Excellence. The 24 subjects in this model largely represent the 39 subjects in the AMEM.
1 2 3 4 5
Customer Focus Leadership Involvement Of People Process Approach System Approach to Management Continual Improvement Factual Approach to Decision Making Mutually Beneficial Supplier Relationship
Clear accountabilities and job description for all Business opportunities that meet risk appetite Benchmark against peer group Corporate Health & Safety Performance Index Quality Management Guidelines for Realizing Financial & Economic Benefits Asset Management Excellence Model Visible engagement with staff Measurement and analysis of feedback from employee surveys ISO 10014 CHaSPI AMEM KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES “formal measure of achievement; allows MAM to track progress against recognised standard” LEADING & LAGGING (PERFORMANCE) INDICATORS “hard data which may be analysed” Leadership Culture People Risk Management Performance Improvement KEY OBJECTIVES the “influencer”; accelerates or decelerates progress (achievement) Risk Committee/ AMSG established Stewardship & Governance Accident frequency rates Increase in near miss reporting Accidents & Incidents Asset failure rates Assets performing to requirements Asset Management Number incidents; lack of training Authorisations tally with competence Competence Number NC’s not closed out Improvement captured thru’ audits Continual Improvement
failing to meet specification
specification Design Management Contingency plans ineffective on use
emergencies Emergency Preparedness & Incident Management Poor comms. lead to unwanted results Communication of business performance Employee Involvement Enforcement action taken All legal contract req’ments identified Legal, Contractual & Other Number
Statutory inspections carried out Monitoring, Audit & Review Volume water used per sqm Measure use of natural resources Natural Resources Reportable cases of ill health Statutory health assessments Occupational Health & Wellbeing Failure to control PTW activities Number of permits closed Permit To Work Failure to meet agreed KPI Contractors approved as per procedure Supply Chain Management Incorrect procedure implemented Procedures meet business requirements Systems & Process Example lagging indicator Example leading indicator
KEY:
Number of persons using EAP Percentage of work related absences Absence Management Energy usage & CO2 emission Number of energy interventions Energy Management Number of BCP’s not fit for purpose Frequency of periodic tests
Business Continuity
STRATEGY & RISK MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION & CAPABILITY SYSTEMS & PROCESSES PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT GOVERNANCE & POLICIES TOOLS & TECHNOLOGY
1 2 3
21
performance;
John Nelson Email: jcnelson@Hotmail.co.uk Mobile: 07912 609357
IIRSM CEO Phillip Pearson