LOCATION MAP Project Bakersfield Location Baker Kramer Junction - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

Kramer Apartments Corporation Kramer Service Corporation

District 8, SR 58 San Bernardino County

Michael Whiteside

Assistant Chief Engineer Caltrans

2

LOCATION MAP

Interstate 40

Barstow Needles Kramer Junction

Project Location

Baker

San Bernardino County

Bakersfield

Project Location

3 Kramer Apartments Corp. & Kramer Service Corp.

BNSF Grade Separation Route 58/395 Separation

Edwards Air Force Base

KERN COUNTY To Bakersfield SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

BNSF

20 Mule Team Road Edwards Air Force Base Boundary

4

Project Location

Kramer Apartments

• Corp. Properties

0.75 Ac ANTIQUE PARCEL Kramer Service

• Corp. Property

16.88 Ac SERVICES PARCEL

To Barstow

Proposed R/W Kramer Junction Proposed R/W

Edwards Air Force Base

ROUTE 58

To Bakersfield

Kramer Apartments

• Corp. Properties

3.08 Ac MOTEL PARCEL

ROUTE 58

Project Impact

5

Motel Parcel

Edwards Air Force Base

Southern Remainder 9.21 Ac Antique Parcel

To Bakersfield To Barstow

ROUTE 58 IMP Service Parcel Northern Remainder 0.97 Ac

Proposed R/W

Subject Parcel Fee Acquisition Legend:

Contacts Mail 35 Phone 30 Email 87 Personal 26

Project Impact

7

Motel Parcel

Edwards Air Force Base

To Bakersfield To Barstow

ROUTE 58 IMP

Proposed R/W

Motel Parcel (3.08 Ac)

8

0.13 Ac Fee Kramer Apartments Corp.

Project Impact

Motel Parcel

Motel Parcel 3.08 Ac

Project Impact

9

Edwards Air Force Base

Antique Parcel

To Bakersfield To Barstow

ROUTE 58 IMP

Antique Parcel (0.75Ac)

Proposed R/W

10

0.05 Ac TCE 0.04 Ac Fee

Project Impact

Antique Parcel

Kramer Apartments Corp.

11

Antique Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Property lines incorrect on drawings

• Buildings don’t traverse property lines

Parking access not to code in after condition Northern driveway a raised median

• Access commercial / over-sized vehicles

12

Northern Driveway (Right-in/Right-out) Raised Curbed Median Signalized Intersection

Antique Parcel Motel Parcel

Building traverses property line

Antique Parcel

Southern Driveway

13

THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Property lines incorrect on drawings

• Buildings don’t traverse property lines

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE:

Confirmed - Buildings traverse property lines Acquisition doesn’t impact building

Antique Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.

14

THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Parking access not to code in after condition

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE:

San Bernardino code 51’ setback Final 63’ provided

Antique Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.

15

THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Northern driveway raised median

• Access concerns commercial / over-sized vehicles

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE:

Median required for safety Proximity to signalized intersection Southern signalized driveway Trucks can enter/exit

Antique Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.

Project Impact

16

Edwards Air Force Base

Antique Parcel

To Bakersfield To Barstow

ROUTE 58 IMP

Antique Parcel

Proposed R/W

17

Edwards Air Force Base

Northern Remainder 0.97 Acres Southern Remainder 9.21 Acres

Project Impact

Service Parcel (16.88 Ac)

Service Parcel 6.70 Ac Fee 0.41 Ac TCE 0.09 Ac Utility Kramer Services Corp

Proposed R/W

ROUTE 58 IMP

To Bakersfield To Barstow

18

Edwards Air Force Base

Existing Utility Corridors

Service Parcel

Proposed R/W

ROUTE 58 IMP

To Bakersfield To Barstow

SCE Utility NextEra Utility

Northern Remainder

SCE Easement NextEra Easement

19

6.70 Ac Fee 0.41 Ac TCE Kramer Service Corp.

Service Parcel

Project Impact

20

6.57 Ac Fee 0.41 Ac TCE Kramer Service Corp.

Service Parcel

Project Impact

21

6.57 Ac Fee Kramer Service Corp.

Service Parcel

Project Impact

22

Services Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Replacement private utilities Design is incorrect

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE

Meeting June 23 Sizes agreed upon Steel casings - 2 water, 1 sewer, 1 future Resolved

THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Left u-turns be allowed at Salton Rd

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE

No u-turn restrictions at Salton Rd

23

Services Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.

THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Northern remainder Move SCE pole to CT R/W

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE

SCE designed relocation Within in existing easement Line spans limited & balanced Safety & access Relocated to minimize impact Limitations compensation issue

Related to the findings of the Commission: That the property sought to be condemned is necessary for the project.

24

Services Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.

THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Replace poles w/ tubular steel

• No guy wires

Shorten guy wires Meeting with SCE and CT

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE

SCE designed Within existing easement SCE - tubular steel not feasible / clearance Many SCE meetings – design/redesign complete Will attend meeting Impacts compensation issue

Related to the findings of the Commission: That the property sought to be condemned is necessary for the project.

25

Services Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.

THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

CT is seeking new rights for SCE

• Existing has no provision for underground

Terms of SCE underground easement not reasonable

• Should be negotiated

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE:

Yes, seeking underground easements SCE requirements / issued easement language Not stated specific objections Impacts compensation issue

Related to the findings of the Commission: That the property sought to be condemned is necessary for the project.

26

Services Parcel

Related to the findings of the Commission: This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.

27

All Parcels

Related to the findings of the Commission: That a valid offer of compensation has been made. THE PROPERTY OWNER CONTENDS:

Valid offer not made

• Private air strip
• NextEra easement extinguished

DEPARTMENT RESPONSE Written offers made

• Service Parcel - March 2016 / rev. Jan 2017
• Antique Parcel - March 2016 / rev Jan 2017
• Motel Parcel - March 2016

Included airstrip, easements, & encumbrances

Summary

1.The public interest and necessity require the proposed project. 2.This project is planned and located in a manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury. 3.The property sought to be condemned is necessary for the proposed project. 4.An offer of compensation has been made.

28

29

Northerly Remainder Service Parcel

SCE EASE SCE EASE

A TSP would conflict with Transmission Line TSP 011E moved 55

• ft. south

U-turns are allowed Only area not encumbered by SCE Ease New UG SCE

SR 58 WB OFFRAMP SR 58 EB ONRAMP

TSP 011E

30

6.57 Ac Fee 0.41 Ac TCE Kramer Service Corp.

Service Parcel

Project Impact

New SCE TSP Remove SCE Tower

Existing Utility Corridors

Service Parcel

Existing Utility Corridors

Service Parcel

33

Kramer Junction

Services Parcel

NextEra easement NewEra easement

ROUTE 58 IMP

13 Acres $18.1m 8 Acres $17.5m

Southern CA Edison easement

34

SCE Transmission Relocation Letter

35

Motel Parcel

Southerly Service, Antique and Motel Remainder Parcels

Initial Proposed Design

45 ft. Driveway (Right-in/Right-out) Raised Curbed Median to prevent left turns Signalized T-Intersection (3-legged) 45 ft. Driveway Service Parcel Antique Parcel

36

Southerly Service, Antique and Motel Remainder Parcels

Darr’s Proposed Design

60 ft. Driveway (Right-in/Right-out) Raised Curbed Median Signalized Intersection (4-legged) Antique Parcel Motel Parcel Service Parcel

Design Changes Negotiated

Interchange layout

• Minimize impacts

Constructing 60’ driveway and signalized intersection

• Intersection directly into property

R/W reduced 25’ feet avoid workshop Setback SCE poles 25’/50’

• Clear areas
• Extra space into driveway

Ramp access control from 300’ – 100’

• Future development
• Maintain access

Paved access north remainder / designated left-turn

• Maintain access

Replace/encase private utilities & extra casing for future

46