Lizards and Lyme disease risk
- Diana Erazo
- Luisa Carrillo Rodriguez
- Marilia Palumbo Gaiarsa
- Paula Ribeiro Prist
- Rodrigo Mazzei Carvalho
Lizards and Lyme disease risk Diana Erazo Luisa Carrillo Rodriguez - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Lizards and Lyme disease risk Diana Erazo Luisa Carrillo Rodriguez Marilia Palumbo Gaiarsa Paula Ribeiro Prist Rodrigo Mazzei Carvalho Introduction It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common
It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common vector-borne disease
It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common vector-borne disease
Black-legged tick (Ixodes scapularis) Western black-legged tick (Ixodes pacificus)
It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common vector-borne disease
Western black-legged tick (Ixodes pacificus)
It’s transmitted to humans trough ticks’ bites
Black-legged tick (Ixodes scapularis)
It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common vector-borne disease
Western black-legged tick (Ixodes pacificus)
It’s transmitted to humans trough ticks’ bites
Black-legged tick (Ixodes scapularis)
Borrelia burgdorferi
Spring Winter Summer Fall
Spring Fall Winter Summer
Eggs
Spring Fall Winter Summer
Eggs Larvae
Spring Fall Winter Summer
Eggs Larvae Nymph
Spring Fall Winter Summer
Eggs Larvae Nymph
Spring Fall Winter Summer
Eggs Larvae Nymph Adults
Spring Fall Winter Summer
Eggs Larvae Adults Nymph Eggs
Spring Fall Winter Summer
Eggs Larvae Adults Nymph Eggs
Sceloporus occidentalis
Hosts
California Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys californicus) Dusky-footed Woodrat (Neotoma fuscipes) Western Grey Squirrel (Sciurus griseus) Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus)
Hosts
Host competence: ability to sustain the tick population.
Host competence: ability to sustain the tick population. Reservoir competence: ability of an infected host to infect a tick.
Host competence
Host competence
Host competence Lizards hold up to 90 % of the ticks
Reservoir competence
Susceptible tick Infected tick Reservoir competence
é Host competence ê Reservoir competence ê Host competence é Reservoir competence
To assess the impacts of experimentally reduced western fence lizard density on abundance and infection prevalence of Ixodes pacificus and on tick distributions
Sceloporus occidentalis Ixodes pacificus ü Abundance ü Infection prevalence Other hosts
The presence of lizards may act as a barrier for the transmission of lyme disease, due to it high host competence and lower reservoir competence
The presence of lizards may act as a barrier for the transmission of lyme disease, due to it high host competence and lower reservoir competence 1) If ticks switch to other hosts when lizards are scarce, and feed with equal success, then tick abundance might not decline and infection prevalence would increase.
1) If ticks switch to other hosts when lizards are scarce, and feed with equal success, then tick abundance might not decline and infection prevalence would increase. 2) Alternatively, reduced lizard abundance might lower tick abundance if ticks generally fail to find alternative, high-quality hosts
The presence of lizards may act as a barrier for the transmission of lyme disease, due to it high host competence and lower reservoir competence
1) If ticks switch to other hosts when lizards are scarce, and feed with equal success, then tick abundance might not decline and infection prevalence would increase. 2) Alternatively, reduced lizard abundance might lower tick abundance if ticks generally fail to find alternative, high-quality hosts
If there is a strong preference for lizards – no switch to an alternate host
The presence of lizards may act as a barrier for the transmission of lyme disease, due to it high host competence and lower reservoir competence
MarinCounty,CA, north of San Francisco 14 long-term 1 ha plots
MarinCounty,CA, north of San Francisco 6 experimental removal plots 8 control plots 14 long-term 1 ha plots
The effect of lizard removals on the density and infection prevalence of questing ticks was evaluated: ü Sampling larval ticks in the year of removals (time t) ü Nymphal ticks the year after the experimental manipulation
é Larvae ticks The effect of lizard removals on the density and infection prevalence of questing ticks was evaluated: ü Sampling larval ticks in the year of removals (time t) ü Nymphal ticks the year after the experimental manipulation Time t: were not able to immediately find an alternate blood meal host
é Larvae ticks were not able to immediately find an alternate blood meal host lizard removal elevated larval tick burden on female woodrats é Larval burdens
The effect of lizard removals on the density and infection prevalence of questing ticks was evaluated: ü Sampling larval ticks in the year of removals (time t) ü Nymphal ticks the year after the experimental manipulation Time t:
The year following lizard removal:
The year following lizard removal: ê Nymphal ticks ü 5.19% of larval I. pacificus did switch to a competent reservoir host (N. fuscipes)
The year following lizard removal: ê Nymphal ticks ü 5.19% of larval I. pacificus did switch to a competent reservoir host (N. fuscipes) ü The increased larval burden on N. fuscipes was not enough to absorb 94.81% of larvae that would have fed on lizards
The year following lizard removal: ê Nymphal ticks ü 5.19% of larval I. pacificus did switch to a competent reservoir host (N. fuscipes) ü The increased larval burden on N. fuscipes was not enough to absorb 94.81% of larvae that would have fed on lizards Results indicate that an incompetent reservoir for a pathogen may, in fact, increase disease risk through the maintenance of higher vector density and therefore, higher density of infected vectors
L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible Larvae Nymph Tick fed hungry susceptible infected L N T
Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N N N T L
Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N
Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N
Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N
Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N
Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N
Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N
µ1 Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T µ2 µ2 µ3 µ3 γ γ L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N
µ1 Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T µ2 µ2 µ3 µ3 γ γ L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N
Larvae
Larvae
Larvae
Larvae
Larvae
Larvae
Larvae
Nymph
Nymph
Nymph
Nymph
Nymph
Nymph
Nymph
Nymph
Final Remarks
Final Remarks