Lizards and Lyme disease risk Diana Erazo Luisa Carrillo Rodriguez - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lizards and lyme disease risk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lizards and Lyme disease risk Diana Erazo Luisa Carrillo Rodriguez - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lizards and Lyme disease risk Diana Erazo Luisa Carrillo Rodriguez Marilia Palumbo Gaiarsa Paula Ribeiro Prist Rodrigo Mazzei Carvalho Introduction It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lizards and Lyme disease risk

  • Diana Erazo
  • Luisa Carrillo Rodriguez
  • Marilia Palumbo Gaiarsa
  • Paula Ribeiro Prist
  • Rodrigo Mazzei Carvalho
slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common vector-borne disease

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common vector-borne disease

Black-legged tick (Ixodes scapularis) Western black-legged tick (Ixodes pacificus)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction

It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common vector-borne disease

Western black-legged tick (Ixodes pacificus)

It’s transmitted to humans trough ticks’ bites

Black-legged tick (Ixodes scapularis)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction

It is an important public health issue in the US, where it is the most common vector-borne disease

Western black-legged tick (Ixodes pacificus)

It’s transmitted to humans trough ticks’ bites

Black-legged tick (Ixodes scapularis)

Borrelia burgdorferi

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Spring Winter Summer Fall

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Spring Fall Winter Summer

Eggs

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Spring Fall Winter Summer

Eggs Larvae

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Spring Fall Winter Summer

Eggs Larvae Nymph

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Spring Fall Winter Summer

Eggs Larvae Nymph

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Spring Fall Winter Summer

Eggs Larvae Nymph Adults

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Spring Fall Winter Summer

Eggs Larvae Adults Nymph Eggs

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Spring Fall Winter Summer

Eggs Larvae Adults Nymph Eggs

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sceloporus occidentalis

Hosts

slide-18
SLIDE 18

California Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys californicus) Dusky-footed Woodrat (Neotoma fuscipes) Western Grey Squirrel (Sciurus griseus) Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus)

Hosts

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Host competence: ability to sustain the tick population.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Host competence: ability to sustain the tick population. Reservoir competence: ability of an infected host to infect a tick.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Host competence

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Host competence

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Host competence Lizards hold up to 90 % of the ticks

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Reservoir competence

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Susceptible tick Infected tick Reservoir competence

slide-27
SLIDE 27

é Host competence ê Reservoir competence ê Host competence é Reservoir competence

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Objectives

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Objectives

To assess the impacts of experimentally reduced western fence lizard density on abundance and infection prevalence of Ixodes pacificus and on tick distributions

  • n the remaining hosts

Sceloporus occidentalis Ixodes pacificus ü Abundance ü Infection prevalence Other hosts

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Hypothesis

The presence of lizards may act as a barrier for the transmission of lyme disease, due to it high host competence and lower reservoir competence

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Hypothesis

The presence of lizards may act as a barrier for the transmission of lyme disease, due to it high host competence and lower reservoir competence 1) If ticks switch to other hosts when lizards are scarce, and feed with equal success, then tick abundance might not decline and infection prevalence would increase.

Predictions

slide-32
SLIDE 32

1) If ticks switch to other hosts when lizards are scarce, and feed with equal success, then tick abundance might not decline and infection prevalence would increase. 2) Alternatively, reduced lizard abundance might lower tick abundance if ticks generally fail to find alternative, high-quality hosts

Hypothesis Predictions

The presence of lizards may act as a barrier for the transmission of lyme disease, due to it high host competence and lower reservoir competence

slide-33
SLIDE 33

1) If ticks switch to other hosts when lizards are scarce, and feed with equal success, then tick abundance might not decline and infection prevalence would increase. 2) Alternatively, reduced lizard abundance might lower tick abundance if ticks generally fail to find alternative, high-quality hosts

If there is a strong preference for lizards – no switch to an alternate host

Hypothesis Predictions

The presence of lizards may act as a barrier for the transmission of lyme disease, due to it high host competence and lower reservoir competence

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Methods

MarinCounty,CA, north of San Francisco 14 long-term 1 ha plots

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Methods

MarinCounty,CA, north of San Francisco 6 experimental removal plots 8 control plots 14 long-term 1 ha plots

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Results

The effect of lizard removals on the density and infection prevalence of questing ticks was evaluated: ü Sampling larval ticks in the year of removals (time t) ü Nymphal ticks the year after the experimental manipulation

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Results

é Larvae ticks The effect of lizard removals on the density and infection prevalence of questing ticks was evaluated: ü Sampling larval ticks in the year of removals (time t) ü Nymphal ticks the year after the experimental manipulation Time t: were not able to immediately find an alternate blood meal host

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Results

é Larvae ticks were not able to immediately find an alternate blood meal host lizard removal elevated larval tick burden on female woodrats é Larval burdens

  • n female N. fuscipes

The effect of lizard removals on the density and infection prevalence of questing ticks was evaluated: ü Sampling larval ticks in the year of removals (time t) ü Nymphal ticks the year after the experimental manipulation Time t:

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Results

The year following lizard removal:

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Results

The year following lizard removal: ê Nymphal ticks ü 5.19% of larval I. pacificus did switch to a competent reservoir host (N. fuscipes)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Results

The year following lizard removal: ê Nymphal ticks ü 5.19% of larval I. pacificus did switch to a competent reservoir host (N. fuscipes) ü The increased larval burden on N. fuscipes was not enough to absorb 94.81% of larvae that would have fed on lizards

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Results

The year following lizard removal: ê Nymphal ticks ü 5.19% of larval I. pacificus did switch to a competent reservoir host (N. fuscipes) ü The increased larval burden on N. fuscipes was not enough to absorb 94.81% of larvae that would have fed on lizards Results indicate that an incompetent reservoir for a pathogen may, in fact, increase disease risk through the maintenance of higher vector density and therefore, higher density of infected vectors

slide-43
SLIDE 43

L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible Larvae Nymph Tick fed hungry susceptible infected L N T

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N N N T L

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N

slide-51
SLIDE 51

µ1 Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T µ2 µ2 µ3 µ3 γ γ L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N

slide-52
SLIDE 52

µ1 Lf Las Lai Nfs Nfi Nas Nai T µ2 µ2 µ3 µ3 γ γ L= Larvae N=Nymph T=Tick f = hungry a = fed i = infected s=susceptible L L N N L N N

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Larvae

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Larvae

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Larvae

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Larvae

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Larvae

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Larvae

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Larvae

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Nymph

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Nymph

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Nymph

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Nymph

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Nymph

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Nymph

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Nymph

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Nymph

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Hosts

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Hosts

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Hosts

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Hosts

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Hosts

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Hosts

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Hosts

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Hosts

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Hosts

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Humans

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Humans

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Humans

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Ticks

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Ticks Saturation term

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Ticks Saturation term Maintenance term

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Ticks Saturation term Maintenance term Eggs

slide-84
SLIDE 84
slide-85
SLIDE 85
slide-86
SLIDE 86
slide-87
SLIDE 87
slide-88
SLIDE 88
slide-89
SLIDE 89
slide-90
SLIDE 90
slide-91
SLIDE 91

Final Remarks

  • Transient state;
  • Lizard = barrier
slide-92
SLIDE 92

Final Remarks

  • Transient state;
  • Lizard = barrier
slide-93
SLIDE 93

THANKS!!! ¡ ¡

  • Organizers
  • Professors
  • T.As
slide-94
SLIDE 94