littoral erosion amp extreme events hazard quantification
play

Littoral erosion & extreme events --- Hazard quantification in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Littoral erosion & extreme events --- Hazard quantification in oil transport on Hazard quantification in oil transport on seas --- Quantification of buried oil in the intertidial beach zone Summary Morphodynamics by minimization


  1. Littoral erosion & extreme events --- Hazard quantification in oil transport on Hazard quantification in oil transport on seas --- Quantification of buried oil in the intertidial beach zone

  2. Summary Morphodynamics by minimization principle: fluid model + bottom motion minimizing a given energy + Uncertainties on bed characteristics + Extreme scenarios

  3. Erosion and storms Erosion concerns 70% sandy beaches worldwide Accretion Erosion ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� ���������������������!�����"��������������#���������������������������������������������������������������������������� Sète

  4. Coupling shallow water & soft bottom Think of other multi-physics coupling through interactions at boundaries

  5. Fluid/Bottom model Bed time and space variability through its response to flow perturbations. Aleatoric uncertainties also present in initial and boundary conditions. Epistemic uncertainties due to model & numerics. � � � � Same platform used to design beach protection devices (geotube, sand dune, groyne, etc).

  6. Erosion and waves Constructive waves Destructive waves

  7. Example of functional for beach morphodynamics simulations T : Time interval of influence : observation domain Ω t 1 ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ψ = ρ η + ρ ψ τ − ψ − τ Ω J U g g t T d d 2 2 ( ( )) ( ( ( ) ( )) ) w s − − Ω Ω t t T T 2 2 1 t ∫ η τ ψ = τ ψ − τ ψ τ x h x h x d ( , , ) ( , , ) ( , , ) T − t T Hypothesis: The bed adapts in order to reduce water kinetic energy with ‘minimal’ sand transport

  8. Coupling shallow water & bottom http://www.soltc.org/database/lidar

  9. Coupling shallow water & bottom http://www.soltc.org/database/lidar

  10. OildeBeach project How deep oil is buried ? bed reconstituted by summer nourishment 5m water depth depth After storm profile Cross-shore distance: 150m Oil might be covered by 40cm of sand in some area, corresponding to on site observations (Prestige oil spill) It can reappear next winter ! Pertinent with strong tidal coefficient (Saint-Malo 28-116) (Piriac 40-100)

  11. Equivalent bottom velocity ψ = − ρ ∇ = − ∇ ψ J V t ψ x , ψ ≤ = − ∇ ψ U z h ( ) t orb x , J Web Y. Place ∇ J log 10 ( ) ψ

  12. Impact of bed characteristics uncertainty

  13. Extreme scenarios Knowing the PDF of the bed characteristics and and given a confidence level, provide extreme evolution scenarios for the bed

  14. Quantile-based extreme scenrios Knowing the PDF of the uncertainties on the bed receptivity, define two extreme scenarios for the bed receptivity and therefore for our fluid-structure coupling. α α α ≤ ρ = ρ + ≤ ≤ x x x 0 ( ) ( ) VaR ( ) , with VaR 0 VaR ± + 0 - x x Knowing Knowing the the PDF PDF of of the the uncertaint uncertaint ies ies of of a a control control parameter parameter , , define define two two quantile - based extreme scenarios for the variation s : = + α α ≤ ≤ α X x x VaR ( ) , with VaR 0 VaR (defined component by component) ± + - If Gaussian PDF : = = 0.99 0.95 VaR 2.33 and VaR 1.65 for N(0,1) α α σ = σ x x and VaR (N(0, ( ) )) ( ) VaR (N(0, 1 )) α = − α and VaR VaR + -

  15. Bed variability…….due to………bed mobility variability Assumption: sand mobility variability increases toward the beach: from 0 to 50% This also accounts for imperfect modelling (epistemic UQ) ~5cm ~5cm Variability for 20cm water ~10cm depth: Variability 25% for 5m water depth: 2% Cross-shore distance: 150m

  16. Bottom equivalent velocity V ψ = ρ ∇ = − ∇ ψ J V - ψ t x = ρ ∇ ∂ ψ ρ ∇ ∂ ψ V J J Formally, ( / , / ) ψ x ψ x 1 2 ∫ ψ = Remark : Conservati on, 0 t Ω => Optimization under constraint: Experiences in basin cannot represent open sea.

  17. Differences between basin and open sea Sogreah basin Impact of conservation constraint + sand variability accretion With conservation constraint Same initial behavior erosion $��%���

  18. Impact of state uncertainty

  19. Adjoint-based & extreme scenarios construction of bed covariance matrix Two - step applicatio n = x* (j(u(x))) 1/ arg min x ← + − Cov j j u x u x u x 2/ with ( ( )) ( ) ( *) x Cov known & modelling u * aleatoric and epistemic uncertaint ies

  20. Extreme scenarios due to state variability (epistemic or aleatoric) ~5m ~5m Larger uncertainty on water h in swash zone depth Cross-shore distance: 150m 5% uncertainty on water level induce an uncertainty on the sand thickness of 40cm !

  21. Bed covariance Extreme scenarios vs. Adjoint-based ~40cm ~40cm Cross-shore distance: 150m State uncertainty induces an uncertainty on the sand thickness of 40cm !

  22. Remarks - Morphodynamics by minimization principle. -VaR-based extreme scenarios. -Bed covariance (extreme scenarios & adjoint-based) accounting for epistemic & aleatoric state variability - Need to account for bed variability during the coupling and not only eventually through engineering margins. - Open sea is not basin. - Useful to estimate how deep oil might be present after summer bed beach reconstruction

  23. References (Aeronautics, Littoral, Seismic/reservoir, Others) - Minimization principles for the evolution of a soft sea bed interacting with a shallow sea, with A. Bouharguane, IJCFD+C&F, 2012-2013. - Plate Rigidity Inversion in Southern California Using Interseismic GPS Velocity Fields, with J. Chery, M. Peyret, C. Joulain, Geophysics J. Int., 2012. - Reduced sampling and incomplete sensitivity for low-complexity robust parametric optimization, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 2013. -Code Division Multiple Access Filters Based on Sampled Fiber Bragg Grating Design of by Global Optimization, with B. Ivorra, A. Ramos, Optimization and Engineering, 2013. - Value at Risk for confidence level quantifications in robust engineering optimization, - Value at Risk for confidence level quantifications in robust engineering optimization, Opt. Control Appl. Method, 2013. - Quantitative extreme scenarios for the evolution of a soft bed interacting with a fluid using the Value at Risk of the bed characteristics, with F. Bouchette, Computers & Fluids, 2013. -Principal angles between subspaces and reduced order modelling accuracy in optimization, Structural & Multi-Disciplinary Opt. 2014. - Uncertainty Quantification by geometric characterization of sensitivity spaces, CMAME, 2014. -Ensemble Kalman Filters and geometric characterization of sensitivity spaces for Uncertainty Quantification, CMAME, 2015. -Backward uncertainty propagation in shape optimization, IJNMF, 2015.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend