Littoral erosion & extreme events --- Hazard quantification in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

littoral erosion amp extreme events hazard quantification
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Littoral erosion & extreme events --- Hazard quantification in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Littoral erosion & extreme events --- Hazard quantification in oil transport on Hazard quantification in oil transport on seas --- Quantification of buried oil in the intertidial beach zone Summary Morphodynamics by minimization


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Littoral erosion & extreme events

  • Hazard quantification in oil transport on

Hazard quantification in oil transport on seas

  • Quantification of buried oil in the intertidial

beach zone

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Summary

Morphodynamics by minimization principle: fluid model + bottom motion minimizing a given energy + Uncertainties on bed characteristics + Extreme scenarios

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Erosion and storms

Erosion concerns 70% sandy beaches worldwide

Accretion

!"#

Erosion

Sète

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Coupling shallow water & soft bottom Think of other multi-physics coupling through interactions at boundaries

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fluid/Bottom model

Bed time and space variability through its response to flow perturbations. Aleatoric uncertainties also present in initial and boundary conditions. Epistemic uncertainties due to model & numerics.

  • Same platform used to design beach protection devices (geotube, sand dune,

groyne, etc).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Erosion and waves

Constructive waves Destructive waves

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Example of functional

for beach morphodynamics simulations T: Time interval of influence : observation domain τ ψ τ ψ ρ η ρ ψ d d T t g g U J

s t T t w

∫ ∫

− Ω

Ω − − + = ) )) ( ) ( ( 2 1 ( )) ( (

2 2

Hypothesis:

The bed adapts in order to reduce water kinetic energy with ‘minimal’ sand transport τ ψ τ ψ τ ψ τ η d x h T x h x

t T t T t

∫ ∫ ∫

− − Ω

− = ) , , ( 1 ) , , ( ) , , ( 2

slide-8
SLIDE 8

http://www.soltc.org/database/lidar

Coupling shallow water & bottom

slide-9
SLIDE 9

http://www.soltc.org/database/lidar

Coupling shallow water & bottom

slide-10
SLIDE 10

OildeBeach project

How deep oil is buried ?

bed reconstituted by summer nourishment 5m water depth After storm profile

Cross-shore distance: 150m Oil might be covered by 40cm of sand in some area, corresponding to on site observations (Prestige oil spill) It can reappear next winter ! Pertinent with strong tidal coefficient (Saint-Malo 28-116) (Piriac 40-100)

depth

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Equivalent bottom velocity

ψ ψ ψ ρ ψ

ψ x

  • rb

t x t

h z U V J ∇ − = ≤ ∇ − = ∇ − = ) (

, , Web Y. Place

J

) ( log10 J

ψ

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Impact of bed characteristics uncertainty

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Extreme scenarios Knowing the PDF of the bed characteristics and and given a confidence level, provide extreme evolution scenarios for the bed

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Quantile-based extreme scenrios

Knowing the PDF of the uncertainties on the bed receptivity, define two extreme scenarios for the bed receptivity and therefore for our fluid-structure coupling.

α α α

ρ ρ

+ ±

≤ ≤ + = ≤ VaR VaR with , ) ( VaR ) ( ) (

  • x

x x two define , parameter control a

  • f

ies uncertaint the

  • f

PDF the Knowing x

α α α α α α α

σ σ

+ + ±

− = = = = ≤ ≤ + = VaR VaR and )) 1 (N(0, VaR ) ( )) ) ( (N(0, VaR and N(0,1) for 1.65 VaR and 2.33 VaR : PDF Gaussian If component) by component (defined VaR VaR with , ) ( VaR : s variation for the scenarios extreme based

  • quantile

two define , parameter control a

  • f

ies uncertaint the

  • f

PDF the Knowing

  • 0.95

0.99

  • x

x x x X x

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Bed variability…….due to………bed mobility variability

Assumption: sand mobility variability increases toward the beach: from 0 to 50% This also accounts for imperfect modelling (epistemic UQ) ~5cm

Cross-shore distance: 150m

~10cm Variability for 5m water depth: 2% ~5cm Variability for 20cm water depth: 25%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Bottom equivalent velocity V

  • n,

Conservati : Remark ) / , / ( Formally,

  • 2

1

= ∂ ∇ ∂ ∇ = ∇ − = ∇ =

Ω t x x x t

J J V V J ψ ψ ρ ψ ρ ψ ρ ψ

ψ ψ ψ

=> Optimization under constraint: Experiences in basin cannot represent open sea.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Impact of conservation constraint + sand variability accretion Differences between basin and open sea Sogreah basin erosion

Same initial behavior

$%

With conservation constraint

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Impact of state uncertainty

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Adjoint-based & extreme scenarios construction of bed covariance matrix ies uncertaint epistemic and aleatoric modelling & known *) ( ) ( )) ( ( with 2/ min arg 1/ n applicatio step

  • Two

* u x x

Cov x u x u x u j j Cov (j(u(x))) x* − + ← =

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Extreme scenarios due to state variability (epistemic or aleatoric)

~5m

Cross-shore distance: 150m 5% uncertainty on water level induce an uncertainty on the sand thickness of 40cm !

~5m water depth

Larger uncertainty on h in swash zone

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Bed covariance Extreme scenarios vs. Adjoint-based

~40cm

Cross-shore distance: 150m State uncertainty induces an uncertainty on the sand thickness of 40cm !

~40cm

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Remarks

  • Morphodynamics by minimization principle.
  • VaR-based extreme scenarios.
  • Bed covariance (extreme scenarios & adjoint-based)

accounting for epistemic & aleatoric state variability

  • Need to account for bed variability during the coupling

and not only eventually through engineering margins.

  • Open sea is not basin.
  • Useful to estimate how deep oil might be present after

summer bed beach reconstruction

slide-23
SLIDE 23

References

(Aeronautics, Littoral, Seismic/reservoir, Others)

  • Minimization principles for the evolution of a soft sea bed interacting with a shallow

sea, with A. Bouharguane, IJCFD+C&F, 2012-2013.

  • Plate Rigidity Inversion in Southern California Using Interseismic GPS Velocity Fields,

with J. Chery, M. Peyret, C. Joulain, Geophysics J. Int., 2012.

  • Reduced sampling and incomplete sensitivity for low-complexity robust parametric
  • ptimization, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 2013.
  • Code Division Multiple Access Filters Based on Sampled Fiber Bragg Grating Design of

by Global Optimization, with B. Ivorra, A. Ramos, Optimization and Engineering, 2013.

  • Value at Risk for confidence level quantifications in robust engineering optimization,
  • Value at Risk for confidence level quantifications in robust engineering optimization,
  • Opt. Control Appl. Method, 2013.
  • Quantitative extreme scenarios for the evolution of a soft bed interacting with a fluid

using the Value at Risk of the bed characteristics, with F. Bouchette, Computers & Fluids, 2013.

  • Principal angles between subspaces and reduced order modelling accuracy in
  • ptimization, Structural & Multi-Disciplinary Opt. 2014.
  • Uncertainty Quantification by geometric characterization of sensitivity spaces, CMAME,

2014.

  • Ensemble Kalman Filters and geometric characterization of sensitivity spaces for

Uncertainty Quantification, CMAME, 2015.

  • Backward uncertainty propagation in shape optimization, IJNMF, 2015.