Limitations of Comal Springs Riffle Beetle Plastron Use During - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

limitations of comal springs riffle
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Limitations of Comal Springs Riffle Beetle Plastron Use During - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Limitations of Comal Springs Riffle Beetle Plastron Use During Low-Flow EAHCP Study #14-14-697-HCP Parvathi Nair 1 Weston Nowlin 1 Benjamin Schwartz 1 Randy Gibson 2 Thomas Hardy 1 1 Department of Biology 2 USFWS Texas State University SMARC


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Limitations of Comal Springs Riffle Beetle Plastron Use During Low-Flow

EAHCP Study #14-14-697-HCP Parvathi Nair1 Weston Nowlin1 Benjamin Schwartz1 Randy Gibson2 Thomas Hardy1

1Department of Biology

Texas State University San Marcos, TX 78666

2USFWS

SMARC San Marcos, TX 78666

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Comal Springs Riffle Beetle and Spring Flows

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Comal Springs Riffle Beetle Plastron

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Comal Springs Riffle Beetle and Spring Flows

O2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Comal Springs Riffle Beetle and Spring Flows

Temperature

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comal Springs Riffle Beetle and Spring Flows

Temperature O2 demand

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Comal Springs Riffle Beetle and Spring Flows

Temperature

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Comal Springs Riffle Beetle and Spring Flows

Temperature

O2

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Comal Springs Riffle Beetle and Spring Flows

Temperature

O2

O2 for plastron function

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Study Objectives

  • Examine effect of increasing temperature and

decreasing DO on performance of H. comalensis – Separate effects of each factor – Not direct assessment of plastron function

  • Explore use of non-listed surrogate species
  • Compare temperature and DO responses among

surrogate species and H. comalensis

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hypotheses

  • All species will exhibit threshold temperatures and

DO concentrations, beyond which beetles will exhibit a reduction in performance

  • Spring-ass0ciated species (H. comalensis and H.

glabra) will exhibit smaller ranges in temperature and DO than the surface associated species (H. vulnerata).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Elmid Species Examined

H.comalensis H.glabra H.vulnerata

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Critical Limit Methodology

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Beetle Collection

Finnegan Springs (Devils River) Comal Springs (SMARC)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Beetle Housing

  • SMARC and FAB
  • Ambient temperatures (22-

23oC), DO >4 mg/L

  • Plastic flow-through

chambers

  • Issues with H. vulnerata

– Die off over a 2-week period in August, re-collected in September – Seasonality?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Experimental System

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Experimental Design

  • Examined responses to short-term and long-term

changes in DO and temperature

– Short term = minutes to hours – Long-term = Days

  • Short term experiments

– Responses to rapid environmental changes, no time for acclimation – Thresholds not indicative of responses over longer time periods

  • Long term experiments

– Limits of acclimation – Allows for longer term deleterious effects to manifest

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Short Term Experiments

  • Short Term DO

– Start at 4 mg/L, decreased 1mg/L every few minutes – 3 min observation period – Temperature maintained at 23oC

  • Short Term Temperature

– Start at 23oC, increase temperature by 1oC every few minutes – Maintained DO >4 mg/L – 3 minute observation period

  • n = 16 H. glabra, n = 12 H. comalensis
  • Examined for Loss Of Response (LOR)

– Other consistent behaviors noted

  • At LOR, individuals moved to recovery chambers
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Recovery Chambers

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Long Term Experiments

  • Only H. glabra

– Flows at Comal Springs, mortality issues – Funding and time

  • Long Term DO

– Start at 4 mg/L, decreased 1mg/L over 24-h period – Observed every 2-3 hours over day – Temperature at 23oC

  • Long Term Temperature

– Start at 23oC, increase 1oC every 24 hours – Maintained DO >4 mg/L – Observed every 2-3 hours

  • n = 16 and 12
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Data analysis

  • Critical temperature and DO thresholds

determined as mean of observed LOR (or other recognizable behavioral responses)

  • Differences among species for short term

experiments assessed with one-way ANOVA

  • Long term thresholds for H.glabra compared to

data in literature for other elmids and dryopids

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Short term DO Results

  • H. glabra

– No LOR even at 0 mg/l DO for 3 minutes

  • H. comalensis

– No LOR even at 0 mg/l DO for 3 minutes

  • Recovery chamber

– Observed for 1-h

– No lasting exposure effects

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Short term Temperature Results

Rapid movement

45.17

31.6 28.8

F1, 26 = 9.92 p = 0.004

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Short term Temperature Results

Uncoordinated movement

45.17 F1, 21 = 3.99 p = 0.059

37.3 40.2

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Short term Temperature Results

LOR

45.2 49.9 F1,26= 23.08 p < 0.001

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Short term Temperature Recovery

  • H.comalensis

– All individuals recovered within one hour.

  • H. glabra

– All individuals recovered within an hour except one

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Long term DO Results

  • H. glabra only

– LOR at mean DO concentration 0.48 mg/L (0 – 1 mg/L) – LOR after an average of 10.2-h at <1 mg/L

– All beetles recovered within 3-h

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Long term Temperature Results

  • H. glabra only

– Rapid agitated movements at around 34.7 0C – LOR at 36.30C – On an average 177.6 -h spent at temperatures above 300C before LOR

  • Recovery chamber

– Only 3/12 individuals recovered after 4-h

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Implications of Low DO

  • Not sensitive to rapid changes in DO
  • Findings consistent with other studies on elmids
  • Stenelmis quadrimaculata exhibited LOR after

an average of 60-h at 0 mg/L (Harpster 1944)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Implications of high temperature

  • Short term experiments

– Rapid movement onset at 28 – 32oC – Threshold temperature for both species high – H. comalensis had significantly lower than H. glabra

  • Long term experiment with H. glabra

– Stress at 30-340C

  • Findings consistent with other studies on elmids

– Stenelmis quadrimaculata exhibited LOR at 30-330C (Harpster,1944)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Potential use of surrogate

  • H. vulnerata

– Utility as surrogate unknown

  • H. glabra

– Promising in terms of DO responses – Limited utility as threshold temperature 50C greater

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Future studies

  • Long term threshold study for H. comalensis.
  • Future studies to clearly identify long term

thresholds for DO and temperature by holding beetles for weeks-months

  • Surrogate studies in Habitat Connectivity Study

(later today)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Dewatering Issues

  • Decline in mean

daily discharge since 2010

  • Marked decline in

beetle habitat

  • Movement of beetle

into hyporheos?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Acknowledgements

  • Funding- EAHCP
  • Help-Michael Markowski, Dan Huston,

McLean Worsham, Amelia Everett, and Duane Friedman

slide-35
SLIDE 35