lie solvability in matrix algebras
play

Lie solvability in matrix algebras Micha l Ziembowski Warsaw - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lie solvability in matrix algebras Micha l Ziembowski Warsaw University of Technology Noncommutative and non-associative structures, braces and applications Malta, March 12, 2018 Based on a joint works with J. van den Berg, J. Szigeti and


  1. Lie solvability in matrix algebras Micha� l Ziembowski Warsaw University of Technology Noncommutative and non-associative structures, braces and applications Malta, March 12, 2018 Based on a joint works with J. van den Berg, J. Szigeti and L. van Wyk M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  2. Problem: Give an example of a subalgebra of M n ( F ) which is commutative. M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  3. Problem: Give an example of a subalgebra of M n ( F ) which is commutative. Take any pair ( k 1 , k 2 ) of positive integers satisfying k 1 + k 2 = n and consider k 1 J = k 2 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  4. Problem: Give an example of a subalgebra of M n ( F ) which is commutative. Take any pair ( k 1 , k 2 ) of positive integers satisfying k 1 + k 2 = n and consider k 1 J = k 2 R = FI n + J M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  5. R = FI n + J M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  6. R = FI n + J dim F ( R ) = 1 + k 1 k 2 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  7. R = FI n + J dim F ( R ) = 1 + k 1 k 2 (Schur 1905, Jacobson 1944) The dimension over a field F of � � n 2 any commutative subalgebra of M n ( F ) is at most + 1, 4 where ⌊ ⌋ is the floor function. M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  8. R = FI n + J dim F ( R ) = 1 + k 1 k 2 (Schur 1905, Jacobson 1944) The dimension over a field F of � � n 2 any commutative subalgebra of M n ( F ) is at most + 1, 4 where ⌊ ⌋ is the floor function. Commutativity: ∀ r , s ∈ R , [ r , s ] def = rs − sr . M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  9. Define inductively the Lie central and Lie derived series of a ring R as follows: C 0 ( R ) := R , C q +1 ( R ) := [ C q ( R ) , R ] (central series) , (1) and D 0 ( R ) := R , D q +1 ( R ) := [ D q ( R ) , D q ( R )] (derived series) . (2) We say that R is Lie nilpotent (respectively, Lie solvable) of index q (for short, R is Ln q ; respectively, R is Ls q ) if C q ( R ) = 0 (respectively, D q ( R ) = 0). M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  10. Let k 1 , k 2 , . . . , k m +1 be a sequence of positive integers such that k 1 + k 2 + · · · + k m +1 = n . M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  11. Let k 1 , k 2 , . . . , k m +1 be a sequence of positive integers such that k 1 + k 2 + · · · + k m +1 = n . Let k 1 k 2 · · · · · · · J = · · · · · · · · k m k m +1 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  12. Let k 1 , k 2 , . . . , k m +1 be a sequence of positive integers such that k 1 + k 2 + · · · + k m +1 = n . Let k 1 k 2 · · · · · · · J = · · · · · · · · k m k m +1 Let R = FI n + J (“TYPICAL EXAMPLE”) M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  13. k 1 k 2 · · · · · · · J = · · · · · · · · k m k m +1 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  14. k 1 k 2 · · · · · · · J = · · · · · · · · k m k m +1 dim F R = k 1 ( n − k 1 ) + k 2 ( n − k 1 − k 2 ) + · · · + k m ( n − k 1 − k 2 − · · · − k m ) + 1 = � m +1 i , j =1 , i < j k i k j + 1 . M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  15.  ℓ  M ( ℓ, n ) def � = max k i k j + 1 : k 1 , k 2 , . . . , k ℓ are  i , j =1 , i < j ℓ � � nonnegative integers such that k i = n . i =1 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  16.  ℓ  M ( ℓ, n ) def � = max k i k j + 1 : k 1 , k 2 , . . . , k ℓ are  i , j =1 , i < j ℓ � � nonnegative integers such that k i = n . i =1 If ℓ and n are positive integers with ℓ > n , then n 2 − n M ( ℓ, n ) = 1 � � + 1. 2 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  17.  ℓ  M ( ℓ, n ) def � = max k i k j + 1 : k 1 , k 2 , . . . , k ℓ are  i , j =1 , i < j ℓ � � nonnegative integers such that k i = n . i =1 If ℓ and n are positive integers with ℓ > n , then n 2 − n M ( ℓ, n ) = 1 � � + 1. 2 Let ℓ � n and � n � n = ℓ + r . ℓ M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  18.  ℓ  M ( ℓ, n ) def � = max k i k j + 1 : k 1 , k 2 , . . . , k ℓ are  i , j =1 , i < j ℓ � � nonnegative integers such that k i = n . i =1 If ℓ and n are positive integers with ℓ > n , then n 2 − n M ( ℓ, n ) = 1 � � + 1. 2 Let ℓ � n and � n � n = ℓ + r . ℓ We get M ( ℓ, n ) for the sequence ( k 1 , k 2 , . . . , k ℓ ) ∈ N ℓ 0 defined in the following way: � n  � , for 1 � i � ℓ − r ℓ  def k i = � n � + 1 , for ℓ − r < i � ℓ.  ℓ M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  19. Conjecture. (J. Szigeti, L. van Wyk) Let F be any field, m and n positive integers, and R an F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) with Lie nilpotence index m . Then dim F R � M ( m + 1 , n ) . M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  20. Theorem 1 Let F be any field, m and n positive integers, and R an F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) with Lie nilpotence index m . Then dim F R � M ( m + 1 , n ) . M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  21. PROBLEM: Every ring R that is Lie nilpotent of index m , is also Lie solvable of index m . Thus, it is natural to ask about the maximal dimension of Lie solvable of index m subalgebras of M n ( F ). M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  22. PROBLEM: Every ring R that is Lie nilpotent of index m , is also Lie solvable of index m . Thus, it is natural to ask about the maximal dimension of Lie solvable of index m subalgebras of M n ( F ). Unfortunately, we do not have good “typical example”. M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  23. FACTS: [ x 1 , y 1 ] [ x 2 , y 2 ] · · · [ x q , y q ] = 0 (3) Mal’tsev proved that all the polynomial identities of U q ( F ) are consequences of the identity in (3). We denote algebras satisfying (3) by D 2 q . M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  24. FACTS: [ x 1 , y 1 ] [ x 2 , y 2 ] · · · [ x q , y q ] = 0 (3) Mal’tsev proved that all the polynomial identities of U q ( F ) are consequences of the identity in (3). We denote algebras satisfying (3) by D 2 q .     D 1 D (1 , 2) · · · D (1 , q )    .  ...  .      0 D 2 .     D = (4) .  ... ...  .   . D ( q − 1 , q )           0 · · · 0 D q   Each D i is a commutative F -subalgebra of M n i ( F ) for every i , and D ( j , k ) = M n j × n k ( F ) for all j and k such that 1 ≤ j < k ≤ q . D satisfies (3). M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  25. FACTS: In general Ln 2 �⇒ D 2 , D 2 �⇒ Ln 2 (5) M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  26. FACTS: In general Ln 2 �⇒ D 2 , D 2 �⇒ Ln 2 (5) The maximum dimension for D 2 F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) is � � 3 n 2 2 + . 8 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  27. FACTS: In general Ln 2 �⇒ D 2 , D 2 �⇒ Ln 2 (5) The maximum dimension for D 2 F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) is � � 3 n 2 2 + . 8 The maximum dimension for Ln 2 F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) is � � n 2 1 + . 3 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  28. FACTS: In general Ln 2 �⇒ D 2 , D 2 �⇒ Ln 2 (5) The maximum dimension for D 2 F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) is � � 3 n 2 2 + . 8 The maximum dimension for Ln 2 F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) is � � n 2 1 + . 3 Also, in general D 2 m , Ln m +1 ⇒ Ls m +1 (6) M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  29. FACTS: In general Ln 2 �⇒ D 2 , D 2 �⇒ Ln 2 (5) The maximum dimension for D 2 F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) is � � 3 n 2 2 + . 8 The maximum dimension for Ln 2 F -subalgebra of M n ( F ) is � � n 2 1 + . 3 Also, in general D 2 m , Ln m +1 ⇒ Ls m +1 (6) (Meyer, Szigeti, van Wyk) For any commutative ring R , the subring U ⋆ 3 ( U ⋆ 3 ( R )) of U ⋆ 9 ( R ) is Ls 2 , but it is neither Ln 2 nor D 2 , and so we have, in general, Ls 2 �⇒ Ln 2 or D 2 . (7) M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  30. Problem 2 Construct an example of Ls 2 subalgebra of M n ( F ) with dimension � � 3 n 2 bigger than 2 + . 8 Theorem 3 If A is an Ls m +1 (for some m ≥ 1 ) structural matrix subring of U n ( R ) , R a commutative ring and n ≥ 1 , then A is D 2 m . M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  31. Let k be a positive integer and n = 2 k + 1. Consider �� A 1 B � � A = : A 1 ∈ M k ( F ) , A 2 ∈ M k +1 ( F ) , A i − comm. . 0 A 2 M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  32. Let k be a positive integer and n = 2 k + 1. Consider �� A 1 B � � A = : A 1 ∈ M k ( F ) , A 2 ∈ M k +1 ( F ) , A i − comm. . 0 A 2 Theorem 4 If A is a D 2 subalgebra of U n ( F ) with maximum possible dimension for D 2 , such that A 1 , A 2 and B are independent, then A 1 and A 2 are commutative. M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

  33. Thank you for your attention! M.Z. Lie solvability in matrix algebras

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend