Lessons Learned from Measuring Student Behavior During Class PERRY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lessons learned from measuring student behavior during
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lessons Learned from Measuring Student Behavior During Class PERRY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lessons Learned from Measuring Student Behavior During Class PERRY SAMSON UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-ANN ARBOR Class Presentation TECHNOLOGY Asynchronous Face-to-Face Synchronous Remote Remote What Do We Need in the Classroom? q Students


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lessons Learned from Measuring Student Behavior During Class

PERRY SAMSON

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-ANN ARBOR

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Class Presentation

Face-to-Face Synchronous Remote Asynchronous Remote

TECHNOLOGY

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What Do We Need in the Classroom?

q Students should be challenged with a wide range of question types q Students should be able to access my slides q Students should be able to take notes q Students should be encouraged to ask questions q Students should be able to answer each other’s questions q Students should be able to indicate when they’re confused q Student notes should be linked to lecture capture

slide-4
SLIDE 4

@PJSAMSON

LMS

  • Gradebook
  • Assignments
  • Collaboration

TLC

  • Student Notes
  • Student Response
  • Lecture Capture

Other

  • Textbook
  • ePortfolio
  • Content Creation

Interoperability ¡Standards ¡

Creating an Ecosystem

slide-5
SLIDE 5

@PJSAMSON

How to Build Educational Technology

Technology ¡ Use ¡ Pedagogy ¡ Assessment ¡

slide-6
SLIDE 6

@PJSAMSON

Active Learning Definition

Active learning is a process whereby students engage in activities, such as reading, writing, discussion, or problem solving that promote analysis, synthesis, and evaluation

  • f class content.

www.crlt.umich.edu/tstrategies/tsal

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Active Learning

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Villemard, 1900 Prediction for the French School in Year 2000

Passive Learning

slide-9
SLIDE 9

@PJSAMSON

Active Learning

“The studies analyzed here document that active learning leads to increases in examination performance that would raise average grades by a half a letter, and that failure rates under traditional lecturing increase by 55% over the rates

  • bserved under active learning.”

Freeman et al. (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics PNAS 2014 111 (23) 8410-8415

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Note Confusion Bookmark Slides Pose/Review Questions Take Notes Video Capture Screen Capture View ¡Slides ¡

Student View

  • Active

Learning Platform

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

@PJSAMSON

The Value of Anonymity in Inquiry

  • Q. When I have questions in class, I am

comfortable asking them verbally.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

@PJSAMSON

The Value of Anonymity in Inquiry

  • Q. When I have questions in class, I am

comfortable asking them verbally.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5

Female Male Avergae Questions/Student Number ¡of ¡ students ¡ 158 Number ¡of ¡ ques?ons ¡asked 413 Average ¡number ¡of ¡ ques?ons ¡per ¡ student 2.7

slide-14
SLIDE 14

@PJSAMSON

Justify Answers Answer Questions

Image- Base Questions

Optional: Require students to justify their selection.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Multiple Choice

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Image Quiz

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Learning ¡ Analy?cs ¡ Database ¡

Confusion ¡ Ques?ons ¡ Posed ¡ Ac?vity ¡ Answers ¡ ¡ Notes ¡ ALendance ¡ Bookmarks ¡ Lecture ¡ Capture ¡

Creating an Ecosystem

slide-18
SLIDE 18

¡ ¡

Learning ¡ Analy?cs ¡ Database ¡

Confusion ¡ Ques?ons ¡ Posed ¡ Ac?vity ¡ Answers ¡ ¡ Notes ¡ ALendance ¡ Bookmarks ¡ Lecture ¡ Capture ¡

Creating an Ecosystem

University ¡ db ¡

LMS ¡ SIS ¡ Other ¡ Vendors ¡

slide-19
SLIDE 19

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Number of Students In the classroom From my school residence From elsewhere Missing

slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Assume You Knew Everything Your Students Did as Part of Class

NOW WHAT?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

@PJSAMSON

Forecasting Student Success

Outcomes = b(background) + m(motivation) + p(participation) + l(life)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

@PJSAMSON

What Participation Affects Learning?

  • ALendance? ¡
  • Taking ¡Notes? ¡
  • Par?cipa?ng ¡in ¡Discussion? ¡
  • Inquiry? ¡
  • Answering ¡Ques?ons? ¡
  • Other? ¡
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Multiple Courses: Winter 2015

COURSE INSTRUCTOR SIZE MOVESCI ¡230

  • M. ¡Gross

103 AOSS ¡102

  • F. ¡Marsik

187

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Relationship

  • f Student

Motivation

  • vs. Grades

65 70 75 80 85 90

Low/Some Interest Medium Interest High Interest Truly Excited by

Exam Scores

Exam 1 Exam 2 Exam 3

slide-26
SLIDE 26

@PJSAMSON

Relationship of Attendance

  • vs. Grades

2 4 6 8 10 <70 70-80 80-90 >90

Classes Attended Exam 1 Grades

AOSS 102 MOVESCI 230

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Relationship of Reviewing Lecture Capture

  • vs. Grades

10 15 20 25 30 40 60 80 100 120 <70 70-80 80-90 >90

AOSS 102 MOVESCI 230 Exam 1 Grades

MOVESCI230 AOSS102

slide-28
SLIDE 28

@PJSAMSON

Relationship of Note Taking

  • vs. Grades

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 <70 70-80 80-90 >90

Notes Taken MOVESCI 230 Notes Taken AOSS102/AOSS105 Exam 1 Grades

AOSS 102 MOVESCI 230

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Relationship of Slide Viewing

  • vs. Grades

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 <70 70-80 80-90 >90

Slides Viewed Exam 1 Grades

AOSS 102 MOVESCI 230

slide-30
SLIDE 30

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

Exam #1 Score Incoming GPA

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Do High GPA Students behave Differently from Low GPA Students?

IS IT A DIFFERENCE IN COGNITIVE ABILITY

  • OR-

IS IT A DIFFERENCE IN MOTIVATION OR STUDY SKILLS?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

@PJSAMSON 5 10 15 20 25

<2.5 2.5-3.0 3.0-3.5 >3.5

Minutes of Lecture Capture Viewed per Class Incoming Grade Point Average

Successful Students Behave Differently

slide-33
SLIDE 33

2 4 6 8 10 12

<2.5 2.5-3.0 3.0-3.5 >3.5

Number of Classes Attended Incoming Grade Point Average

Attendance by itself is a poor predictor of student success.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

50 100 150 200 250 300 350

<2.5 2.5-3.0 3.0-3.5 >3.5

Number of Slides Viewed Incoming Grade Point Average

slide-35
SLIDE 35

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

<2.5 2.5-3.0 3.0-3.5 >3.5

Number of Notes Taken Incoming Grade Point Average

Low GPA students take five times fewer than high GPA students.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

@PJSAMSON

  • 1. Student exam scores are related to in-class participation

measured as slides viewed, notes taken and more. These terms should be valuable both for predictive analytics and as a basis for development of personalized feedback.

  • 2. Levels of student participation are related to students’

incoming grade point average. This supports the possibility that low grade point students lack motivation or study skills rather than cognitive ability.

Lessons Learned

slide-37
SLIDE 37

@PJSAMSON

Thank you

Blog: www.sageonstage.com Email: samson@umich.edu