Lessons from Haiti: Innovation in Lessons from Haiti: Innovation in - PDF document

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 Lessons from Haiti: Innovation in Lessons from Haiti: Innovation in Tracking and Housing Internally Tracking and Housing Internally Displaced Persons Displaced Persons Brookings Institution Washington, 13 th December 2012 IOM Haiti Mission 1

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 2

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX (DTM) Two complementary data gathering processes to determine the number of displaced; camps and IDP population profile. Both started in February 2010 and are still in use to track and monitor the displacement. REGISTRATION: CAMP BASED Detailed IDP ASSESSMENT Profiling How many? Who? Where? Results 3

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 How Many & Where? Camp Based Assessment How Many & Where? Camp Based Assessment How many & where? By July 2010: 1,5 million estimated in 1,555 IDP Sites (Camps) Phases of displacement tracking Phases of displacement tracking Registration Phase 4 Individual Assistance and De-registration Phase 3 Return and Referral Updating of Existing Registry Phase 2 Phase 1 Emergency Registration 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Quarter 2010 2011 2012 2013 Camp Based Assessments 4

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 Trends in IDP Sites and population Trends in IDP Sites and population 1,500,000 IDP population IDP population 1,370,000 1,069,000 * 810,000 680,000 635,000 595,000 551,000 516,000 519,000 491,000 420,000 390,000 369,000 359,000 JUL '10 SEP '10 NOV '10 JAN '11 MAR '11 MAY '11 JUL '11 SEP '11 NOV '11 JAN '12 FEB '12 APR '12 JUN '12 AUG '12 NOV '12 1,199 1,555 1,152 1,061 1,356 1,001 894 IDP Sites IDP Sites 802 758 707 660 602 575 541 498 Spontaneous return Organized return & camp closure JUL '10 SEP '10 NOV '10 JAN '11 MAR '11 MAY '11 JUL '11 SEP '11 NOV '11 JAN '12 FEB '12 APR '12 JUN '12 AUG '12 NOV '12 Timeline of post earthquake displacement in IDP sites Timeline of post earthquake displacement in IDP sites IDP population IDP population Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 1 Phase 2 1,360,319 IDPs 167,824 IDPs 53% F 47% M 52% F 48% M 321,235 HH 44,205 HH (47% CENSUS) (12% PH1) 1273 SITES 252 SITES 13 communes 8 communes • PH1 = 83% from Port au Prince & 17% from outside • PH1 = 85% from the same commune & 73% from the same section communale • PH2 2012= 63% from the same commune and 57% from the same section communale 5

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 Age and sex structure (1) Age and sex structure (1) Female R1 Female R1 M ale R1 M ale R1 M ale R1 M ale R2 201 M ale R2 201 M ale R2 201 2 2 2 60-64 60-64 60-64 60-64 60-64 60-64 Females Census EQAA Females Census EQAA 60-64 60-64 Female R1 Female R1 Female R1 Female R2 201 Female R2 201 Female R2 201 2 2 2 M ale R1 M ale R1 M ale R2 all M ale R2 all M ale R2 all M ale C PAP M ale C PAP M ale C PAP 50-54 50-54 50-54 Female C PAP Female C PAP Female C PAP M ales Census EQAA M ales Census EQAA Female R2 all Female R2 all Female R2 all 50-54 50-54 50-54 50-54 50-54 40-44 40-44 40-44 40-44 40-44 40-44 40-44 40-44 30-34 30-34 30-34 30-34 30-34 30-34 30-34 30-34 20-24 20-24 20-24 20-24 20-24 20-24 20-24 20-24 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 10-14 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 0-4 ‐ 10.0 ‐ 10.0 ‐ 5.0 ‐ 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 ‐ 10.0 ‐ 10.0 ‐ 10.0 ‐ 5.0 ‐ 5.0 ‐ 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 ‐ 10.0 ‐ 10.0 ‐ 10.0 ‐ 5.0 ‐ 5.0 ‐ 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Average age IDPs 24 23 & 24 in 2010 2011 and 2012 Average age HoH 38 37 & 36 in 2010 2011 and 2012 Dependency Ratio 49 in 2010 & 43 in 2012 Sex Ratio 87 93 & 94 in 2010 2011 and 2012 Who heads the household? Who heads the household? Single male headed HH, from 16% to 23% in 2012 Average HH size from 4.2 to 3.4 in 2012 Average N of children <15 yrs per HH from 1.3 to 1 in 2012 Average N <15 yrs per HH Who heads the Household 2010 2011 2012 Couple headed HH 1.6 1.5 1.4 Female headed HH 1.1 1.1 1.0 Male headed HH 0.8 0.6 0.4 Average HH size Who heads the Household 2010 2011 2012 Couple headed HH 4.6 4.3 4.0 Female headed HH 4.0 3.8 3.3 Male headed HH 3.6 3.2 2.6 6

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 Education Education 8% Males & 56% Male & 12% Females 53% Females % Females % Males 34.5 In school 36.2 12.3 8.0 Not in school Drop out 53.3 55.8 NER = 45.2 NER drops from 83 in Primary to 23 in Junior Secondary and to 15 in Senior Secondary DHS 2012 79 Primary NER in camps Occupation Occupation 66% Females Males 50.9 24.6 30.1 56.8 Unemployment rate Each working IDP 18.5 supports 2.3 19.0 non working IDPs Unemployed Not in the workforce Employed 54% unskilled workforce and informal occupation 28% skilled workforce (artisans / crafts and skilled manual workers) 4% Drivers and machine operators & technicians (non manual workers ) 7

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 Ownership status Ownership status 120% Tenants 2010 Tenants 2012 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% % of tenants from 64% to 86% Owners who can repair from 20% to 6% Summary findings Summary findings • Over time older IDPs and children returned home and camps now show a population of young adults and increasing age of the head of households • The ratio of females is decreasing • The size of household is decreasing • Most IDPs own identification documents, fewer in 2012 than in 2010 • Primary NER is similar to the value in the neighborhood • Unemployment and unskilled labor are predominant • Most owners, especially those who could repair their homes, left and the proportion of tenants is increasing 8

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 Phase 3: Return and Referral IOM projects 2011/12 Phase 3: Return and Referral IOM projects 2011/12 Targeted = 11,797 Returned = 11,736 Still in camps = 61 Phase 3: Return and Referral IOM & partners (*) in 2012 Phase 3: Return and Referral IOM & partners (*) in 2012 20.7% 17.3% 62.0% Done / in process Planned Gap (*) JP/HRO – IFRC – Concern WW- CRS – WVI – ACTED- CARE- GOAL - HELPAGE - MOFKA 9

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 Methods, technology & innovation DTM Methodology – – Data Collection Instruments Data Collection Instruments DTM Methodology Registration Form Household & Individuals IDP Site details Assessment Form Household Registration Card SN Database (SQL) (*) JP/HRO – IFRC - ??????? 10

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 DTM Methodology – – GIS & Mapping GIS & Mapping DTM Methodology Points and polygons of the IDP Sites Street network Neighborhoods of Port au Price IOM GIS Unit data sources - Field surveyors - Satellite imagery - Cooperation with open source community - National Center for geospatial information DTM Methodology – – GIS & Mapping GIS & Mapping – – Aerial photo 1 Aerial photo 1 DTM Methodology 11

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 DTM Methodology – – GIS & Mapping GIS & Mapping – – Aerial photo 2 Aerial photo 2 DTM Methodology DTM Methodology – – Registering Returnees from camp and Registering Returnees from camp and DTM Methodology follow up (Blackberry & android application) follow up (Blackberry & android application) Data Data Processing for Generate questionnaire form and Data Data Processing for Generate questionnaire form and Collection output/reporting convert it to Blackberry Application. Collection output/reporting convert it to Blackberry Application. Text, Text, GPS number, GPS number, information Image Data information Image Data Establish table in SQL Server and Establish table in SQL Server and connection for Web Service in web server connection for Web Service in web server Retrieving and Retrieving and Sending Data Sending Data (Synchronize with (Synchronize with server) server) INTERNET (Encrypted Data) 12

Presentation v2_121212 Brookings final IOM DTM v2 short 25 Thank you Thank you Camera for aerial photo IOM DTM team in Haiti 13