LCM 2007 Presentation Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
lcm 2007 presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

LCM 2007 Presentation Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 09, 2023 249 likes •438 views

LCM 2007 Presentation Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal Case Study on Rajesh Metal Crafts Ltd. Jeetpur, Bara (Iron Pipe Industry) Govinda Prasad Kharel From the Least Developed Country (LDC) Nepal Life Cycle

slide-1
SLIDE 1

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 1 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

Govinda Prasad Kharel From the Least Developed Country (LDC) Nepal Life Cycle Management (LCM) Industrial Ecology and Environment

LCM 2007 Presentation

Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal

Case Study on Rajesh Metal Crafts Ltd. Jeetpur, Bara (Iron Pipe Industry)

Zinc Dust Collector

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 2 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

Presentation Outline

1. Introduction 2. Eco-efficiency 3. Study Objectives 4. General Methodology 5. Results and Comparisons 6. Conclusion and Recommendations 7. Concluding Remarks

Hot Rolled Sheets GI Pipe

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 3 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

  • 1. Introduction (Scope of the Study)

Study Are Study Area of Iron P

  • f Iron Pipe

pe Industry Industry Study a re a : Ce ntra l De ve lopme nt Re g ion (CDR), Na ra ya ni zone , Ba ra Distric t Southe rn pa rt of Ne pa l, Ne a r to the Northe rn borde r of India .

I N D I A I N D I A C H I N A

N

Study sc ope d to e valuate e c o- e ffic ie nc y indic a tor s in pr

  • pose d site :

1. Ma nufa c turing mild ste e l blac k pipe a nd ga lva nize d iron pipe

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 4 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

  • 1. Introduction
  • Infrastructural

development of country

  • Conventional technologies,

age old practice

  • Contributing factor for

economic development and environmental pollution

  • Eco-efficiency and LCM not

yet implemented

  • Boundary setting of

production processes

Rajesh Metal (Iron Pipe Industry) Black Pipe

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 5 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

  • 2. Eco-efficiency

(WBCSD, 1991)

World Business Council for Sustainable Development states (1991),

  • Delivery of competitively

priced goods

  • Bring quality of life
  • Reducing ecological

impacts and resource intensity in line with the earth’s carrying capacity

  • Main theme is producing

more with less

ECO ECONOMY ECOLOGY

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 6 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

Slitting F r

  • m HR She e ts

Slitting L

  • ade d in T

ube Mill High F r e que nc y E RW We lding Contour e d the T ubing F

  • r

ming or Contour ing Bur r ing Hydr

  • T

e sting Ga lva nizing T hr e ad Cutting

Manufacturing Processes of Iron Pipe Industry (Rajesh Metal Crafts Ltd.)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 7 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

  • 3. Study Objectives
  • 1. Coupling Environmental

Improvements and Economic Excellence

  • 2. Eco-innovation and

Exploring further creation Evaluation of Eco-efficiency Quantitative Analysis Using Conversion Factors 1.Energy Intensity (GJ) 2.Material Consumption (T) 3.Water Use (m3) 4.Waste Generation (T) 5.CO2 Gas Emission (T of CO2 eq.) 6.Sales Revenue (US$)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 8 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

∑

= r t t n

E SR

1

) CF x E ... .......... CF x E CF x (E

r nr 2 n2 1 1 n

+ +

n

SR

  • 1. EEn =

=

∑

= r t t n

M SR

1

) CF x M ... .......... CF x M CF x (M

r nr 2 n2 1 n1

+ +

n

SR

  • 2. EEn =

= ∑

= r t t n

W SR

1

) W ... .......... W (W

nr n2 n1

+ +

n

SR

  • 3. EEn =

=

∑

= r t n

Wst SR

1

) Ws ... .......... Ws (Ws

nr n2 n1

+ +

n

SR

  • 4. EEn =

=

∑

= r t t n

CO SR

1 2)

(

) CF x E ... .......... CF x E CF x (E

r nr 2 n2 1 n1

+ +

n

SR

  • 5. EEn =

=

E c o- e ffic ie nc y = Pr

  • duc tion Va lue in US$

E nvir

  • nme ntal Influe nc e s
  • 4. General Methodology
slide-9
SLIDE 9

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 9 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

E nerg y E co- efficiency Indica tor of Iron Pipe Industry $ 8 6 6 1 $ 9 4 1 6 $ 9 0 4 8 $ 8 2 6 3 $ 1 1 6 3 1 1 3 8 2 6 G J 7 7 1 8 G J 1 2 1 3 2 G J 1 4 5 1 3 G J 7 8 4 2 G J 1112 $/ GJ 681 $/ GJ 746 $/ GJ 1054 $/ GJ 801 $/ GJ 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000

$ or GJ

Ene rg y Utilize d (G J) a nd Pro d uc tio n ($ )

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 $/ GJ E c o-e ffic ie nc y in $/ GJ E c o-e ffic ie nc y Tre nd L ine in $/ GJ

Production in (US$, 000) 8661 9416 9048 8263 11631 E nerg y Utilized (GJ) 7718.682 13825.825 12132.233 7841.667 14513.142 E co- efficiency in $/ GJ 1112 681 746 1054 801 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • 5. Results
slide-10
SLIDE 10

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 10 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

Ma ter ia l E c o- effic ienc y I ndic a tor

  • f I

r

  • n Pipe I

ndustr y $8661 $9416 $9048 $8263 $11631 18000 T 11834 T 19021 T 23771 T 23086 T 646 $/ T 698 $/ T 475 $/ T 396 $/ T 375 $/ T 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000

$ o r T

Ma te ria lUtilize d (T ) a nd Produc tion Va lue ($)

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 $/ T E c o -e ffic ie nc y in $/ T E c o -e ffic ie nc y Tre nd L ine in $/ T

Pr

  • duc tion in (US$,000)

8661 9416 9048 8263 11631 Ma ter ia l Utilized (T ) 23086 23771 19021 11834 18000 E c o- effic ienc y in $/ T 375 396 475 698 646 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • 5. Results
slide-11
SLIDE 11

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 11 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

Wa ter E c o- effic ienc y Indic a tor

  • f Ir
  • n Pipe I

ndustr y $8661 $9416 $9048 $8263 $11631 861 m 3 792 m 3 1365 m 3 1815 m 3 1911 m 3 13509 $/ m 3 10434 $/ m 3 6628 $/ m 3 5188 $/ m 3 4532 $/ m 3 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

$ o r m3

Wa te r Utilize d (m 3) a nd Prod uc tion (US$)

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 $/ m3 E c o -e ffic ie nc y in $/ m3 E c o -e ffic ie nc y Tre nd L ine in $/ m3

Pr

  • duc tion in (US$, 000)

8661 9416 9048 8263 11631 Wa ter Utilized (m 3) 1911 1815 1365 792 861 E c o- effic ienc y in $/ m 3 4532 5188 6628 10434 13509 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • 5. Results
slide-12
SLIDE 12

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 12 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

Wa ste E c o- effic ienc y I ndic a tor

  • f I

r

  • n Pipe I

ndustr y $11631 $8263 $9048 $9416 $8661 422.18 T 294 T 498 T 675.4 T 795.4 T 10889 $/ T 13941 $/ T 18168 $/ T 28108 $/ T 27550 $/ T 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

$ o r T

Wa ste G e ne r a tion (T ) a nd Produc tion ($)

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 $/ T E c o -e ffic ie nc y in $/ T E c o -e ffic ie nc y Tre nd L ine in $/ T

Pr

  • duc tion in (US$, 000)

8661 9416 9048 8263 11631 Wa ste Gener a tion (T ) 795.4 675.4 498 294 422.18 E c o- effic ienc y in $/ T 10889 13941 18168 28108 27550 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • 5. Results
slide-13
SLIDE 13

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 13 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

CO2 Emission Ec o-effic ienc y Indic a tor Of Iron Pipe Industry $8661 $9416 $9048 $8263 $11631 279 T CO2 749 T CO2 689 T CO2 453 T CO2 890 T CO2 31042 $/ T CO2 12571 $/ T CO2 13132 $/ T CO2 18242 $/ T CO2 13068 $/ T CO2 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

T o r T CO2

CO2 Emission (T CO2) a nd Pr

  • duc tion ($)

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000

$/ T CO2

Ec o- e ffic ie nc y in $/ T CO2 Ec o- e ffic ie nc y T re nd L ine in $/ T CO2

Produc tion in (US$, 000) 8661 9416 9048 8263 11631 CO2 Emission (T CO2) 279 749 689 453 890 Ec o-effic ienc y in $/ T CO2 31042 12571 13132 18242 13068 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

  • 5. Results
slide-14
SLIDE 14

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 14 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

Environmental Influences Unit 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Average (2001- 2005) Comparison (2001 and 2005)

Production Capacity Tone 36000 57000 57000 57000 57000 Actual Production Tone 22244 22682 18200 11309 17188 Capacity Utilization % 62 % 40 % 32 % 20 % 30 % Energy Eco- efficiency $/GJ 1112 681 746 1054 801 879 28 % (↓) Material Eco- efficiency $/T 375 396 475 698 646 518 72 % (↑) Water EE $/m3 4532 5188 6628 10434 13509 8058 198 % (↑) Waste Generation EE $/T 10889 13941 18168 28108 27550 19731 153 % (↑) CO2 Emission EE $/T CO2 31042 12571 13132 18242 13068 17611 58 % (↓)

  • 5. Results: Summary of Overall Eco-efficiency of Iron

Pipe Industry (BENCH MARK)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 15 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

E c o- e ffic ie nc y of Ir

  • n Pipe Industr

y (In E c onom ic T e r m ) 801 $/ GJ 1054 $/ GJ 746 $/ GJ 681 $/ G J 1112 $/ G J 375 $/ T 396 $/ T 475 $/ T 698 $/ T 646 $/ T 13509 $/ m 3 10434 $/ m 3 6628 $/ m 3 5188 $/ m 3 4532 $/ m 3 27550 $/ T 28108 $/ T 18168 $/ T 13941 $/ T 10889 $/ T 31042 $/ T CO 2 13068 $/ T CO2 12571 $/ T CO 2 13132 $/ T CO2 18242

1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Energ y intensity ($/ GJ) Ma teria l Consumption ($/ T ) Wa ter Use ($/ m3) Wa ste Genera tion ($/ T ) CO2 Emission ($/ T CO2)

  • 5. Results & Comparison of Eco-efficiency)
slide-16
SLIDE 16

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 16 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

E c o- e ffic ie nc y of Ir

  • n Pipe Industr

y (In Physic al Unit)

2.88 T / G J 1.64 T / G J 1.5 T / G J 1.44 T / G J 1.18 T / G J 0.963 T / T 0.954 T / T 0.957 T / T 0.955 T / T 0.954 T / T 11.64 T / m3 12.5 T / m3 13.33 T / m3 14.28 T / m3 20 T / m3 28 T / T 33.6 T / T 36.55 T / T 38.5 T / T 40.71 T / T 19 T

  • f CO 2

80 T / T

  • f CO 2

30 T

  • f CO 2

26 T

  • f CO 2

25 T

  • f CO 2

0.1 1 10 100 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

E ne rg y E c o -e ffic ie nc y (T/ GJ) Mte ria l E c o -e ffic ie nc y (T/ T) Wa te r E c o -e ffic ie nc y (T/ m3) Wa ste E c o -e ffic ie nc y (T/ T) CO2 E c o -e ffic ie nc y (T/ T o f CO2)

  • 5. Results & Comparison of Eco-efficiency)
slide-17
SLIDE 17

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 17 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

  • 6. Conclusion and recommendations
  • Compare each year’s

environmental influences and sustainability oriented decision making

  • Inte g r

a te e c onomic va lue with e nvir

  • nme nta l influe nc e s
  • Provide ta ng ible fe e dba c k to

a lte r r e sour c e s input

  • E

c o- e ffic ie nc y is sig nific a nt appr

  • ac h for

e nsur ing L CM, Industr ia l E c olog y a nd Susta ina ble De ve lopme nt

Stimulating Findings

  • Industr

y ma y c r e a te CO 2 e mission inve ntory (Kyoto Protoc ol, 1997)

  • Govt. c a n br

ing c a r bon- ta x polic y F ur the r r e se ar c h and E c o- e ffic ie nc y of:

  • He a vy me ta ls into wa te r
  • Dioxins and F

ur ans

  • (Other GHGs) N2O, SO 2, CH4
  • Re plic a te d to othe r

industr ie s

  • Stipula te in Industria l Polic y of Ne pa l

1. Iron Pipe Industry is progressively improving eco-efficiency

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CO- EFFICIENCY Kharel 18 "Evaluation of Eco-efficiency of Iron and Steel Industries in Nepal" KHAREL, Abstract No. 114 (August 27-29, 2007)

  • 7. Concluding Remarks and Acknowledgements

Sincere Thanks and obliged to:

  • 3rd International Life cycle Management (LCM 2007

Conference Organizing Committee)

  • University of Zurich, ETH (Swiss Federal

Institute of Technology)

  • Chairwoman, All Professors, Organizer, Co-
  • rganizer, Donors, Sponsors, and all other Staff
  • Industry owners, technical experts, and staff