Lattice calculations
&
DiRAC facility
Matthew Wingate DAMTP , University of Cambridge PPAP Community Meeting, 20-21 July 2017
Lattice calculations & DiRAC facility Matthew Wingate DAMTP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Lattice calculations & DiRAC facility Matthew Wingate DAMTP , University of Cambridge PPAP Community Meeting, 20-21 July 2017 DiRAC Outline Overview Selected physics highlights Flavour physics Muon magnetic moment QCD
Matthew Wingate DAMTP , University of Cambridge PPAP Community Meeting, 20-21 July 2017
2
to turn a quantum physics problem into a statistical physics problem
glue + sea of quark-antiquark bubbles
methods: importance sampling & correlation functions
has a diverging condition number as amq ➙ 0 (vanishing lattice spacing × light quark mass)
3
Image credit: CIA World Factbook
international collaborations (e.g. HPQCD, RBC-UKQCD, HadSpec, QCDSF, FastSum)
flavour, hadron spectrum, hot/ dense QCD; BSM theories of EWSB, dark matter
Belle, JLab, J-PARC, FAIR, RHIC, NA62
4
Apologies for all the interesting work not mentioned here due to time.
6 CKM Fitter
Vud Vus Vub Vcd Vcs Vcb Vtd Vts Vtb CKM matrix
Bc → J/ `⌫ B0
(s) − ¯
B0
(s)
D → ⇡`⌫ K → ⇡`⌫ B(s) → D(∗)
(s)`⌫
B → ⇡`⌫ D → K`⌫
u d′ W + e+ νe
1 − λ2/2 λ Aλ3(ρ − iη) −λ 1 − λ2/2 Aλ2 Aλ3(1 − ρ − iη) −Aλ2 1 + O(λ4)
=
tree
7
B → D∗`⌫ PRELIMINARY
Harrison et al, (HPQCD), in preparation
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 DECAY CONSTANT [GeV] π ψ ηc ψ φ Υ ηb Υ Bc B
c
Bs B
s
B B Ds D
s
D K Experiment : weak decays : em decays Lattice QCD : predictions : postdictions
Colquhoun et al., (HPQCD), arXiv:1503.05762
Bc → J/ `⌫
Boyle et al, (RBC-UKQCD), arXiv:1701.02644
Decay constants
Weak (or EM) annihilation
Form factors
Weak decay zero recoil
hD∗(k)|Jµ|B(p)i h0QCD|Jµ|Hi
8
1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 E 2
[GeV2 ]1.10 1.30 1.50 1.70 fV PRELIMINARY 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 E 2
[GeV2 ]1.10 1.30 1.50 1.70 fA0 PRELIMINARY 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 E 2
[GeV2 ]0.48 0.54 0.60 0.66 fA1 PRELIMINARY 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 E 2
[GeV2 ]0.26 0.30 0.34 0.38 fA12 PRELIMINARY 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 E 2
[GeV2 ]0.85 1.00 1.15 1.30 fT1 PRELIMINARY 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 E 2
[GeV2 ]0.46 0.50 0.54 0.58 0.62 fT2 PRELIMINARY 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.0 E 2
[GeV2 ]0.75 0.85 0.95 1.05 fT23 PRELIMINARY aml =0.008 aml =0.006 aml =0.004 aml =0.010 aml =0.005
Flynn et al, (RBC-UKQCD), arXiv:1612.05112(C)
Bs → `+`−
s W W t ν ℓ ℓ b
t W γ, Z s b
Also rare K decays
K → π l l : Christ et al., (RBC-UKQCD), arXiv:1608.07585 K → π νν : Bai et al., (RBC-UKQCD), arXiv:1701.02858
Flavour changing neutral decays
B → K∗`+`− Bs → `+`−
Horgan et al., (HPQCD) arXiv:1310.3722, arXiv:1310.3887
penguin box
9 Blum et al., arXiv:1311.2198 SM theory Expt
.
Value (× 10−11) units QED ( + `) 116 584 718.951 ± 0.009 ± 0.019 ± 0.007 ± 0.077α HVP(lo) [20] 6 923 ± 42 HVP(lo) [21] 6 949 ± 43 HVP(ho) [21] −98.4 ± 0.7 HLbL 105 ± 26 EW 154 ± 1 Total SM [20] 116 591 802 ± 42H-LO ± 26H-HO ± 2other (±49tot) Total SM [21] 116 591 828 ± 43H-LO ± 26H-HO ± 2other (±50tot)
Standard model contributions Hadron Vacuum Polarization (HVP) Hadronic Light-by-Light scattering (HLbL) aµ = 1
2(g − 2)muon
10
−0.0001 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004 0.0005 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 δV Πu(Q2) ˆ Q2/
2
Isospin breaking effects [exploratory study]
Chakraborty et al., (HPQCD), arXiv:1601.03071
640 650 660 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 aHVP,LO
µ
× 1010 no new physics Jegerlehner 1511.04473 Benayoun et al 1507.02943 Hagiwara et al 1105.3149 Jegerlehner et al 1101.2872 ETMC 1308.4327 HPQCD this paper
Lattice Expt R ratio
HVP in SM + first LQCD efforts to estimate HLbL and quark-disconnected contributions.
Boyle et al, (RBC-UKQCD), arXiv:1706.05293 Isospin breaking
Aim for 1% precision in lattice HVP in the next couple years
quantum numbers; some are charged)
lighter than expected from quark model
distinguishing bound states and determining scattering properties
structure, then control systematic errors
11
12 Cheung et al. (HadSpec), arXiv:1610.01073
Green ( ): Good overlap w/ operators Red ( ) & blue ( ): Hybrid mesons; Black ( ): Expt mπ ≈ 240 MeV as ≈ 0.12 fm as at ≈ 3.5
Exotics
q¯ q
energy levels
scattering amplitude
exploring new, sophisticated methods
control systematic uncertainties
13
Dπ → Dπ Ds ¯ K → Ds ¯ K Dη → Dη Dπ → Dη Dη → Ds ¯ K Dπ → Ds ¯ K mπ = 391 MeV
Moir et al. (HadSpec), arXiv:1607.07093
— 3 coupled channels!
I = 3 2
facility for particle & nuclear physics, cosmology, & theoretical astrophysics. Recurrent costs funded by STFC
coupled clusters with various levels of interconnectivity, memory, and fast I/O (Cambridge, Durham, Leicester)
15
20/7/2017)
35,365 citations (as of 20/7/2017)
exoplanets, MHD, particle pheno, nuclear physics
16
DiRAC-2 x10
17
DiRAC&3((2016/17(–(TBC)(
Extreme Scaling Data Intensive
Memory Intensive
Data Management
Internet Analytics
Many-Core Coding Data Analytics Programming
Fine Tuning Parallel Management Multi-threading
Disaster Recovery
Data Handling Archiving Tightly(coupled( compute(&(storage:( confronta7on(of( complex(simula7ons( with(large(data(sets!! Maximal( computa7onal( effort(applied( to(a(problem(of( fixed(size( Larger(memory(footprint(per(node:(problem( size(grows(with(increasing(machine(power((
and electricity
research and HPC training impact with PDRA and PhD support (Big Data CDTs)
e‑Infrastructure roadmap
18
2011/12 2018/19
2016/17 DiRAC 2.5 2017 DiRAC 2.5x Stop-gap funding:
access to Sandybridge system
0.5 Pflop/s KNL service
cores
19
After £1.67M capital injection
nodes (1-6 TB); NVMe storage for data intensive workflows
20
June 2017: £9M capital funding (BEIS), lifeline to DiRAC3:
21
G Aarts (Swansea) C Allton (Swansea) C Bouchard (Glasgow) P Boyle (Edinburgh) C Davies (Glasgow) L Del Debbio (Edinburgh) J Flynn (Southampton) S Hands (Swansea) R Horgan (Cambridge) R Horsley (Edinburgh) A Jüttner (Southampton) T Kennedy (Edinburgh) R Kenway (Edinburgh) K Langfeld (Liverpool) B Lucini (Swansea) C McNeile (Plymouth) Project Board Chair: D Sijacki (Cambridge) Project Board Co-chair: S Hands (Swansea) Director: M Wilkinson* (Leicester) Technical Director: P Boyle (Edinburgh) Project Scientist: C Jenner (UCL) Technical Manager: J Yates (UCL) A Patella (Plymouth) B Pendleton (Edinburgh) A Rago (Plymouth) P Rakow (Liverpool) C Sachrajda (Southampton) M Teper (Oxford) C Thomas (Cambridge) M Wingate (Cambridge) + PDRAs & PhD students
DiRAC UKQCD
* Thanks to Mark Wilkinson for contributing to DiRAC slides presented here.
impact in addressing STFC’s key scientific challenges
internationally competitive
refreshing capital resources
22