Latino Health Riverside Greer Sullivan & Mary Figueroa Latino - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

latino health riverside
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Latino Health Riverside Greer Sullivan & Mary Figueroa Latino - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Latino Health Riverside Greer Sullivan & Mary Figueroa Latino Health Riverside Project was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Award (1289) Latino Health Riverside Goals


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Latino Health Riverside

Greer Sullivan & Mary Figueroa

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Latino Health Riverside Project was funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Eugene Washington PCORI Engagement Award (1289)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Latino Health Riverside

Goals

  • Engage 3 predominantly Latino neighborhoods in

Riverside

  • Identify communities' health priorities
  • Build capacity for community engaged research
  • Community members
  • CBO’s
  • Academics

Situation

  • No minority owned CBO focusing on health
  • Very little prior community discussion about health
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Riverside, California

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Latino Health Riverside Steering Committee

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

In Home Meetings

  • Community representatives identified host

families

  • We supplied invitations and meals
  • We prepared a series of questions as

facilitation

  • Anthropologist took notes
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Four Priority Areas

  • Access to care
  • Management of chronic health condition
  • Neighborhood safety
  • MENTAL HEALTH
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Modified Deliberative Democracy

Kettering Model

Which is more important?

  • Preventing mental illness or improving treatment for

those who already have a mental health problem?

  • Addressing mental health among children (young

adults) or adults (and seniors)?

  • Encouraging service use by providing community

education about mental health and stigma or linking to services?

  • Improving existing services or offer more services

in community?

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank you!

  • Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
  • Mike Pazzani, Vice Chancellor for Research and Economic

Development, UC Riverside

  • In- Home Meetings host families
  • UC Riverside Participants: Christina Reaves, Ann Cheney,

Juliet McMullin, Rita Rodriguez, Michelle Jaramillo

  • MPH Student (University of Washington): Alejandra Cabral
  • Parkview Community Hospital and neighborhood community

centers

  • Community Based Organization Partners:
  • Casa Blanca Home of Neighborly Services
  • Arlington Temporary Assistance
  • Community Settlement Association
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Steering Committee

  • Patricia Cano
  • Carmen Martinez
  • Darlene DeBayona
  • Morris Mendoza
  • Suzanna Medina
  • Andrea Nieto
  • William Leon
  • Hurnan Vongsachang
  • Katherine Tsai
  • Araceli Damian
  • Jocelyn Guerrero-

Cardenas

  • Joey Abadilla
  • Gloria Perez
  • Mary Alvarez
  • Michelle Anguiano
  • Eldaa Rivera
  • LuAnna Jauergui
  • Diana Alvarez
  • Marci Aguirre
  • Lily Gallegos
  • Sylvia Aguirre-Aguilar
  • Carlos Fernandez
  • Greer Sullivan
  • Ann Cheney
  • Christina Reaves
  • Mary Figueroa
  • Alejandra Cabral
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Deliberative Democracy Kettering Model

  • Name the issue
  • Frame the issue
  • Prepare issue book
  • Facilitate deliberation
  • Find common ground
  • Invite participants to be part of the solution
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Comparing Focus Groups and Deliberative Forums

  • Inductive analysis: similar themes
  • Deductive analysis:

− Forum participants more tuned to

  • Structural inequalities
  • Structural solutions
  • Community initiated solutions

− Forum participants expressed more hopelessness − Activation

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Comparing Public Deliberation Methods

Sites: Chicago, Sacramento, Durham, Silver Spring Participants: 1774 recruited (about 75% show rate) 55% women, 45% college, 90% white, 12% >65y/o Design: Five arm RCT comparing

  • Four Deliberative methods
  • Reading materials only

Topic: “Should individual patients or their doctors be able to make any health decisions no matter what the evidence of medical effectiveness shows, or should society specify some boundaries for these decisions?” Outcomes: Knowledge about medical evidence Attitudes about using evidence in medical decision- making

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Comparing Deliberative Methods: Results

  • Deliberation increased knowledge and shifted attitudes

(deliberation vs. RMO)

  • All methods changed either knowledge or one attitude

measure

  • Citizens Panel and Brief Citizens Deliberation were

superior in increasing knowledge

  • Citizens Panel most effective in changing attitudes
  • “”Public deliberation may be particularly useful for

healthcare issues where members have limited knowledge yet hold strong beliefs.”

  • Participant activation??