L ogic of resources and capabilities Apostolos Tzimoulis joint work - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

l ogic of resources and capabilities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

L ogic of resources and capabilities Apostolos Tzimoulis joint work - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

L ogic of resources and capabilities Apostolos Tzimoulis joint work with Marta Blkov, Giuseppe Greco, Alessandra Palmigiano and Nachoem Wijnberg TACL 2017 - Prague M otivation Organizations are social units of agents structured and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Logic of resources and capabilities

Apostolos Tzimoulis

joint work with Marta Bílková, Giuseppe Greco, Alessandra Palmigiano and Nachoem Wijnberg

TACL 2017 - Prague

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation

◮ Organizations are social units of agents structured and

managed to meet a need, or pursue collective goals.

◮ Competitive advantage lends itself to be explained terms of

agency, knowledge, goals, capabilities and inter-agent coordination.

◮ Resource-based view: Central role in determining the

success of an organization is played by the acquisition, management, and transformation of resources within that

  • rganization.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Main features

◮ STIT-logic approach of capabilities captured via modalities

and use of resources and their manipulation to provide a concrete handle on the notion of capabilities.

◮ Constructive character guarantees that each theorem

translates into an effective procedure.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Language

α ::= a ∈ AtRes | 1 | 0 | α · α | α ⊔ α | α ⊓ α, A ::= p ∈ AtProp | ⊤ | ⊥ | A ∨ A | A ∧ A | A → A | α ⊲ A | A | α | α ⊲α.

◮ A: ‘the agent is able to bring about state of affairs A’ ◮ α: ‘the agent is in possession of resource α’ ◮ α ⊲ A: ‘whenever resource α is in possession of the agent,

using α the agent is capable to bring about A’

◮ α ⊲β: ‘the agent is capable of getting β from α, whenever in

possession of α’

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The logic of resources and capabilities

Axiom schemas for and

D1.

(A ∨ B) ↔ A ∨ B

D3.

(α ⊔ β) ↔ α ∨ β

D2.

⊥ ↔ ⊥

D4.

0 ↔ ⊥

Axiom schemas for ⊲ and ⊲

B1.

(α ⊔ β) ⊲ A ↔ α ⊲ A ∧ β ⊲ A

B4.

(α ⊔ β) ⊲γ ↔ α ⊲γ ∧ β ⊲γ

B2.

0 ⊲ A

B5.

0 ⊲α

B3.

α ⊲ β ⊲ A → α · β ⊲ A

B6.

α ⊲(β ⊓ γ) ↔ α ⊲β ∧ α ⊲γ

B7.

α ⊲1

Interaction axiom schemas

BD1.

α ∧ α ⊲ A → A

BD2.

α ⊲β → α ⊲ β

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The logic of resources and capabilities

Pure-resource entailments schemas R1.

⊔ and ⊓ are commutative, associative, idempotent,

and distribute over each other; R2.

· is associative with unit 1;

R3.

α ⊢ 1 and 0 ⊢ α

R4.

α · (β ⊔ γ) ⊢ (α · β) ⊔ (α · γ) and (β ⊔ γ) · α ⊢ (β · α) ⊔ (γ · α).

and closed under modus ponens, uniform substitution and the following rules:

α ⊢ β α · γ ⊢ β · γ A ⊢ B α ⊲ A ⊢ α ⊲ B A ⊢ B A ⊢ B α ⊢ β γ ⊲α ⊢ γ ⊲β α ⊢ β γ · α ⊢ γ · β α ⊢ β β ⊲ A ⊢ α ⊲ A α ⊢ β α ⊢ β α ⊢ β β ⊲γ ⊢ α ⊲γ

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Completeness, canonicity and disjunction property

Heterogeneous LRC-algebras are tuples of the form

F = (A, Q, ⊲ , , ⊲, )

where

◮ A is a Heyting algebra, ◮ Q = (Q, ⊔, ⊓, ·, 0, 1) is a bounded distributive lattice with binary

join-preserving operator · with unit 1.

◮ ⊲ : Q × A → A, : A → A, ⊲ : Q × Q → A, : Q → A. ◮ Lindenbaum-Tarski argument guarantees completeness ◮ Standard argument guarantees disjunction property

Theorem

The axioms of LRC are canonical. Hence, for every heterogenerous LRC-algebra F, its canonical extension Fδ is a perfect LRC-algebra. Hence, the logic LRC is complete w.r.t. the class of perfect LRC-algebras.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Display-style calculus

Structural and operational symbols for pure Res-connectives:

Str.

⊙ , ⋗ ⋖ ⊐ (⊏)

Op.

· ⊓ ⊔ (·\) (/

·)

(⊔\) (⊓\) (/

⊔)

(/

⊓)

Structural and operational symbols for the modal operators:

Str.

Op.

Structural and operational symbols for the adjoints and residuals of the modal operators:

Str.

Op.

() (◮) () () (◮)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Introduction rules

Γ ⊢ α A ⊢ X ⊲ L α ⊲ A ⊢ Γ ✶ X X ⊢ α ✶ A ⊲ R X ⊢ α ⊲ A Γ ⊢ α β ⊢ ∆ ⊲ L α ⊲α ⊢ Γ ✶ ∆ Γ ⊢ α ✶ α ⊲R Γ ⊢ α ⊲α

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rules corresponding to axioms

Γ ⊢ (Y ❛ ∆) , (Z ❛ ∆)

B4

Γ ⊢ (Y ; Z) ❛ ∆ Γ ⊢ (Y ❛ W) , (Z ❛ W)

B1

Γ ⊢ (Y ; Z) ❛ W (Γ ❛X) , (Γ ❛Y) ⊢ ∆

B6

Γ ❛(X ; Y) ⊢ ∆ X ⊢ Γ ✶ (∆ ✶ Y)

B3

X ⊢ Γ ⊙ ∆ ✶ Y X ⊢ Γ ✶

  • Y BD1

X ⊢ ◦Γ > Y X ⊢ Γ ✶

  • Y BD2

X ⊢ Γ ✶ Y

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Display rules ... but

  • X ⊢ Y

X ⊢ •Y

  • Γ ⊢ X

Γ ⊢ •X X ⊢ Γ ✶ Y Γ ⊢ X ❛ Y X ⊢ Γ ✶ ∆ Γ ❛X ⊢ ∆ X ⊢ Γ ✶ ∆ Γ ⊢ X ❛ ∆

Notice the argument of the second coordinate of ⊲ cannot be displayed

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Cut rules

(X ⊢ Y)[A]succ A ⊢ Z (X ⊢ Y)[Z/A]succ Γ ⊢ α α ⊢ ∆ Γ ⊢ ∆

Canonical Cut-elimination and subformula property

Follow from a general meta-theorem.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Homework correction

Capabilities initial state planning

α ⊲cPα β ⊲cPβ cα Mβ → cβ α ⊲dMα β ⊲dMβ dβ Pα → dα X ⊢ Y

Exi ◦iX ⊢ Y

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The wisdom of the crow

Σ ⊙ Σ ⊢ Ω Σ ⊢ Ω (Γ ❛X) ⊙ (Π ❛Y) ⊢ ∆ (Γ ⊙ Π) ❛(X ; Y) ⊢ ∆ (Γ ❛X) ❛Y ⊢ ∆ Γ ❛(X ; Y) ⊢ ∆

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The gift of the magi

1σ ∧ 2ξ ∧ [σ, ξ] ⊲χ → 2χ,

which is equivalent on perfect LRC-algebras to the following analytic rule:

  • ◦2[Σ, Ξ] ❛X ⊢ Y RR
  • 1Σ ; ◦2Ξ ; X ⊢ Y