l l ame ne ss comple x ame ne ss comple x
play

L L ame ne ss Comple x ame ne ss Comple x WestGen Annual Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

T T he Impor he Impor tanc e of F tanc e of F oot Confor oot Confor mation, mation, F F oot T oot T r r imming, and Cow Comfor imming, and Cow Comfor t in the t in the L L ame ne ss Comple x ame ne ss Comple x WestGen Annual


  1. T T he Impor he Impor tanc e of F tanc e of F oot Confor oot Confor mation, mation, F F oot T oot T r r imming, and Cow Comfor imming, and Cow Comfor t in the t in the L L ame ne ss Comple x ame ne ss Comple x WestGen Annual Meeting Dr. Gordon Atkins – Mar 28, 2017

  2. Data Source – Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

  3. How Should Industry Respond to the Lameness Issue? Is lameness an inevitable consequence of higher milk production & intensively managed, confinement housing systems or do we have to learn more about the anatomy and function of the bovine foot?

  4. (Raven 1989) (Raven 1989) (Raven 1989)

  5. Distribution of Claw Pressure While Walking on a Flat, Hard Surface Van der Tol 2003. J. Dairy Sci

  6. Vicious circle of horn production I ncreased proliferation I ncreased pressure Increased horn production I ncreased lateral claw lateral claw horn thickness

  7. Lameness Feet Legs (88%) Hind Feet Front Feet (86%) Outer Claw Inner Claw (85%) (Blowey 1998)

  8. What do we know about the What do we know about the conformation of the bovine foot? conformation of the bovine foot? Front Feet = 1.6 : 1 Hind Feet = 2.2 : 1 Range 80 – 90 mm TOE ANGLE Front Feet = 52 O Hind Feet = 49 O Heel Depth is 1 cm Higher in Front Feet Than Hind Feet

  9. Heel Axial Groove White Line Sole Abaxial Wall Axial Wall Courtesy Dr. Gordon Atkins

  10. How Have We Evaluated Feet and Leg Conformation? Section Pre’90 1993 1998 2012  Mammary System 40% 40% 40% 42%  Feet & Legs 12% 16% 20% 28%  Dairy Character Dairy Strength 16% 14% 12%  Frame/Capacity 22% 20% 18% 20%  Rump 10% 10% 10% 10% Holstein Canada 2015

  11. Rear Legs – Rear View 31% Heel Depth 22% Foot Angle 9% Rear Legs – Side View 17% Bone Quality 12% Thurl Placement 9%

  12. Foot Angle and Heel Depth 9% 13 % Heritable 1 10 % Heritable 4 7 Intermediate Steep (ideal) 9 Courtesy Holstein Canada

  13. What do we know about the phenotypic expression for feet and leg conformation traits ?

  14. A new approach to evaluate A new approach to evaluate feet and leg conformation? feet and leg conformation? Hair Line Hair Line Angle Angle Foot Foot Angle Angle

  15. Foot Angle Foot Angle Frequency The distribution of foot angle measurements before and after trimming. The mean foot angle after trimming was 49 ° (35 ° – 68 ° ). Atkins et al 2016

  16. Heel Depth Heel Depth

  17. Heel Depth Heel Depth Frequency The distribution of heel depth measure before and after trimming. The mean heel depth after trimming was 47 mm (33 mm – 61 mm). Atkins et al 2016

  18. Relationship between measured foot Relationship between measured foot angle and heel depth with the linear angle and heel depth with the linear score from Holstein classification score from Holstein classification Frequency of Measured Frequency of Measured Foot Angle in Degrees Heel Depth in mm Atkins et al 2016

  19. Digital Cushion Digital Cushion

  20. Digital Cushion Digital Cushion

  21. Digital Cushion at the Flexor Tuberosity Digital Cushion at the Flexor Tuberosity

  22. Digital Cushion at the Flexor Tuberosity Digital Cushion at the Flexor Tuberosity

  23. Digital Cushion Digital Cushion

  24. Digital Cushion at the Navicular Digital Cushion at the Navicular Digital Cushion DDF Navicular Bone

  25. P2 P3 Navicular bone

  26. Is there a Relationship between and Is there a Relationship between and Digital Cushion Depth & Heel Depth? Digital Cushion Depth & Heel Depth?

  27. Relationship between BCS and Digital Relationship between BCS and Digital Cushion Depth (DCD) at both the Cushion Depth (DCD) at both the Flexor Tuberosity and the Navicular Flexor Tuberosity and the Navicular DCD at Flexor Tuberosity and Navicular in mm

  28. Toe Length Toe Length

  29. Archer et al 2015

  30. Archer et al 2015 Archer et al 2015 • The minimum external wall length was calculated using CT measured internal wall. • External wall length must be at least 14 mm greater than the internal wall length when trimming the toe to a point, having a toe angle of 50 ° , & a 5 mm sole thickness. • The external dorsal wall length must be greater for a rounded toe than a square toe. • Where fixed toe lengths are used to simplify protocols and facilitate the training of less experienced operators, the minimum recommended length for trimming the dorsal wall should be conservative.

  31. Toe Length Toe Length Frequency The distribution of toe length measure before and after trimming. The mean toe length after trimming was 81.5 mm (69 mm – 119 mm). Atkins et al 2016

  32. What is the Impact of Hoof Trimming? What is the Impact of Hoof Trimming?

  33. Two primary functions of foot trimming are: 1.Balance the weight distribution between the claws 2.Restore the foot angle to 49 – 52 degrees

  34. 5 Step Dutch Trimming Method Based on technique introduced by Dr. E. Toussaint Raven and taught by Mr. Pieter Kloosterman Trimming Steps 1. Medial Claw (non weight bearing) - Cutting Toe Length (75 mm) - Leaving Toe with a Square End - Leveling the toe

  35. 5 Step Dutch Trimming Method Trimming Steps 1. Medial Claw (non weight bearing) - Cutting Toe Length with Square End 2. Lateral Claw (weight bearing) - Match Medial Claw Length - Balance Heel - Level toe

  36. 5 Step Dutch Trimming Method Trimming Steps 1. Medial Claw (non weight bearing) - Cutting Toe Length with square End 2. Lateral Claw (weight bearing) - Balance Heel & Match Medial Length 3. Modeling - Lateral Sole

  37. 5 Step Dutch Trimming Method Trimming Steps 1. Medial Claw (non weight bearing) - Cutting Toe Length 2. Lateral Claw (weight bearing) - Balance Heel 3. Modeling - Lateral Sole 4. Treat Lesions 5. Remove Loose Horn

  38. “Principles of Claw Trimming in Cattle” with special consideration of the anatomy and biomechanics of the foot Master Thesis - Denise Schilliger Supervision - Professor Dr. Karl Nuss University of Zurich

  39. Swiss Trimming Method - 1

  40. Swiss Trimming Method - 2

  41. Swiss Trimming Method - 3

  42. Swiss Trimming Method - 4

  43. Comparison of Trimming a Square Toe (Similar to the Dutch Trimming Method) versus a Rounded Toe (Similar to the Swiss Trimming Method)

  44. Conclusions that can be made: 1. Foot Trimming can dramatically change the toe length, foot angle, and heel depth. 2. There appears to be a poor relationship between measured foot angle and classification linear scores for the angle of the hairline. 3. A foot angle of 50 ° can be achieved with a dorsal wall length of 80 - 85 mm. 4. Sole thickness is related to the dorsal wall length and the type of toe trimming.

  45. Questions that need to be answered: 1. Are there unidentified conformational characteristics of the foot that help to limit the undesirable changes in foot angle, heel depth & dorsal wall length seen in intensively managed, confinement housing systems? 2. Is the classification linear score assessment for the angle at the hairline actually measuring foot angle or is it measuring a separate and independent trait? 3. How reliable is the relationship between heel depth, digital cushion depth, and BCS and how important is heel depth in the lameness complex?

  46. Next Steps: 1. Set up a workshop with classifiers to compare their estimated linear scores for foot angle and heel depth with actual measured values. 2. Measure both the angle at the hairline and the toe angle to determine the relationship between these two measured values. 3. Develop a technique to measure the contact surface area of the lateral claw of hind feet. 4. Re-evaluate the the emphasis give to foot angle and heel depth in the classification system.

  47. Acknowledgements Dr. Laura Solano – data interpretation and statistical calculations Dr. Steve Mason – data interpretation Mr. Elbert Koster – foot trimmer Mr. Rob Guyer – foot trimmer Ms. Casey Jacobs – data recording and ultrasound measurements Dr. Jase Skelton – data recording and ultrasound measurements Dr. Kerry Atkins – data recording and ultrasound measurements Ms. Charlotte Pickel – data recording Ms. Danielle Lee – data recording Ms. Jasmine Voegeli – data recording

  48. Impact of Cow Comfort on Lameness

  49. Free Stall Design Factors Influencing Use 1. Surface Cushion 2. Traction 3. Room to Bob and Lunge 4. Adequate Defined Resting Area 5. Room to Rise Below & Behind Neck Rail 6. Curb Height and Design

  50. Surface Cushion and Traction

  51. Deep Deep Deep Bedding Bedding Bedding Deep Bedding Little Little Little Bedding Bedding Bedding Little Little Bedding Bedding

  52. Bob and Lunge Room

  53. Adequate Resting Space

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend