L ECTURE 13 The Determinants of Macroeconomic Policy: The Great - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

l ecture 13 the determinants of macroeconomic policy the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

L ECTURE 13 The Determinants of Macroeconomic Policy: The Great - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Economics 210c/236a Christina Romer Fall 2011 David Romer L ECTURE 13 The Determinants of Macroeconomic Policy: The Great Depression November 30, 2011 I. R


slide-1
SLIDE 1

LECTURE 13 The Determinants of Macroeconomic Policy: The Great Depression

November 30, 2011

Economics 210c/236a Christina Romer Fall 2011 David Romer

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • I. REVIEW OF GREAT DEPRESSION FACTS AND

EXPLANATIONS

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1929-01 1929-07 1930-01 1930-07 1931-01 1931-07 1932-01 1932-07 1933-01 1933-07 1934-01 1934-07 1935-01 1935-07 1936-01 1936-07 1937-01 1937-07 1938-01 1938-07 1939-01 1939-07 1940-01 1940-07 1941-01 1941-07

1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4

Industrial Production (Logarithms)

Industrial Production, 1929 to 1941

August 1929 March 1933 May 1937 June 1938

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Explanations

  • Aggregate demand contraction
  • Stock market crash
  • Money supply contraction
  • Credit contraction
  • Increased nominal rigidity
  • Supply-side stories
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • II. JONATHAN ROSE, “HOOVER’S TRUCE: WAGE

RIGIDITY IN THE ONSET OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

01/03/1920 10/09/1920 07/16/1921 04/22/1922 01/27/1923 11/03/1923 08/09/1924 05/16/1925 02/20/1926 11/27/1926 09/03/1927 06/09/1928 03/16/1929 12/21/1929 09/27/1930 07/03/1931 04/09/1932 01/14/1933 10/28/1933 08/04/1934 05/11/1935 02/15/1936 11/21/1936 08/28/1937 06/04/1938 03/11/1939 12/16/1939 09/21/1940 06/27/1941

Commercial Paper Rate (Percent)

Commercial Paper Rate 1920-1941

slide-7
SLIDE 7

White House Press Statement Following the November 21, 1929 Conference

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Source: Rose, 2010.

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Months following Peak

Decline in Industrial Production in 1920 and 1929

1929 1920

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Source: Rose, 2010.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Source: Rose, 2010.

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • III. HSIEH AND ROMER, “WAS THE FEDERAL RESERVE

CONSTRAINED BY THE GOLD STANDARD DURING THE GREAT DEPRESSION? EVIDENCE FROM THE 1932 OPEN MARKET PURCHASE PROGRAM”

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Source: Hsieh and Romer, 2006.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Indicators of Devaluation Expectations

  • Forward exchange rate premium
  • Did forward rates rise relative to spot rates?
  • Interest rate differential
  • Did U.S. interest rates rise relative to foreign?
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Source: Hsieh and Romer, 2006.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Source: Hsieh and Romer, 2006.

Was the Fed worried about gold flows?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Source: Hsieh and Romer, 2006.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Source: Hsieh and Romer, 2006.

Role of Conflict Between Federal Reserve Banks

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Source: Hsieh and Romer, 2006.

Role of Ideas

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Source: Hsieh and Romer, 2006.

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • IV. HAROLD COLE AND LEE OHANIAN, “NEW DEAL

POLICIES AND THE PERSISTENCE OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Source: Chandler (1970)

Model NRA Code

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Source: Cole and Ohanian

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Source: Cole and Ohanian

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Source: Romer (1999)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Source: Temin and Wigmore (1990)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Source: Cole and Ohanian

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Does It Matter that Cole and Ohanian Don’t Explain Why Output Was So Low before the NRA?

  • What does their analysis imply output growth would

have been in 1934 in the absence of the NRA?

  • With nominal rigidity and i = 0, what are the effects of

a fall in potential output?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Source: Eggertsson (2008)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Source: Temin and Wigmore (1990)

slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • V. GAUTI EGGERTSSON AND BENJAMIN PUGSLEY, “THE

MISTAKE OF 1937”

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Source: Friedman and Schwartz (1963)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Source: Chandler (1970)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

The Key Elements of Eggertsson’s and Pugsley’s Proposed Explanation

  • A change in expectations of future policy.
  • The economy is incredibly sensitive to those

expectations: A change from a situation where “the public fully believes that the government is committed to targeting 4 percent inflation” to one where “the public thinks there is a 5 percent chance that the government will [adopt] a zero inflation goal within the next two years … results in a double-digit output collapse and deflation” (Eggertsson-Pugsley, p. 3).

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Other Theories of the Downturn

  • Friedman and Schwartz: A largely conventional

monetary contraction caused by the increase in reserve requirements.

  • Telser and others: A fiscal contraction.
  • Cole and Ohanian and others: adverse supply

shocks, especially from unionization.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Eggertsson and Pugsley’s Evidence

  • Narrative evidence from statements and actions.
  • Behavior of commodity prices.
  • Hamilton’s and Cecchetti’s estimates of expected

inflation.

  • The behavior of the economy when statements and

actions changed back.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Source: Eggertsson and Pugsley

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Source: Eggertsson and Pugsley

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Source: Eggertsson and Pugsley

FDR as a Nominal GDP Targeter?