The Determinants of Web Page Viewing The Determinants of Web Page - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the determinants of web page viewing the determinants of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Determinants of Web Page Viewing The Determinants of Web Page - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Determinants of Web Page Viewing The Determinants of Web Page Viewing Behavior: An Eye- -Tracking Study Tracking Study Behavior: An Eye Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, Geri Gay, Laura Granka, Matt Feusner, Jill Newman HCI Group Information


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Determinants of Web Page Viewing The Determinants of Web Page Viewing Behavior: An Eye Behavior: An Eye-

  • Tracking Study

Tracking Study

Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, Geri Gay, Laura Granka, Matt Feusner, Jill Newman HCI Group Information Science Program

Department of Communication

Cornell University http://www.hci.cornell.edu

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction Introduction

– Web: a ubiquitous information source – Web pages involve textual, pictorial, and

multimedia information

– Different cognitive processes:ocular-motor to

semantic

– Very limited research

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background Background

Determinants of viewing behavior

— Three processes during an eye fixation: encoding, sampling, and planning [Viviani 1990]: — Eyes are attracted to most informative areas [Rayner, 1998] — Fixation frequency -> importance; Fixation duration -> complexity and difficulty [Fitts et al. 1950] — Instructions influences fixation sequence [Buswell 1935] — Intent influence eye movement [Yarbus 1967] — Complexity influences fixation duration [Pelz et al. 2000]

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Web Page Viewing Behavior: Previous Research Web Page Viewing Behavior: Previous Research

– Texts were first entry points for online news readers

[Stanford Poynter Project 1998]

– Viewers spent more time on pictures than texts in print

advertisements [Rayner 1998]

– Subjects have habitually preferred scanpath and features

  • f site and familiarity influence scanpaths [Josephson and

Holmes 2002]

– Research on a web portal page: more horizontal

movement; headers are not always viewed before the body; searches are not more directed along time [Goldberg et al. 2002]

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methodology Methodology

– 30 Subjects (1 African American, 4 Asian Americans,

and 25 Caucasians, 13 females and 17 maless)

– 22 web pages from 11 popular web sites from four

categories (news, shopping, search, and business);

– Half of the subjects were given instructions to

remember as much as they could about the content;

– 30 seconds of viewings; – Demographic data and recall were measured.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Stimuli Stimuli

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Indices Indices

Dependent variables:

– Mean Fixation Duration (average fixation duration):

indication of information complexity and task difficulty [Rayner 1998]

– Gazing Time (rate of gazing vs. fixation): negatively

related to task difficulty [Nakayama et al. 2002]

– Saccade Rate (number of saccades per second):

negatively related to task difficulty and mental load [Nakayama et al. 2002]

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Eye Tracking Equipment: ASL 504 Eye Tracking Equipment: ASL 504

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Analysis Analysis

A mixed model [Little et al. 1996]

– 2 (Gender) X 2 (Task Condition) X 2 (Page Order) X

4 (Site Type)

– Fixed factors: gender, task condition, page order,

site type

– Random factors: subject factor, random web site

selection from each of four categories of sites

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results Results

Table 2. Mixed Model on Mean Fixation Duration Effect Numerator DF Denominator DF F Value Signific ance Gender 1 98.8 5.22 .02 Page Order 1 104 16.66 .00 Types

  • f Sites

* Page Order 3 104 5.95 .00

Table 3. Different Values of Mean Fixation Duration (in Seconds) Group Mean Fixation Duration Male .374 Female .357 First Page .377 Second Page .353

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results Results

Table 4. Mixed Model on Gazing Time Source Numerator DF Denominator DF F Value Significance Page Order 1 104 4.3 .04 Type of Sites * Page Order 3 104 10.04 .00

Table 5. Different Means of Gazing Time (Percentage) Group Mean Gazing Time First Page 66.7 Second Page 64.3

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results Results

Table 6. Fixed Model on Saccade Rate Source Numerator DF Denominator DF F Value Significance Type of Sites * Page Order 3 104 5.530 .00

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results Results

Interaction between Types of Web Sites and Page Order

0.33 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39 0.4 0.41 First Page Second Page

Shopping Search New s Business

Figure 2. Interaction Effect on Mean Fixation Duration

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Interaction Effects Interaction Effects

58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 First Page Second Page

Shopping Search News Business

Figure 3. Interaction Effect on Gazing Time

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Interaction Effects Interaction Effects

1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9 1.95 First Page Second Page

Shopping Search News Business

Figure 4. Interaction Effect on Saccade Rate

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Overall Results Overall Results

Site Type Gender Page Order Mean Fixation Duration Gazing Time Saccade Rate

Figure 5. Overall Results

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Scanpath Analysis Scanpath Analysis

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4

E B A Y

  • 1

G O O G L E

  • 1

J O B

  • T

R

  • 1

C N E T

  • 1

W 3

  • 1

W 3

  • F

M A C R O

  • F

G O O G L E

  • F

C N N

  • 1

C N E T

  • F

M S N

  • 1

C N N

  • F

A M A Z O N

  • 1

M A C R O

  • 1

J O B

  • T

R

  • F

Y A H O O

  • 1

M S N

  • F

Y A H O O

  • F

N E T S

  • 1

N E T S

  • F

A M A Z O N

  • F

E B A Y

  • F

Figure 6. Variance of Scanpaths for Different Web Pages

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Variance of Web Sites Variance of Web Sites

Figure 7. Two Web Pages with the Smallest Scanpath Variances Figure 8. Two Web Pages with the Largest Scanpath Variances

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusions Conclusions

Gender of subjects, the order of web pages being

viewed, and the interaction between site types and the

  • rder of the pages influence web viewing behavior;

A possible relationship between scanpath variability and

the structural/visual complexity of the web page;

Individual characteristics and the stimuli contribute to

viewers’ eye movement behavior [Rayner 1998].

The problem with mental workload

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Conclusions Conclusions

Males exhibited significantly longer mean fixation

durations than females while females scan more of the pages

– males and females reacted differently to images, and

affected subsequent memory performance [Jones, Stanaland, and Gelb, 1998]:.

– females often engage in comprehensive processing of all

the available information, while males tend to focus on a fewer number of areas [Meyers-Levy and Maheswaran, 1991]:.

Complex interaction effects of page order and site type – Eye movement behavior changes over time, more

variability on first pages

– The change in direction and magnitude were influenced by

the type of web sites – “Context Cueing” and adaptation [Chun, 2000]

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusions Conclusions

– No significant effects for other individual variables

and task instruction

– Mental workload is a multi-dimensional construct. – know “what” and “how” not “why” – Future research: combined with verbal protocol,

videos of facial expression, and post experiment interviews.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Thank you! Comments and questions…

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Ten Things You Don’t about Women Ten Things You Don’t about Women

  • 8. We can scan a room faster than you can. Within sixty

seconds we can spot every girl to watch out for and all the men we’d like to meet. …

– Electra, C. (2004). Ten things you don’t know about

  • women. Esquire, 141(2): 68.