Kalyn Holmes, B.S., David Jackson, Ph.D., & Trina Orimoto, Ph.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kalyn holmes b s david jackson ph d trina orimoto ph d
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Kalyn Holmes, B.S., David Jackson, Ph.D., & Trina Orimoto, Ph.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kalyn Holmes, B.S., David Jackson, Ph.D., & Trina Orimoto, Ph.D. & Count based on primary diagnosis only Over 90% Agree or Strongly Agree that they were satisfied with services. 100 93.2 92.9 90.2 87.2 Percent of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Kalyn Holmes, B.S., David Jackson, Ph.D., & Trina Orimoto, Ph.D. &

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Count based on primary diagnosis only

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Over 90% “Agree” or “Strongly Agree” that they were satisfied with services.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

87 80 93.2 90.2 87.2 92.9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Percent of positive responses (agree

  • r strongly agree)
slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • These percentages are based on the number of respondents whose combined scores totaled a ‘3.5’ or

better.

  • A five-point Likert-type scale was used for each item (i.e., ‘Strongly Agree ‘ (5), ‘Agree’ (4), ‘Undecided’ (3),

‘Disagree’ (2), or ‘Strongly Disagree’ (1).

91.8 60.9 86.8 60.7 90.2 88.6 85.9 85.7

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Cultural Sensitivity Functioning Access Outcomes Treatment Participation Social Connectedness Overall Program Assessment Communication with Care Coordinator

Positive Ratings* for Each Domain

slide-15
SLIDE 15

50 60 70 80 90 100

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Percent of positive responses (agree

  • r strongly agree)

cultural sensitivity treatment participation social connectedness access

slide-16
SLIDE 16

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Percent of positive responses (agree or strongly agree)

child outcomes child functioning

slide-17
SLIDE 17

73 87 81 89.3 89.4 82.9 85.9 50 60 70 80 90 100

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Percent of positive responses (agree

  • r strongly agree)
slide-18
SLIDE 18

83 89 84 86 50 60 70 80 90 100

2014 2015 2016 2017

Percent of positive responses (agree or strongly agree)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

7.6 3.8 2.2 36.4 48.9 10 20 30 40 50 60 strongly disagree disagree undecided agree strongly agree Percent

My Care Coordinator contacted me (in person

  • r by phone) at least one time every month

my child was receiving services. (N = 182)

2.7 6 1.1 1.6 34.8 52.7 10 20 30 40 50 60

NA strongly disagree disagree undecided agree strongly agree

Percent

During the time my child received services from CAHMD, I was kept informed about the exact services my child was receiving. (N = 182)

1.6 5.4 2.2 6 36.4 47.8 10 20 30 40 50 60

NA strongly disagree disagree undecided agree strongly agree

Percent

During the time my child received services from CAMHD, I was kept informed about how my child was doing. (N = 183)

0.5 6 1.1 3.3 38.6 50

10 20 30 40 50 60

NA strongly disagree disagree undecided agree strongly agree

Percent

During meeting(s) with my child’s Care Coordinator, I was asked for my feedback about my child’s treatment plan. (N = 183)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 2014 2015 2016 2017

Percent of positive responses (agree or strongly agree)

My Care Coordinator contacted me at least one time every month my child was receiving services During the time my child was receiving services from CAMHD, I was kept informed about the exact services my child was receiving During the time my child was receiving services from CAMHD, I was kept informed about how my child was doing During meetings with my child's Care Coordinator, I was asked for feedback about my child's treatment plan

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • “One-on-one with my child.”
  • “MST services, looked at what my child enjoyed doing and put him in a

program (art) to learn more different kinds of arts (drawing)”

Specific services (n=61, 41%)

  • “Our therapist has been very supportive in everything regarding my
  • child. She’s helpful and understanding.”
  • “She advocated for my son when no one else would. Thank you.”

Qualities of service providers (n=25, 17%)

  • “DOH has been the most helpful people to work with.”
  • “They listen to children and parents.”

General positive comment (n=22, 15%)

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • “FFT program is good for our family. Since it started I can see my child

improving.”

  • “The in home therapy made communications between parent and child

a lot better.”

Child/case progress/improvement (n=13, 9%)

  • “Having therapist available 24/7 it is so helpful to have someone to call

and speak to when there is a crisis.”

  • “The times she spends with him and talk with him and talking the time

to meet with meds doctors and school staff.”

Availability of service provider (n=11, 7%)

  • “Regular monthly treatment team meetings to keep everybody on the

team for the youth as well as the youth on the same page with helping plan for the youth's future.” Communication about child’s case (n=6, 4%)

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • “Services are great at this time. I am satisfied how things work.

No improvements needed at this time.”

  • “More kind people like them”

No improvement needed (n=46, 38%)

  • “More resources in Hawai’i.”
  • “Need more mental health services, facilities.”

Lack of availability of services and/or resources (n=42, 35%)

  • “Written reports to other services providers or copies of notes.”
  • “More communication.”

More reports/communications (n=10, 8%)

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • “Take into consideration the child’s and parents relationship

with the worker and keep the child with the worker.”

  • “Allow longer...to enable same therapist for child

consistently hopefully find good match/fit.”

Greater consistency (n=4, 3%)

  • “It took a lot of begging and pleading to get the next level of

support (respite). Things shouldn’t be so difficult for a family in need.”

  • “Intake process could be faster.”

Increase ease of moving through the system (n=4, 3%)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

24.5 8.2 7.1 6 29.3 21.2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

NA strongly disagree disagree undecided agree strongly agree

Percent

Having the Parent Partner involved has contributed to my feelings of empowerment as a caregiver. (N = 179)

20.1 7.6 6.5 3.3 32.6 27.2 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

NA strongly disagree disagree undecided agree strongly agree

Percent

During meeting(s) with my child’s Care Coordinator, I was informed about the role of the Parent Partners. (N = 179)

21.7 8.2 4.9 3.8 32.1 26.6 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

NA strongly disagree disagree undecided agree strongly agree

Percent

I understand the role of the Parent Partner in the treatment of my child. (N = 177)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

2014 2015 2016 2017

Percent of positive responses (agree or strongly agree)

During meeting(s) with my child’s Care Coordinator, I was informed about the role of the Parent Partners. I understand the role of the Parent Partner in the treatment of my child. Having the Parent Partner involved has contributed to my feelings of empowerment as a caregiver.

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

2017

yes no 31% 69%

2016

yes no

slide-29
SLIDE 29

31% 69%

2016

yes no

24% 76%

2017

yes no

slide-30
SLIDE 30

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 07/15 08/15 09/15 10/15 11/15 12/15 01/16 02/16 03/16 04/16 05/16 06/16 07/16 08/16 09/16 10/16 11/16 12/16 01/17 02/17 03/17 04/17 05/17 06/17

Number of Visitors Month HYK Website Visitors Flow (July 2015-June 2017) Global US Hawaii Linear (Global) Linear (US) Linear (Hawaii)

slide-31
SLIDE 31