Jon Jensen, Kent Bolton, Dick Simons SITF This study was - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
jon jensen kent bolton dick simons sitf
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Jon Jensen, Kent Bolton, Dick Simons SITF This study was - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jun 16, 2023 162 likes •436 views

Changes in system inertia with high renewable implementation 1/15/2020 Jon Jensen, Kent Bolton, Dick Simons SITF This study was performed through the System Inertia Task Force (SITF). A group of stakeholders and subject matter

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Changes in system inertia with high renewable implementation

1/15/2020

Jon Jensen, Kent Bolton, Dick Simons

slide-2
SLIDE 2

▪ This study was performed through the System Inertia Task Force (SITF). A group of stakeholders and subject matter experts.

2

SITF

slide-3
SLIDE 3

▪ Assess impact on reliability of Bulk Electric System (BES) in the Western Interconnection (WI) as inertia decreases from retirement of coal resources and addition of Inverter Based Resources (IBR) by assessing the following:

  • Frequency response
  • Reliability impact
  • Transient voltage stability
  • Impact of IBR with/without frequency response capability
  • Crucial contingency changes
  • Transmission path loading change
  • Short circuit fault duty
  • Resource adequacy
  • Capital cost of added IBR

3

Purpose

slide-4
SLIDE 4

▪ 2028 Anchor Data Set (ADS) Phase 2 V2.0 ▪ Retire 100% of coal resources ▪ Add Wind/Solar/Battery to replace coal resources ▪ Select hours of PCM to study in PowerFlow ▪ Dynamic and contingency analysis ▪ Capital cost ▪ Fault current analysis

4

Assessment Approach

slide-5
SLIDE 5

▪ Alberta

5

Resource conversions

Unit Name Capacity, MW Sheerness_2_2 408 Sheerness1-1 408 Genesee_2_2 422 Genesee1-1 422 Genesee_3_3 527 Keephills3_1 498 Total: 2,685

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Resource retirements

Total of 18,976 MW coal retirements, 21,661 MW including Alberta resource conversions

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Resource Additions

Total of 115,840 MW added capacity

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MW Comparison

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Energy Comparison

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

PowerFlow hours to analyze

8/4/2028 10/28/2028

slide-11
SLIDE 11

▪ Hour 5198 (8-4-2028 hour 14)

  • Generation = 135,972 MW
  • IBR/Sync = 2.02

11

8-4-2028

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Path Flow

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Paths

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Inter-regional transfers

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Inertia

  • SITF case has about 62% of the Inertia as the Phase 1 case.
  • Note MVA on plot does not include IBR MVA, synchronous only.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Inertia

  • We see decreased

inertia where coal was removed

  • Other differences due

to dispatch/load differences between cases

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

System Cost $/MW for a 1MW System-E3

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Capital Cost

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Capital Cost – 2023 Install year

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

▪ Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) represents the energy price

  • utput needed to recuperate the cost of the plant over its

estimated lifetime. CCGT has an LCOE of about $48/MWh

20

LCOE-Energy Price $/MWh

slide-21
SLIDE 21

▪ Plot shows decreasing fault current only ▪ IBR vs Synch machine fault current ▪ Difference in 28HS1 vs SITF (Dispatch difference) ▪ Reliability concerns ▪ Geographic information system (GIS) data for about half of the busses

21

Fault Current

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Standard Disturbances include: ▪ Chief Joe Brake insertion

  • Insertion for 30 cycles and then removal of the large braking resistor in the Northwest

▪ Double Palo Verde Outage

  • Simultaneous tripping of two Palo Verde generation units

▪ Colorado River Red Bluff Outage

  • 3 phase fault with tripping of two transmission lines in Southern California

▪ Gates – Midway and Diablo-Midway Outage

  • 3 phase fault with tripping of three transmission lines in Northern California

▪ Brownlee – Hells Canyon Outage

  • 3 phase fault with tripping of one large transmission line in Idaho. This includes the

approximation of an associated Remedial Action Scheme (RAS).

▪ Daniel Park – Comanche Outage

  • 3 phase fault and then tripping of two large transmission lines in Colorado

▪ Pacific DC Intertie (PDCI) Block

  • Simulates a block (removal of the lines from service) of the DC line from Celilo (in the

Northwest) to Sylmar (in Southern California)

22

Dynamics

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Dynamics double PV outage (units 1 & 2)

23

f nadir f delt response RoCoF ADS 59.86461 0.136112 2018.335

  • 0.027

SITF 59.77664 0.223797 1168.739

  • 0.13564

F nadir is in Hz, fdelt is in Hz, f response is in MW/.1 Hz and RoCoF is in Hz/s.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

▪ Six times as much IBR generation capacity needed to replace the coal capacity due to capacity factor differences. ▪ …

24

Observations

slide-25
SLIDE 25

▪ Updating all Short Circuit Model busses with GIS data to more fully represent system on map plot; ▪ Completing additional Short Circuit analysis in CAPE/Aspen where

  • ne case has all coal removed and the other one includes coal to

include Zero and Negative sequence; ▪ Completing autumn Power Flow and dynamics analyses; ▪ Studying dynamics where frequency response and voltage regulation capability is turned on for all IBR; ▪ Evaluating differences in Path flow loading and run contingencies on related loaded paths; ▪ Analyzing in greater depth the impact on reliability from the addition

  • f energy storage (Batteries/CAES);

▪ Evaluating possible mitigation techniques for path overloads; and ▪ Optimizing the system for the best mix of energy storage and renewables.

25

Recommendations

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Contact:

Jon Jensen Kent Bolton Dick Simons

26