jewish agencies familiarity and perception
play

Jewish Agencies: Familiarity and Perception 2 Familiarity with - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 24, 2023 •181 likes •1.81k views

1 1 Jewish Agencies: Familiarity and Perception 2 Familiarity with Jewish Agencies (Respondents) 100% Very Somewhat Not at All 80% 60% 43% 42% 41% 41% 39% 39% 39% 38% 40% 36% 36% 35% 34% 34% 34% 33% 32% 29% 28% 28% 27%

  1. 23 Excellent Perceptions of the Fresh Air Society/Tamarack Camps (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 47% Very Familiar with 61% Fresh Air Society/Tamarack Camp Core Area 47% Non ‐ Core Area 48% West Bloomfield 51% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 61% Farmington 57% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 59% Wayne County 27% Under 35 21% 35 ‐ 49 65% 50 ‐ 64 48% 65 ‐ 74 43% 75+ 56% 65+ 48% Male 50% Female 45% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  2. 24 Excellent Perceptions of the Fresh Air Society/Tamarack Camps (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 47% Household with Children 52% Household with Jewish Children 38% HH with Only Adult Children 50% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 46% Elderly Couple 60% Elderly Single 45% Under $50,000 58% $50 ‐ $100,000 36% $100 ‐ $200,000 52% $200,000 and over 42% Conservative 44% Reform 56% Just Jewish 46% In ‐ married 50% Conversionary 41% Intermarried 63% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  3. 25 Excellent Perceptions of the Fresh Air Society/Tamarack Camps (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 47% Synagogue Member 46% Non ‐ Member 49% JCC Member 45% Non ‐ Member 48% Jewish Organization Member 58% Non ‐ Member 42% Donated to Federation 48% Asked, Did Not Donate 30% Not Asked 52% Federation Non ‐ Donor 47% Donated under $100 42% Donated $100 ‐ $500 51% Donated $500 and over 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  4. Very Familiar with the Local Jewish Federation 26 (Respondents) Omaha 46% Detroit 2018 39% Detroit 2005 37% Tidewater 35% San Antonio 32% Indianapolis 30% Lehigh Valley 30% Minneapolis 29% Rhode Island 26% Hartford 26% Jacksonville 23% New Haven 21% Miami 21% St. Paul 21% Broward 20% Sarasota 20% Howard County 20% Portland (ME) 19% Bergen 18% New York 16% Washington 15% Middlesex 15% Tucson 15% Atlantic County 14% South Palm Beach 13% St. Petersburg 12% Westport 12% West Palm Beach 11% Las Vegas 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  5. 27 Not at All Familiar with the Local Jewish Federation (Respondents) Las Vegas 63% West Palm Beach 63% San Francisco 60% South Palm Beach 59% St. Petersburg 55% Howard County 54% Portland (ME) 51% Atlantic County 51% New York 49% Tucson 47% Middlesex 45% Westport 45% Washington 44% St. Paul 41% Broward 38% Sarasota 38% Miami 35% Bergen 34% New Haven 33% Lehigh Valley 29% Jacksonville 28% Hartford 27% Rhode Island 26% Indianapolis 25% San Antonio 24% Minneapolis 24% Tidewater 23% Detroit 2018 22% Detroit 2005 20% Omaha 15% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  6. 28 Very Familiar with the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit (Respondents) All 39% Core Area 46% Non ‐ Core Area 23% West Bloomfield 50% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 49% Farmington 47% Southfield 37% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 35% Wayne County 16% 0 ‐ 9 Years in Detroit 27% 10 ‐ 19 Years 30% 20+ Years 41% Under 35 44% 35 ‐ 49 46% 50 ‐ 64 37% 65 ‐ 74 31% 75+ 43% 65+ 37% Male 35% Female 44% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  7. 29 Very Familiar with the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit (Respondents) All 39% Household with Children 41% HH with Only Adult Children 37% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 52% Non ‐ Elderly Single 37% Elderly Couple 51% Elderly Single 33% Under $25,000 18% $25 ‐ $50,000 30% $50 ‐ $100,000 39% $100 ‐ $200,000 41% $200,000 and over 58% Orthodox 39% Conservative 59% Reform 45% Just Jewish 25% Humanist 23% In ‐ married 56% Conversionary 47% Intermarried 22% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  8. 30 Very Familiar with the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit (Respondents) All 39% Synagogue Member 55% Non ‐ Member 29% JCC Member 61% Non ‐ Member 37% Jewish Organization Member 74% Non ‐ Member 30% Jewish Trip to Israel 67% General Trip to Israel 28% Not to Israel 21% Donated to Federation 64% Asked, Did Not Donate 40% Not Asked 17% Federation Non ‐ Donor 21% Donated under $100 50% Donated $100 ‐ $500 64% Donated $500 and over 89% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  9. 31 Excellent Perceptions of the Local Jewish Federation (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) Omaha 49% Detroit 2018 38% Sarasota 35% Detroit 2005 35% Broward 34% Tucson 34% San Antonio 33% Jacksonville 32% South Palm Beach 32% Tidewater 32% Indianapolis 31% Miami 30% St. Paul 29% Minneapolis 29% St. Petersburg 29% Hartford 28% West Palm Beach 28% Lehigh Valley 26% New Haven 26% Rhode Island 25% Portland (ME) 24% Middlesex 23% Atlantic County 22% Bergen 22% Westport 22% Washington 20% Las Vegas 11% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  10. Fair/Poor Perceptions of the Local Jewish Federation 32 (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) Las Vegas 32% Westport 23% New Haven 20% Broward 19% Bergen 19% Rhode Island 18% Indianapolis 18% Middlesex 18% Portland (ME) 17% Atlantic County 17% Lehigh Valley 17% St. Petersburg 16% Omaha 16% Miami 16% Minneapolis 16% San Antonio 15% Tidewater 15% Detroit 2005 14% Detroit 2018 14% Jacksonville 14% Washington 14% South Palm Beach 13% West Palm Beach 13% Sarasota 13% Tucson 12% Hartford 11% Fair Poor St. Paul 9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  11. 33 Excellent Perceptions of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 38% Very Familiar with the Jewish Federation 53% Core Area 40% Non ‐ Core Area 33% West Bloomfield 43% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 46% Farmington 39% Southfield 35% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 33% Wayne County 53% Under 35 33% 35 ‐ 49 47% 50 ‐ 64 36% 65 ‐ 74 33% 75+ 43% 65+ 37% Male 39% Female 38% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  12. 34 Excellent Perceptions of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 38% Household with Children 49% HH with Only Adult Children 35% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 35% Non ‐ Elderly Single 26% Elderly Couple 46% Elderly Single 27% Under $25,000 31% $25 ‐ $50,000 38% $50 ‐ $100,000 39% $100 ‐ $200,000 36% $200,000 and over 51% Orthodox 32% Conservative 41% Reform 44% Just Jewish 32% In ‐ married 42% Conversionary 38% Intermarried 41% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  13. 35 Excellent Perceptions of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 38% Synagogue Member 39% Non ‐ Member 37% JCC Member 49% Non ‐ Member 37% Jewish Organization Member 42% Non ‐ Member 34% Donated to Federation 50% Asked, Did Not Donate 18% Not Asked 28% Federation Non ‐ Donor 26% Donated under $100 41% Donated $100 ‐ $500 50% Donated $500 and over 62% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  14. 36 Very Familiar with Yad Ezra (Respondents) All 36% Core Area 47% Non ‐ Core Area 11% West Bloomfield 40% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 57% Farmington 62% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 43% Wayne County 6% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 33% 20+ Years 37% Under 35 29% 35 ‐ 49 34% 50 ‐ 64 45% 65 ‐ 74 45% 75+ 19% 65+ 32% Male 34% Female 39% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  15. 37 Very Familiar with Yad Ezra (Respondents) All 36% Household with Children 38% HH with Only Adult Children 63% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 46% Non ‐ Elderly Single 32% Elderly Couple 36% Elderly Single 27% Under $25,000 42% $25 ‐ $50,000 19% $50 ‐ $100,000 41% $100 ‐ $200,000 31% $200,000 and over 58% Orthodox 30% Conservative 56% Reform 48% Just Jewish 20% In ‐ married 47% Intermarried 25% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  16. 38 Very Familiar with Yad Ezra (Respondents) All 36% Synagogue Member 56% Non ‐ Member 25% JCC Member 40% Non ‐ Member 36% Jewish Organization Member 65% Non ‐ Member 27% Jewish Trip to Israel 64% General Trip to Israel 29% Not to Israel 31% Donated to Federation 54% Asked, Did Not Donate 42% Not Asked 11% Federation Non ‐ Donor 22% Donated under $100 53% Donated $100 ‐ $500 44% Donated $500 and over 73% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  17. 39 Excellent Perceptions of Yad Ezra (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 51% Very Familiar with Yad Ezra 78% Core Area 58% Non ‐ Core Area 21% West Bloomfield 65% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 69% Farmington 47% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 50% Under 35 48% 35 ‐ 49 46% 50 ‐ 64 52% 65 ‐ 74 75% 75+ 36% 65+ 55% Male 46% Female 58% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  18. 40 Excellent Perceptions of Yad Ezra (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 51% Household with Children 60% HH with Only Adult Children 62% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 48% Elderly Couple 66% Elderly Single 34% Under $50,000 55% $50 ‐ $100,000 60% $100 ‐ $200,000 42% $200,000 and over 54% Orthodox 67% Conservative 56% Reform 57% Just Jewish 31% In ‐ married 67% Intermarried 35% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  19. 41 Excellent Perceptions of Yad Ezra (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 51% Synagogue Member 62% Non ‐ Member 40% JCC Member 49% Non ‐ Member 51% Jewish Organization Member 58% Non ‐ Member 54% Donated to Federation 54% Asked, Did Not Donate 32% Not Asked 52% Federation Non ‐ Donor 47% Donated under $100 53% Donated $100 ‐ $500 39% Donated $500 and over 77% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  20. 42 Very Familiar with BBYO (Respondents) All 33% Core Area 36% Non ‐ Core Area 24% West Bloomfield 38% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 26% Farmington 44% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 28% Wayne County 6% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 18% 20+ Years 34% Under 35 46% 35 ‐ 49 38% 50 ‐ 64 28% 65 ‐ 74 28% 75+ 29% 65+ 28% Male 27% Female 37% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  21. 43 Very Familiar with BBYO (Respondents) All 33% Household with Children 45% HH with Only Adult Children 22% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 18% Non ‐ Elderly Single 27% Elderly Couple 28% Elderly Single 36% Under $25,000 8% $25 ‐ $50,000 31% $50 ‐ $100,000 34% $100 ‐ $200,000 31% $200,000 and over 51% Orthodox 30% Conservative 43% Reform 42% Just Jewish 19% In ‐ married 33% Conversionary 22% Intermarried 38% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  22. 44 Very Familiar with BBYO (Respondents) All 33% Synagogue Member 44% Non ‐ Member 26% JCC Member 39% Non ‐ Member 32% Jewish Organization Member 54% Non ‐ Member 27% Jewish Trip to Israel 41% General Trip to Israel 43% Not to Israel 19% Donated to Federation 47% Asked, Did Not Donate 46% Not Asked 18% Federation Non ‐ Donor 22% Donated under $100 44% Donated $100 ‐ $500 48% Donated $500 and over 49% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  23. 45 Excellent Perceptions of BBYO (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 32% Very Familiar with BBYO 52% Core Area 28% Non ‐ Core Area 46% West Bloomfield 33% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 23% Farmington 26% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 35% Under 50 47% 50 ‐ 64 22% 65 ‐ 74 24% 75+ 44% 65+ 30% Male 35% Female 30% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  24. 46 Excellent Perceptions of BBYO (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 32% Household with Children 48% HH with Only Adult Children 12% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 30% Elderly Couple 43% Elderly Single 34% Under $50,000 28% $50 ‐ $100,000 30% $100 ‐ $200,000 32% $200,000 and over 42% Conservative 38% Reform 35% Just Jewish 32% In ‐ married 33% Intermarried 36% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  25. 47 Excellent Perceptions of BBYO (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 32% Synagogue Member 36% Non ‐ Member 29% JCC Member 23% Non ‐ Member 33% Jewish Organization Member 48% Non ‐ Member 18% Donated to Federation 40% Not Asked 23% Federation Non ‐ Donor 24% Donated under $100 33% Donated $100 ‐ $500 42% Donated $500 and over 46% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  26. 48 Very Familiar with Senior Housing/ALF (Respondents) Detroit 2005 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis) 39% Detroit 2005 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 35% Detroit 2018 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 32% St. Petersburg 29% New Haven 29% Detroit 2018 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 28% Sarasota 24% South Palm Beach 3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  27. 49 Very Familiar with Senior Housing/ALF (Age 65 and Over) Detroit 2005 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 44% Detroit 2018 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 35% Detroit 2005 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 35% New Haven 29% Detroit 2018 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 28% Sarasota 26% St. Petersburg 13% South Palm Beach 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  28. 50 Not at All Familiar with Senior Housing/ALF (Respondents) South Palm Beach 91% Sarasota 38% Detroit 2018 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 34% St. Petersburg 30% New Haven 30% Detroit 2018 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 27% Detroit 2005 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 26% Detroit 2005 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 26% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  29. 51 Not at All Familiar with Senior Housing/ALF (Age 65 and Over) South Palm Beach 91% St. Petersburg 72% Sarasota 33% New Haven 30% Detroit 2005 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 29% Detroit 2018 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 27% Detroit 2005 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 27% Detroit 2018 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 23% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  30. 52 Very Familiar with Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Prentis, Meer, etc. (Respondents) All 32% Core Area 37% Non ‐ Core Area 16% West Bloomfield 44% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 21% Farmington 49% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 50% Wayne County 9% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 9% 20+ Years 36% Under 35 37% 35 ‐ 49 32% 50 ‐ 64 36% 65 ‐ 74 29% 75+ 27% 65+ 28% Male 30% Female 34% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  31. 53 Very Familiar with Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Prentis, Meer, etc. (Respondents) All 32% Household with Children 32% HH with Only Adult Children 20% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 53% Elderly Couple 29% Elderly Single 37% Under $25,000 28% $25 ‐ $50,000 14% $50 ‐ $100,000 29% $100 ‐ $200,000 39% $200,000 and over 44% Orthodox 28% Conservative 32% Reform 39% Just Jewish 25% In ‐ married 37% Intermarried 25% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  32. 54 Very Familiar with Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Prentis, Meer, etc. (Respondents) All 32% Synagogue Member 39% Non ‐ Member 27% JCC Member 44% Non ‐ Member 31% Jewish Organization Member 50% Non ‐ Member 27% Jewish Trip to Israel 56% General Trip to Israel 20% Not to Israel 22% Donated to Federation 41% Asked, Did Not Donate 47% Not Asked 21% Federation Non ‐ Donor 25% Donated under $100 39% Donated $100 ‐ $500 34% Donated $500 and over 55% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  33. 55 Very Familiar with Fleischman and Coville (Respondents) All 28% Core Area 36% Non ‐ Core Area 12% West Bloomfield 34% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 34% Farmington 42% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 29% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 31% 20+ Years 28% Under 35 28% 35 ‐ 49 33% 50 ‐ 64 19% 65 ‐ 74 26% 75+ 47% 65+ 35% Male 27% Female 29% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  34. 56 Very Familiar with Fleischman and Coville (Respondents) All 28% Household with Children 25% HH with Only Adult Children 25% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 43% Non ‐ Elderly Single 19% Elderly Couple 41% Elderly Single 27% Under $50,000 32% $50 ‐ $100,000 37% $100 ‐ $200,000 25% $200,000 and over 34% Orthodox 54% Conservative 39% Reform 30% Just Jewish 15% In ‐ married 46% Conversionary 28% Intermarried 13% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  35. 57 Very Familiar with Fleischman and Coville (Respondents) All 28% Synagogue Member 37% Non ‐ Member 23% JCC Member 30% Non ‐ Member 28% Jewish Organization Member 34% Non ‐ Member 25% Jewish Trip to Israel 36% General Trip to Israel 18% Not to Israel 28% Donated to Federation 40% Asked, Did Not Donate 37% Not Asked 30% Federation Non ‐ Donor 22% Donated under $100 37% Donated $100 ‐ $500 43% Donated $500 and over 40% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  36. 58 Excellent Perceptions of Senior Housing/ALF (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) Sarasota 51% New Haven 37% Detroit 2005 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Prent 36% South Palm Beach 35% Detroit 2005 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 34% Detroit 2018 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 28% St. Petersburg 27% Detroit 2018 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Prent 26% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  37. 59 Excellent Perceptions of Senior Housing/ALF (Age 65 and Over) Sarasota 49% New Haven 37% South Palm Beach 36% Detroit 2005 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 36% Detroit 2018 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 34% Detroit 2005 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 34% St. Petersburg 33% Detroit 2018 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 22% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  38. 60 Fair/Poor Perceptions of Senior Housing/ALF (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) New Haven 16% Detroit 2018 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 14% Detroit 2005 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 12% Detroit 2018 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 12% St. Petersburg 10% Detroit 2005 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 10% South Palm Beach 5% Sarasota 4% Fair Poor 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  39. 61 Fair/Poor Perceptions of Senior Housing/ALF (Age 65 and Over) New Haven 16% Detroit 2018 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 14% Detroit 2005 ‐ Fleischman and Coville 12% Detroit 2018 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 12% St. Petersburg 10% Detroit 2005 ‐ Jewish Senior Life Apts ‐ Prentis 10% South Palm Beach 6% Sarasota 4% Fair Poor 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  40. 62 Excellent Perceptions of Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Prentis, Meer. Etc. (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 26% Very Familiar with Senior Life 50% Apartments Core Area 27% Non ‐ Core Area 22% West Bloomfield 32% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 22% Farmington 21% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 25% Under 50 32% 50 ‐ 64 26% 65 ‐ 74 29% 75+ 13% 65+ 22% Male 22% Female 30% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  41. 63 Excellent Perceptions of Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Prentis, Meer. Etc. (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 26% Household with Children 34% HH with Only Adult Children 23% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 28% Elderly Couple 14% Elderly Single 32% Under $50,000 23% $50 ‐ $100,000 16% $100 ‐ $200,000 34% $200,000 and over 27% Orthodox 24% Conservative 24% Reform 26% Just Jewish 36% In ‐ married 23% Intermarried 39% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  42. 64 Excellent Perceptions of Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Prentis, Meer. Etc. (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 26% Synagogue Member 31% Non ‐ Member 22% JCC Member 40% Non ‐ Member 25% Jewish Organization Member 20% Non ‐ Member 21% Donated to Federation 33% Asked, Did Not Donate 20% Not Asked 17% Federation Non ‐ Donor 18% Donated under $100 38% Donated $100 ‐ $500 21% Donated $500 and over 40% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  43. 65 Excellent Perceptions of the Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Fleischman, Coville (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 28% Very Familiar with Senior Life 44% Apartments Core Area 28% Non ‐ Core Area 31% West Bloomfield 27% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 34% Farmington 16% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 27% Under 50 30% 50 ‐ 64 19% 65 ‐ 74 27% 75+ 43% 65+ 34% Male 34% Female 23% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  44. 66 Excellent Perceptions of the Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Fleischman, Coville (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 28% Household with Children 41% HH with Only Adult Children 19% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 30% Elderly Couple 40% Elderly Single 29% Under $50,000 32% $50 ‐ $100,000 32% $100 ‐ $200,000 21% $200,000 and over 36% Orthodox 45% Conservative 32% Reform 25% Just Jewish 24% In ‐ married 42% Intermarried 8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  45. 67 Excellent Perceptions of the Jewish Senior Life Apartments ‐ Fleischman, Coville (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 28% Synagogue Member 29% Non ‐ Member 28% JCC Member 35% Non ‐ Member 28% Jewish Organization Member 47% Non ‐ Member 26% Donated to Federation 33% Asked, Did Not Donate 11% Not Asked 29% Federation Non ‐ Donor 26% Donated under $100 23% Donated $100 ‐ $500 37% Donated $500 and over 41% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  46. 68 Very Familiar with Friendship Circle (Respondents) All 28% Core Area 33% Non ‐ Core Area 13% West Bloomfield 34% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 29% Farmington 40% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 31% Wayne County 6% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 29% 20+ Years 28% Under 35 45% 35 ‐ 49 35% 50 ‐ 64 24% 65 ‐ 74 24% 75+ 23% 65+ 24% Male 23% Female 33% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  47. 69 Very Familiar with Friendship Circle (Respondents) All 28% Household with Children 42% HH with Only Adult Children 20% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 44% Non ‐ Elderly Single 16% Elderly Couple 27% Elderly Single 28% Under $50,000 23% $50 ‐ $100,000 21% $100 ‐ $200,000 28% $200,000 and over 45% Orthodox 45% Conservative 47% Reform 30% Just Jewish 15% In ‐ married 38% Conversionary 24% Intermarried 28% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  48. 70 Very Familiar with Friendship Circle (Respondents) All 28% Synagogue Member 44% Non ‐ Member 16% JCC Member 35% Non ‐ Member 28% Jewish Organization Member 48% Non ‐ Member 16% Jewish Trip to Israel 41% General Trip to Israel 28% Not to Israel 24% Donated to Federation 42% Asked, Did Not Donate 32% Not Asked 15% Federation Non ‐ Donor 17% Donated under $100 39% Donated $100 ‐ $500 27% Donated $500 and over 66% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  49. 71 Excellent Perceptions of Friendship Circle (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 66% Very Familiar with Friendship Circle 78% Core Area 67% Non ‐ Core Area 63% West Bloomfield 75% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 55% Farmington 83% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 58% Under 35 43% 35 ‐ 49 88% 50 ‐ 64 63% 65 ‐ 74 61% 75+ 78% 65+ 68% Male 70% Female 63% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  50. 72 Excellent Perceptions of Friendship Circle (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 66% Household with Children 71% HH with Only Adult Children 62% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 66% Elderly Couple 72% Elderly Single 68% Under $50,000 56% $50 ‐ $100,000 50% $100 ‐ $200,000 81% $200,000 and over 68% Orthodox 66% Conservative 63% Reform 73% Just Jewish 62% In ‐ married 66% Conversionary 44% Intermarried 85% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  51. 73 Excellent Perceptions of Friendship Circle (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 66% Synagogue Member 64% Non ‐ Member 69% JCC Member 73% Non ‐ Member 65% Jewish Organization Member 70% Non ‐ Member 66% Donated to Federation 64% Asked, Did Not Donate 55% Not Asked 72% Federation Non ‐ Donor 68% Donated under $100 57% Donated $100 ‐ $500 71% Donated $500 and over 63% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  52. 74 Very Familiar with the Local Jewish Family Service (Respondents) Detroit 2005 35% Tidewater 33% Minneapolis 31% Detroit 2018 28% Jacksonville 27% San Antonio 23% St. Paul 22% Omaha 20% Rhode Island 18% Lehigh Valley 18% Hartford 17% Indianapolis 16% Tucson 16% Washington 16% Atlantic County 16% St. Petersburg 15% Sarasota 14% Las Vegas 11% New Haven 10% Miami 9% Broward 9% Bergen 9% Westport 8% Howard County 8% Middlesex 8% South Palm Beach 7% Portland (ME) 7% West Palm Beach 7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  53. 75 Not at All Familiar with the Local Jewish Family Service (Respondents) Portland (ME) 75% West Palm Beach 75% Middlesex 70% Howard County 69% South Palm Beach 69% St. Petersburg 66% Bergen 66% Westport 64% Broward 63% Miami 61% Las Vegas 61% New Haven 55% Sarasota 54% Indianapolis 52% Atlantic County 51% Hartford 49% Washington 48% Lehigh Valley 47% Omaha 44% Rhode Island 44% Tucson 44% Jacksonville 41% San Antonio 39% St. Paul 35% Minneapolis 28% Tidewater 28% Detroit 2018 27% Detroit 2005 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  54. 76 Very Familiar with Jewish Family Services (Respondents) All 28% Core Area 35% Non ‐ Core Area 11% West Bloomfield 31% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 32% Farmington 42% Southfield 39% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 32% Wayne County 9% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 21% 20+ Years 29% Under 35 21% 35 ‐ 49 33% 50 ‐ 64 28% 65 ‐ 74 33% 75+ 20% 65+ 27% Male 21% Female 34% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  55. 77 Very Familiar with Jewish Family Services (Respondents) All 28% Household with Children 32% HH with Only Adult Children 25% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 21% Non ‐ Elderly Single 33% Elderly Couple 27% Elderly Single 22% Now Married 29% Currently Widowed 36% Currently Divorced 16% Single, Never Married 24% Under $50,000 35% $50 ‐ $100,000 21% $100 ‐ $200,000 28% $200,000 and over 34% Orthodox 35% Conservative 24% Reform 31% Just Jewish 23% In ‐ married 39% Intermarried 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  56. 78 Very Familiar with Jewish Family Services (Respondents) All 28% Synagogue Member 36% Non ‐ Member 21% JCC Member 46% Non ‐ Member 26% Jewish Organization Member 46% Non ‐ Member 24% Jewish Trip to Israel 39% General Trip to Israel 13% Not to Israel 22% Donated to Federation 38% Asked, Did Not Donate 20% Not Asked 19% Federation Non ‐ Donor 19% Donated under $100 37% Donated $100 ‐ $500 37% Donated $500 and over 43% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  57. Excellent Perceptions of the Local Jewish Family Service 79 (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) Tidewater 51% Minneapolis 49% Jacksonville 48% St. Petersburg 46% Sarasota 45% Tucson 41% Atlantic County 40% St. Paul 40% Detroit 2018 37% South Palm Beach 36% San Antonio 36% Washington 35% Detroit 2005 34% Lehigh Valley 34% Omaha 34% Hartford 33% Rhode Island 33% West Palm Beach 32% Miami 30% Broward 30% Indianapolis 29% New Haven 29% Westport 25% Bergen 25% Middlesex 24% Portland (ME) 17% Las Vegas 17% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  58. 80 Fair/Poor Perceptions of the Local Jewish Family Service (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) Las Vegas 27% Bergen 24% Broward 21% Portland (ME) 18% Middlesex 18% San Antonio 17% West Palm Beach 16% Miami 16% Omaha 15% St. Petersburg 14% Lehigh Valley 13% Tucson 13% New Haven 12% Rhode Island 12% South Palm Beach 11% Detroit 2005 11% St. Paul 10% Westport 10% Washington 10% Sarasota 10% Jacksonville 9% Indianapolis 8% Tidewater 8% Minneapolis 8% Hartford 8% Detroit 2018 6% Fair Poor Atlantic County 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  59. 81 Excellent Perceptions of Jewish Family Services (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 37% Very Familiar with JFS 57% Core Area 37% Non ‐ Core Area 38% West Bloomfield 31% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 47% Farmington 49% Southfield 29% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 28% Under 35 30% 35 ‐ 49 46% 50 ‐ 64 40% 65 ‐ 74 37% 75+ 25% 65+ 31% Male 32% Female 42% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  60. 82 Excellent Perceptions of Jewish Family Services (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 37% Household with Children 52% HH with Only Adult Children 40% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 36% Elderly Couple 23% Elderly Single 28% Now Married 39% Currently Widowed 28% Currently Divorced 39% Single, Never Married 25% Under $50,000 34% $50 ‐ $100,000 34% $100 ‐ $200,000 44% $200,000 and over 39% Orthodox 28% Conservative 32% Reform 43% Just Jewish 32% In ‐ married 33% Conversionary 40% Intermarried 57% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  61. 83 Excellent Perceptions of Jewish Family Services (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 37% Synagogue Member 39% Non ‐ Member 36% JCC Member 45% Non ‐ Member 37% Jewish Organization Member 34% Non ‐ Member 36% Donated to Federation 41% Asked, Did Not Donate 23% Not Asked 35% Federation Non ‐ Donor 33% Donated under $100 36% Donated $100 ‐ $500 44% Donated $500 and over 47% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  62. 84 Very Familiar with Detroit Hebrew Free Loan (Respondents) All 25% Core Area 30% Non ‐ Core Area 9% West Bloomfield 28% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 36% Farmington 15% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 48% Wayne County 5% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 15% 20+ Years 27% Under 35 21% 35 ‐ 49 37% 50 ‐ 64 27% 65 ‐ 74 19% 75+ 20% 65+ 19% Male 27% Female 23% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  63. 85 Very Familiar with Detroit Hebrew Free Loan (Respondents) All 25% Household with Children 35% HH with Only Adult Children 17% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 31% Non ‐ Elderly Single 24% Elderly Couple 27% Elderly Single 19% Under $50,000 36% $50 ‐ $100,000 23% $100 ‐ $200,000 27% $200,000 and over 32% Orthodox 41% Conservative 25% Reform 31% Just Jewish 18% In ‐ married 39% Intermarried 10% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  64. 86 Very Familiar with Detroit Hebrew Free Loan (Respondents) All 25% Synagogue Member 33% Non ‐ Member 18% JCC Member 29% Non ‐ Member 24% Jewish Organization Member 32% Non ‐ Member 23% Jewish Trip to Israel 30% General Trip to Israel 31% Not to Israel 20% Donated to Federation 37% Asked, Did Not Donate 11% Not Asked 18% Federation Non ‐ Donor 16% Donated under $100 35% Donated $100 ‐ $500 27% Donated $500 and over 55% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  65. 87 Excellent Perceptions of Detroit Hebrew Free Loan (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 49% Very Familiar with Hebrew Free Loan 77% Core Area 53% Non ‐ Core Area 25% West Bloomfield 55% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 67% Farmington 33% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 48% Under 50 43% 50 ‐ 64 52% 65 ‐ 74 47% 75+ 59% 65+ 53% Male 46% Female 53% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  66. 88 Excellent Perceptions of Detroit Hebrew Free Loan (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 49% Household with Children 50% HH with Only Adult Children 40% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 51% Elderly Couple 47% Elderly Single 62% Under $50,000 55% $50 ‐ $100,000 43% $100 ‐ $200,000 45% $200,000 and over 58% Orthodox 55% Conservative 52% Reform 59% Just Jewish 38% In ‐ married 55% Intermarried 26% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  67. 89 Excellent Perceptions of Detroit Hebrew Free Loan (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 49% Synagogue Member 54% Non ‐ Member 43% JCC Member 57% Non ‐ Member 49% Jewish Organization Member 67% Non ‐ Member 44% Donated to Federation 56% Asked, Did Not Donate 29% Not Asked 43% Federation Non ‐ Donor 40% Donated under $100 47% Donated $100 ‐ $500 57% Donated $500 and over 69% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  68. 90 Very Familiar with Detroit JVS (Jewish Vocational Service) (Respondents) All 24% Core Area 32% Non ‐ Core Area 6% West Bloomfield 25% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 51% Farmington 23% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 36% Wayne County 2% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 15% 20+ Years 25% Under 35 10% 35 ‐ 49 28% 50 ‐ 64 28% 65 ‐ 74 28% 75+ 17% 65+ 23% Male 29% Female 19% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  69. 91 Very Familiar with Detroit JVS (Jewish Vocational Service) (Respondents) All 24% Household with Children 35% HH with Only Adult Children 18% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 30% Non ‐ Elderly Single 12% Elderly Couple 28% Elderly Single 23% Under $50,000 15% $50 ‐ $100,000 16% $100 ‐ $200,000 24% $200,000 and over 41% Orthodox 27% Conservative 17% Reform 36% Just Jewish 17% In ‐ married 37% Conversionary 25% Intermarried 18% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  70. 92 Very Familiar with Detroit JVS (Jewish Vocational Service) (Respondents) All 24% Synagogue Member 29% Non ‐ Member 21% JCC Member 24% Non ‐ Member 24% Jewish Organization Member 32% Non ‐ Member 29% Jewish Trip to Israel 19% General Trip to Israel 28% Not to Israel 25% Donated to Federation 32% Asked, Did Not Donate 22% Not Asked 18% Federation Non ‐ Donor 18% Donated under $100 13% Donated $100 ‐ $500 42% Donated $500 and over 47% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  71. 93 Excellent Perceptions of Detroit JVS (Jewish Vocational Service) (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 47% Very Familiar with JVS 76% Core Area 50% Non ‐ Core Area 32% West Bloomfield 40% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 70% Farmington 33% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 56% Under 50 53% 50 ‐ 64 45% 65 ‐ 74 50% 75+ 35% 65+ 44% Male 61% Female 35% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  72. 94 Excellent Perceptions of Detroit JVS (Jewish Vocational Service) (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 47% Household with Children 59% HH with Only Adult Children 48% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 46% Elderly Couple 44% Elderly Single 47% Under $25,000 37% $25 ‐ $50,000 34% $50 ‐ $100,000 30% $100 ‐ $200,000 54% $200,000 and over 61% Conservative 46% Reform 59% Just Jewish 36% In ‐ married 49% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  73. 95 Excellent Perceptions of Detroit JVS (Jewish Vocational Service) (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 47% Synagogue Member 56% Non ‐ Member 40% JCC Member 47% Non ‐ Member 47% Jewish Organization Member 54% Non ‐ Member 48% Donated to Federation 49% Asked, Did Not Donate 52% Not Asked 43% Federation Non ‐ Donor 45% Donated under $100 36% Donated $100 ‐ $500 51% Donated $500 and over 65% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  74. 96 Very Familiar with Detroit Jewish Hospice and Chaplaincy Network (Respondents) All 23% Core Area 29% Non ‐ Core Area 6% West Bloomfield 33% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 25% Farmington 55% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 22% Wayne County 5% 0 ‐ 19 Years in Detroit 9% 20+ Years 25% Under 35 15% 35 ‐ 49 20% 50 ‐ 64 25% 65 ‐ 74 28% 75+ 23% 65+ 26% Male 17% Female 27% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  75. 97 Very Familiar with Detroit Jewish Hospice and Chaplaincy Network (Respondents) All 23% Household with Children 22% HH with Only Adult Children 19% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 37% Non ‐ Elderly Single 9% Elderly Couple 33% Elderly Single 26% Under $50,000 8% $50 ‐ $100,000 15% $100 ‐ $200,000 26% $200,000 and over 43% Orthodox 22% Conservative 25% Reform 34% Just Jewish 11% In ‐ married 29% Conversionary 29% Intermarried 19% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  76. 98 Very Familiar with Detroit Jewish Hospice and Chaplaincy Network (Respondents) All 23% Synagogue Member 34% Non ‐ Member 16% JCC Member 29% Non ‐ Member 22% Jewish Organization Member 41% Non ‐ Member 20% Jewish Trip to Israel 36% General Trip to Israel 23% Not to Israel 8% Donated to Federation 33% Asked, Did Not Donate 35% Not Asked 13% Federation Non ‐ Donor 16% Donated under $100 22% Donated $100 ‐ $500 34% Donated $500 and over 49% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  77. 99 Excellent Perceptions of Detroit Jewish Hospice and Chaplaincy Network (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 55% Very Familiar with Hospice/ 79% Chaplaincy Network Core Area 55% Non ‐ Core Area 53% West Bloomfield 60% Bloomfield ‐ Birmingham ‐ Franklin 65% Farmington 65% Oak Park ‐ Huntington Woods 27% Under 50 48% 50 ‐ 64 51% 65 ‐ 74 52% 75+ 76% 65+ 63% Male 61% Female 51% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

  78. 100 Excellent Perceptions of Detroit Jewish Hospice and Chaplaincy Network (Respondents Who Are Very/Somewhat Familiar) All 55% Household with Children 58% HH with Only Adult Children 49% Non ‐ Elderly Couple 56% Elderly Couple 65% Elderly Single 73% Under $50,000 42% $50 ‐ $100,000 55% $100 ‐ $200,000 52% $200,000 and over 63% Conservative 69% Reform 59% Just Jewish 32% In ‐ married 57% Intermarried 56% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Jewish Genealogy Questions? 2 Where is Bessarabia and Where is Moldova ? Are these two

Jewish Genealogy Questions? 2 Where is Bessarabia and Where is Moldova ? Are these two

JEWISH GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY OF MONTREAL in association with the JEWISH PUBLIC LIBRARY Bessarabia/Moldova : Geography, History of Jews, Vital and other Records, Jewish Cemeteries, Yizkor Books and more Yefim A. Kogan Masters of Jewish Liberal

687 views • 31 slides
Religious Profile: Jewish Identification 2 Jewish Identification (Jewish Households)

Religious Profile: Jewish Identification 2 Jewish Identification (Jewish Households)

1 1 Religious Profile: Jewish Identification 2 Jewish Identification (Jewish Households) Reconstructionist Conservative 2% 20% Orthodox 9% Reform 35% Humanist 4% Just Jewish 31% 3 Jewish Identification (Jewish Persons) Conservative

1.59k views • 119 slides
Trends in Perception of Federal Statistical Agencies Among the U.S. Population: 2012-2017 Rodney

Trends in Perception of Federal Statistical Agencies Among the U.S. Population: 2012-2017 Rodney

Trends in Perception of Federal Statistical Agencies Among the U.S. Population: 2012-2017 Rodney L. Terry 1 Mandi Martinez 1 Jennifer H. Childs 1 Gerson Morales 2 1 U.S. Census Bureau, 2 TRIADA Research and Planning 73 rd AAPOR Conference Denver,

454 views • 24 slides
JEWISH MUSIC 101: WHAT IS JEWISH MUSIC? A PROGRAM OF THE LOWELL MILKEN FUND FOR AMERICAN JEWISH

JEWISH MUSIC 101: WHAT IS JEWISH MUSIC? A PROGRAM OF THE LOWELL MILKEN FUND FOR AMERICAN JEWISH

U N I T 1 JEWISH MUSIC 101: WHAT IS JEWISH MUSIC? A PROGRAM OF THE LOWELL MILKEN FUND FOR AMERICAN JEWISH MUSIC AT THE UCLA HERB ALPERT SCHOOL OF MUSIC CONCEPTUAL FRAME FOR DEFINING MUSIC WHAT IS JEWISH MUSIC? UNIT 1: JEWISH MUSIC 101

840 views • 29 slides
Yes Mixed Response No BORN OR RAISED JEWISH PERSON Great! My name is ____ , Since no one in

Yes Mixed Response No BORN OR RAISED JEWISH PERSON Great! My name is ____ , Since no one in

Screener Hello. We are calling for a population study for the Jewish community sponsored by the Jewish Federation of Broward County. We are NOT asking for donations or selling anything and we do not know your name or address. We are randomly

279 views • 27 slides
Where Does Jewish Teaching Come From? Torah (5 Books of Moses) Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus,

Where Does Jewish Teaching Come From? Torah (5 Books of Moses) Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus,

12/11/2018 Understanding Jewish Religious Values & Their Role In Health Care A View From Jewish Tradition Rabbi James A. Gibson, Temple Sinai, Pittsburgh, PA Where Does Jewish Teaching Come From? Torah (5 Books of Moses) Genesis,

549 views • 8 slides
Between Halakhah and the Other: Navigating the Scope of Jewish Ethics One recurring

Between Halakhah and the Other: Navigating the Scope of Jewish Ethics One recurring

Matthew Peterson University of Chicago Philosophy of Religions/Jewish Studies Workshop Presentation 4/14/15 Between Halakhah and the Other: Navigating the Scope of Jewish Ethics One recurring theme in modern Jewish thought has been

534 views • 16 slides
Jewish Missions in the Warsaw Ghetto Presented by Dr. Mitch Glaser The Messianic Jewish Movement

Jewish Missions in the Warsaw Ghetto Presented by Dr. Mitch Glaser The Messianic Jewish Movement

Jewish Missions in the Warsaw Ghetto Presented by Dr. Mitch Glaser The Messianic Jewish Movement The Messianic Jewish Movement Important Individuals Emanuel Ringelblum - Jewish historian in the Warsaw Ghetto who preserved many documents

496 views • 21 slides
MASTERClass AJAS Master Class Innovations in Jewish End-of-Life Care End-of-Life Care for Jewish

MASTERClass AJAS Master Class Innovations in Jewish End-of-Life Care End-of-Life Care for Jewish

2017 AJAS Annual Conference MASTERClass AJAS Master Class Innovations in Jewish End-of-Life Care End-of-Life Care for Jewish Community Should be informed by and incorporate the following: Cultural norms in Jewish community Jewish vs.

492 views • 38 slides
CONTENTS Introduction Summary Methodology Household and Population Estimates

CONTENTS Introduction Summary Methodology Household and Population Estimates

THE 2002 PITTSBURGH JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDY The Jewish Population of Greater Pittsburgh An Executive Briefing UKELES ASSOCIATES, INC. [UAI] Marketing Systems Group [MSG] -GENESYS International Communications Research [ICR] The United Jewish

1.24k views • 82 slides
Dreaming About Jewish Peoplehood A Critical Exploration of Jewish Identity in the 21st Century

Dreaming About Jewish Peoplehood A Critical Exploration of Jewish Identity in the 21st Century

Dreaming About Jewish Peoplehood A Critical Exploration of Jewish Identity in the 21st Century Rabbi Talia Avnon-Benveniste . airb & b's #WeAccept campaign. Super Bowl 2017 What qualities do I preserve? How many can fit in one jar? How

241 views • 11 slides
What is the Challenge in Experiential Jewish Education? Presentation to Consultation on Jewish

What is the Challenge in Experiential Jewish Education? Presentation to Consultation on Jewish

What is the Challenge in Experiential Jewish Education? Presentation to Consultation on Jewish Experiential Learning November 4 th , 2007, Brandeis University David Bryfman bryfman@nyu.edu Lifes challenges are not supposed to paralyze you,

110 views • 8 slides
Were All Jewish Men Married? DVC All Jewish Men Married Jesus as a married man makes

Were All Jewish Men Married? DVC All Jewish Men Married Jesus as a married man makes

Were All Jewish Men Married? DVC All Jewish Men Married Jesus as a married man makes infinitely more sense than our standard biblical view of Jesus as a bachelor. Why? Sophie asked. Because Jesus was a Jew, Langdon

529 views • 41 slides
Jewish Population Study Ira M. Sheskin, Ph.D. Director of the Jewish Demography Project of the

Jewish Population Study Ira M. Sheskin, Ph.D. Director of the Jewish Demography Project of the

1 t o t e h t e a d 2 p 0 U 0 5 0 1 D 0 e 2 t r e o h i T t Jewish Population Study Ira M. Sheskin, Ph.D. Director of the Jewish Demography Project of the Sue and Leonard Miller Center for Contemporary Judaic Studies

1k views • 98 slides
Albanian-American-Jewish Relations: Contributions of U.S. Ambassador to Albania, Herman Bernstein

Albanian-American-Jewish Relations: Contributions of U.S. Ambassador to Albania, Herman Bernstein

Albanian-American-Jewish Relations: Contributions of U.S. Ambassador to Albania, Herman Bernstein (1876-1935) By Mal Berisha RUTH GAY SEMINAR IN JEWISH STUDIES YIVO Institute for Jewish Research December 14, 2014 This presentation is based

832 views • 61 slides
Jewish Worship and Community Learning Objective: To find out the meaning of Jewish rituals in

Jewish Worship and Community Learning Objective: To find out the meaning of Jewish rituals in

Jewish Worship and Community Learning Objective: To find out the meaning of Jewish rituals in relation to joining the Jewish community. NEXT www.planbee.com What does it mean to belong to a community? How many communities do you belong

247 views • 7 slides
MIT 6.875 & Berkeley CS276 Foundations of Cryptography Lecture 21 TODAY: Homomorphic

MIT 6.875 & Berkeley CS276 Foundations of Cryptography Lecture 21 TODAY: Homomorphic

MIT 6.875 & Berkeley CS276 Foundations of Cryptography Lecture 21 TODAY: Homomorphic Encryption 1. Secure Outsourcing Input: x Program: P Enc (x) x Enc (P(x)) P(x) Client Server (the Cloud) A Special Case: Encrypted Database Lookup

515 views • 38 slides
Quelques applications des fonctions ` a variation born ee en dimension finie et infinie. Th`

Quelques applications des fonctions ` a variation born ee en dimension finie et infinie. Th`

Quelques applications des fonctions ` a variation born ee en dimension finie et infinie. Th` ese de Doctorat Michael Goldman CMAP, Polytechnique 9 d ecembre 2011 Topic of the Thesis Introduction Primal-Dual methods in image

846 views • 62 slides
infrastructure in existing residential buildings? e-MOTICON FINAL EVENT March 26, 2019 Milan,

infrastructure in existing residential buildings? e-MOTICON FINAL EVENT March 26, 2019 Milan,

How to implement charging infrastructure in existing residential buildings? e-MOTICON FINAL EVENT March 26, 2019 Milan, Palazzo Lombardia Christian STEGER-VONMETZ About us We are a federal company owned by the Austrian Federal Ministry of

158 views • 13 slides
A Communication Protocol for Distributed Process Management Lerina Aversano, Aniello Cimitile,

A Communication Protocol for Distributed Process Management Lerina Aversano, Aniello Cimitile,

A Communication Protocol for Distributed Process Management Lerina Aversano, Aniello Cimitile, Andrea De Lucia RCOST - Research Center On Software Technology Department of Engineering, University of Sannio Via Traiano, Palazzo ex-Poste

470 views • 5 slides
Measurements of Reactor Neutrinos at Long Baselines: KamLAND and Beyond Brian Kurt Fujikawa

Measurements of Reactor Neutrinos at Long Baselines: KamLAND and Beyond Brian Kurt Fujikawa

Measurements of Reactor Neutrinos at Long Baselines: KamLAND and Beyond Brian Kurt Fujikawa Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2011 APS April Meeting 2011-05-01 1 Reactor Anti-Neutrino Disappearance Experiments Beta Decay of Neuron Rich

668 views • 43 slides
Dynamically Time-Capped Possibilistic Testing of SubClassOf Axioms Against RDF Data to Enrich

Dynamically Time-Capped Possibilistic Testing of SubClassOf Axioms Against RDF Data to Enrich

Introduction Principles Possibilistic Scoring Candidate Axiom Testing Subsumption Axiom Testing Experiments Conclusion Dynamically Time-Capped Possibilistic Testing of SubClassOf Axioms Against RDF Data to Enrich Schemas Andrea G. B.

446 views • 25 slides
Patterns and Packages in PostgreSQL for Privacy Preservation mantaq10 15 November 2019, Sydney

Patterns and Packages in PostgreSQL for Privacy Preservation mantaq10 15 November 2019, Sydney

PostgreSQL, Planning, PostGIS, Partitioning, PaaS, Permissions and now. Patterns and Packages in PostgreSQL for Privacy Preservation mantaq10 15 November 2019, Sydney www.2019.pgdu.org Atif Rahman I was like her According to Pearson-R

508 views • 24 slides
Selecting an Optimiser for a multinational supply chain - real world case study Eddy Parkinson

Selecting an Optimiser for a multinational supply chain - real world case study Eddy Parkinson

Selecting an Optimiser for a multinational supply chain - real world case study Eddy Parkinson Multi-National Supply Chain Customers in China/USA/Australia etc Exchange Rates Import Tax Transport Costs Factory Costs

509 views • 22 slides

More recommend