Religious Profile: Jewish Identification 2 Jewish Identification - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

religious profile jewish identification
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Religious Profile: Jewish Identification 2 Jewish Identification - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 1 Religious Profile: Jewish Identification 2 Jewish Identification (Jewish Households) Reconstructionist Conservative 2% 20% Orthodox 9% Reform 35% Humanist 4% Just Jewish 31% 3 Jewish Identification (Jewish Persons) Conservative


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Religious Profile: Jewish Identification

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Jewish Identification

Orthodox 9% Conservative 20% Reconstructionist 2% Reform 35% Just Jewish 31% Humanist 4%

(Jewish Households)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Jewish Identification

Orthodox 15% Conservative 20% Reconstructionist 1% Reform 35% Just Jewish 25% Humanist 4%

(Jewish Persons)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Jewish Identification

Orthodox 5% Conservative 24% Reconstructionist 1% Reform 37% Just Jewish 27% Humanist 6%

(Jewish Respondents Age 65 and Over)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Jewish Identification

Orthodox 37% Conservative 16% Reconstructionist 1% Reform 30% Just Jewish 13% Humanist 2%

(12,000 Jewish Children)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Orthodox Identification

(Jewish Respondents)

21% 20% 12% 11% 11% 10% 10% 9% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% Baltimore New York Bergen Miami Detroit 2005 Cleveland Atlanta Detroit 2018 Chicago Middlesex Pittsburgh Detroit 1989

  • St. Louis

Philadelphia Rhode Island Columbus Cincinnati Seattle Indianapolis Broward Houston New Haven Lehigh Valley San Antonio Boston South Palm Beach Hartford

  • St. Petersburg

Omaha East Bay Las Vegas San Francisco San Diego Phoenix Tidewater Denver Portland (ME) West Palm Beach Minneapolis

  • St. Paul

Washington Jacksonville Tucson Sarasota Westport Howard County Atlantic County 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Conservative Identification

(Jewish Respondents)

39% 38% 38% 35% 35% 34% 32% 32% 32% 32% 31% 31% 31% 31% 31% 30% 30% 30% 30% 30% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 25% 25% 25% 24% 24% 23% 22% 22% 22% 22% 21% 21% 20% 19% 19% 19% 17% 16% 15% 14% 13% 10% Tidewater Jacksonville Detroit 1989 Middlesex South Palm Beach Lehigh Valley West Palm Beach Atlantic County

  • St. Paul

Pittsburgh Philadelphia Boston Minneapolis Bergen Hartford Broward Howard County New Haven Washington Rhode Island Columbus Detroit 2005 Cincinnati Atlanta Miami Cleveland Baltimore San Antonio Houston Phoenix Las Vegas Chicago San Diego Sarasota Westport

  • St. Petersburg

Tucson Detroit 2018

  • St. Louis

New York Seattle San Francisco Denver East Bay Portland (ME) Omaha Indianapolis 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Reform Identification

(Jewish Respondents)

47% 47% 46% 45% 45% 44% 43% 42% 41% 41% 41% 40% 39% 39% 38% 38% 38% 37% 37% 37% 36% 36% 35% 35% 34% 34% 34% 33% 32% 32% 32% 31% 31% 31% 30% 30% 30% 29% 29% 28% 28% 28% 27% 26% 25% 24% 23%

  • St. Louis

Cincinnati Cleveland Chicago Atlanta Phoenix Boston Philadelphia Pittsburgh Seattle Westport San Diego Denver San Antonio Omaha San Francisco Sarasota Houston West Palm Beach Atlantic County Indianapolis Detroit 2005 Detroit 2018 Portland (ME) Columbus South Palm Beach Detroit 1989 East Bay Howard County Minneapolis Tucson Miami Washington Hartford

  • St. Petersburg

New Haven Lehigh Valley Middlesex Tidewater Broward

  • St. Paul

Rhode Island Baltimore Las Vegas Bergen Jacksonville New York 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Just Jewish Identification

(Jewish Respondents)

48% 47% 47% 46% 45% 44% 43% 40% 37% 37% 37% 37% 36% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 35% 34% 34% 33% 33% 33% 32% 31% 31% 30% 30% 29% 29% 29% 28% 28% 28% 26% 25% 22% 22% 21% 20% 18% 18% 18% 18% 16% 14% Portland (ME)

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas Omaha East Bay Tucson Indianapolis San Francisco Broward New York

  • St. Paul

Sarasota Jacksonville Detroit 2018 New Haven Minneapolis Rhode Island Seattle Westport Washington Hartford Houston Miami Columbus San Diego Denver Lehigh Valley San Antonio Bergen Middlesex West Palm Beach Atlantic County

  • St. Louis

Phoenix Tidewater South Palm Beach Howard County Cincinnati Detroit 2005 Detroit 1989 Baltimore Philadelphia Atlanta Boston Pittsburgh Cleveland Chicago 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Includes Jewish Humanist for comparative purpose (31% Just Jewish + 4% Humanist)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Jewish Identification by Geographic Area

(Jewish Respondents)

11% 2% 23% 12% 37% 30% 25% 46% 4% 5%

0% 5%

Core Area Non‐Core Area

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist Reconcstructionist

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Jewish Identification by Age of Respondent

(Jewish Respondents)

23% 11% 5% 8% 2% 22% 11% 20% 19% 29% 32% 31% 37% 41% 32% 22% 44% 30% 24% 30% 0% 2% 5% 6% 7% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist

Reconstructionist varies from 0.3% to 3% for each age group

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12 Orthodox 16% Conservative 29% Reconstructionist 2% Reform 42% Just Jewish 7% Humanist 3%

Jewish Identification by Synagogue Membership

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13 Orthodox 27% Conservative 32% Reconstructionist 1% Reform 23% Just Jewish 18%

Jewish Identification by Chabad Attendance

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14 Orthodox 3% Conservative 34% Reconstructionist 1% Reform 39% Just Jewish 22% Humanist 2%

Jewish Identification by JCC Membership

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 Orthodox 10% Conservative 28% Reconstructionist 3% Reform 36% Just Jewish 20% Humanist 3%

Jewish Identification by Jewish Organization Membership

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Religious Profile: Attitudes Toward Being Jewish

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Importance of Being Jewish

Very Important 62% Somewhat Important 31% Not too Important 6% Not at all Important 1% (Jewish Respondents)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

76% 75% 74% 74% 73% 73% 70% 70% 67% 66% 64% 63% 62% 62% 61% 57% 56% 53% 53% 44% 42% 41% Cincinnati Cleveland Miami Baltimore Chicago Detroit 1989 Howard County Philadelphia Pittsburgh Broward San Diego Phoenix Detroit 2018 Sarasota Denver New York Atlanta

  • St. Louis

Las Vegas Columbus East Bay San Francisco 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Importance of Being Jewish

(Jewish Respondents) % Very Important

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

62% 99% 91% 81% 46% 94% 75% 63% Being Jewish Is Very Important Proud to Be Jewish Have Strong Sense of Belonging to Jewish People Have a Special Responsibility to Care 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Detroit Pew

Source: Pew 2013

Attitude Comparisons with Pew 2013 US National Sample

for Jews in Need Around the World

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Being Jewish Is Very Important

(Jewish Respondents) 62% 64% 54% 68% 69% 41% 81% 69% 54% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Being Jewish Is Very Important

(Jewish Respondents) 62% 70% 65% 68% 50% 59% 54% 60% 64% 75% 52% 65% 70% 71% 42% 44% 64% 71% 50% 76% All Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22 62% 87% 84% 60% 32% 50% 78% 71% 38% 82% 47% 68% 58% 81% 61% 70% 59% 80% 63% 44% All Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School No Jewish Education 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Being Jewish Is Very Important

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23 62% 68% 60% 62% 55% 87% 56% 76% 64% 44% 71% 71% 50% 53% 75% 63% 78% 69% 63% 75% All To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100‐$500 Donated $500+ Republican Democrat Independent 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Being Jewish Is Very Important

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Proud to Be Jewish

(Jewish Respondents)

99% 99% 99% 98% 98% 97% 95% 94% Detroit Indianapolis Miami Broward

  • St. Petersburg

Houston Omaha Pew 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Have a Strong Sense of Belonging to the Jewish

(Jewish Respondents)

92% 91% 90% 89% 85% 83% 78% 75% Miami Detroit Broward Indianapolis

  • St. Petersburg

Houston Omaha Pew 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Special Responsibility to Take Care of Jews in Need Around the World

(Jewish Respondents)

83% 81% 81% 80% 77% 76% 70% 63% Houston Detroit Indianapolis Omaha Miami Broward

  • St. Petersburg

Pew 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Have a Strong Sense of Belonging to the Jewish People

(Jewish Respondents)

91% 75% 93% 82% 95% 98% 96% 98% 91% 81% All Pew Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Have a Strong Sense of Belonging to the Jewish People

(Jewish Respondents)

91% 97% 90% 85% 92% 96% 94% 86% 95% 89% 90% 87% 71% 97% 97% 76% 93% 93% 87% 97%

All Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29 91% 93% 94% 88% 89% 99% 99% 97% 70% 99% 85% 100% 90% 90% 91% 98% 84% 92% 89% 93%

All Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School No Jewish Education

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Have a Strong Sense of Belonging to the Jewish People

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30 91% 91% 92% 89% 96% 93% 94% 100% 82% 91% 98% 98% 82% 84% 97% 97% 99% 97% 90% 72%

All To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100‐$500 Donated $500+ Republican Democrat Independent

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Have a Strong Sense of Belonging to the Jewish People

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Have a Special Responsibility to Take Care of Jews in Need Around the World

(Jewish Respondents)

81% 63% 85% 68% 80% 94% 76% 100% 89% 82% All Pew Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Have a Special Responsibility to Take Care of Jews in Need Around the World

(Jewish Respondents)

81% 97% 88% 77% 73% 80% 76% 82% 81% 94% 75% 83% 69% 86% 80% 68% 87% 86% 79% 85%

All Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33 81% 100% 92% 83% 62% 67% 88% 86% 79% 92% 73% 97% 77% 78% 81% 92% 71% 83% 83% 66%

All Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School No Jewish Education

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Have a Special Responsibility to Take Care of Jews in Need Around the World

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34 81% 91% 68% 85% 76% 97% 80% 80% 87% 72% 94% 83% 69% 71% 93% 92% 98% 92% 81% 89%

All To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100‐$500 Donated $500+ Republican Democrat Independent

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Have a Special Responsibility to Take Care of Jews in Need Around the World

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Religious Profile: Religious Practices

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Religious Practices

(Jewish Households)

65% 59% 16% 4% 14% 9% 12% 6% 1% 4% 17% 18% 37% 28% 6% 9% 11% 41% 66% 75% Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Observe Sabbath in Some Way Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always Usually Sometimes Never

Of Households Who Never Light Sabbath Candles

Compared to Other Communities All are: Average

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37 69% 19% 13% 8% Mezuzah on Front Door Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity on Sabbath 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Compared to Other Communities Kosher Home: Seventh highest Kosher In/Out of Home: Fourth highest Electricity: Second highest Mezuzah: Average

Religious Practices

(Jewish Households for Mezuzah and Home, Respondents for Out of Home and Electricity)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Practice

(Always/Usually Do One or More of the Following: Passover Seder, Chanukah Candles, Sabbath Candles, or Kosher Home) (Jewish Households) 91% 91% 91% 90% 89% 89% 88% 88% 88% 88% 88% 87% 87% 87% 87% 87% 86% 85% 85% 85% 84% 84% 84% 83% 82% 81% 80% 80% 79% 79% 79% 78% 77% 75% 75% 75% 72% 72% 68% 68% 68% Howard County Middlesex Bergen Cincinnati Detroit 2005 South Palm Beach Broward Chicago West Palm Beach Minneapolis Detroit 1989 Miami Atlanta Atlantic County Hartford Westport Tidewater New Haven

  • St. Paul

Rhode Island Detroit 2018 Baltimore Washington Pittsburgh Lehigh Valley New York Indianapolis Cleveland Houston Portland (ME) San Antonio Sarasota Tucson Denver Jacksonville Phoenix

  • St. Louis

Las Vegas

  • St. Petersburg

Omaha Columbus 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Practice

(Jewish Households)

84% 90% 67% 90% 93% 91% 97% 88% 59% 94% 79% 84% 79% 87% 82% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Practice

(Jewish Households)

84% 87% 85% 95% 72% 87% 84% 68% 80% 89% 83% 93% 96% 96% 92% 67% 62% 96% 100% 69% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single Under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41 84% 98% 74% 96% 82% 95% 83% 99% 79% 93% 82% 73%

All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School No Jewish Education

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Practice

(Jewish Households)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42 84% 90% 82% 93% 75% 100% 88% 99% 88% 63% 94% 95% 72% 75% 90% 96% 98%

All To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100‐$500 Donated $500+

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Practice

(Jewish Households)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Have a Mezuzah on Front Door

(Jewish Households) 87% 83% 83% 80% 78% 77% 77% 76% 72% 69% 69% 68% 68% 68% 67% 67% 65% 65% 64% 63% 62% 58% 57% 57% 55% 55% 55% 52% 50% 50% 41% South Palm Beach Middlesex West Palm Beach Miami Broward Detroit 2005 Atlantic County Bergen Hartford Detroit 2018 Sarasota Lehigh Valley San Antonio Tidewater

  • St. Paul

Rhode Island New Haven Minneapolis Jacksonville Houston Westport Tucson Indianapolis San Diego Las Vegas Washington Phoenix

  • St. Petersburg

Omaha Portland (ME) Seattle 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Always/Usually Participate in a Passover Seder

(Jewish Households)

85% 83% 82% 82% 81% 81% 80% 79% 79% 78% 78% 78% 78% 78% 77% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 75% 75% 74% 73% 72% 71% 70% 70% 69% 69% 69% 67% 64% 63% 62% 62% 61% 61% 60% 60% 57% 55% 54% 50% 49% Bergen Middlesex Detroit 2005 Detroit 1989 Howard County Miami South Palm Beach Westport West Palm Beach Hartford Minneapolis Chicago Broward Atlantic County Washington Baltimore

  • St. Paul

Cincinnati New Haven Philadelphia Pittsburgh Tidewater Detroit 2018 Rhode Island Boston Houston Lehigh Valley Cleveland New York Sarasota San Antonio Indianapolis San Diego Jacksonville Atlanta Phoenix Columbus Tucson

  • St. Louis

Portland (ME) Denver San Francisco Omaha Las Vegas

  • St. Petersburg

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Never Participate in a Passover Seder

(Jewish Households)

29% 23% 22% 21% 19% 18% 16% 16% 15% 14% 14% 13% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% 10% 9% 9% 9% 9% 8% 8% 8% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 4% Columbus

  • St. Louis
  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas Atlanta Denver Omaha San Diego Jacksonville New York Sarasota Baltimore Pittsburgh Tucson Cleveland Portland (ME) Phoenix Houston Howard County Cincinnati Lehigh Valley San Antonio Indianapolis Rhode Island Tidewater Detroit 2018 Chicago Hartford Detroit 1989 Boston

  • St. Paul

Westport Broward New Haven South Palm Beach West Palm Beach Minneapolis Washington Miami Middlesex Detroit 2005 Atlantic County Bergen 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Always/Usually Light Chanukah Candles

(Jewish Households)

84% 83% 81% 79% 78% 78% 78% 78% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 77% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 75% 75% 74% 73% 73% 71% 71% 70% 70% 70% 70% 69% 69% 68% 68% 68% 68% 66% 65% 64% 64% 62% 58% 58% 57% 55% Middlesex Bergen Howard County Boston Hartford Westport Minneapolis Chicago Detroit 2005 Detroit 1989 Atlantic County South Palm Beach Broward Tidewater West Palm Beach Miami

  • St. Paul

Rhode Island Cincinnati New Haven Baltimore Atlanta Indianapolis Lehigh Valley Detroit 2018 Philadelphia Pittsburgh San Antonio Washington Portland (ME) Houston Cleveland Jacksonville New York Tucson San Diego Denver Sarasota Phoenix Las Vegas Columbus

  • St. Petersburg
  • St. Louis

San Francisco Omaha 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Never Light Chanukah Candles

(Jewish Households)

28% 25% 22% 21% 21% 20% 20% 18% 18% 17% 17% 17% 16% 16% 16% 16% 15% 14% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% 10% 10% 9% 9% 9% 8% 7% Columbus

  • St. Louis

Sarasota Omaha New York

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas Cleveland Phoenix Denver Jacksonville Pittsburgh Baltimore Portland (ME) San Diego Tucson Detroit 1989 Westport Houston Lehigh Valley San Antonio Detroit 2005 South Palm Beach West Palm Beach Washington Rhode Island Tidewater Hartford Miami Atlanta Atlantic County Detroit 2018 Howard County New Haven Chicago Cincinnati Boston

  • St. Paul

Indianapolis Broward Bergen Minneapolis Middlesex 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Always/Usually Light Sabbath Candles

(Jewish Households)

36% 33% 32% 32% 32% 29% 29% 26% 26% 25% 25% 25% 25% 24% 24% 23% 23% 22% 22% 22% 22% 22% 22% 21% 20% 20% 20% 20% 19% 19% 18% 18% 18% 18% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 17% 16% 14% 13% 13% 11% Baltimore New York Bergen Miami Detroit 1989 Detroit 2005 Cincinnati Boston Minneapolis Middlesex Hartford Pittsburgh

  • St. Paul

Jacksonville Houston Cleveland Atlanta Detroit 2018 South Palm Beach Broward Lehigh Valley Chicago Tidewater Rhode Island San Antonio San Diego New Haven San Francisco Washington Denver Indianapolis Omaha Howard County Philadelphia West Palm Beach Sarasota Tucson Westport Columbus

  • St. Louis
  • St. Petersburg

Phoenix Atlantic County Seattle Portland (ME) Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Never Light Sabbath Candles

(Jewish Households)

67% 63% 61% 59% 58% 58% 58% 58% 58% 57% 56% 56% 56% 56% 55% 54% 54% 53% 52% 52% 51% 51% 51% 50% 50% 49% 49% 48% 48% 48% 48% 47% 46% 46% 44% 44% 43% 43% 43% 42% 41% 41% 40% 39% Las Vegas Sarasota Portland (ME) West Palm Beach

  • St. Louis

Atlantic County Tucson Seattle Westport Phoenix

  • St. Petersburg

Columbus New Haven Denver South Palm Beach San Diego Tidewater Rhode Island Chicago Washington Omaha Middlesex Jacksonville Cleveland New York Howard County Lehigh Valley San Antonio Atlanta Pittsburgh Hartford Boston Broward Miami Indianapolis Bergen Houston Baltimore Detroit 1989 Minneapolis Detroit 2018 Cincinnati Detroit 2005

  • St. Paul

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Keep a Kosher Home

(Respondents)

32% 26% 20% 19% 19% 19% 15% 15% 13% 13% 13% 9% 9% 8% 7% 5% 29% 23% 22% 20% 19% 17% 16% 15% 15% 14% 14% 13% 12% 12% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% 10% 10% 9% 6% 6% 5% 3% New York Bergen Baltimore Middlesex Detroit 2005 Miami Cleveland Detroit 2018 Cincinnati Pittsburgh Detroit 1989 Hartford Rhode Island Omaha New Haven Chicago Philadelphia

  • St. Paul

South Palm Beach Minneapolis

  • St. Louis

Denver Atlanta Indianapolis Washington Houston Broward

  • St. Petersburg

Tucson Columbus Lehigh Valley San Antonio Jacksonville Tidewater Atlantic County West Palm Beach Howard County Phoenix San Diego Boston Sarasota Westport Las Vegas Seattle Portland (ME) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

In Home Only In/Out of Home

Communities shown with white bars asked about keeping a kosher home only.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Keep Kosher In and Out of Home

18% 14% 14% 13% 13% 12% 9% 8% 8% 7% 7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% Bergen Omaha Detroit 2005 Detroit 2018 Miami Middlesex

  • St. Paul

New Haven Rhode Island

  • St. Petersburg

Washington Indianapolis Houston Minneapolis Tucson Hartford Broward Columbus Lehigh Valley San Antonio South Palm Beach Jacksonville Tidewater Atlantic County Portland (ME) Las Vegas West Palm Beach Sarasota Westport 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Respondents)

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Refrain from Using Electricity on Sabbath

12.1% 9.5% 8.0% 7.4% 6.1% 4.4% 4.1% 3.3% 3.2% 2.9% 2.9% 2.7% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 1.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1.1% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.3% Bergen Detroit 2005 Detroit 2018 Miami Middlesex Rhode Island Omaha New Haven

  • St. Petersburg

Houston Washington Hartford Minneapolis Broward

  • St. Paul

San Antonio Lehigh Valley South Palm Beach Tidewater Tucson Portland (ME) Las Vegas Jacksonville Indianapolis Atlantic County West Palm Beach Sarasota Westport 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% (Respondents)

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Have a Christmas Tree in Home

(Jewish Households) Always/Usually/Sometimes 48% 48% 44% 40% 36% 34% 31% 30% 28% 27% 26% 26% 26% 25% 25% 25% 25% 24% 24% 23% 20% 17% 17% 15% 15% 14% 13% 10% 8% Omaha Portland (ME)

  • St. Petersburg

Indianapolis Houston Las Vegas Westport Tidewater Tucson Washington Rhode Island Lehigh Valley San Antonio Detroit 2018 New Haven

  • St. Paul

Jacksonville Broward Atlantic County Minneapolis Hartford Bergen Sarasota Detroit 2005 Detroit 1989 West Palm Beach Miami Middlesex South Palm Beach 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Religious Practices

(Jewish Households)

86% 77% 27% 77% 18% 44% 55% 9% 63% 43% Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Do Something to Observe Sabbath Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Core Area Non‐Core Area

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Observe Sabbath and Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55 82% 22% 14% 10% 37% 11% 10% 2% Mezuzah on Front Door Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity on Sabbath 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Core Area Non‐Core Area

Religious Practices

(Jewish Households for Mezuzah and Kosher Home, Respondents for Kosher Out of Home and Electricity)

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56 Mezuzah on Front Door

69% 61% 69% 71% 77% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Passover Seder

78% 72% 73% 73% 76% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always + Usually Always + Usually Christmas Tree

28% 40% 26% 23% 5% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Chanukah Candles

79% 72% 76% 62% 64% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always + Usually Always + Usually + Sometimes

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

37% 23% 13% 14% 17% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Kosher In/Out of Home

35% 17% 8% 9% 8% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Respondents Do Something to Observe Sabbath

93% 68% 75% 62% 72% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always + Usually Sabbath Candles

35% 29% 15% 22% 18% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Always + Usually Always + Usually + Sometimes

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

Religious Practices in Households with Children

76% 80% 84% 35% 82% 27% 22% 19% 31% Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Do Something to Observe Sabbath Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath in Some Way and Tree: Always/usually/Sometimes

(Jewish Households with Children, Respondents for Out of Home)

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

Religious Practices by Jewish Identification

(Jewish Households) 93% 96% 96% 90% 100% 88% 91% 82% 31% 90% 78% 87% 79% 13% 76% 46% 45% 52% 10% 54%

40% 58% 46% 0% 40% Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Do Something to Observe Sabbath 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath in Some Way: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

Religious Practices by Jewish Identification

(Jewish Households, Respondents for Out of Home)

93% 89% 87% 3% 30% 13% 0% 5% 3% 0% 0% 26% 11% 8% 2% 42% 1% 0% 0% 36% Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist

Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

Religious Practices by Type of Marriage

(Jewish Households, Respondents for Out of Home) 90% 93% 86% 35% 85% 28% 20% 15% 4% 96% 97% 94% 35% 85% 20% 13% 11% 11% 44% 56% 63% 6% 50% 5% 5% 4% 77%

Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Do Something to Observe Sabbath Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

In‐married (2 born Jews) In‐married (1Jew‐by‐Choice) Intermarried

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath in Some Way and Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

Religious Practices by Synagogue Membership

(Jewish Households, Respondents for Out of Home)

92% 97% 91% 40% 90% 34% 23% 15% 10% 55% 59% 58% 10% 62% 9% 6% 3% 34% Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Do Something to Observe Sabbath Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Synagogue Member Non‐Member

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath in Some Way and Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

Religious Practices by Chabad Attendance

(Jewish Households, Respondents for Out of Home)

93% 88% 93% 60% 93% 46% 35% 29% 12% 66% 72% 65% 14% 67% 13% 9% 4% 28% Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Observe Sabbath Candles or Other Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Attended Chabad Did Not Attend

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath in Some Way and Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-64
SLIDE 64

64

Religious Practices by JCC Membership

(Jewish Households, Respondents for Out of Home)

89% 94% 74% 26% 84% 21% 13% 2% 15% 67% 72% 71% 21% 72% 18% 13% 9% 26% Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Do Something to Observe Sabbath Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

JCC Member Non‐Member

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath in Some Way and Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-65
SLIDE 65

65

Religious Practices by Jewish Organization Membership

(Jewish Households, Respondents for Out of Home)

84% 97% 87% 35% 85% 26% 20% 13% 6% 66% 68% 67% 16% 64% 14% 9% 6% 29% Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Do Something to Observe Sabbath Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath in Some Way and Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-66
SLIDE 66

66

Religious Practices by Trips to Israel

(Jewish Households, Respondents for Out of Home)

91% 98% 87% 25% 81% 16% 9% 2% 12% 79% 84% 81% 35% 88% 30% 26% 21% 19% 51% 49% 50% 5% 52% 3% 1% 1% 42% Mezuzah on Front Door Passover Seder Chanukah Candles Sabbath Candles Do Something to Observe Sabbath Kosher Home Kosher In/Out of Home Refrain from Using Electricity Christmas Tree 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Any Adult Visited Israel on a: Jewish Trip General Trip No Trip to Israel

Seder, Chanukah, and Sabbath Candles: Always/Usually Sabbath in Some Way and Tree: Always/Usually/Sometimes

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

Religious Profile: Synagogue Attendance

67

slide-68
SLIDE 68

68

Synagogue Attendance

* or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah

Never * 31% Only on High Holidays 20% A Few Times per Year 26% Once per Month or More 23%

(Jewish Respondents)

slide-69
SLIDE 69

69

Synagogue Attendance

* or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah

Never * 32% Only on High Holidays 17% A Few Times per Year 29% Once per Month or More 22%

(Jewish Respondents Age 65 and Over)

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

Attend Synagogue Services Once per Month or More

(Jewish Respondents) 33% 32% 31% 29% 29% 29% 28% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 26% 25% 25% 25% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 22% 22% 22% 21% 21% 21% 20% 20% 20% 19% 18% 18% 16% 15% 14% 13% Pittsburgh Boston Cleveland New York Bergen

  • St. Louis

Tidewater Detroit 2005

  • St. Paul

Hartford Houston Omaha Jacksonville Detroit 1989 San Antonio Sarasota New Haven San Diego Columbus Detroit 2018 Lehigh Valley Westport Minneapolis Washington Middlesex Miami Philadelphia Rhode Island Tucson Indianapolis Broward South Palm Beach East Bay Atlantic County Phoenix West Palm Beach Portland (ME)

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Pew 23%

slide-71
SLIDE 71

71

Never Attend Synagogue Services

(or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah) (Jewish Respondents) 55% 45% 45% 44% 40% 40% 39% 38% 37% 35% 35% 32% 32% 32% 32% 32% 31% 31% 31% 31% 29% 29% 29% 29% 28% 28% 28% 27% 27% 25% 25% 23% 23% 23% 23% 22% 21% Columbus

  • St. Petersburg

Portland (ME) Las Vegas

  • St. Louis

San Diego Philadelphia Tucson Phoenix Omaha New York Indianapolis Cleveland New Haven Sarasota Detroit 1989 Detroit 2018 West Palm Beach Washington Jacksonville Lehigh Valley Atlantic County Rhode Island Westport Broward Miami South Palm Beach Houston Hartford Middlesex San Antonio Minneapolis

  • St. Paul

Pittsburgh Bergen Detroit 2005 Tidewater 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-72
SLIDE 72

72

Synagogue Attendance by Age

(Jewish Respondents)

38% 24% 19% 23% 21% 19% 34% 33% 30% 35% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

1X/Month+ Never *

* or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah

slide-73
SLIDE 73

73

Attend Synagogue Services Once per Month or More

Respondent Under Age 35 (Jewish Respondents) 43% 43% 41% 38% 36% 35% 35% 28% 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 24% 23% 23% 22% 22% 20% 18% 17% 16% 16% 16% 16% 13% 12% 12% 12% 10% 9% 8% 4% Cleveland Detroit 2005 New York Detroit 2018 Houston Middlesex Bergen Lehigh Valley Miami New Haven Detroit 1989 Columbus

  • St. Louis

San Antonio Pittsburgh Rhode Island Omaha East Bay South Palm Beach San Diego Indianapolis Tucson Tidewater Hartford Westport Las Vegas

  • St. Paul

Washington Jacksonville Broward West Palm Beach Minneapolis Phoenix 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Based on small sample sizes in some communities

slide-74
SLIDE 74

74

Attend Synagogue Services Once per Month or More

Respondent Age 35‐49 (Jewish Respondents) 36% 34% 34% 33% 33% 33% 33% 32% 30% 29% 29% 28% 28% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 25% 25% 24% 24% 24% 24% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 22% 21% 20% 18% 18% 16% 11% 10% Hartford Pittsburgh Jacksonville New York Detroit 2005 Bergen Tidewater San Antonio Detroit 1989 New Haven San Diego Houston Westport

  • St. Paul

Washington Miami Atlantic County Cleveland Omaha Middlesex Detroit 2018 Lehigh Valley Columbus

  • St. Louis

South Palm Beach Tucson Phoenix Rhode Island East Bay Minneapolis Portland (ME) Indianapolis Broward Sarasota West Palm Beach Las Vegas

  • St. Petersburg

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-75
SLIDE 75

75

Attend Synagogue Services Once per Month or More

Respondent Age 50‐64 (Jewish Respondents) 35% 33% 32% 31% 29% 29% 27% 26% 25% 25% 25% 23% 23% 23% 23% 22% 22% 22% 21% 21% 21% 20% 20% 19% 19% 18% 18% 17% 17% 17% 15% 15% 14% 13% 12% 11% 10%

  • St. Paul

Pittsburgh Cleveland Omaha

  • St. Louis

New York Detroit 2005 Hartford San Antonio Sarasota Tidewater Houston New Haven Washington Bergen Miami Columbus Lehigh Valley Jacksonville Westport Detroit 1989 Indianapolis Middlesex Detroit 2018 Minneapolis Rhode Island Tucson Broward East Bay Phoenix South Palm Beach West Palm Beach Portland (ME) San Diego

  • St. Petersburg

Las Vegas Atlantic County 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-76
SLIDE 76

76

Attend Synagogue Services Once per Month or More

Respondent Age 65‐74 (Jewish Respondents) 35% 32% 31% 31% 30% 29% 29% 28% 27% 27% 27% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 23% 23% 22% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 20% 19% 18% 18% 18% 18% 16% 16% 16% 15% 15% 14% 12% Tidewater Pittsburgh Detroit 2005 Sarasota Jacksonville Houston

  • St. Louis

Indianapolis Cleveland

  • St. Paul

Tucson Lehigh Valley Minneapolis Washington Phoenix Bergen Detroit 2018 Hartford Broward Columbus New York New Haven San Antonio Rhode Island Miami Omaha Middlesex Portland (ME) South Palm Beach San Diego West Palm Beach Atlantic County Detroit 1989

  • St. Petersburg

East Bay Las Vegas Westport 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-77
SLIDE 77

77

Attend Synagogue Services Once per Month or More

Respondent Age 75 and Over (Jewish Respondents) 47% 39% 36% 33% 33% 33% 33% 29% 29% 29% 29% 28% 28% 28% 27% 27% 26% 26% 25% 25% 25% 23% 22% 22% 21% 21% 21% 20% 20% 20% 18% 18% 18% 17% 16% 13% 13%

  • St. Louis

Pittsburgh Tidewater Omaha Jacksonville Westport Detroit 1989 Indianapolis Cleveland

  • St. Paul

Bergen Houston Columbus Minneapolis Broward Hartford New York Atlantic County New Haven San Antonio Sarasota Tucson San Diego Rhode Island Detroit 2018 Middlesex South Palm Beach

  • St. Petersburg

Detroit 2005 Washington Lehigh Valley West Palm Beach Phoenix Miami Las Vegas East Bay Portland (ME) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-78
SLIDE 78

78

Attend Synagogue Services Once per Month or More

Respondent Age 65 and Over (Jewish Respondents) 38% 36% 36% 32% 29% 28% 28% 28% 28% 27% 27% 25% 25% 24% 24% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 22% 22% 21% 21% 21% 21% 21% 20% 20% 20% 18% 17% 17% 15% 15% 15%

  • St. Louis

Pittsburgh Tidewater Jacksonville

  • St. Paul

Indianapolis Houston Cleveland Minneapolis Bergen Sarasota Broward Hartford Omaha Columbus New York Detroit 2005 Tucson New Haven San Antonio Detroit 1989 Detroit 2018 Washington Lehigh Valley Atlantic County Phoenix Rhode Island Westport Middlesex South Palm Beach San Diego Miami

  • St. Petersburg

West Palm Beach East Bay Portland (ME) Las Vegas 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-79
SLIDE 79

79

Attend Services Once per Month or More

(Jewish Respondents)

23% 28% 12% 28% 19% 25% 56% 32% 22% 50% 38% 20% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐9 Years 20+ Years 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-80
SLIDE 80

80

Attend Services Once per Month or More

(Jewish Respondents)

23% 38% 24% 19% 23% 21% 22% 24% 23% 32% 15% 22% 14% 30% 20% All Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-81
SLIDE 81

81

Attend Services Once per Month or More

(Jewish Respondents)

23% 19% 28% 28% 24% 23% 79% 29% 19% 10% 16% 32% 29% 9% All Under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-82
SLIDE 82

82

Attend Services Once per Month or More

(Jewish Respondents)

23% 46% 8% 50% 19% 37% 22% 45% 18% 39% 22% 12% 27% 19% 27% 22% 49% 21% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School No Jewish Education To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-83
SLIDE 83

83

Attend Services Once per Month or More

(Jewish Respondents)

23% 31% 30% 6% 35% 29% 11% 14% 38% 35% 33% All Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100‐$500 Donated $500+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-84
SLIDE 84

84 31% 22% 54% 19% 22% 24% 15% 29% 63% 22% 18% 33% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐9 Years 20+ Years 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Never Attend Services

(or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah) (Jewish Respondents)

slide-85
SLIDE 85

85

Never Attend Services

31% 19% 34% 33% 30% 35% 32% 32% 30% 23% 29% 23% 47% 31% 29% All Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 65+ Male Female Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Non‐Elderly Single Elderly Couple Elderly Single 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah) (Jewish Respondents)

slide-86
SLIDE 86

86

Never Attend Services

31% 50% 41% 32% 22% 23% 2% 17% 22% 57% 39% 15% 24% 48% All Under $25,000 $25‐$50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist In‐married Conversionary Intermarried 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah) (Jewish Respondents)

slide-87
SLIDE 87

87

Never Attend Services

31% 2% 50% 9% 36% 17% 32% 8% 40% 5% 32% 41% 21% 35% 13% 41% 3% 24% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School No Jewish Education To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah) (Jewish Respondents)

slide-88
SLIDE 88

88

Never Attend Services

31% 10% 14% 62% 16% 26% 45% 43% 17% 17% 13% All Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100‐$500 Donated $500+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(or only for weddings/b'nai mitzvah) (Jewish Respondents)

slide-89
SLIDE 89

89

Types of Marriage

89

slide-90
SLIDE 90

90

Types of Marriage

(2 Born/Raised Jews) 62% (1 is Jew‐by‐Choice) 9% Intermarried 30% In‐married

(Married Couples in Jewish Households)

In‐married

slide-91
SLIDE 91

91

Types of Marriage

(2 Born/Raised Jews) 74% Conversionary 7% Intermarried 19% In‐married

(Married Couples Age 65 and Over)

In‐married

slide-92
SLIDE 92

92

Types of Marriage by Synagogue Membership

(2 Born/Raised Jews) 77% Conversionary 11% Intermarried 12% (2 Born/Raised Jews) 47% Conversionary 7% Intermarried 46%

Synagogue Member

Non‐Member

(Married Couples)

In‐married In‐married In‐married In‐married

slide-93
SLIDE 93

93

(2 Born/Raised Jews) 70% Conversionary 13% Intermarried 17% (2 Born/Raised Jews) 61% Conversionary 4% Intermarried 35%

Types of Marriage by Chabad Attendance

Attended Chabad

Did Not Attend

(Married Couples)

In‐married In‐married In‐married In‐married

slide-94
SLIDE 94

94

(2 Born/Raised Jews) 80% Conversionary 5% Intermarried 15% (2 Born/Raised Jews) 60% Conversionary 9% Intermarried 31%

Types of Marriage by JCC Membership

JCC Member

Non‐Member

(Married Couples)

In‐married In‐married In‐married In‐married

slide-95
SLIDE 95

95

(2 Born/Raised Jews) 85% Conversionary 3% Intermarried 12% (2 Born/Raised Jews) 55% Conversionary 10% Intermarried 35%

Types of Marriage by Jewish Organization Membership

Jewish Organization Member

Non‐Member

(Married Couples)

In‐married In‐married In‐married In‐married

slide-96
SLIDE 96

96

Intermarriage

61% 61% 58% 56% 55% 55% 55% 53% 52% 50% 48% 48% 46% 46% 44% 44% 43% 41% 40% 39% 39% 38% 37% 36% 36% 34% 34% 34% 33% 33% 33% 30% 29% 28% 26% 23% 23% 22% 20% 20% 17% 16% 16% 16% 15% 14% 9% East Bay Portland (ME) Omaha

  • St. Petersburg

Indianapolis Seattle San Francisco Denver Columbus Atlanta Las Vegas

  • St. Louis

Tucson Boston San Diego Jacksonville Tidewater Washington Phoenix Houston

  • St. Paul

Cleveland San Antonio Pittsburgh Lehigh Valley Cincinnati Rhode Island New Haven Chicago Minneapolis Westport Detroit 2018 Howard County Philadelphia Atlantic County Broward Hartford New York Baltimore Sarasota Bergen Miami Detroit 2005 West Palm Beach Detroit 1989 Middlesex South Palm Beach 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

Pew 61%

slide-97
SLIDE 97

97

Couples Conversion Rate

40% 37% 33% 32% 31% 28% 28% 27% 27% 27% 25% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% 23% 22% 22% 21% 21% 20% 20% 20% 20% 19% 18% 18% 18% 17% 17% 17% 16% 16% 15% 15% 14% 13% 12% 9% 9% 8% Howard County Miami Detroit 2005 Detroit 1989 Baltimore Omaha Broward Cincinnati Pittsburgh Hartford San Antonio South Palm Beach

  • St. Paul

Detroit 2018 New York Chicago Bergen West Palm Beach Tidewater Denver Lehigh Valley Houston Minneapolis San Diego Jacksonville Atlantic County

  • St. Petersburg

Phoenix Rhode Island Indianapolis Atlanta Sarasota New Haven Westport Tucson Seattle Middlesex Washington Las Vegas Portland (ME) Boston San Francisco 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Married Couples)

slide-98
SLIDE 98

98

Types of Marriage by Age of Head of Household

75% 45% 59% 68% 86% 7% 11% 10% 8% 4% 19% 44% 32% 24% 10% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2 Born/Raised Jews 1 is Jew‐by‐Choice Intermarried

(Married Couples)

In‐married

slide-99
SLIDE 99

99

Intermarriage

Head of Household Under Age 35

93% 78% 70% 66% 62% 60% 59% 56% 53% 52% 51% 50% 48% 44% 44% 43% 42% 42% 42% 40% 34% 33% 33% 31% 26% 25% 24% 22% 20% 19% 19% 15% 14% Tidewater East Bay Denver

  • St. Louis

Atlanta Indianapolis Pittsburgh Lehigh Valley Washington Minneapolis San Diego Westport

  • St. Paul

Jacksonville Tucson Hartford Cincinnati South Palm Beach West Palm Beach Rhode Island Phoenix San Antonio Las Vegas Detroit 1989 Middlesex Bergen Chicago Detroit 2005 Houston Detroit 2018 Miami Baltimore New York 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Couples Intermarriage Rate)

Based on small sample sizes in some communities

slide-100
SLIDE 100

100

Intermarriage

Head of Household Age 35‐49

76% 71% 68% 67% 65% 63% 62% 60% 60% 60% 60% 59% 55% 54% 51% 51% 51% 50% 49% 48% 48% 45% 45% 45% 44% 43% 42% 41% 41% 37% 35% 32% 31% 29% 29% 29% 27% 26% 26% 25% 24% 18% 17% Columbus Las Vegas

  • St. Petersburg

East Bay Portland (ME) Tucson Denver Indianapolis Omaha

  • St. Louis

Phoenix San Diego Sarasota Chicago Atlanta

  • St. Paul

Jacksonville Houston Washington Pittsburgh Rhode Island Cincinnati West Palm Beach New Haven Detroit 2018 Minneapolis Cleveland Lehigh Valley Atlantic County Tidewater San Antonio Westport Broward New York Hartford Howard County Middlesex South Palm Beach Baltimore Miami Bergen Detroit 2005 Detroit 1989 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-101
SLIDE 101

101

Intermarriage

Head of Household Age 50‐64

68% 65% 64% 56% 52% 51% 49% 49% 47% 47% 45% 43% 43% 42% 42% 42% 40% 39% 37% 37% 37% 35% 34% 33% 33% 32% 32% 31% 29% 27% 27% 26% 25% 24% 24% 24% 23% 19% 15% 15% 14% 12% 5% Omaha

  • St. Petersburg

Portland (ME) East Bay

  • St. Louis

Tucson Indianapolis Jacksonville Denver Las Vegas Columbus Houston San Antonio Atlanta Phoenix Tidewater Cleveland New Haven Lehigh Valley San Diego Rhode Island Westport

  • St. Paul

Howard County Pittsburgh Detroit 2018 Washington Cincinnati Chicago Baltimore Atlantic County Minneapolis Broward New York West Palm Beach Sarasota Hartford Detroit 2005 Miami Middlesex South Palm Beach Bergen Detroit 1989 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-102
SLIDE 102

102

Intermarriage

Head of Household Age 65‐74

65% 64% 58% 56% 52% 50% 41% 39% 36% 34% 34% 34% 33% 33% 32% 32% 27% 25% 25% 24% 23% 23% 22% 20% 19% 17% 17% 16% 13% 13% 12% 12% 11% 11% 11% 10% 10% 8% 7% 6% 5% 2% Omaha Atlanta East Bay

  • St. Petersburg

Cleveland Indianapolis Denver Cincinnati San Antonio

  • St. Louis

San Diego Jacksonville Columbus Westport Portland (ME) Las Vegas Washington New Haven Lehigh Valley Detroit 2018 Atlantic County Tucson Phoenix Minneapolis New York Broward Rhode Island Houston Miami Baltimore

  • St. Paul

Pittsburgh Chicago Bergen Tidewater Detroit 2005 Hartford Sarasota Middlesex West Palm Beach South Palm Beach Detroit 1989 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-103
SLIDE 103

103

Intermarriage

Head of Household Age 75 and Over

40% 37% 36% 34% 32% 30% 28% 26% 24% 21% 20% 20% 18% 17% 17% 14% 14% 14% 13% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12% 11% 10% 10% 10% 10% 9% 9% 9% 8% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 5% 4% 3% 0% Atlanta Washington East Bay

  • St. Petersburg

Indianapolis Portland (ME) Las Vegas San Antonio Jacksonville Lehigh Valley Houston Tucson Chicago Columbus Phoenix Cleveland Denver

  • St. Paul

Omaha New Haven Rhode Island New York Pittsburgh Hartford Bergen Detroit 2018 Broward Detroit 2005 Sarasota

  • St. Louis

Cincinnati San Diego Miami Baltimore Minneapolis Detroit 1989 Tidewater Westport West Palm Beach South Palm Beach Middlesex Atlantic County 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-104
SLIDE 104

104

Intermarriage

Head of Household Age 65 and Over

55% 52% 50% 49% 45% 36% 34% 32% 32% 31% 31% 30% 29% 28% 24% 23% 23% 22% 21% 19% 19% 19% 18% 17% 15% 15% 14% 14% 14% 14% 13% 12% 11% 11% 11% 11% 10% 9% 8% 6% 5% 4% 3% Atlanta Omaha East Bay

  • St. Petersburg

Indianapolis Cleveland Denver San Antonio Washington Portland (ME) Las Vegas Columbus Jacksonville Cincinnati

  • St. Louis

Lehigh Valley Westport San Diego Tucson Detroit 2018 New Haven Phoenix Howard County Houston New York Rhode Island Broward Chicago Atlantic County Minneapolis

  • St. Paul

Pittsburgh Miami Baltimore Bergen Hartford Detroit 2005 Sarasota Tidewater West Palm Beach Middlesex South Palm Beach Detroit 1989 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-105
SLIDE 105

105

Intermarried Households

30% 22% 59% 15% 21% 38% 13% 17% 81% 16% 35% 30% All Core Area Non‐Core Area West Bloomfield Bloomfield‐Birmingham‐Franklin Farmington Southfield Oak Park‐Huntington Woods Wayne County 0‐9 Years in Detroit 10‐9 Years 20+ Years 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-106
SLIDE 106

106

Intermarried Households

30% 36% 35% 26% 16% 35% 26% 39% 17% 13% 11% 32% 49% 29% All Household with Children HH with Only Adult Children Non‐Elderly Couple Elderly Couple Under $50,000 $50‐$100,000 $100‐$200,000 $200,000 and over Orthodox Conservative Reform Just Jewish Humanist 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-107
SLIDE 107

107

Intermarried Households

30% 12% 46% 17% 35% 15% 31% 12% 35% 12% 34% 10% 25% 21% 24% 28% 19% 31% All Synagogue Member Non‐Member Attended Chabad Did Not Attend JCC Member Non‐Member Jewish Organization Member Non‐Member To Day School To Supplemental School No Jewish Education To Overnight Camp Not to Overnight Camp Youth Group Participant Not Youth Group Participant Hillel/Chabad Participant Not Hillel/Chabad Participant 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-108
SLIDE 108

108

Intermarried Households

30% 13% 36% 57% 10% 19% 52% 47% 13% 10% 6% All Jewish Trip to Israel General Trip to Israel Not to Israel Donated to Federation Asked, Did Not Donate Not Asked Federation Non‐Donor Donated under $100 Donated $100‐$500 Donated $500+ 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Couples Intermarriage Rate)

slide-109
SLIDE 109

109

What Is the Intermarriage Rate?

Abraham Sarah

Howard Wolowitz

Bernadette Rostenkowski

109

slide-110
SLIDE 110

110

Abraham Sarah

Howard Wolowitz

Bernadette Rostenkowski

110

Couples Rate is 50% Individual Rate is 33% What Is the Intermarriage Rate?

slide-111
SLIDE 111

111

Rates of Intermarriage 30% Couples Intermarriage Rate translates to 18% Individual Intermarriage Rate translates to 10% of both married and single Jewish adults are both married and married to non‐Jews

111

slide-112
SLIDE 112

112

Percentage of Married Jewish Persons Who Are Married to Non‐Jews by Age

10% 28% 19% 14% 5% 18% Under 35 35‐49 50‐64 65‐74 75+ All 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Individual Intermarriage Rate)

slide-113
SLIDE 113

113

Current Religion of Children in Intermarried Households

Jewish 44% Not Jewish 39% Part Jewish 17%

(Children Age 0‐17 in Intermarried Jewish Households)

slide-114
SLIDE 114

114

Children Being Raised Jewish in Intermarried Households

75% 74% 62% 62% 60% 60% 60% 59% 59% 56% 49% 49% 48% 47% 46% 46% 45% 45% 45% 45% 44% 43% 42% 39% 39% 38% 37% 36% 36% 35% 34% 33% 33% 32% 32% 31% 31% 30% 30% 27% 26% 21% 18% 11% South Palm Beach Sarasota Indianapolis Howard County Atlantic County Cincinnati Boston Hartford Bergen Westport Chicago Jacksonville Detroit 1989 Portland (ME) Broward Miami

  • St. Petersburg

Tucson Washington Tidewater Detroit 2018 New Haven Las Vegas San Antonio Atlanta San Francisco

  • St. Paul

Lehigh Valley Pittsburgh Rhode Island West Palm Beach Middlesex Cleveland Omaha Houston New York Detroit 2005 Minneapolis Baltimore

  • St. Louis

Phoenix San Diego Denver Columbus 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Children Age 0‐17 in Intermarried Jewish Households)

What percentage of children in intermarried households are being raised Jewish?

slide-115
SLIDE 115

115

Jewish Children Who Are Being Raised in Intermarried Households

68% 52% 46% 46% 43% 43% 42% 40% 38% 36% 35% 31% 31% 29% 28% 27% 27% 25% 25% 24% 22% 21% 21% 21% 20% 20% 20% 20% 19% 19% 19% 17% 17% 16% 16% 16% 13% 11% 9% 9% 8% 6% 5% Columbus

  • St. Petersburg

Indianapolis Las Vegas Portland (ME)

  • St. Louis

Tucson Sarasota Boston Omaha Atlantic County Jacksonville Tidewater San Francisco Howard County West Palm Beach Washington Cincinnati Atlanta Chicago Pittsburgh Phoenix Lehigh Valley New Haven

  • St. Paul

Hartford Rhode Island Westport San Diego Houston South Palm Beach Denver San Antonio Detroit 2018 Broward Minneapolis Cleveland Bergen Miami Middlesex Baltimore Detroit 2005 New York 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

(Jewish Children Age 0‐17 in Married Households)

In what types of married households are the Jewish children being raised?

slide-116
SLIDE 116

116

Jewish Children Who Are Being Raised in Conversionary In‐married Households

35% 35% 30% 30% 26% 24% 22% 22% 22% 19% 19% 17% 17% 17% 16% 16% 15% 15% 15% 14% 14% 14% 13% 13% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 10% 9% 8% 8% 8% 7% 4% 4% Omaha Phoenix Denver

  • St. Paul

San Antonio Howard County San Diego Jacksonville Pittsburgh Cincinnati Tidewater Indianapolis

  • St. Petersburg

Atlantic County West Palm Beach Sarasota Atlanta Minneapolis Tucson Houston Lehigh Valley Hartford Chicago Rhode Island Detroit 2018 Miami Baltimore New Haven Portland (ME) Las Vegas Washington South Palm Beach Broward Detroit 2005 Bergen Westport New York Middlesex 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% (Jewish Children Age 0‐17 in Married Households)

In what types of married households are the Jewish children being raised?

slide-117
SLIDE 117

117

93% 92% 92% 88% 87% 85% 85% 84% 81% 81% 81% 79% 79% 78% 78% 77% 76% 76% 75% 75% 75% 75% 74% 74% 73% 72% 72% 71% 69% 68% 68% 67% 67% 65% 65% 61% 60% 59% 57% 56% 56% 53% 52% 34% Miami South Palm Beach Bergen Detroit 2005 Hartford Sarasota Westport Middlesex New York Cincinnati Atlantic County Detroit 2018 New Haven Baltimore San Antonio Indianapolis Howard County Washington Cleveland Chicago

  • St. Paul

Jacksonville Atlanta Tidewater Minneapolis Houston Lehigh Valley Rhode Island Philadelphia Broward Tucson West Palm Beach Pittsburgh Portland (ME) San Francisco

  • St. Petersburg

Phoenix Seattle San Diego Denver Las Vegas Omaha

  • St. Louis

Columbus 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Percentage of Children Age 0‐17 in Jewish Households Who Are Jewish

slide-118
SLIDE 118

118

Persons in Jewish Households Who Are Jewish

96% 94% 92% 92% 92% 90% 90% 89% 88% 87% 87% 86% 86% 85% 85% 84% 84% 83% 82% 82% 82% 82% 81% 81% 80% 80% 80% 80% 79% 79% 78% 78% 78% 76% 76% 76% 76% 76% 75% 73% 72% 71% 70% 69% 69% 68% South Palm Beach Miami Middlesex Detroit 2005 Bergen West Palm Beach Detroit 1989 Sarasota Hartford New York Atlantic County Broward Baltimore Detroit 2018 Philadelphia Howard County Westport New Haven Cleveland Cincinnati Lehigh Valley Minneapolis San Antonio

  • St. Paul

Houston Washington Jacksonville Rhode Island Boston Tidewater Phoenix Pittsburgh Tucson Indianapolis

  • St. Petersburg

Chicago Atlanta Las Vegas San Diego San Francisco Denver Portland (ME) Seattle Omaha Columbus

  • St. Louis

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

slide-119
SLIDE 119

119

Jews Who Are Jew‐by‐Choice

(Jewish Persons in Jewish Households) 15.7% 11.1% 9.1% 8.0% 7.2% 6.9% 6.2% 5.8% 5.8% 5.1% 4.8% 4.8% 4.5% 4.3% 4.1% 4.0% 3.8% 3.5% 3.4% 3.1% 3.0% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.3% 2.0% 1.4% 1.3% Omaha

  • St. Petersburg

Indianapolis

  • St. Paul

Jacksonville San Antonio Houston Washington Tidewater Detroit 2018 Las Vegas Minneapolis Broward Tucson Rhode Island Lehigh Valley Miami Portland (ME) New Haven Hartford Detroit 2005 Atlantic County Westport Bergen Sarasota West Palm Beach Middlesex South Palm Beach 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%